Wednesday, July 28, 2021

GOP Silent Consent to Overthrowing the Election.

Moderate Republicans in Oregon have a problem. They need to be Trump-compliant in a state that rejected Trump.


Trump is making it hard for them. So is Liz Cheney.


     "Until January 6th, we were proof positive for the world that a nation conceived in liberty could long endure. But now, January 6th threatens our most sacred legacy. The question for every one of us who serves in Congress, for every elected official across this great nation, indeed, for every American is this: Will we adhere to the rule of law? Will we respect the rulings of our courts? Will we preserve the peaceful transition of power? Or will we be so blinded by partisanship that we throw away the miracle of America?"

          U.S. Rep. Elizabeth Cheney, (R) Wyoming

Click: NBC
A Republican in national office is exposed. There are yes-or-no votes, and Trump does not tolerate apostasy.  Loyal and subservient as Mike Pence was, when he would not unilaterally discard votes for Biden he was no longer part of the Trump GOP. On January 7 Mitch McConnell said on the floor of the Senate, "The mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the president and other powerful people." McConnell, too, lost Trump's blessing.

Liz Cheney is the most visible current example of a Republican who wouldn't go along with overthrowing the election, and she is condemned by Trump, of course, but also now condemned by the House GOP. She keeps saying what must not be said aloud, that their party's hero attempted--and still attempts--to remain in power despite losing the election. She shames Republicans in national office. 

But Republican state and local candidates have a place to hide. They might win in blue Oregon. It starts with the reality that there is restlessness in the public mood. Problems accumulate. Enemies accumulate. COVID shutdown. Unemployment check delays. Portland disturbances night after night. As a senior Oregon Democratic political operative said to me yesterday, 
Peter, we could have a Republican governor and Republicans for three of the six U.S. Representatives. Democrats soiled their brand, what with Portland and everything. We are all sick of Portland, not just downstate. Up here, too.

The path for a Republican is narrow, though, because the state as a whole opposes Trump and Trump is in the center of the GOP brand. Victory statewide would require the right political biography, combined with mumbling a non-answer to uncomfortable subjects. Oregon has a tradition of voting for Main-Street, Chamber-of-Commerce Republicans. They project a kind of good-government civic-mindedness at odds with the national GOP current message. Populist Trump condemns the institutions of government, corporate elites, and the "Fake News" media. Old-school Chamber of Commerce Republicans lead institutions and support them, and are friendly with the local and state media. They were comfortable with the Bush-Romney party with its traditional pro-business, anti-union, low-regulation, low-tax policies. They don't hate the elites; they are the elites, or friendly with them.

I talk with Republican political operatives, too. (In my long career as a financial advisor I got along well with Republicans.) I asked a senior Republican advocate and donor how Main Street Republicans were going to deal with the Donald Trump/Liz Cheney problem. Isn't ignoring an effort to void an election and then an attack on the Capitol a bit like the macabre joke, "Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?" I got this answer:

Peter, move on. January 6 is behind us. Biden is president. We're not going to talk about Trump and what he says about the election. It just isn't a subject we think about. 

I asked again later, and got:

Peter, we aren't talking about Trump and whether or not the election was fair. After the primary Republicans can talk about bipartisanship, but until then we won't be commenting on Trump or the election. We are looking past that.

It might work. A candidate might have enough message discipline to keep refusing steadfastly to address what Trump keeps advocating, what Democrats and Liz Cheney keep condemning, and what a questioner keeps asking. "No comment," may seem like sufficient agreement in the ears of Republican voters who expect and assume agreement. It may be ambiguous enough to Democrats satisfied that at least someone isn't praising the insurrection. The strategy is to mumble and not comment.

The big confounding factor will be Trump and Cheney. It doesn't appear that either will let it go, and they aren't mumbling. 



[To get his blog daily by email, go to: https://petersage.substack.com   Enter your email address. The blog will come to your inbox midmorning, Pacific time.  It is free and always will be.]





11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Can you be for democracy and be a good Republican? Seems like it is one or the other. A house divided on itself can not stand.

Rick Millward said...

The term "moderate" is a nice way of saying "blind, deaf and dumb" or "hear no evil see no evil speak no evil". Securely floating in a gauzy bubble of sophomania and entitlement they find all this agitation inconvenient and not a little annoying.

So, yeah, Jan. 6th never happened and "whatabout" Portland?

BTW there are no more "moderate" Republicans, if there ever were. They all are on the white supremacist religious extremist conspiracy mongering bandwagon, I mean pickup, now. They have found political gold on the far right and will mine it ferociously until it caves in on them.

Unfortunately, Oregon promises to be the motherlode.

Ed Cooper said...

It seems to me that the very term "good republican" is itself an oxymoron. What differentiates a spineless republican who refuses to admit that the Republic is crumbling, keeping his/her head stuffed down a rabbit hole, from one of those who tried to kill the Capitol policemen on January 6 ?
Anybody of the "retrumplican" party who could watch those testimonies yesterday and still stay loyal to The Former Guy is as bad as every one of those terrorists trying to hang the Vice President.

Ed Cooper said...

After reading Peter Sage, this showed up on my News Feed.
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-bled-tonight-texas-reaction-trump-pick-defeated-house-runoff-1613817
I hope it's OK to paste the link here, as I think it reinforces Peter's points.

Dave Norris said...

Diogenes here. Still looking for an honest person, any party, either sex. Do you have anyone in mind?

Michael Trigoboff said...

The mob on 1/6 never had the slightest chance in hell of overturning the election. Calling it an “insurrection“ massively overstates the case. They were completely disorganized and they had no organized support within the military or the police.

If you want to see the kind of thing that might actually have been effective, watch the old movie 7 Days In May. Nothing even close to this was happening on 1/6.

What never seems to be mentioned is the amazing and blatant incompetence of the government organizations that were supposed to guard the Capitol and prevent something like this. I fear for the fate of our country when a dysfunctional bureaucracy cannot even protect the center of government from a disorganized mob.

It’s fine with me to prosecute the people who committed crimes that day. They deserve whatever they get. But depicting the events of that day in apocalyptic terms is just ridiculous.

Ed Cooper said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ed Cooper said...

That it's ridiculous to call the attempted overthrow of the Government apocalyptic, as incompetent as it was, would go a long way towards explaining the Republican resistance to finding out not only what, but why it happened.

Low Dudgeon said...

Though one would be hard-pressed to find it from the overheated comments here, Mr. Trigoboff's excepted, there is much middle ground between disingenuous GOPers dismissing the January 6th travesty as little or nothing, and "Bad America" leftists suddenly posing as patriotic, cop-loving institutionalists, inveighing that we Nearly Lost Our Beloved Democracy.

In the end, President Biden's certification was delayed by a couple of hours, and the largely inchoate Trump yokels left all their guns at home or in their cars for the "coup" because they feared stringent D.C. and federal gun crime punishments. You know, just like Serious, Dread Insurrectionists would.

Fortunately we'll never know what would have truly diagnosed the nature and degree of the travesty--had the mob come across members of Congress. Meanwhile, the legacy media lied about Officer Sicknick, who did not die of blunt force trauma, and unarmed Ms. Babbitt died at the hands of a Good Apple.

Ralph Bowman said...

Disorganized does not mean this group of pigs could not have killed someone if they had gotten their hands on a Congress person. To do Monday morning Quarter backing from a couch shows indifference to what went down. The cop on the front lines knew the tenor of these
Homemade “insurrectionists” with hammers, rebar, knives, stun guns, bear spray, crowbars, and flag poles. CNN reporters did not stick around to protect their multi thousand dollar tv cameras, lights and sound equipment, they ran from the screaming madame Defarges who hated “fake news” and used lighter fluid to snuff it out permanently. Terrorists, as one cop called them. Pick a descriptive word, what happened was violence.

Ed Cooper said...

It pains me to write it, but Liz Cheney comes close, and Adam Kinzinger right with her.