Wednesday, February 9, 2022

Truck Blockades in Canada


"Freedom Convoy."


Truckers protest vaccination mandates in Canada.


In Canada's capital city of Ottawa big trucks are blocking downtown traffic and blasting their horns.  Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said "they don't have the right to blockade our economy, or our democracy, or our fellow citizens' daily life. It has to stop." 

U.S. citizens are famous for their ignorance about Canada, our mild-mannered and better-behaved neighbor to the north. U.S. truckers have expressed interest in sending a similar message of angry disagreement with vaccination and mask mandates. Canadian protesters are getting support from prominent Americans, including Donald Trump. Trump called Trudeau a "far left lunatic" who "destroyed Canada with insane COVID mandates."  Texas senator Ted Cruz said on Fox News that "government doesn't have a right to force you to comply to their arbitrary mandates."

Sandford Borins is close to the events. He is a college classmate and Professor of Public Management Emeritus at the University of Toronto. He writes at www.sandfordborins.com and his Guest Post below first appeared there yesterday. Four days ago he posted his view on the protest:
I think the occupiers’ demands are misguided and detrimental to public health. I find the symbols of racism and intolerance they flaunt are repugnant. I believe their actions, including blocking traffic and disrupting the peace, are illegal. Their demand that the Governor-General replace the duly elected Government is ludicrous, but also borders on sedition.

 

Guest Post by Sandford Borins 

Sandford Borins
"The Whole World is Watching” was a rallying-cry used by anti-Vietnam War protesters to shame American police and military who were violently suppressing demonstrations. But it now fits the situation in which Canadians find ourselves. What the world has recently seen of Canada in stories that have received international attention is not how we would like to see ourselves.

The revelations of unmarked graves of indigenous children at residential schools has shown a nation that condoned physical and psychological violence against First Nations. The hostage-swap of the two Michaels for Ms. Meng has shown us as a pawn in the power-struggle between the U.S. and China. And now the insurrection on the streets of Ottawa shows us as a G-7 country incapable of keeping order in its national capital, a global weakling.

The insurrection in Ottawa is not bringing the federal government to a halt, as Parliament can still meet, as it did last night, and most of the bureaucracy is working virtually. But it is making life a nightmare for the citizens of Ottawa. It is also doing great damage to our self-image and the world’s perception of us. We consider Canada a country that embodies the objectives of the British North America Act, our founding charter: peace, order, and good government. The insurrection negates Canada’s image as a country that works. It contradicts our self-image as a country that can solve its disputes calmly and peacefully. And it presents a picture not of good government, but of confused and ineffective government.

The Chess Game

The insurrectionists, with their big rigs blocking the streets of Ottawa, including the street that runs through the centre of the Parliamentary precinct, are daring the civil authorities to evict them. They are playing a chess game. Moving the insurrectionists’ soup kitchen away from Parliament Hill to the suburbs: a pawn captured by government. The injunction against horn-blowing in the Ontario Superior Court: a rook captured by government. Substituting GiveSendGo for GoFundMe: a bishop protecting the insurrectionists’ queen.

Endgame?

The three levels of government have not yet been able to create a set of incentives strong enough to convince the insurrectionists to get in their trucks and drive out of Ottawa. Doing this will require political and managerial creativity. Are there sufficient financial incentives given the apparent availability of dark money to nullify them? A more powerful incentive than tickets and fines is license suspension. Is that possible, given current regulations, or would new regulations or even legislation be necessary?

If the only way that government can induce the insurrectionists to drive out of Ottawa is with the threat of seizing and removing their trucks, then government must have the means to make good on that threat. Is it legally and logistically possible to seize their trucks, as Ontario Liberal leader Steve Del Duca has suggested? If the government takes possession of the trucks but the drivers immobilize them, what happens next? Can the government remove them from the streets? There are stories of private sector towing companies refusing this business. Perhaps the government could offer the towing companies the carrot of extra money and the threat of withdrawing future business if they don’t step up now.

If the towing companies can’t or won’t remove the trucks, then the government must have the capacity to do so. Could the Canadian Armed Forces do this? The Trudeau Government still appears reluctant to engage the Armed Forces, but this may be necessary.

Or perhaps the government doesn’t have to remove the trucks immediately if it has taken possession of them. Maybe life in Ottawa could return to a new and decidedly sub-optimal normal with some streets blocked by hulking but unoccupied trucks.

All levels of government do not want to negotiate with insurrectionists. But the inability to remove the trucks strengthens the insurrectionists’ hand. Perhaps the government could establish a federal provincial task force of public health experts to study science-based approaches to safely and gradually removing vaccine and mask mandates. Such an initiative, while not the result of negotiations, could be trumpeted by the insurrectionists as a concession that validates their efforts, and induce them to leave.

Now is a time for government to act with the appropriate mixture of firmness, force, and flexibility. That is what “good government” means.

13 comments:

Dave said...

Do whatever is necessary to alleviate the problem, just as Portland should have done the same earlier than they did. Being liberal does not mean accepting lawlessness.

Rick Millward said...

While looking for information about this I noticed that the second most searched term is "Where is Ottawa?".

Vaccine paranoia is a mental health issue, and there's no simple way to address it. I see this protest as sort of the same kind of reaction as hoarding toilet paper, an example of irrational behavior. In this case it's also unlikely to succeed. The Canadian government cannot allow itself to be intimidated, and it has shown that it has the patience to wait out the protests, which may be the only way to resolve the conflict.

It's reported that the trucker's union has condemned the protests. Union members are 99% vaccinated. The protests include Qanon and white nationalist elements so this movement, while not as violent, seems to have some of the same motivations as the 1/6 mob, also evidenced by the show of support from MAGA allies in the US.

Finally, protest organizers have raised over several million dollars which also may be a clue as to intentions. In an interesting twist, the following was reported by the Washington Post:

"After being denied several million dollars raised on GoFundMe, organizers of a trucker-led protest disrupting life in Canada’s capital have found a new platform: a Christian crowdfunding site where they raised more than $3.5 million in two days to demonstrate against the country’s vaccine mandate.

The new fundraiser hosted by GiveSendGo, which describes itself as the “#1 free Christian crowdfunding site,” reported Sunday that the “Freedom Convoy” campaign had raised several million dollars two days after GoFundMe announced that it was freezing more than $8 million in donations to the cause, a move that led Republican officials in the United States to announce investigations.

The rapid influxes of donations have prompted questions about the origin of the funds and sparked concerns among analysts about the use of the online platforms for financing fringe organizations that could allow the interference of foreign entities."

Low Dudgeon said...

The biggest obstacle today to common sense, broad-based solutions is, in my opinion, the oft-facile resort to supposed process or mode-and-manner objections which are no more than fig leafs for bald substantive favoritism. Outcome-based ethics, one might term it.

Just as we on the right heartened to sudden progressive appreciation for the police function after 1/6, now the Left cares about order--protests blocking traffic, ordinary city functions disturbed, and the free operation of businesses upon which regular folks depend.

From free speech and cancel culture to the parameters of government tolerance for extra-legal political protest, it needn't always devolve into which side has the power to act based simply on whose ox is being gored. The "due" in due process is for everyone.

John F said...

The event of a truck blockade is a game changer to me. I had been on the fence with respect to autononmous operating trucks, but not anymore. The fact that our public health policies can be held hostage to a bunch of misguided hot-head truckers is a threat that must now be confronted. As an aside - tracking the spread of HV-AIDS in Africa showed infections followed the truck routes. In that case they refused to wear condoms. In short they're a menace.

Anonymous said...

Blog suggestion:

Have you been following the absurd TERF, JK Rowling (Harry Potter) and now Adele (wildly popular contemporary British singer) "transphobia" issue?

The canceling of gender and women in particular is a major political issue. It is a winning issue for conservatives. It includes the debate about biological boys and men participating in female sports.

Michael Trigoboff said...

“Canada, our mild-mannered and better-behaved neighbor to the north.“

The United States was settled from Europe by rebellious people who did not want to live under the rules imposed by European society. Canada was settled by bureaucrats hired by, for instance, the Hudson Bay Company. I think that right there we have an explanation for the difference in character between the two countries.

Mc said...

The US was settled by wealthy White men who wanted to become richer.

People who are poor seldom have the means to take a trip across an ocean.

The fact that the Founding Fathers were all wealthy White men is not a coincidence.

Mc said...

Corporations/corporate interests convince the religious and ignorant to do their dirty work, and fund it.


Corporations don't like government regulations and neither do religions.

Follow the money.

If Exxon could get away with calling itself a religion, it would. And it would enjoy the benefits, including the ability to discriminate and ignore other laws.

There's also foreign influence. Russia does need to invade or occupy the US if it can influence elections - which it has.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Sorry, Mc,

Most of the people who came here from Europe were not rich and probably something like half of them were women.

Anonymous said...

C’mon, are you for real? Or are you trying to impress us with your moderation? You can’t abandon your vehicle on a public street for weeks on end and not expect it to be towed. I agree with Dave. If something isn’t done soon, expect to see similar convoys descending on DC, Salem, etc.

Doe the unknown said...

Americans stereotype Canadians as "nice" and Canada as a homogeneous country. Actually, Canada is a divided country. The divisions in the United States pale in comparison to the issues Anglophone Canada has concerning Quebec and that Quebec has concerning Anglophone Canada.

Ralph Bowman said...

Make it a capitalist offense … taking money out of struggling Main Street. Fine the lot beyond imagination..confiscate , then cut the trucks up for scrap metal. Give them to the homeless for shelter. Strip the tires, pieces of the motor, see how fast thugs can make a buck out of these abandoned trucks as the cops look the other way.

Low Dudgeon said...

"Taking money out of struggling Main Street".

I well recall the same sentiment expressed by principled progressives during the Antifa/BLM riots.