Americans have been fighting over "internal improvements" from the very start. The look of "infrastructure" has changed over the centuries.
Today, I look at maps of infrastructure.
From the earliest days of the republic there were political fights were over the difficult problem of transporting goods between the coastal cities back and forth to the interior of the growing country. George Washington and the Federalists favored building network of post roads, turnpikes, canals, and waterway improvements. In the early Republic, and until development of a rail system, goods moved primarily by water. The Democratic-Republicans generally opposed "internal improvements" being paid by the federal government. It was an issue of sectional equity (one region forced to help another), government ideology (the power of the federal government), and who pays (improvements were paid by tariffs, which tended to help states with manufacturing in the North and hurt agricultural states in the South.)
It is still the same fight. Improvements unite the country and assist commerce, but they help some people more than others and they are expensive. The definition and look of infrastructure has changed over the centuries. Today's post is a map of a few of them.
Goods still move by water. The Columbia is navigable into Idaho, the Mississippi Valley is a major network, and Gulf and Atlantic coasts have Intracoastal Waterways.
This map below shows volume of freight by weight within the continental U.S.--green for Rail, blue for inland waterway, red for the interstate highway system. The heavy green line shows coal moving from the Powder River coal fields of Wyoming toward coal plants in the east. The thickness of the lines reflect relative volumes. The thickness of the blue line shows how significant Mississippi and Ohio River barge traffic remains. Goods still move by water.
Natural gas moves primarily by pipeline. The central node of transfer is around Cushing, Oklahoma, a small town in north-central Oklahoma. A network of major pipelines meet there and there are storage facilities. Energy prices are set by the price of West Texas Intermediate or Light Sweet Crude oil delivered to Cushing.
Below is the route map for Delta Airlines. Its infrastructure is a mix of public airports and private facilities at airports. It centers on Atlanta.
Trail systems are infrastructure.
In the midst of the Civil War, the U.S. established a funding mechanism for spreading knowledge of farming, mining, manufacturing and other useful arts through public universities.
Military bases are part of the American infrastructure system. Most states have an active air force base in them. California and Texas have several.
Here is a map of American electrical power generators. Notice the remaining significance of federal investment in the Tennessee Valley Authority.
The United States has three power grids, not one. This is the interstate highway system for electricity.
The federal government sponsors research laboratories.
My overall point is a simple one, and I enjoy maps.
Americans have a "mental map" of what infrastructure means--beginning with roads, and bridges, and then maybe for people with an historian's eye, canal building in the early republic.
Infrastructure is more than that. In a world where value is created in design studios and is transported electronically, and where the real threats to American security may come in a hacker's innocuous-looking email and not from an invading tank force, what constitutes infrastructure has evolved. Some of it is buried, some of it is not at all visible to the passer-by, and some of it is invisible.
6 comments:
You left out the Democrats’ politically misleading one: “social infrastructure.”
Point taken.
I'd add public schools and public transportation, two systems that are not getting much discussion as infrastructure but I would argue are in vital need of investment, especially in urban centers. High speed rail is more logical that bigger freeways and nothing could be clearer than the need to upgrade inner city schools.
It strikes me that those big Republican donors largely bypass public systems, so are insulated from the hardships most of us endure to travel and do business. Less prosperous Republican voters are mesmerized with their cultural diversions and of little importance since they will vote in lockstep for those who pander to them.
It's true that infrastructure impacts everyone at some point, but will any Republicans place it higher than abortion, LGBTQ rights, or international baby eating cults?
So far no Republicans have shown support for the bill except...surprise!...proposing to build more toll roads and increased user fees.
The human aspect of infrastructure is essential to the operation of the "structure". It takes people to operate and use the "structure", as I am at the moment using fiberoptic interconnection. Someone is monitoring my use. The same is true for the electricity I require to power my device, system operators and local dispatchers provide and assure the operation of "the grid". But what supports the human side of infrastructure? A road to get to operator to their control center? A housing policy that makes it possible for an employee to live close to their job? A school to educate the children of the operator? A hospital and care facility to service and care for the operators family and perhaps elderly or infirmed relatives? Infrastructure is the underpinning our society in the broadest terms possible so as not to limit society in the areas of its chosen activity. Imagine for a moment how US Representatives and US Senators would be able to function if any part of our current infrastructure by the broadest definition failed? We are behind the curve in maintaining and expanding the hardware and firmware that supports the United States at the moment. The a parting thought, without a "society" there would be no need for infrastructure.
Things that he-men do, like building roads, laying rail, burying pipe and cables, dredging waterways, paving runways..... now that’s infrastructure.
Things that women and wimpy guys do, like teaching, nursing, child care, elder care.... that’s all just a give away socialist leftist agenda. Tucker told me so.
Love your maps. Fun to think of what else to display!
Thanks, Peter. Mind-expanding and I like maps, too. I also appreciate your other readers' comments on how it requires so-called social infrastructure for all of us to enjoy the possibilities of what we traditionally think of as infrastructure (brick and mortar/fiberoptic/gas & electric, etc.).
Post a Comment