Monday, November 1, 2021

Why Immigration Reform Eludes Us, Part Two

"That overthrow was the work of the CIA."

         Herb Rothschild


Political flash point: Central Americans are crowding at our southern border. What makes anyone think that the USA has any responsibility for the mess they have down there?


I asked Herb Rothschild to return with a followup guest post. His comments on Haiti reminded readers of some uncomfortable history at a time when teaching students uncomfortable history regarding slavery and racism is yet another political flash point. Americans won't understand some of the intractable problems we have until we face up to how those problems came to be. 

Rothschild is a retired professor of English. During his working years he was a political activist on behalf of world peace and civil rights for Black Americans. He is still doing that work, advocating for peace and justice. He lives in Talent, Oregon.

Guest Post by Herb Rothschild


Herb Rothschild
Guatemala: Another story of suffering, death, and hypocrisy



In a guest column that Peter published Sunday, I maintained that there cannot be comprehensive immigration reform until the U.S. reforms its conduct in Central America and the Caribbean. In support of that assertion, I argued that for more than 100 years our use of force to guarantee that the wealth of those nations enriches U.S. corporations and banks has created the endemic poverty and violence that the migrants coming to our southern border are fleeing. 

I also said that the list of our invasions, occupations and subversions is far too long to recount in a guest blog, and pointed readers to a website that lists them. (https://yachana.org/teaching/resources/interventions.html). As a relevant example, though, I used our maltreatment of Haiti—relevant because of the large number of people from that country who arrived in Mexico across from Del Rio, Texas this September. Let me now recount our behavior toward Guatemala, another major source of immigrants.

The numbers from Guatemala were especially high between 1983 and 1986. They were fleeing from their government’s violence. From 1981 through 1983, the military, right-wing paramilitaries and death squads killed about 200,000 people, mostly indigenous people living in the highlands (indigenous represent 60% of the population). However, the agitation for justice they were suppressing began in the 1950s, following the 1954 overthrow of democracy and its replacement by a series of military dictators. 

That overthrow was the work of the CIA.  

Until 1944, Guatemala had been ruled by military dictators that the U.S. supported because they made sure that the major portion of Guatemala’s agricultural land was owned by U.S. corporations and the nation’s wealthy elite. That year, Guatemala held its first elections and chose a reform-minded president, Juan José Arévalo. His minister of defense was Jacopo Arbenz Guzman, who played a critical role in foiling an attermpted military coup in 1949. Two years later, after Arévalo died, Arbenz was elected president. He persuaded the Guatemalan congress to pass a law ordering the expropriation of all land larger than 600 acres that wasn't under cultivation. Of the country's 341,000 landowners, only 1,700 fit the law. The owners were to be compensated based on the currently assessed value of their land and paid with 25-year government bonds. The confiscated lands were to be distributed to landless peasants. 

Sam Zemurray
Samuel “Sam the Banana Man” Zemurray was not happy. His corporation, United Fruit Company, owned some 600,000 acres, mostly uncultivated. In 1911, without U.S. government help, Zemurray had overthrown Honduran president Miguel Dávila, installing former president Manuel Bonilla, who had been living in exile in New Orleans, Zemurray’s own place of residence. This time, though, he had a sympathetic ear in Washington. John Foster Dulles, Eisenhower’s secretary of state, and John’s brother Allen, director of the CIA, had been partners in the law firm that represented United Fruit. They persuaded Eisenhower to greenlight the removal of Arbenz. 

The CIA chose Guatemalan colonel Carlos Castillo Armas to lead the coup, armed and trained his rebel army in Nicaragua, and supported the invasion with CIA-piloted airplanes. That was the end of Guatemalan democracy for four decades. It was not the end of U.S. involvement in the repression. We provided arms and training to the Guatemalan military and even helped plan operations against the rebels. During the 1980s, our mainstream media toed the White House line on the repression and wholesale murder in Guatemala by presenting it as a civil war with bad behavior on both sides. The 1999 UN Truth Commission, however, found that 83% of casualties were indigenous Maya, and 93% of the human rights violations were perpetrated by state military or paramilitary forces. 
John Foster Dulles

Since many readers find personal notes of interest, I’ll tell two. I was born and raised in New Orleans, and for a time went to school with Sam Zemurray, grandson of the Banana Man, who was still alive then. In the mid-80s I was close to a teenager from Guatemala who had entered the U.S. illegally. He had fled his country after his parents were murdered. He was a gentle, sweet young man. After two years he left Baton Rouge for Canada on the underground railroad moving illegals. I don’t know what happened to him . . . nothing but good things, I hope.

7 comments:

Rick Millward said...

To my thinking there is a direct connection between wealth inequality and US, and others, foreign political interventions. The deals that are made for the resources extracted from Latin America, and elsewhere, Africa, only benefit the leaders in those countries and the US individuals and corporations whose political influence push our troops and tax dollars into those countries. Other than cheaper bananas the average US citizen gets little value from these activities relative to the enormous profits going to the 1% which makes us no better off than the disadvantaged Guatemalan.

Morality aside, the pragmatic political solution embraced by Republicans and forced on Democrats is to continue these policies, which includes draconian border control. Efforts like NAFTA may be well intentioned, but they actually don't change the fundamental dynamic and maybe even worsened the problem.

It's not sustainable. Climate change is the game changer, driving populations North.

To address this requires a paradigm shift of American fundamental values. Progressives see this as urgent and necessary, Regressives are in denial, or worse.

Low Dudgeon said...

Climate change is just a banana leaf, sorry, fig leaf for the real immigration game-changer, which is political climate change. Most of the Haitian "refugees" at Del Rio, for instance, had been hunkered down for years in Central and South America waiting for the best political opportunity to make the move en masse.

I'd like to hear from serious progressives something besides bromides about a "broken" system (let's try Mexico's!), or from Mr. Millward, what if anything is the policy difference between "draconian" border control and...actual border control. If economic "refugees" is to be the overarching category, just say so openly.

Meanwhile, the Democratic version of America First is that America must trim its horns first on emissions (and economic prospects), even as China builds new coal plants every week or so and made unenforceable Paris promises to begin fractional reductions starting in 2030. Feckless self-abnegation feels good?

Thanks again to Mr. Rothschild for another eye-opener, this time on Guatemala. One one level these slimy arrangements with Central American nations on behalf of big corporations should be seen as what the law terms "adhesion" contracts. In 2021, though, are we now to patronize these nations as if helpless children?

Mike said...

The discrepancy between the values expressed in our founding documents and the reality on the ground has led to a lot of cognitive dissonance. Both parties are culpable for our bad behavior both here and abroad, but people seem more interested in blaming their opponents, or “enemies,” than in correcting the situation.

One thing I’ve learned in my brief sojourn on this fine planet: When the U.S. invades some country on the pretext of imposing “freedom and democracy,” you can be sure it will benefit no-one except war profiteers and – WWII being the possible exception.

Ralph Bowman said...

Thank you for a great blog. THE PEASANTS ARE NOW ON OUR BORDERS. Let them eat cake in the holding tank and then shuttle them home to MS 13. Or maybe bring them in, exploit their labor and then get ICE to send them packing. Another great American Dream at work
As climate disasters destroy the planet, we ain’t seen nothing yet..

M2inFLA said...

RE: Climate change is the game changer, driving populations North.

You may want to check your data

In the US it is the SE, SW, and West that are are growing. NE and Mid West that have declining population.

And it's not climate that is causing that migration.

As for influx of people on that southern border, they are not escaping for climate change reasons, but rather opportunity, and to escape poverty.

Malcolm said...

Everything Mr. Rothschild wrote is totally true, unfortunately. I’ve been to Guatemala three times, and have done quite a bit of reading about the horrrible récord of Ike, Alan and John Foster Douglas, all for the greedy pig administrators at United Fruit company. These a-holes basically stole huge quantities of land being inhabited by maya Indians. Stupid Maya didn’t file the proper warranty deeds at their county courthouses when they developed their homesites a couple of thousand years ago, so United Fruit decided they’d just take over.

The new government tried to get the displaced mayans to pay head taxes, but guess what? They didn’t have any money; they stayed home, farmed, traded for things they needed. So the government ordered any Mayan who was unable to pay”their taxes”-and what did the Mayans get for their taxes? They got forced labor, working for, yep, United Fruit Company. Six weeks (?) per year. No wages, just brutally long days in the hot sun. The women got to cook and clean in rich United fruit families' elegant homes, and got to sexually satisfy the charming United Fruit “men”.

That’s still not telling the entire, sorry story. I recommend reading “Bitter Fruit: The Story of the American Coup in Guatemala”, Revised and Expanded (Series on Latin American Studies) Paperback – Illustrated, December 30, 2005.

When you’ve finished, I think you’ll join me in my belief that we “Americans” OWE any Indian from Guatemala rapid, rapid, admittance to our country, along with the most generous war reparations.

Malcolm said...

One last comment. I find it pretty strange that I heard not one word about the United Fruit Company travesty-not one word, until I traveled thru Guate in 1980. That’s like a 25 year news blackout.

And even after we usasians slaughtered hundreds of thousands of these sweet people, the survivors still greet us with big smiles, help when we need it, and general openness and friendliness. Amazing!