Monday, February 19, 2024

Make public information public.

Jackson County, Oregon withheld public information and got the news headline they wanted.

It was manipulative. It was a power play. 

The news media make self-government possible. They are a primary mechanism for an informed citizenry. I happily subscribe to the Rogue Valley Times, the Grants Pass Daily Courier, and Ashland.news.

County Administrator Danny Jordan

On Thursday morning last week the Jackson County commissioners received a report from county administrator Danny Jordan outlining the presumed costs of adding two commissioners to the current three-person board. The local media were in attendance as were several members of the public, including the leaders of the Jackson County for All group that had gathered petitions to update the county charter. Jordan passed out several sheets of paper to each commissioner. The people in the small room were not allowed to see the numbers on those papers. 

These were not personnel files with Social Security numbers. Nor was it litigation strategy. It was public budget information of obvious public interest. It involved matters people would be voting on. A copy of what was being discussed right in front of them could have been shared by being posted on a wall for all to see -- but it was not.

The county told the small group -- a group that included reporters from two local newspapers, two television stations, and the local public radio station -- that they would not share the information contemporaneously. Everyone needed to file a public records request, a process that would take time and paperwork, and then consideration by the county on whether to charge them to get the information, and for how much, and only then to share it. Denise Krause, the leader of the Jackson County for All group, immediately filed such a request. She told me that she had not gotten an OK to get the information as of Thursday afternoon, although she learned that the Rogue Valley Times had gotten it, but only late that day. By coincidence I had telephoned their reporter that afternoon and he hurriedly told me he was right on deadline. The county got the story and headline I had predicted they would want in my post the day prior to the meeting -- a story reporting the purported difficulties and expense of going from three to five commissioners. The commissioners oppose the ballot measures. What better way to frame the issue than as one in which adding two commissioners would somehow be a giant burden. 

Here is the headline and photo in the RV Times:


Jordan had given me a heads up that his report would have high-ball numbers. He told me he would be allocating sheriff deputy retirement benefits pro rata to the new commissioners, although they don't share in those benefits. He cited as an example of new expenses that budget committee meetings would require a substantial remodel of the county auditorium because there would not be room on the dais for 10 people. For decades the budget committee met at tables in front of the dais, not on it. That would be a free and easy workaround, but free and easy solutions would not serve the purpose of a headline saying the initiative proposals would be expensive. The way to get that story out was to make sure there wasn't a prompt, informed response from the public to accompany Jordan's report. 

The county got what it wanted.

Jackson County is treating public information as if it were secrets to be pried from them. The Jackson County for All group is still waiting for the information and it may be five days or longer. They will need to pay $13 to get it, which they will happily pay. Remember, that information was right there on the table, available to be handed out or posted. But no. Jump through hoops. Wait. Pay. Wait some more.

The county has a bunker mentality. There is no law requiring that the county make public information hard to get. This is a choice. A policy of inconvenience. The county should want the public to know what it is doing. There are important issues where the county needs public support, including a major new jail, an animal shelter, and homeless people living on the Greenway. The county attitude should be one of helpfulness, not resistance, especially when information can be shared simply and at negligible cost, as in this case. It is far more costly for the county to process a public information request form than simply to be friendly and cooperative. 

Look at this invoice. What a waste! The county assigned staff time to prepare this, but not staff time to thumb-tack the public information to a bulletin board so it could be read by people standing in front of them.  

The media is not the enemy of the county. Nor is the public. This isn't a cost saving issue -- quite the opposite. There is no legal prohibition against making public information available --  again, the intent of our public meeting laws are quite the opposite. It is a control issue. The county is intentionally making it hard to see what it is doing. Bureaucratic delay stiff-arms the public. It is a manipulative way to influence what news the media will present. Making the general public and the media jump through hoops is a way to show who is boss. 

The county commissioners and their administrator have it backwards. The public is the boss.



[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to: https://petersage.substack.com Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.]






17 comments:

Dave said...

Danny Jordan should lose his job for this kind of obfuscation. It makes him and government look bad.

Mike Steely said...

We know that Republicans have no honor and Jackson County Republicans are certainly no exception, as we saw when they officially proclaimed Joe Biden an “illegitimate president.” All they care about is power and they won’t surrender it gracefully. Trump’s response to losing the 2020 election is their moral compass. So far, Jordan and the commissioners’ petulance and exaggerations seem relatively restrained by comparison, but I hope the truth is also being publicized.

LBA said...

Here's some background: JCFA had already filed a Public Records Request for whatever information Jordan would present to the Commissioners. Response: The materials don't exist yet, so we're closing out your PRR. You can file again after Jordan presents the information at a public meeting. Well, none of those burdens is supported by Oregon Law. Plus, the PRR asked what cost the County was incurring to compile this information - the County simply ignored that part. JCFA resubmitted the PRR, asking that it be accepted as a standing request. Response: The County is incompetent to track or manage a standing request. Hmm. Based on fees charged for recent PRRs, my informed judgment is that the Executive Assistant who managed this PRR and generated the $13 invoice cost taxpayers over $50.

Phil Arnold said...


The process of obfuscation by county government will generate support FOR the measures.

Joe Cambodia 🇰🇭 said...

He lost his steroid connexion what more do you people want!

Curt said...

Today is February 19, 2024. The filing deadline to run for Jackson County Commissioner is March 12, 2024, so there are about 3 more weeks available to file to run for office. As of today, not one Democrat has filed to run for County Commissioner in either Jackson or Josephine Counties. What's the deal? What's the delay?? If Democrats want to be a Commissioner so badly, then why don't they show some intestinal fortitude and file to run for office?? Or.....do they know they can't win a County-wide office because they are too extreme, and they need to have a Commissioner seat dedicated to Ashland in order for them to win? This is pathetic that Democrats make a big deal about the number of Commissioners that exist, yet they haven't filed to run yet. SAD. Once upon a time.....a Democrat named Peter Sage ran for Commissioner, and he won.

For the record, I oppose all three Commissioner's measures proposed by the Democrats. Three Commissioners (and the current system) works just fine.

Curt Ankerberg
Medford, OR

Ed Cooper said...

Great column today, Peter. I hope you will submit it as a Guest Opinion to all three of the Papers you arre currently receiving.
I don't know if there is any Legal Remedy to the obfuscation and roadblocks being thrown up.by Jackson County, but fell that perhaps a Law Suit is in order. I'd appreciate any if the Attorneys reading your blog chiming in on the advisabiliyy of such a suit, which might help get more coverage from the local TV Stations and even radio.

Sally said...

If DannyJordan is a stickler, maybe that’s why Jackson County is often cited for being fiscally in the best shape of any county in the state.

“Jackson County For All” is a lie from its very title! Just because you don’t like the current partisan makeup of the officeholders? Everybody in the county gets a vote, how is that not FOR ALL?

And if this phony partisan group believed what it said, it would have out their measure on the NOVEMBER NOT THE MAY BALLOT, where there is always way higher turnout.

It also has NEVER acknowledged the election about a dozen years ago — put forth by a Republican dominated board — to make the offices non-partisan! I strongly supported it; the voters did not. Am I the only person who remembers that‽

Of course the original intent of JCFA (cough) was to carve the county into five districts to gain a special district for Ashland. They abandoned that because apparently they figured out that would go down like a crate of eggs off the Empire State Building.

I predict you’ll find out this one will also.

Mc said...

Isn't it against the law for city employees to campaign?

Jordan needs to go.

Mc said...

You can't request something that doesn't exist.

Ed Cooper said...

Again, Sally is wrong in at least on or more points of her diatribe. 37 % of registered voters in Jackson County are NAV, or non-affiliated, Independents, and do NOT get to vote in Primary Elections, without going through the hassle of changing Registration to one or the other of the two major Parties, and thus have NO say in who Candidates should be.
And she has never responded as to why apparently she is afraid of the Ashland area having an equal say in County Government.

Ed Cooper said...

The Election of about a dozen years ago, which I also voted for, is Yesterday's News, and cannot take into account the Drmograogic changes which have occurred in Jackson County.

Ed Cooper said...

Interesting point, and while I'm on total agreement that Jordan is long past his "sell by" date, I don't know that his ginned up bogus report on how much the Charter cha

Sally said...

My diatribe? As opposed to everyone else’s diatribe?

Mr Cooper, I cannot respond to things I did not say and not respond to things I did, like having SUPPORTED a non-partisan Board of Commissioners a dozen or so years ago when voters voted it down!

Support a move to five commissioners? No. It’s too expensive, as Danny Jordan (the great fiscal manager!) pointed out, which is why most of you are so cranky.

Having this measure on the primary rather than general election ballot gives it a better chance of passing. I guess if you like the outcome, you don’t care about the process that got you there.

Ed Cooper said...

Interesting question. I'm not sure Jordan's ginned up bogus report on what the Charter Changes might cost Courts as "Campsigning", I m in total agreement that Jordan is well past his "best used by" date, and should retire to spend more time with family.

Sally said...

Last comment (I hope).

My OBJECTION was to carving the county into districts. I do not think county issues divide by districts. Most all county issues affect the whole county.

So-called JCFA retracted this provision.

Joe Cambodia 🇰🇭 said...

Maybe the Democrats are wise enough to save their $50 because Jackson County Republicans that are dumb enough to vote for Qray Perkins are equally dumb enough to vote for you?