"Yes, Jesus loves me!Yes, Jesus loves me!
Yes, Jesus loves me!
The Bible tells me so."
Christian song for children
Hilliard |
The difference between Dems and the GOP is not the process, but rather their different epistemologies. It has taken me a lifetime to understand at a soul-level what this hifalutin word even means, which in Anglo-Saxon is translated as "ways of knowing." A democratic society validates what is real through evidence and scientific fact. But as much as we pretend otherwise, America has always been half democratic/half patriarchal. Slavery, fundamentalist Christianity, Jim Crow, discrimination, voter suppression are based on a knowledge system defined by power. The real and the true is what those in power say it is. So long as you're conveying the patriarch's message with loyalty and conviction, that epistemological system will never accuse you of lying or immoral behavior.
That had a ring of truth to me. Traditional-values people cite traditional authorities and practices. For many evangelical Christians, the Bible is inerrant and is meant to be understood literally. Rituals, too, must be performed perfectly. The Roman Catholic Church, even under this liberalizing Pope, declared that thousands of baptisms performed over decades by a priest were now null and void. In baptismal ceremonies he had used the word "we" in saying "we baptize you" instead of "I baptize you." We implies that a Catholic community of the faithful consecrates the baptism. The word "I" means that the priest, and only the priest, acting as the official agent of Christ with authority passed down from St. Peter, delivers the only true baptism. It matters. The mis-baptized need new ceremonies.
Americans understand themselves to be innovators, empowered by freedom of thought and action. We contrast ourselves with Europe in that way. We are the new and improved brand. The Enlightenment Era was in full flower at the time the USA's founding documents were written. Enlightenment thinkers replaced religious authority with reason and human observation. We were the go-getters. The country expanded westward and developed new technologies. America considered itself modern. The Civil War was the triumph of the modern, industrialized urban North over the traditional.
Change faces resistance. People like the familiar, especially if they are inconvenienced or disadvantaged by change. "Don't fix it if it ain't broke." Trump represented the desire to circle back to an imagined American Golden Age prior to the modern disruptions of Black Civil Rights, second wave feminism, and the modern era of immigration from Latin America and Asia. Trump is is a cultural counter-revolutionary in that change--but he isn't a prude. Trump exemplified the Hugh Hefner Playboy philosophy of the 1950s and early 1960s. The great-again America prior to 1963 was a traditional America.
Trump sells an alternative universe to his political base. People believe him, or they suspend belief and accept him on faith. He represents delivered truth. Kellyanne Conway famously cited "alternative facts," but she wasn't presenting new facts. She and Trump supporters have an ample way to confront observations that dispute the Trump-truth. They have the distraction of "whatabouts." What about inflation, gasoline prices, Afghanistan, gaffes, low poll numbers. They have faith.
The Big Lie is true. Trump told them so.
7 comments:
To believe Trump, you'd have to be as crazy as he is. One of his first official acts as our so-called president was going to the CIA, standing in front of the Wall of Heroes, and lying to them about the size of his inauguration crowd, as if daring them to contradict him with facts. It went downhill from there.
Dr. Fauci contradicted Trump with facts and the whackos still demonize him for it, parroting baseless accusations about his complicity for COVID-19. We aren't polarized. We just live in different realities. The problem is people whose reality is composed of "alternative facts" still vote in ours.
Time and optics are cracking the hold Trump has over the faithful followers. Murdoch's media outlets are seeking a new conservative political face in the likes of a DeSantis-ish character. The lies about the Dominion voting machines has produced legal troubles as well as credibility issues for Fox News. The DoJ, the January 6th Select Congressional Committee and the Georgia AG's Special Grand Jury are making obvious the lies and misdeeds by Trump and his enablers.
Whether the monied interests are yet ready to cast out Trumpism remains to be seen. As of this writing, the Democrats haven't mounted a full-scale 50 State offensive. These two unknowns suggest Trumpism will move forward on the momentum of 30 to 40 percent of electorate support.
However, the fog is lifting and the scales are starting to fall from the eyes of Trumpian followers revealing a sobering detail: We are close to losing our Republic.
The only one laughing about our being close to losing our Republic is Vladimir Putin.
All seekers after knowledge meet up initially at the epistemological trailhead. Reading this blog, however, along with regular helpings of CNN, MSNBC, NYT and WaPo, recall for me other even more foundational categories from Philosophy 110. Trump must first be considered as one of Plato's forms, before we proceed inexorably to St. Anselm's Ontological Proofs for the Existence of God and the Centrality of Trump.
For an explanation of where these different epistemologies originate, see Jonathan Haidt’s book, The Righteous Mind.
His research demonstrates that conservative people have different “moral foundations“ than liberal people do. We need to recognize the diversity of our different moral approaches, and stop demonizing each other.
You can read more about moral foundations here.
The problem with alternate realities is that actual reality sometimes intrudes.
McConnell said it best: “The Democrats are going to take care of the son of a bitch for us.”
There's some reality for ya!
There's nothing wrong with demonizing the pathological liars undermining our democracy. They're demonic. This has nothing to do with conservative vs. liberal. It's about fact vs. fiction.
Post a Comment