Tuesday, November 2, 2021

The troubling history of the U.S. in Ghana


Ghana's first President, Kwame Nkrumah, was overthrown in a CIA-backed military coup.


Former CIA intelligence officer John Stockwell wrote about it.

Americans worried about Donald Trump's anti-democratic activities are whipsawed. U.S. intelligence apparatus--the CIA, the FBI, the State Department, even the military--have been whistleblowers and resisters to Trump. They have been seen defending democratic rules. The anti-war good-government Left finds itself in a strange place, defending institutions it spent a century calling out for misdeeds and hypocrisy. 

American history is complicated and troubling, and how schools should teach it is a top issue in current politics, including an election in Virginia today. Recent posts here looked at America's covert work in Haiti and Guatemala. Today we look at Ghana, from the eyes of someone who did charitable work there.

Coster
John Coster trained as a construction electrician, electrical engineer, and contractor. Over his 40+ year career he has managed huge electrical projects for Fortune 100 companies in over 30 countries. Over the years, he has volunteered on numerous energy, water and community development projects for Christian charitable organizations throughout Africa and Latin America. 


Guest Post by John Coster




Like many from the 1960’s, I learned about U.S. History through a distinctly patriotic lens. The Boston suburb where I grew up was settled in 1655 and its early residents were part of the American Story. We even had a Minuteman Militia complete with period costumes and musket rifles. They would march in the July 4th parade, fire their guns and stage reenactments of the battles at Lexington and Concord. We learned about Manifest Destiny in school in a positive light. Most men I knew were WWII veterans. Television shows like The Rat Patrol, Combat – and even Hogan’s Heroes--celebrated Americans as courageous, strong, clever and of course, virtuous.

Laying Cable in Ghana
“Americans as the good guys” was the accepted storyline for me, but as I started traveling abroad in the late 1980s, I began to see a more complex and disturbing narrative emerge. Here is one example. About 15 years ago I was walking with one of my business partners past the Ghanaian Embassy in D.C., and we discovered that we had each lived in Ghana. Mine was for charitable work, but his father worked for the CIA, and had been involved in the 1966 overthrow of Kwame Nkrumah’s presidency.

This was astonishing news. During my time in Ghana, I had wondered why the much-beloved Nkrumah, with streets, buildings, and monuments with his name, would be driven out? My colleague’s comments got me researching, and it turns out there are many books and articles written about this with declassified documents readily available online. I came across this article, which I think does a credible job synthesizing what I had been able to stitch together over years of my amateur research. Click: Ghana

Kwame Nkrumah
Nkrumah, a Ghanaian, was a U.S.-educated Pan African Black Nationalist - who envisioned a unified post-colonial Africa. He was Ghana's first democratically elected president, serving from 1960-1966. He also saw that hydro-power potential from the Volta River and abundant deposits of bauxite could allow Ghana to flourish as an international aluminum producer. His vision was promising because of Ghana’s relative wealth from their cacao industry and because the population was largely literate. Nkrumah appealed to then President Eisenhower--who in turn referred him to Kaiser Industries which was building industrial plants globally. Kaiser ended up structuring a joint venture agreement with ALCOA and Ghana. But the complex deal structure favored Kaiser’s fortunes and Ghana never realized the jobs and economic prosperity that the project promised. Kaiser was wary that Nkrumah’s more socialist philosophy might result in nationalization of their smelters and supply chain, so they mostly used abundant and low-cost power from the Lake Volta dam project.

His socialist leaning meant Nkrumah was in regular dialog with people like Ho Chi Minh, the President of North Viet Nam. Nkrumah miscalculated the extent to which the U.S. would go to thwart the development of a Ghanian socialist economy. With LBJ’s knowledge and consent, Nkrumah scheduled a meeting with Ho Chi Minh as a diplomatic envoy on behalf of the U.S. to attempt to halt escalation of the Viet Nam War. During Nkrumah’s three-day meeting in Hanoi, the CIA pulled the trigger on the coup plans and over 1,600 Ghanaians died in the violence. Nkrumah was exiled to Conakry Guinea, and never returned to Ghana before his death. Ghana has struggled with seven more coups and when I was there in 1990 had little running water, open sewers and garbage heaps in the middle of Accra, the capitol. While Ghana is reported to be one of the most peaceful countries today , according to 
Heritage, even after more than half a century it ranks 101st in economic freedom.

We can speculate what might have happened if the U.S. had brokered an honest deal with Nkrumah or had not been so frightened of socialism. I have come to believe that people and systems are inherently flawed as well as capable of achieving good and noble things. And if we are honest, we should call out both.

5 comments:

Art Baden said...

To what extent is the amazing wealth of our country based upon our ability to control the destinies of smaller, weaker countries like Ghana? Our warrior culture and xenophobic blinders keep us from seeing the handwriting on the wall. Our abject failures in Viet Nam and Afghanistan are harbingers of the coming inability and unsustainability of the USA to continue being successful in maintaining suzerainty over 3rd world countries. But try selling this world view at a NASCAR rally

USA. USA USA 🇺🇸

Mike said...

Sooner or later, actions have consequences. Between the Republican Party’s mass insanity and the U.S. national debt, we’ll soon be one more empire upon which the sun never rises.

Rick Millward said...

It might be useful to differentiate between "America" and "The US" as a way to explore this dynamic.

"America" represents the ideals put forward by the founders, "US" the reality of a nation whose economic prosperity is in part due to a de facto colonization of resource rich parts of the World through the use of military power, including covert actions.

To be fair, the justification is that it's in defense against competitors who might be even more exploitive. Fear mongering just such threats is key to Regressive political tactics, as well as race baiting and demonizing Progressive values, which are "American" values, as "Socialism". The result is our "America" suffers staggering wealth inequality that now threatens the stability of the Republic.

Among other things being woke is realizing that this is contrary to the ideals that represent "America", and the vision of an egalitarian society.

Today's Virginia governor's election is a prime example. I hope the Regressive candidate loses, but between voter apathy and the continuing denial of Republicans that their party has become a white supremacist cult the outcome is in jeopardy.
The Republican candidate gladly accepted the endorsement of the party's leader, when a more principled person would have repudiated it.

Anonymous said...

Thank you Peter and John for the column. And to Rick, too, for your comment -- we need more America thinking, that is ideals, not self-service.

Ed Cooper said...

I learn something new just about every time I read this blog. I entered the Army in January 1966, and was in training of one kind or another all that year and early 67, with quite limited access to news sources of any kind. I had never heard of our Ghanaian malodorous adventures until today. Thanks, for all you do, Peter, and thanks to all the thoughtful comments.