Saturday, January 13, 2024

Partisanship in Local Offices

Partisanship reduces the effectiveness of local officials. 

It stops people who might otherwise serve from doing so.

And it's irrelevant to nearly all the issues local officials address.

Jackson County is slow to  change.

I read the news today, oh boy, in the new local newspaper, the Rogue Valley Times. It replaced the newspaper I grew up with, the Medford Mail Tribune, a paper that got thinner and worse, and then finally died a year ago.

I like having a local newspaper. I like reading the editorials. Today's raised a question: Why aren't multiple Democrats filing for county commissioner? The Jackson County for All citizens group wants to increase the number from three to five. Will anybody file for the positions?

My sense is that part of the problem with the job is that it is partisan. People who seek the job become draftees into the nation's pitched partisan battle. Put a D or R beside ones name and enter the public arena and one immediately has enemies. Certain people enjoy that. Others don't.

I prepared this op-ed style comment to the Rogue Valley Times in response to their editorial:


Aren’t we all tired of nasty partisanship?

 

A Rogue Valley Times editorial noted that no Democrat has yet announced plans to run for county commissioner. The editorial hints at a real problem. Why aren’t we getting lots of good candidates rushing to file for the position? Part of the answer is partisanship. Partisanship makes the office unattractive to many people of good will. The Jackson County for All citizen committee is addressing that problem. The committee includes Democrats, Republicans, and Non-affiliated voters.

 

The Jackson County for All petition drive makes the commissioner job nonpartisan – just like every other county official. The second of the three ballot measures cuts commissioner salaries approximately in half from the current $143,000. The third increases the number of commissioners from three to five. Three commissioners was the number set in 1853, when the county census showed fewer than 4,000 people.

 

A stated goal of the Jackson County for All volunteer group is to allow the county’s unaffiliated voters to participate equally in choosing county leaders. Non-affiliated voters are the largest group in Jackson County. Using 2021 figures, there were 54,121 Nonaffiliated voters and only 45,515 Democrats and 49,285 Republicans. There were also 8,363 voters registered as Independent. Independent is a registered party and are in addition to the Non-affiliated. Under the current primary system, Non-affiliated voters don’t get to participate in choosing finalist county nominees in Democratic and Republican primaries.  Choosing finalists is sometimes when the most consequential choices of candidate gets made. The initiatives attempt to catch up to the modern reality that a great many people don’t like this era’s nasty partisanship, so they call themselves Non-affiliated. It's the fastest growing group.

 

Plus, there is the point made in the editorial. Who wants that job? 

 

Making the commissioner job nonpartisan will likely increase the potential pool of good candidates, people who are running for office out of a spirit of public service. I understand why people of good will are reluctant to file for a partisan office. The moment a person files as a partisan candidate, a third of the public has an instant aversion to them. Teams of people organize and raise money to pay for negative advertising to demonize that person. One becomes a target. One is also drafted into being a soldier in the national battleground of red and blue. We saw the transition with a local officeholder. As a nonpartisan mayor, Randy Sparacino was broadly popular from what I heard – a nice guy, generally acceptable to everyone. I didn’t hear mean things said about him. I didn’t hear him say mean things about other people. But when he became a candidate for a partisan office -- state senator -- his campaign thought it necessary to spend over a million dollars in this tiny media market on ads demonstrating that he was a loyal Republican at war with half the people in his district. That is the partisan game. What sane person wants to be part of that?

 

The issues commissioners face aren’t partisan. Commissioners, if they are doing their jobs and not busy protecting themselves from a primary election challenge, address issues with no partisan skew. Don’t both Democrats and Republicans want a working animal shelter? Are conditional use permits on rock quarry hours of operation a partisan issue? Are road grader maintenance schedules partisan?

 

We need not try to make the Jackson County commissioner job attractive by overpaying them. Instead, we should remove the partisanship that diminishes the effectiveness of commissioners in office and makes the job unattractive to people who think of themselves as citizens, not partisan warriors. Don’t we want people in office who get along with nearly everyone, people comfortable and on good terms with a wide variety of people?  I sure do.






[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to Https://petersage.substack.com  Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]

13 comments:

Ed Cooper said...

Please send your Guest Opinion to the Daily Courier in Grants Pass, Peter. I believe their Jackson County subscribers list exceed that of the Rogue Valley Times.
And what a pleasure it is to have a choice between two good Newspapers.

Curt said...

What a bunch of false drivel.

Everybody is partisan (I am partisan, and so is Peter Sage), and by putting a (D) or an (R) behind your name allows the voters to generally know what you stand for.

The Ashland City Council is technically non-partisan, and everybody on that board is a liberal, and when there is an opening, then the person chosen to fill an open vacancy is ALWAYS a liberal. Ashland is more than 30% conservatives, yet NONE serve on the city council. Where is their representation? (You can't answer that).

The fact is that Democrats can't win a commissioner's seat, so they dishonestly want to change the rules. Perhaps prior voters thought that Democrat Dave Gilmore was a better candidate than Democrat Denise Krause is.

If you want to vote in the GOP primary, then register as a Republican. If you want to vote in the Democrat primary, then register as a Democrat. You can't vote in another party's primary if you're not a member of that party. I don't get to vote in Democrat primaries. Medford residents don't get to vote in Ashland elections, and unaffiliated voters don't get to vote in GOP or Democratic primaries.

And for the record, Randy Sparacino was a lousy and weak police chief, and a lousy and weak mayor. Randy is being promoted by the Chamber of Commerce good old boys because he has proven time and time again to be their lackey. Anybody is better than Sparacino.

Curt Ankerberg
Medford, OR

Ed Cooper said...

Of the 120 to 130 signatures I have gathered so far, the Nonpartisan measure has been at least as popular as the Compensation plan, and I have only seen 3 people who refused to sign, usually rudely.
I hope you send this excellent op-ed to the Grants Pass Daily Courier, Peter, as I believe their reach into Jackson County is at least the size of the RVT.

Mike Steely said...

I’m surprised Trumplicans would agree to losing a venue for the sort of ‘alternative facts’ and conspiracy theories behind the commissioners’ opposition to pandemic precautions, which undoubtedly contributed a few unnecessary deaths. Curt's response indicates they probably don't.

LBA said...

I hope to read your analysis soon in the RV-Times. And I encourage that newspaper to employ objective analysis and fact-checking in its coverage and opinion-making about County government. A citizen willing to run for elective office knowns s/he will run a gauntlet of political attacks, but sadly the RV-Times has sometimes attacked citizens simply for exercising their First Amendment and state rights of free expression. I say this is a target of the Times "Stop The Barking" Our View opinion published on March 24, 2023, about the "animal shelter" - more accurately, a dog control detention facility. There have been zero cats for adoption for over a month, and no other type of animal for the past three years. This contrasts with neighboring Klamath and Douglas Counties where true ANIMAL shelters are focused on meeting community needs. Jackson County should look seriously at this model ....

Am I off topic? Not really. Everything is connected.

Curt said...

My response to Mike Steely.....

1) I'm not a fan of the 3 current commissioners, and the only one that I can "stomach" is Colleen Roberts, since she's a conservative. The other 2 are RINOs who are controlled by the Chamber of Commerce, and that's who they represent. Dave Dotterrer worked as a registered Chamber of Commerce lobbyist for almost 5 years. I've never voted for Dyer or Dotterrer (or Sparacino).

2) My understanding is that Kate Brown gave Jackson County approximately $40 million during the Covid epidemic, since the commissioners were willing to close the county down and play-ball with Kate Brown. The $40 million was their reward for obeying Kate Brown. They didn't get that money for being renegades.

Curt Ankerberg
Medford, OR

Ed Cooper said...

I've been circulating in Gold Hill, which is hardly a Democratic Stronghold, and the JacksonCountyforAll group has gone to great pains to emphasize the Nonpartisan focus of this drive. Consequently, I can't even guess at how many of the signers I've met have been R vs. D. My gut is that a very significant percentage lean right and are just fed up with the Partisan backbiting. Only one of the people I've met were as far off the rails as Curt Angerberg, and he chose not to put the measures on the Ballot at all.

Anonymous said...

Peter, you are being a sap.

You probably think you are being fair by posting comments by Curt Ankerberg. You are platforming him by letting him comment sometimes, like today, but you are misleading the public by censoring the crazy sex-obsessed comments he makes about you and others. Curt has moments of sanity, given that he is a conspiracy nut, but that isn't the real Curt Ankerberg. The troll is. Don't think you are being generous to a critic. You are enabling him a hateful vile angry kook.

Don't soil your blog. Ban him and stick to it.

Up Close: Road to the White House said...

Mostly Curt sends me comments that share his sexual fantasies, disguised as accusations. I delete those.

I am sensitive to the accusation that the comments here have too much bickering and the accusation that conservative voices get censored. Most of the conservative comments I get are anonymous and are copied and pasted from discredited media, so I delete them. Or obscene and from Curt. I suppose I was attempting to encourage Curt -- since he is a faithful reader -- to behave civilly. I thought maybe I could carry out a policy of deleting his wacky and obscene rants but publish him when isn't accusing local officeholders and media figures of sex crimes. A middle path.

The easiest thing is a blanket ban. I may do that. Or limit him to one or two comments a month, which he must sign with his own name, and I could put warning labels up around them. If he wants to squander his comment on obscene rants, that would be his decision.

I have mixed feelings.

Curt said...

Anonymous....I'm not "sex-obsessed" at all. That's a Democratic Party thing.

I'll bet that you support abortions and sex change operations for 13 year olds.
I don't.

Up Close: Road to the White House said...

There. That is very typical Curt. A shot in the dark accusation positing something sex related with a child or young teen. I publish this one, this one time, so readers get the Curt Ankerberg drift, but not again.

Mike Steely said...

Even when Curt refrains from his habitual obscenity and sexual obsession, he spreads blatant disinformation. For example, the money he refers to was CARE’s act money, and the commissioners didn’t "obey" Kate Brown. In fact, they passed a resolution opposing state mandated COVID precautions that served no purpose other than encouraging people to ignore them and which included a number of misleading statements about the pandemic, such as claiming county hospitals were not overwhelmed with COVID-19 cases (a big, fat lie).

Mc said...

Angerberg's posts make this blog a hostile place.