"The strong do as they can, the weak suffer as they must."
Athenians to the Melians, 416 BC, as described by Athenian historian Thucydides.
The Aegean island of Melos was neutral in the war between Athens and Sparta. Larger and stronger Athens approached Melos' leaders and demanded large annual tributes of wheat and silver, and said to pay up or be utterly destroyed. Melian leaders said this was immoral and unjust. We hurt nobody. Leave us be. Athens said it wasn't a matter of morality, it was a matter of strength. Melos resisted. Athens killed their men and enslaved their women and children.
We are at a moment of profound change in American foreign policy.
America announced a change in values. In post-WWII world, America presented itself to the world as having a value system of good versus evil, of friends versus opponents. We told ourselves and the world that we were fighting for righteous causes: freedom, democracy, peace, fairness, prosperity, and free markets. We asked the blessing of God. We were the good guys.
It is different now. America isn't claiming to act on moral values. They are irrelevant. We are being selfish and realistic. America is open to partnering with undemocratic, unfree, unpeaceful, corrupt governments to achieve our interests, which include getting peace on any terms that will bring peace, and getting mineral rights from a country under duress.
There is a good argument that the U.S. has always been self-deluded and hypocritical in our foreign policy. We have always been looking out for number one. We dressed up self-interest under a cloak of righteousness. This painting by John Singer Sargent is in the main hallway at Harvard's Widener Library. I scoffed at it every time I passed it in the late 1960s as the Vietnam War was underway, but it was painted and displayed in dead earnest:
World Wars One and Two, we told ourselves and the world, were fought to save democracy from German aggression. The Korean War was fought to stop communism. We were protecting Vietnam from being another falling domino of communism. Our interventions in Latin America were to protect private property and capitalism. We intervened in Iraq first to protect innocent Kuwait and then to stop the spread of weapons of mass destruction. We fund the United Nations to promote peace and international law. We fund foreign aid because we are good guys, feeding the poor, healing the sick. We are the Mercy Ship people.
There is truth in all of it, and hypocrisy, too. The hypocrisy is the point of the moral basis for our actions. We said and believed we were acting out of good, moral intentions. Allies thought we were a fixed point of reliability and consistency. We had beliefs. We had an ideology. Therefore, we would pay our bills, obey treaties, and defend an invaded democracy against an autocratic aggressor, even if it cost America something.
No longer. In the "dog-eat-dog" world, people, businesses, and countries act out of unsentimental self-interest. Trump announced that the U.S. is under new management with new policies. “My administration is making a decisive break with the foreign policy failures of the past administration, and frankly the past.” There is no right or wrong nor any rules of the game; only ability to take what you want if you have the power.
The U.S has shown itself to be an unreliable ally in matters of war and peace and, with the tariff announcements, an unreliable trading partner. That does not mean others cannot work with the U.S. They can, but there is a new north star. The U.S will do whatever transaction best advantages it at any given moment. There is no trust of consistency and honor.
In our lives we know how to deal with unreliable people. We demand prepayment. We file liens in advance of doing work. We audit. We presume bad intentions. We try never to let ourselves get exposed. It is why we much prefer to work with known people and organizations with a track record of reliable service and partnership.
Trump is saying and demonstrating that nobody can trust us anymore. There is value in being trustworthy. This will cost us.
[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to: https://petersage.substack.com Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.]
5 comments:
Yesterday you described how “manly” Republicans think they are for making a pussy-grabbing criminal their party leader and getting him in the White House. They’re desperately trying to ignore the fact that what got him elected was his promise to lower prices on day one, not his promises to destroy our government.
Trump has often stated his commitment to bringing “peace through strength,” but he doesn’t have the strength to stand up to Putin and Republicans don’t have the strength to stand up to him. Maybe he’s afraid Putin will release the infamous pee tape.
We used to be the good guys, then we were mostly the good guys, now we are mostly the bad guys. You can’t side with Putin and be anything besides mostly bad can you?
We stopped sending food to starving nations. After all, it's expensive and food is vastly overrated. Maybe we should send cake.
You have highlighted my lifelong mistake, Peter. I knew there were and had been significant problems, but I believed that we were, at our core, interested in a good and better world. Peace, democracy, justice, the rule of law and a better standard of living for all were our goals and even when we fell short, we would try to correct and get back on course.
Now, a majority of my fellow citizens have said we should follow an insurrectionist, a liar, a charlatan and a narcissist whose only goal is to enrich himself and his family and that all that stuff about democracy and justice is wrong.
Since my Peace Corps days I have always tried to be able to adapt. I find myself unable to adapt to this.
If a group started a gofundme page and was able to collect $5 million, could we all share the "enhanced citizenship?"
Post a Comment