Thursday, September 5, 2019

If age is the subject, Joe loses.

It isn't a matter of whether Joe Biden is "too old." 

 

The very fact that his age and well being is discussed, makes it a loser issue.


I write this with regret.

I am in New Hampshire, sitting at a table, waiting to see Tom Steyer. I have checked my schedule. I see Joe Biden Friday at 1:00 p.m. I realized the entire purpose of my seeing Joe Biden tomorrow, for the fourth time in 3 weeks,  was to look at his bearing, his tone of voice, the strength of his grip if he shook my hand again. Will he stumble with words?  Any gaffes?

I was looking ahead to writing a report on his frailty. Or vitality.

We know his policy positions well enough. He is a Democrat and a liberal, but not a "progressive." There are some details people can fight about but that pretty much describes it. His policy positions aren't dispositive in the upcoming nomination fight. What is important is whether he is "up to the job." 

The subject is the problem for him. I thought he looked pretty strong, but I have to admit the reality that I was going to look closely at him, looking to see if his hands trembled.

Bob Warren sent me a Guest Post.  Bob is a retired musician. He played piano in bars, he played the tuxedoed piano player in movies, and he experienced life richly for 92 years so far. He can be accused of being ageist, but cannot be accused of being in-experienced in the nature of getting old.


Guest Post by Bob Warren     

"Give it up, Joe"

     Joe Biden, the present front runner in the crowded field of Democratic hopefuls, has always been an honest and decent man but suddenly at age 77 (November 2019) his judgment and intellect seem questionable.  Someone has to risk the charge of being branded as an ageist by fearlessly confronting Mr. Biden with the message he needs to hear: “Frankly, Joe, you’re just too damn old!”
     As a ninety-two year old I am painfully aware of the gradual but inexorable loss of mobility and dexterity that have transformed hitherto simple tasks of every day living into stressful encounters of the worst kind. Fulfilling the function of   chief executive of the USA is perhaps the most stressful job in the world. For the good of our nation Joe Biden should forget his pipe dream of the presidency to lend a guiding hand to someone younger, someone at the beginning of a political career. Someone who possesses the instinctive ability to win both the interest and loyalty of young voters. Hopefully, someone not beholden to anyone.
         It would also be well for Mr. Biden to recall that Ronald Reagan, who was 69 years of age in when he entered the White House in 1980, was coincidentally 77 years of age in 1986 when rumors began  surfacing that he was occasionally exhibiting worrisome signs and “sleeping a lot” . While some maintained at the time that those rumors were both politically motivated and overblown, Mr. Reagan was subsequently diagnosed with Alzheimer’s.  So bury your ego Joe, before it buries you. Be a class act.  Stand above the fray and utilize the skills you’ve learned as a distinguished senator and vice-president to unite the party behind a candidate who will restore honor and civiity to a position now being shamelessly abused and dragged through the political swamps of America. 







8 comments:

Rick Millward said...

As a elder statesman and respected Democrat VP Biden could have spent his retirement collecting honors and being the conscience of the party, but instead he chose, unwisely in my view, and likely encouraged by other septuagenarians, to take on Trump. Now he is stuck. There may be moments of clarity when he realizes his mistake, but to admit it is probably not in character.

It is evident there is a colossal ego at work here, a last, desperate grasp for the presidency, (Bernie, too) and it is also evident that his current front runner status displays the heartbreaking lack of courage that has dogged the Democrats since Reagan took the Republican party down, intimidated Democrats, and paved the way for the present disaster.

Why didn't he run in 2016? Methinks the DNC decided he was too old then and the Clintons were getting their revenge after 2008.

He may win Iowa, he may become the nominee, he may be elected ("any Democrat'), but I don't see a Biden administration accomplishing much.

For a moment I considered him as President Warren's Secretary of State....yes?...ummm...

Nah.

Anonymous said...

If all the Democrats have to offer is 'Status Quo With a Veneer of Civility,' they deserve to lose.

Anonymous said...

Methinks someone has a very short memory: Joe Biden had recently lost his son to brain cancer. Unreal.

Anonymous said...

More nasty. I can tell who has a "colossal ego" and it is not Joe Biden. But it is the person who always comments First. Me, me, me.

Joe is a patriotic American and a true public servant who sees his country hurting, badly. IMO, he most likely thinks that a left-wing candidate is not going to win. And no normal person wants 4 more years of the current administration.

Voters will decide. No need to attack Joe to help one's pet candidate. This only helps the opposition. If Joe wins the nomination, he could decide that one term is sufficient for what he wants to accomplish, such as healing our nation and restoring our standing around the world. His choice for VP will be extremely important to unify the party, serve as a close and trusted advisor and to follow in his presidential foot-steps.

Andy Seles said...

To all ageists, I say let Joe run. Why? Because I am an unabashed Bernie supporter as are most of the young folks I encounter. Why do they support Bernie? Because, unlike Biden,
Bernie is not an ego, he's a Movement and the Movement is young and these young folks get it.

"Centrist" Dems, trapped in their entitled bubble, totally underestimate the larger voting demographic, independents (disenchanted and disenfranchised from the Democratic Party) and conservatives included who will vote for a true populist in a general election.

"Centrists" tout electability from the limitations of their limited perspective. People are still angry and Trump still plays on that. Bernie conveys that anger as well but, unlike Trump, empowers people as he does so, inviting them to be change agents and not just victims.

Andy Seles

Alan Jay Weisbard said...

FWIW, as a 68 year old, I agree with Bob Warren. Contrary to the polls and mainstream media, I think Joe would make a weak nominee and might very well lose to Trump. He doesn’t stand for much beyond “Not Trump.” I think his Presidency, should it happen, would underperform and give the Republicans an undeserved chance to come back into power in 2022 and 2024. I support Warren this time around, but beyond that, the Dems need a new generation of leaders.

Peter c said...

It doesn’t matter what young people think. They don’t vote.

Anonymous said...

Yes, who cares about those deplorable young people, clutching their IPhones and student debt? Who do they think we are, the party of inclusion or some such nonsense?