Thursday, February 22, 2024

The right wing populist era

Right-wing authoritarianism doesn't seem wrong to about half of Americans.

Each era sows the seeds of its own reversal.  We are in a new era.

William Jennings Bryan, populist

The post-Civil War era of robber baron industrialists saw economic growth marred by stock swindles, dangerous factories, unsanitary slaughterhouses, and concentration of wealth in competition-stifling monopolies. The era created a response, the Progressive Era of trust busting and reform. That era gave us the direct election of senators, the initiative, and the referendum to circumvent corrupt legislatures. Women got the vote. At the zenith of the reform impulse, people voted for Prohibition.

The 1920s were an oscillation back away from all that do-good reforming. It was back to laissez faire. Small government was good, after all. Business and businessmen were good. The Great Depression ended that era.

The New Deal Era had bi-partisan consensus. It lasted almost 50 years. People understood that government was necessary to do big things. Government ended the Depression; it built dams; it won WWII; it built an interstate highway system; it put people on the moon; it ended racial segregation; it established Medicare; it fought proxy wars against communism; and it began cleaning up our air and water. Presidents Eisenhower, Nixon, and Ford were New Deal presidents. The era ran aground with the failed war in Vietnam and the intractable inflation of the 1970s. Americans decided government wasn't so competent after all.

Reagan inauguration: "Government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem."

In 1980 Ronald Reagan said that government was the problem, and that sounded about right to a majority of people. Democrats got elected by bending in that direction. Both Democrats and Republicans agreed to trust markets -- the bond market, labor markets, and free trade markets between countries. The public liked spending on ourselves but not being taxed. The debt grew. Businesses liked the cheap labor of immigrants and Democrats liked treating poor immigrants with compassion. That problem grew. Free markets made richer the people with capital, but it put America's blue collar workers into direct competition with workers in Mexico and Asia. That problem grew. It was unaddressed because the people with political influence -- the educated donor class -- were doing just fine. However, a growing number of people, enough people to swing elections, were not.  A political constituency was ready for an oscillation into worker and middle class populism. By 2016 that came to a head. 

On the left Democratic Socialist Bernie Sanders blamed corporate greed and suggested a European-style social welfare state. He thrilled some Democrats and frightened others. Democrats had a safe, establishment alternative in Hillary Clinton. She was a comfortable choice for college-educated Democrats, but not for blue collar ones. On the right Trump pointed at immigrants and said we needed to be self-interested and tough -- cruel if necessary.  

DRAIN THE SWAMP
Trump's presidency was marked by high drama and chaos. A plurality of GOP voters liked it. Trump shook up the Supreme Court; he adopted patriotic and religious symbols; he insulted the people and institutions that condescended to the populist right. The American establishment underestimated the public's frustration with the status quo and its longstanding institutions. Trump called all those institutions corrupt: Congress, courts, corporations, medicine, academia, the career Civil Service, and the media. He said they are all part of an amorphous but pervasive Deep State conspiracy to oppress Americans -- and him.

Trump purged the GOP of dissenters. He is open and frank about the purges. Either you say nice things about him and agree, or you are an enemy. It is a credible threat. Republican politicians hasten to "kiss the ring," as Nikki Haley puts it. She is in the political wilderness, along with the people who until recently led the GOP -- the Bush family, the Cheney family, the McCain family, the Romney family. They are RINOs now. He has cleaned out potential opposition within his party.

Trump has been straightforward about his plans for a second term. He is going to drain the swamp, which means ignoring Congress and the courts, prosecuting political opponents, shaking up NATO, attacking "woke" corporations, aligning the Justice Department with him personally, and most important, addressing the immigration problem decisively and without regard for accusations of cruelty or high handedness.  

The checks, balances, and institutional guardrails against lawless government were just barely adequate in the aftermath of the 2020 election. Trump has succeeded in discrediting and eliminating those guardrails. Trump promises decisive action. The alternative to that is the sluggish, piecemeal, court-stymied, checked-and-balanced action of a constitutional republic. The prior era advantaged one kind of American to the disadvantage of the working class. It set the stage for a populist leader who is openly contemptuous of the laws and institutions that would say "no" to him.

It is not a given that Americans want a republic. A near majority of the American public has lost patience with it. It didn't serve their needs. Trump is possible because the era has changed. Historians will look back at this as the Populist Era. 

Of course, the fear is that historians will look at this as the Post-Constitution Era. Or the Fascist Era.





[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to: https://petersage.substack.com Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.]




17 comments:

Dave said...

There is an anti science era also developing. What is truth and facts are an illusion in some eyes. For a while the earth was the center of the universe, just ask Galieo, he will tell you while on house arrest.
Maybe we will be better off when AI takes over.

Doe the unknown said...

A thorough explanation of contemporary populism in the U.S. should include the impact of environmental laws and policies. In the Oregon context, some liberals will argue that the timber industry has changed in the last 50 years, but it's a vital part of our economy. Other liberals blame the timber industry for its own demise (e.g., the "shipping all the logs to Asia" argument). But the spotted owl was cruel to a lot of working class people; we are still paying a big price for protecting the environment in the 1980s and 1990s. Populism results from things like that.

Mike Steely said...

In 2016, only 59.2% of the eligible voters bothered to vote. Of those who did, 46.1% voted for Trump. In other words, he was elected by 27.3% of the electorate. This isn’t much different than the percentage who supported Hitler in the 1930s. After four years of Trump’s madness and corruption while in office and all his ranting and raving since, I don’t believe his support has grown, it’s just become more strident.

The nature of life is change but if we act as well as wish, we can change it for the better. The threat Trump presents to our republic is certainly real, but not inevitable.

Michael Trigoboff said...

I blame our selfish and narcissistic elites, who couldn’t be bothered to give a f*** about working class people for the past three or four decades. They are now getting what they deserve, and unfortunately the country is getting it along with them.

It’s long past time to see the hedge fund and private equity parasites defanged.

Low Dudgeon said...

While the description of Donald Trump himself is perfectly apt, I'm not sure I agree with this effort to place him in historical context, or more accurately , to retrofit history for purposes of characterizing Trumpus.

Williams Jennings Bryan, e.g., was no "right-wing authoritarian", nor even a populist in this bowdlerized or simplistic Trumpian sense. Bryan worked with and within the system for decades as a serious, multivalent reformer.

Mike said...

“Populism" is a fairly meaningless term. About the only common denominator for those called “populist” is their ability to divide and conquer, usually by pitting “the elites” vs. “the people,” as if that meant anything. In referring to Trump, let’s not use euphemisms. He’s a criminal, narcissist and pathological liar. Ironically, he’s also one of the elites who cares about nothing but himself.

Michael Trigoboff said...

What populism means in the current political context is the revolt of working class people like industrial workers and farmers against globalist elites who are destroying the economic basis of their lives and exporting their jobs to low wage foreign countries.

It’s not just a phenomenon here in America. Similar things are happening in Britain (Brexit) and France (the yellow vests).

Mike said...

Working class people such as industrial workers and farmers are revolting against the globalist elites by supporting for president a criminal billionaire with business interests in over 25 countries. Yup, that's pretty revolting.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Elites have many ways to Invalidate the concerns of the working class. Snarky scorn, for instance.

Mike said...

If Trump's supporters are truly so deluded as to imagine that he gives a rip about the concerns of the working class, what can you do but laugh? As Lily Tomlin said, "No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Trump is the only one who even bothers to express concern about them. That beats being ignored or getting called deplorable or racist. Lip service may not be much, but it beats nothing.

Mike said...

As a bankruptcy-prone business mogul, Trump has always financed his lavish lifestyle at the expense of the workers and contractors he screwed over. He casts himself as a protector of workers and jobs, but a USA TODAY NETWORK investigation found hundreds of people – carpenters, dishwashers, painters, even his own lawyers – who say he didn’t pay them for their work. He's also documented as having made well over 30,000 false or misleading claims during his term in office. Anybody who believes him when he says he cares about anything besides himself has to be as crazy as he is.

Mike said...

PS: Those who support a madman who tried to overthrow the government and panders to White nationalists are called deplorable and racist because they are.

Michael Trigoboff said...

PPS: This is how Hillary lost in 2016. Some people are incapable of learning, even from bitter experience.

Experience teaches a tough school, but a fool will learn at no other. Or maybe not even there.

Mike said...

In fact, far more people voted for Hillary than for Trump. But I suspect that eventually even fools will learn that insurrectionists and white supremacists, i.e. deplorables and racists, will remain what they are no matter what they’re called.

Michael Trigoboff said...

The popular vote is irrelevant; that’s not the electoral system we have. if you want a different system, amend the Constitution. Mentioning that Hillary got more votes is just whining.

Mike said...

"Mentioning that Hillary got more votes is just whining."

Yup, Trump whined about it for years.