Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Wow! Did you see that?!

In the "attention economy," you don't need to be right. Or honest. Or wise. 


You need to grab attention. 


Today's guest post author Gerald Murphy takes on a tough task. He says the backward leap by the Philadelphia Eagles' running back Saquon Barkley was a bad idea. A bad idea? But it was great TV, a spectacular moment of athleticism. Murphy grants that, but the point is to win games over a long season and win a championship. Murphy analogizes Barkley's play to the current state of politics. Barkley's spectacular moment draws attention, but it wasn't smart football.


Here it is on YouTube, replayed three times in 30 seconds: 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsRUg_012yE

Donald Trump -- amid all his manifest faults -- understands and takes advantage of the media environment of this era far better than anyone else in American politics. The winner is the person who dominates public attention. That person gets his message out. That person asserts his own facts and shapes the narrative.

This is the new media and information world. A Democrat does not need to be a narcissistic, corrupt authoritarian to compete with Trump. It need not be like-to-like competition. But a Democrat needs to be able to grab attention, ideally with ideas, policies, and a delivery that resonates with Americans. It isn't a "Meet the Press" world anymore.

Murphy is a retired high school English teacher and a playwright who has had dozens of short plays produced for school and church groups.

Gerald Murphy

Guest Post by Gerald Murphy                     

A great leap backward.


In case you missed all the hyperbolic coverage of running back Saquon Barkley before, during and after the Super Bowl, Saquon made a memorable play for the Philadelphia Eagles in a game earlier this season against the Jaguars. Here’s how one TV viewer reacted: “Been watching football since the late 60's. I have seen it all until today. A backward no-look jump over a defender!? Freakiest move I have ever seen."

 

The video of this play has gone viral. Pretty much anyone interested in sports, any sport, will have seen this play, probably numerous times.

 

My thoughts on this? Nice move, Barkley. However:

   1. It only gave you about one more yard of forward progress.
2. It left your body open to back-breaking tackles that could have ended your career and hurt the team.
3. It was the kind of stupid move that impressionable young players will attempt to duplicate at their peril.
4. It far overshadowed your truly impressive runs which led to huge gains and touchdowns.
5. Like slam-dunks in basketball and bicycle-kicks in soccer, this is a hotdog move that keeps young athletes from working on more practical skills.
6. I suspect Barkley himself would prefer people forget about the damn move.

 

Unfortunately, the flash-in-the-pan viral moment not only hogs all the attention in sports but is also currently dominating the political spectrum. It isn't enough to be an effective and reasonable politician. You need shock and awe to get noticed. You need to throw out a Nazi salute. Why not insult European leaders in Munich? Why not use dog whistles to advance racial slurs? And calling Mexican immigrants criminals and rapists makes for wonderful headlines. 

 

The goal is to do anything that gets your face and your right-wing message out to the public. You need to do a political version of Barkley’s double flip to amaze the body politic. Bring on the trapeze acts, the sword swallowers, the lion tamers. And it doesn’t matter if you get caught lying. All that matters is the glitz and the glam. Isn’t that why the Roman emperors decided to provide their citizens with circuses? 

 


[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to:
https://petersage.substack.com Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.]

 

 

9 comments:

Mike Steely said...

Somehow, I can’t imagine coaches trying to turn that feat into a standard play, but I can see Republicans making their stupid lies and crazy conspiracy theories a permanent part of our political scene. The problem with trying to compete on their level is that the truth doesn’t always fit so easily on a bumper sticker, which is about all the message the MAGA attention span can handle.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Like I keep saying, the Democrats persist in trying to play badminton when the game is actually rugby. They hit clever shots that they think will force the Republicans to scramble for the shuttlecock, and the Republicans charge through the net and tackle them.

Continuing to insist that the game should be badminton as you lie there flattened on the ground is not a winning strategy.

Michael Trigoboff said...

The assertion that the MAGA voters are morons reminds me of this quote from Adlai Stevenson during his 1952 U.S. presidential campaign:

When a supporter told him, “Governor, you have the vote of every thinking person!”, Stevenson famously replied:

“That’s not enough, madam, we need a majority!”

Mike said...

Rugby/badminton is a faulty analogy. Democrats and Republicans are playing the same game. The only difference is that Democrats are playing by the rules. That’s because they still value the rule of law and their oath of office. To claim that dooms them to getting trampled by the Insurrection Party is a pretty pessimistic viewpoint. It’s more likely that as voters watch the rich get richer at their expense, they’ll develop buyers’ remorse. Hopefully that will happen while they can still vote.

Michael Trigoboff said...

The analogy is better than you think. "Playing by the rules" is the badminton. Rugby is doing things that work, politically speaking.

There are, effectively, new rules. Playing by the old rules is a losing game.

Mike said...

"Playing by the old rules is a losing game."

The old rules are the Constitution, its separation of powers and the peaceful transfer of power. Recently Republicans have flouted them with apparent impunity, but I believe their karma will catch up with them. Meanwhile, I'm glad we still have one party whose idea of patriotism is honoring our founding principles rather than having non-consensual sex with the American flag like Trump.

Michael Trigoboff said...

That's not what I meant by "the rules".

The Democrats are playing by the old rules of the attention economy: trying to successfully communicate to the voters via the mainstream media. The new rules mostly bypass the mainstream media via channels like podcasts and TikTok.

It remains to be seen if the judiciary will have both the motivation and the power to enforce The Constitution. Here's hoping that it does...

Mike said...

Democrats are playing by the old rules of trying to communicate facts, but they're so boring. MAGA prefers to wallow in crackpot conspiracy theories, and tRump is happy to oblige.

John C said...


I would argue we are in an Entertainment economy and celebrity culture. People want to be entertained. Sports is first an entertainment business and now so are politics. Feeding short attention spans is just the instrument to entertain. Fast-talking “experts”, streaming banners across the screen, instant replays from every angle with “helpful” animations to explain every event in our lives. We simply can’t be bored!

The digital life has trained us to be impatient with everything, and has atrophied our capacity for thoughtful, contemplation. Critical Thinking seems like an abstract idea, or worse yet, a character flaw. Speed and certainty mark every opinion- even in the comments I read here (prove me wrong folks). We seem to have lost the ability to ask serious and penetrating questions; to wrestle with complex ideas with curiosity and humility. But that doesn’t get views and followers, which is the goal of every would-be influencer.

And of course we can easily manipulate nearly video or audio so that we no longer can believe what we see and hear on our devices anyway. But we still watch and click.

Bill Gates recently said in an interview with the New Yorker, that reflecting back, he was naive to think that proliferation of technology could only be used for the benefit of humanity. He never imaged how Social could be so destructive. Too late.