Oregon Senate District 3: A candidate responds

Five Democratic candidates.

Cristian Mendoza Ruvalcaba was the only candidate I did not know. 

He isn't new to Southern Oregon. He is new to the local political scene. 

From his campaign website

I invited the five Senate District Three candidates I profiled on Thursday to respond to that description of their campaign finances. Ruvalcaba's wrote the letter below.

Ruvalcaba wants us to know who he is. His website begins the same way, with a description of his immigrant roots, his education, and the hustle it took to get his doctorate in nursing practice. His ambition, brains, and credentialing are exceptional, but he doesn't emphasize exceptionalism. He emphasizes that he sees the problems of the country from lived experience as someone authentically from and in the world of working Americans struggling to get by. 

His website shows he has positions on issues that one expects from liberal Democrats: universal healthcare, access to reproductive and gender-affirming care, more money for K-12 education and higher education, "immigration justice" by blocking ICE enforcement within hospitals, a general goal of protecting forests and farmland, opposition to the sale of public lands, and support for unions. They are policy goals I see in the websites of the four other Democratic candidates.

Democratic voters face a choice among five personalities and biographies. It is like a high school student body election, only instead of choosing between the jock and the extravert honor student, all the candidates are extravert honor students. How to choose?

From his campaign website

Ruvalcaba puts immigration front and center. Ruvalcaba was born in the U.S. to a Spanish-speaking family. It will test the proposition: Is our current discord over immigration really about illegitimate immigration, or is this really about something darker, a tribal ethnocentric discomfort with diverse people living among us? Ruvalcaba is a strong case for the value immigration brings Americans, a hugely productive citizen. He is an appealing candidate: a nurse and nurse educator, young, idealistic, dedicated to helping others. He is a fresh political face of a new generation at a moment when voters are witnessing profound cronyism associated with the GOP brand. He comes with a severe disadvantage in name familiarity and established network of supporters compared to this primary opponents and Republican opponent, Brad Hicks, if Ruvalcaba wins the primary. Hicks is the long-serving CEO of a strongly Republican-coded Chamber of Commerce and its tight network of establishment politics, political donations, and business deals with government entities.

But every strength embeds a weakness. Hicks is burdened by the aura of cronyism at a time when Trump has put cronyism on unapologetic display. The energy that fueled the populist right during Trump's early "drain the swamp" days still exists. Local voters chose almost two-to-one to cut county commissioner salaries in half, notwithstanding a giant campaign to maintain the status quo. Ruvalcaba could be the fresh face candidate, the new broom that sweeps clean the no-longer-trusted establishment. 

Ruvalcaba has work to do. Currently his campaign financing does not say "local man makes good, very good." It says "upstate nurses lobby has a candidate." Voters will not want to pick between a Chamber swamp and a nurses lobby swamp coming out of the Democratic caucus swamp. Ruvalcaba needs to develop broad, deep local connections that make his campaign match his roots and the brand he is trying to establish. He can grow his local network, but I suspect that this takes more time than he has in this election cycle. 

I could be wrong. Possibly this is his year. We will see.

Letter from Cristian Mendoza Ruvalcaba

Dear Peter,

Thank you for the introduction. As you noted, I have been busy making calls and growing my base of grassroots support.

In conversations with voters over the past few weeks, it is clear that Democrats are looking for bold, fresh leadership. Leaders who are responsive, grounded in community, and accountable to working people. Many voters are frustrated with a political system that feels distant and disconnected from the realities they face every day. Many younger voters and voters from diverse communities feel disengaged because they do not see themselves represented in leadership. Many people who I have spoken with do not see themselves reflected in decision making spaces.

As the son of immigrants, born and raised in Medford, I put myself through SOU and completed both of my graduate nurse practitioner programs, and I proudly call Southern Oregon home. My path has been shaped by working class values and a strong sense of responsibility to the community that raised me and that I continue to serve.

Like many people in our district, I live with the financial pressures of a tight household budget with little room for savings, if any at all. These realities are not abstract to me. They are shared by the families I talk with every day on the campaign trail.

In my work as a registered nurse and nurse practitioner, I have seen firsthand how our broken health care system affects people directly. Patients delay care because they cannot afford it. Conditions worsen because preventive care is out of reach. People end up in costly hospital visits that could have been avoided with earlier access and support. These are not isolated cases. They reflect a system where access and affordability are out of reach for too many.

In my work in higher education, I have also seen students stretched to their limits, working full time jobs while trying to complete their education. Many are doing everything right and still facing rising costs and limited opportunity. Education, which should be a pathway to stability and mobility, is becoming increasingly difficult to access.

This is exactly the perspective we need more of in Salem. Working people who lead by listening and who govern with lived experience at the center.

In addition to endorsements from multiple Democratic state legislators who champion health care and labor, I am honored to have also earned the endorsement of Nurses and Friends for Single Payer, reflecting my commitment to advancing equitable, accessible, and affordable health care.

I am excited to continue listening to voters in SD3 and to connect with even more Southern Oregonians in this campaign.

Further information regarding my campaign can be found on my website. https://www.cristianforsd3.com/

Sincerely,

Cristian Mendoza Ruvalcaba, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, CPNP-PC, CNE
Doctor of Nursing Practice
Advanced Practice Registered Nurse
Family Nurse Practitioner - Certified
Certified Pediatric Nurse Practitioner – Primary Care
Certified Nurse Educator

[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.] 

Democratic Candidates in Senate District 3

Oregon Senate District 3

Five Democratic candidates

A snapshot of where they get their campaign money

Democrat: 31,748. Republican 25,188. Non-affiliated: 36,708

There aren't any polls. How do you know who is ahead? You don't. 

But you can look for bits of evidence to see who has an active campaign and who is successful in lining up support. Presumably a campaign that gets endorsement and financial help correlates with eventual votes. Campaign contributions are an objective measure within a sea of guesswork. Money and endorsements are useful information for voters. Maybe those nodes of support align with a voter's own interests.

My information comes from the Oregon Secretary of State Orestar system as of April 15.  Orestar.

Krause

Denise Krause has raised the most money, with just over $40,000 reported. She has about 75 different entries, many of which are the bundles of contributions of $100 or less. She told me she had 207 different contributors. Krause was the chief organizer of the campaign to update the Jackson County Home Rule Charter with an effort to make commissioners nonpartisan, increase their number from three to five, and to force a reduction of their salaries, now over $150,000/year. It was, from my observation, the best grass roots campaign in the 45 years I have been observing local campaigns. She built a network. So it is no surprise to me that she raised money in a grassroots manner, with a large group of contributions from people whose names I recognize from involvement in that campaign and her two previous campaigns for county commissioner. Former county commissioner David Gilmour donated $750. She lists endorsements from the the SEIU, a public employee union; Nurses & Frieds for Single Payer; a Teamsters, Ironworkers, and Carpenters union; and from a Pro-Animal Oregon, an animal protection organization.

Stine

Kevin Stine has been a Medford city council member for over 11 years. His support appears to me to cluster around people who have seen him over the years and respected his council service. He is a teacher, a Navy veteran from tours as a submariner, and a runner. He is 40 now and has developed a network of people who have seen his civic engagement. He was one of the leaders in rounding up community support for the Rogue X project. He has run for other offices, including challenging U.S. Senator Ron Wyden six years ago and Stine got over 75,000 votes statewide. The Medford city council is an nonpartisan office, but Stine is acknowledged to be a Democrat with ambition for higher office, which gets him support from Democrats interested in the next generation of candidates. It also gets him consistent opposition from the local Republican establishment that wants to nip his ambitions in the bud. Former Medford mayor Al Densmore, who has a reputation for nonpartisan centrism, contributed $1,000. In the photo above, taken this week, Stine was in his role announcing that the Medford Urban Renewal granted $1.5 million to the Children's Museum. Stine has never been a prodigious fundraiser in prior campaigns; he has 26 entries and has raised about $7,000.

Moro

Tonia Moro entered the race just before filing deadline, right after the incumbent, Democrat Jeff Golden, withdrew. She is an attorney and has represented environmental causes. She was a candidate for this office in a special election to fill the vacancy after the death of Senator Alan Bates. She lost in a close race to Republican Alan DeBoer, the former mayor of Ashland. The most prominent of her contributions is a $5,000 one from Golden's campaign. She has 34 entries and has $14,000 in contributions showing on Orestar's records. She presents herself as a "champion" on the environment, which Jeff Golden told me was a factor in his endorsement. I wrote yesterday that Democrats may win primary election support -- Democrats who vote in primary elections prioritize the climate issue -- but lose in general elections by making a villain out of companies that produce the gasoline that voters need to buy. The photo above is from Moro's webpage. (She may not read this blog, or if she does, doesn't agree with yesterday's post where I warn that the voters that Democrats need to win elections are people who dislike $5 gasoline and $6 diesel. They want abundant, affordable energy. I am already getting pushback from Democrats who say I am wrong. That's OK. I don't expect everyone to agree with everything I write.) Her webpage lists endorsements from the Oregon League of Conservation Voters, Nurses & Friends for Single Payer, the Sierra Club, the Communications Workers of America, and a Jane Fonda PAC.

Mendoza-Ruvalcaba

Cristian Mendoza-Ruvalcaba is a highly credentialed nurse practitioner and educator. His donations reveal his substantial connection to the nursing profession and lobby. He received a $10,000 contribution and endorsement from the Oregon Nurses Association. He also received contributions from the campaigns of incumbent Democratic State Representatives Travis Nelson and Rob Nosse, and State Senator Winsvey Campos, all of whom work in health care. Yola's Bakery on South Central Avenue in Medford made a $2,000 contribution, but other than that I don't yet see evidence of substantial local grassroots financial support, but this may be coming. He is a new face in local politics and he is actively making fundraising calls to introduce himself. I see 36 total entries in his contribution list and a total raised of about $23,000, which includes that $10,000 from the nurses association.

Crary

Jim Crary is an experienced campaigner, having run for Congress in past years -- yet another Democrat who confronted the almost two-to-one Republican margin in our congressional district. This campaign has an interesting but limited focus, an idea that Oregon needs to increase our current taxes on alcohol -- the lowest in the nation -- and use that revenue to fund government services, especially including those associated with alcohol problems. Crary's contributions are very limited, coming from only two people. He has raised $15,600, and $15,000 of it comes from one person, a neighbor who lives up the same rural highway, Oregon Route 66, that Crary lives on. I make an inference about Crary's campaign: Crary is more interested in having a forum for advocating a message than he is about making a serious effort to gain grassroots support that results in winning the election.

Disclosure:  When Jeff Golden was seeking re-election, he requested a campaign contribution from me. I donated $2,000. I generally agree with Jeff, although he is probably more reliably liberal-progressive-environmental doctrinaire than I am. Local readers will understand if I say that he is more "Ashland Democrat;" I am more "Medford Democrat." He was a college classmate. I have been donating money to Jeff for political and public TV and public radio causes for 40 years. When Jeff withdrew from the race, he asked if I wanted my contribution returned. I said he should keep it and use it as he thought best. Perhaps my $2,000 was packaged within the money he gave to Moro. That is OK, although Moro would not have been my first choice of candidate.

I have been watching Kevin Stine's campaigns for 12 years. I thought it was unfair for the local Chamber of Commerce Republicans to try keep Kevin off the nonpartisan Medford city council just because he was a Democrat, so I have been a consistent donor to Kevin's campaigns for a decade. I gave Kevin $2,000 last month. 

Denise Krause does what skilled grassroots candidates do: She calls people who are aligned with her politically and who have reason to admire her energy and good sense. She solicited a donation. That is what good candidates and effective officeholders do: They reach out and present their cases. I donated $2,000 to her.

What about Cristian Mendoza-Ruvalcaba and Jim Crary? If either of them win the primary, and if they call me and ask, then I will probably contribute to them, too, but I haven't yet.  

Forty-six years ago I was young, poor, and I was trying to fund my campaigns for county commissioner. I thought to myself that what Medford badly needed were some politically reasonable Democratic businessmen-types, practical non-ideological people with a mix of college-town liberal politics but also some capitalist-businessman-rural-farmer instincts. Such a person might have the money to donate to campaigns like mine, and ideally would do so readily.  He would just write the check. Time has passed, and my situation changed. Now I try to be that person I sorely needed back in 1980.

[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]

Americans don't want $5 gasoline.

The U.S. has a glass jaw.

Voters are impatient and unhappy with the price of gasoline.

Trump wants out of Iran. He wants to declare victory now.

Trump to Fox's Maria Bartiromo:

"I think its close to over. I view it as very close to over."

Democrats are giddy with the prospect that the Trump era is ending. Democrats are counting the blue-wave midterm election chickens before they hatch, but it is too much fun to resist. 

The war with Iran is unpopular, and Trump knows it. He is on deadline. He needs us to be out of Iran, with the Strait of Hormuz open and oil shipping back to pre-war status, and gasoline prices back to where they were two months ago -- $3 and $3.50 in most of the country.

A Republican senator has taken on a hard task, telling Americans to be happy with higher prices, that it is worth it.

Trump takes a smarter approach, telling voters it will be over soon.

Iran can take a punch and keep hitting. What is left of Iran’s government took the world’s economy hostage. They shut down the Strait of Hormuz, letting only their friends pass through and demanded a toll.

Trump is forced to play bad cards. Trump could not open the Hormuz toll road, so he needed to close it completely, making worse the oil disruption. Petroleum is a notoriously inelastic commodity. Prices must move up a lot to suppress demand enough to bring it back in balance with supply.

High oil prices mean high prices at the pump. Pew Research Center polling showed that gasoline prices were more important to Americans than the prospect of sending ground troops to Iran or the prospect of large numbers of American casualties. That is the American glass jaw.

Trump understands his political peril. Whatever incomplete shambles he leaves in Iran will not stop him from claiming the war is over and was a HUGE success. But that is possible only if gasoline and diesel prices are down. Trump has six months to abandon Iran and let Iran have the strait, so long as shipping is restored. Israel cares about the Iran project. Trump doesn’t.

The real question is whether Democrats will understand their peril. Democrats prioritize climate as an issue. Democrats consider abundant oil at low cost to be a problem. Democrats are conflicted. They understand that talk of “affordability” is good politics, and that gasoline prices at the retail pump should be low. But Democratic messaging is that petroleum is drilled, fracked, pumped, and transported in ways that they oppose. The companies that do that work are scorned. “Divest from oil companies” and “Windfall taxes on oil companies “ are applause lines at Democratic events. Somehow, the oil companies that supply filling stations with an essential product are very bad, but the consumers who buy that product and who want it available and cheap are good. Yes, Democrats are conflicted.

U.S. Senator Sen. Ruben Gallego (D- AZ), who is sometimes named as a potential Democratic nominee for president since he is popular, not too old, and was elected in a swing state, described the conundrum for Democrats who talk about climate instead of energy abundance. He said that working men, the voters Democrats need to win back, want to be able to drive a “big ass truck.” The blue state Democratic climate message -- ban drilling, ban pipelines, ban fracking, divest from oil companies -- what Democrats say to win a primary election, is what will allow Trump regain support. Democratic primary-voting activists are out of touch with voters they want back. No more blue wave without those voters.

By November, Trump can be the cheap-gasoline candidate again if he manages to get himself out of Iran and the strait reopened. GOP ads will be showing images of gasoline station prices again.

What can Democrats do? Must they cave on the climate issue? Can Democrats convince Americans that reduced petroleum production and refinement is a worthwhile cost to pay to protect the climate?

No they cannot and neither can that Republican senator. Americans want what they can afford. Americans are who we are. Less is not more. More is more. It is an aspirational message and Democrats should not be afraid of it.

Democrats need to make a choice. The U.S. is in a two-decade period of rapid transition from fossil fuels to renewables. It is happening because of price, not moral suasion. Technology is the Democrats’ friend. Renewable wind and solar are cheaper than fossil fuels, especially if Democrats will allow them to be sited. Natural gas -- a compromise fuel -- is far cheaper and cleaner than coal. A Democrat can make a virtue of the transition underway and lean into it. Praise it. If Democrats try to make a virtue of “less” they elect Trump and people like him.

Americans want cheap abundant energy. The Democratic challenge is to give it to them.

[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]

Pandering to a narcissist in decline

O come, all ye faithful, joyful and triumphant! . . .
O come, let us adore Him
O come, let us adore Him
O come, let us adore Him
     Traditional song, "O come all ye faithful"

By now most readers of this blog will have seen this:

The image is AI, but what was human-generated was the Truth Social post by President Trump. He saw the image and posted it himself on purpose. He did not claim that his account was hacked or that some intern posted it on his behalf. 

Trump claims he thought it was simply a depiction of a compassionate president doing Red Cross rescue. Possibly a Dr. Trump, improbably wearing a robe, and for some reason holding fire in the palm of his left hand, while doing a hand-on-forehead test to check for a fever.

It was a laughable story. No one can look at this image and fail to see that it is an image of Trump acting as Jesus in a modern war setting. Trump must have. The important thing to consider is that Trump failed to recognize the peril, failed to see it was dangerously inappropriate. 

This is another incremental step in Trump's decline, another instance of the disinhibition that sometimes accompanies age-related decline. 

This is part of a pattern that is crossing over from mere peccadillo-quirk into pathology. This isn't Trump being unpresidential. It is Trump failing to comprehend his circumstances, particularly as it relates to his narcissism. Anyone can see that the over-the-top flattery that Trump has his cabinet officers offer at meetings looks silly; Trump is so needy. Trump likes watching the competitive flattery game, grading cabinet members on who does it most fulsomely. The White House lets it be displayed to the public. Trump's pleasure in getting the symbols for other people's awards looks childish, but the White House gatekeepers allow the public to see it. Businesses bring him tribute gifts of gold (but not yet frankincense and myrrh) from which he takes obvious pleasure. We see that, too.

Trump is losing it. I saw it from time to time in brokerage clients and family members as I watched them age. At some point, I needed to suggest -- gently -- that a brokerage client bring on a trusted adult to be a "co-pilot," as I put it, on their accounts. My father has good judgement his entire 92-plus years, except when it came to when to when to stop driving. But Dad was a superb cribbage player and story-teller; he was fully competent for the life he lived. He did not have the nuclear launch codes.

Readers will get a better sense of Trump's cocoon of fawning and pandering if they watch as much as they can of this three-minute video. Trump's spiritual advisor, without irony, treats Trump as God's own anointed savior, an object of adoration here on Earth. The video had been posted on the official White House website, but, like the image of Trump-Jesus, it has been taken down. The White House staff is doing what it can to protect Trump from revealing his condition. Too late, but they see what Trump no longer can.

Click here.

A last comment: Who am I to opine on Donald Trump's mental health and competence? I am an American citizen, living in the country where he is my president. He is spending my tax money, issuing presidential orders that affect me, and making me a passenger in the metaphorical airliner where he is the lead pilot. I have every right to an opinion. He could get me killed. He should not be piloting the plane.

[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]

Viktor Orban conceded defeat. Trump did not.

 It was headline news: 

Hungary's Prime Minister and autocratic model for Trump and MAGA promptly conceded defeat in the election yesterday.

Orban controls the military and the courts and the media. Why not do what Trump does and refuse to accept the vote?

The simple answer is that Orban lost in a landslide. Everyone could see what was happening. You can't steal a landslide loss.

There is also a structural reason. Orban is a prime minister, not a president. Orban was the undisputed strong-man autocrat in Hungary, but held that power as the leader of a party of members who won election in districts, and then they made Orban their party leader. Orban would have needed corrupt voting or vote counting at the level of district votes and then for those members to participate alongside Orban in the overthrow. 

Trump calculated that he needed only Vice President Pence and a compliant GOP Congress to refuse to acknowledge electoral votes in a few states with GOP majority legislatures. It nearly worked. It failed because the mental groundwork had not been done. Not counting certified votes in the states struck too many Americans as "cheating." One hundred forty-seven GOP congressmen (my own congressman, Cliff Bentz, among them) refused to accept electoral votes in only a single state, Pennsylvania. But in our federal system, some states, including Georgia and Arizona with GOP election officials, certified Biden's victory. The notion of a nationwide Democratic conspiracy to rig the election run under the nose of a Republican Attorney General who said that Biden won seemed too preposterous -- and too new a strategy -- for a Republican Congress to justify overturning the election for Trump.

Trump has since changed the moral framework on election reversal. He has insisted that elections are all crooked and rigged. Therefore it is fair -- necessary even -- for his team to use any pretext available to bring a favorable outcome. To disagree is to be a Republican In Name Only RINO turncoat. 

Hungary's democracy is stronger than is ours. A U.S. president with a well-disciplined party need only to claim election irregularities in a handful of heavily Democratic cities. Eliminate the votes in Fulton County, Georgia -- home of Atlanta -- and the state tips decidedly red. So, too with Detroit, Michigan's Wayne County; with Pennsylvania's Philadelphia County; Wisconsin's Milwaukee County; Chicago's Cook County; and Houston's Harris County. Even blue Oregon would be majority Republican if the votes of Portland's Multnomah County were excluded. Those cities have substantial Black and Hispanic populations, an easy target for Trump's accusations. 

The mechanism for refusing to count or certify votes is pretext. One need only accuse fraud and then at the critical time refuse to do what Orban did. Never concede, which means any result is by definition "disputed." Disputed results need not be certified by partisans. Republican voters are well prepared to believe, possibly even insist, that of course counties filled with Black and Hispanic voters are corrupt. 

February, 2016

Trump has been disputing vote counts going back 11 years to when he insisted fraud caused his loss to Ted Cruz.

To send ICE or other armed federal agents to close down election sites, Trump need only claim there is domestic or civil disturbance; it is his purview to make such a determination, even if it openly dishonest, like his claim that the U.S. was under armed invasion by an immigrant army. Trump need only claim he has evidence of secret foreign interference; that decision is his to make. GOP poll watchers need only claim that they saw suspicious activity -- maybe a suitcase sitting under a table -- and polls might be closed or voting made inaccessible or so slow that voters turn away discouraged by endless lines. 

Partisan election officials may refuse to carry out ministerial acts of accepting votes, throwing certification of elections into chaos. Republican officials who accepted the vote in 2020 have been excoriated by Trump and the local party, and have been removed and replaced by people who will do as instructed.

The U.S. is closely divided. I don't expect overwhelming landslides. In 2020, a Biden margin of seven million votes was not enough. Trump claims he won in a landslide. Fox News is backsliding on election denial; yesterday I saw Fox News' Jesse Watters laughingly say that he, too, thinks that Trump probably won in 2020. Republican voters are well-prepared to insist that the midterm elections cannot possibly be won by Democrats. The mechanism to achieve this result is readily at hand: don't let voters in Democratic strongholds vote, and if they vote, claim fraud and don't count the votes.

[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]

Easy Sunday: backfire.

Backfire.

What a politician thinks is his message is not necessarily the audience's takeaway from that message.

I return to that theme repeatedly in my posts here. There are so many examples of it. 

Yesterday's post looked at the long rant by Trump where he complained about MAGA media turncoats. Trump's denoted message was that he is a victim of their stupidity. For most people, the real message is that Trump has become a cranky, whining, semi-demented old guy.

The classic instance of message-backfire was the comment by former Attorney General Pam Bondi amid pressure to explain why she was protecting Trump by withholding the Epstein files. She tried to change the subject to "the Dow is 50,000!" Those words are a punchline now. The received message is that the administration is desperately bringing up distractions to hide something dangerously embarrassing. 

Yesterday presented another instance. Amid all the serious problems in the world, Trump's Truth Social feed led off with this.

It denoted triumphant America. Look at this arch! Bigger than the one in France. America is great and I am the president!! 

Trump is making himself another trophy celebrating premature glory. The real takeaway is "Nero fiddles while Rome burns."  

Paul Krugman's Substack article this morning gave another iteration. Viktor Orban's Hungary is having its election today. Trump openly supports Orban, a strange intervention into the politics of another country. Trump dangled money support from the U.S. to Hungary, if only the voters chose Orban, a blatant example of public money being exchanged for political support. 

Krugman said Trump's support backfires on Orban. Of course it does. Trump is widely reviled in Europe. Trump is known for crony corruption and personal wealth-seeking, using the influence of his office. The big issue for Orban's opponent, Peter Magyar, is Orban's corrupt cronyism. Trump's endorsement doesn't help Orban. It proves Magyar's point.

I am alert to the problem of campaigns backfiring because, 46 years ago I was a primary beneficiary of the self-destruction of the campaign by my Republican opponent. I won as a Democrat amid the 1980 Reagan landslide. How was that possible? My opponent's own campaign sabotaged itself, thank goodness. I will tell the story in a future blog post.

Oh. One more thing:  The real message of Melania Trump's sudden, impromptu declaration that she is not a criminal is that she is in panic mode because some new hidden revelation is about to get exposed, perhaps by that angry former-model friend stuck in Brazil who knows too much and says she is going to tell all, and that Melania isn't waiting for her husband to protect himself or continue the coverup. He is on his own, and she isn't going down.

Total backfire

[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]

Whack job.

Do Republican voters like what Trump is doing and saying?

They must be OK with it.

He has 81-percent approval from Republicans.

I am trying to understand why Republicans of good character tolerate Donald Trump. People who supported Reagan, Dole, two Bush presidents, McCain, and Romney now tolerate Trump who represents values and behavior opposite the people they voted for in the recent past. None of those Republican presidents and candidates would have engaged in the grift, the pardon transactions, the flouting of laws that Trump does openly and proudly. They would have understood it to be wrong, bad for the country and inconsistent with the dignity of the office. They had character. They had the internal controls one expects of people in positions of responsibility.

Trump's rants look strange and dangerous to me. It makes a mockery of his claim to be a "stable genius." Trump is acting like a whack job -- profoundly temperamentally unfit -- and it is getting worse.

The New York Times headline is only partially true. It says that Trump is responding to the criticism about the Iran war. His critics also publicly shared their worry about Trump's mental condition. They think that he has "lost it." 

I present this long Truth Social post to readers, and leave it for you to decide how you feel about the author. Do you trust his temperament and judgment? If he were your father, would you decide it is time to take his car keys away? Imagine you are a Republican congressman. You have the ability to meet with colleagues and arrange to replace the president. Remember, you have an option. JD Vance is in place to take over in the event of presidential incapacity. Does Trump sound like a reasonable man of sound judgment? Would you trust the author of this post to represent you in court? Would you hire this man to be CEO of a business you own? If you were on the board of a school district or public hospital or university, would you hire this man to be its leader and public face?

[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]