Saturday, July 17, 2021

A quiet Coup d'état

    "'This is the Reichstag moment,'" General Milley told aides.' . . . A student of history, Milley saw Trump as a classic authoritarian leader with nothing to lose."


Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker, in I Alone Can Fix It: Donald J. Trump's Catastrophic Final Year.


I take little comfort in learning that the nation's top military official had arranged to confound the Commander in Chief.

This week saw the release of several books with detailed inside looks at the final months of the Trump presidency. Each book gives well-sourced reports that Trump was desperate to void the 2020 election and retain the presidency. This was not just show-boating. He genuinely tried to use every lever of power to stop Biden from taking office. He lobbied local and state officials to ignore the vote in their jurisdictions; he implored Congress to over-ride the vote; he expected the Supreme Court to declare votes for Biden uncountable; he demanded the Vice President void votes. 

It didn't happen.

The books cite people who stood in the way of Trump. These include Michael Pence, who refused to void Biden's electoral votes and refused the Secret Service's urging to leave the Capitol and delay the process. It includes Mitch McConnell, who urged Senate colleagues to accept the election results. It includes AG Bill Barr, who told Trump the "rigged election" lie was "bullshit."

It also included the military. The military feared it was being set up to be used in a coup d'état and took steps to distance themselves from Trump.

Leonnig and Rucker's book report a conversation between Nancy Pelosi and General Mark Milley. Neither raise objections to what they report. Pelosi, who was taken to the safety of an Air Force base to shelter during the insurrection, expressed concern that Trump, in desperation, would use the military to secure his hold on the presidency. Michael Flynn and others had publicly urged Trump to declare martial law and use it as an excuse to delay the election. Trump has openly wondered if that was possible. Meanwhile, a riot was happening at the Capitol and Trump was slow to stop it. Might Trump allow--or create--a state of emergency that would justify extra-Constitutional acts? They report this dialog:
"Ma'am, I guarantee you these processes are very good," Milley reassured her. "There's not going to be an accidental firing of nuclear weapons."

"How can you guarantee me?" Pelosi asked.

"Ma'am, there's a process," he said. "We will only follow legal orders. We'll only do things that are legal, ethical, and moral.”

In the context of these books, the military is positioned as heroic. They stood by the Constitution. They refused to be used. I am happy they played that role, but I am also troubled by it. The people empowered by the Constitution to put a brake on an out-of-control president are Members of Congress, not the military. Representatives and Senators have powers of checks and balances: The power of the purse; the power of impeachment and removal; the power of oversight; and the power to write laws and pass them with majorities that over-ride a veto. Those are the Constitutional ways of protecting Americans from tyranny. 

Congress failed Americans. They failed to pit ambition against ambition. They acted like partisans on a team. Mitch McConnell, Kevin McCarthy, Lindsay Graham, even Bill Barr objected to Trump in the moment, but now have faded away in silence as Trump continues to assert the election was rigged and the presidency legitimately his.

The Congress has license to do this because there was a backstop. We did not have a visible military coup d'état. The public did not see troops in the street and a president standing in front of generals and tanks, saying that he is staying in power to protect Americans from chaos. 

We did not have a military coup d'état on behalf of Trump. We had one in defiance of him. This sets bad precedents. The president attempted--and still attempts--to overthrow an election and it can be done without offending a political party's members. Officeholders have license to play political messaging games, to protect themselves from a primary. What's the big harm? It all worked out. The military wouldn't let itself be used. 

That is dangerous thinking.  General Milley saying that they have taken secret unilateral steps to confound a president should be alarming, not comforting. The authors of the Constitution knew full well that militaries are a dangerous repository for democratic values. Military culture supports order and obedience--an ideal environment for tyrants. 

Worse, by giving the apparent safety-net of a military that would confound a president, we relieve the Congress of doing its duty. Mitch McConnell, after having publicly announced that Trump is dishonest in saying the election was rigged and that Trump unquestionably incited a riot to overturn the election, still goes on to announce that if Donald Trump is the GOP nominee in 2024, that of course he will support him wholeheartedly. 



 





4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Trump may yet destroy America with Republican assisting in every way it can. Apparently nearly half of the US is ok with that. I’m not sure I would choose to live in such country. As many southern republicans consider succession, so too would Democrats in the northern states if Trump returns to power. What unifies America these days? We have it so good here for the most part compared to much of the world and yet, we want to destroy it? For what, an authoritarian ass? I’ll understand if the author deletes this post.

Ed Cooper said...

Anonymous asks a good question. What is so wrong that Republicans are willingly following the twice impeached Drumpf into a rabbit hole of ignominy? What is wrong with seeing that the least among us are fed, and sheltered. I long ago gave up on organized Religion, and especially find Fundamentalist "christians" as abhorrent as the Fundamentalist Ayatollahs in Iran and Saudia Arabia, but the alleged words of the carpenter from Bethlehem certainly provide a guidepost for any human of good heart.

Rick Millward said...

A two party system is only viable if both parties are rational.

Rationality requires seeing and accepting the World as it is. For instance, the US is and has been a pluralistic society since its inception, with systemic inequities that have only been addressed in the last hundred years. Republicans have historically represented the wealthy whose main interest was maintaining the status quo, which includes those inequities. This has failed, leaving them with a constituency of those who are delusional and most resistant to the effects of the changes brought about by the social and technological progress of the 21st century. This is much like the remaining aboriginal tribes who survive in the jungles alongside third world cities.

We can only hope the military will continue to resist the creeping fascism. The places to watch are our military academies, which have historically taught the officer core democratic values and a code of honor that fiercely defends the constitution and rule of law. It is fortunate that the military has mirrored many of the Progressive values in the larger society with respect to minorities and women. We shouldn't have to wonder if the troops would rebel if ordered to turn their guns on citizens. It's certain that the Republicans would not hesitate to turn the nation into a police state.

In this case it was made clear to the corrupted civilian leadership that it would not follow unlawful orders, but you are correct, Congress has become so dysfunctional we are still in danger.

Anonymous said...

Remember when Republicans were in favor of law and order in the military? Sigh. How quaint that you believe that Congress critters control anything, Peter…