Sunday, January 17, 2021

"Seething Rage"


How do Trump supporters justify ending elections and self-government in America?


"Those people were so frustrated."


Five years ago this week I was in South Carolina, at the "Tea Party Convention."  Trump spoke. So did Mike Huckabee, Ben Carson, Ted Cruz, and Rick Santorum. I saw the early signs of a campaign and presidency built around resentment and anger. It grew over the past four years. Trump's supporters showed up as he urged on January 6, expressing seething rage, and feeling entirely justified. 

"Seething rage"
I posted this photo on Facebook, back then, a bad selfie with Mike Huckabee. Huckabee said that Americans should feel enraged, but he was not the seething-rage candidate. Ted Cruz was the angry candidate, the guy who talked about America with a snarl. Ben Carson was mild and sleepy-eyed and Rick Santorum was sanctimonious. Back in January 2016 Donald Trump was still just one of several candidates, but he had his niche. He was the TV star and the resentment-candidate. 

His message was that people were picking on you, you good Americans. Black people and unwanted immigrants were stepping in line in front of you, taking something from you. The left was stealing from you, and so were corporations, politicians, and establishment big shots. He had not yet discovered the phrase "Drain the Swamp." He spoke of loss. You are losing something, America, taken away by that impostor Obama and his lousy health care plan. He had a way better one in mind. Mexico would pay for the wall.

The January 6 Capitol insurrection creates a problem for Republican spokespeople and officeholders. Most of them need to support Trump. Most Republicans are now Trump-populist-resentment Republicans, not straight-arrow-Romney-Republicans. They want a populist, nativist fighter. However,  events at the Capitol show indefensible behavior: People using flagpoles with the American flag or "Trump" on them as weapons, people stealing things, the death of a policeman, people barreling past uniformed officers. The disorder was on video. These aren't caravans. These aren't Muslims in traditional Arabic clothes. The videos cannot be denied. They were White Americans wearing MAGA hats, carrying Trump banners, yelling about killing Pence. That is hard to clean up.

Trump loyalists settled in on an approach. They justify the big thing and condemn the little things. There are exceptions--Liz Cheney, Bill Barr, Mitt Romney, and a few others--but most Republicans have averted their eyes from the fact of armed insurrection. This was an armed mob that attacked the American seat of government at a critical moment in their work completing the choice of an elected leader, with the intention of reversing the result of an election. It was an attack on American government, using force. That is a big thing. The 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor targeted a military installation 5,000 miles from the seat of government; this was an attack on the seat of government itself.

Of course, the complication is that Pearl Harbor was an attack by foreigners; this was an attack by Americans following a speech by the American president. He wound them up telling them "Republicans are constantly fighting like a boxer with his hands tied behind his back. It’s like a boxer. And we want to be so nice. We want to be so respectful of everybody, including bad people. And we’re going to have to fight much harder. And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore."

The narrative Americans get from Republicans is a subordinate clause, and then the real message: Yes, a few extremists in the Capitol mob were wrong, but the Capitol invasion is reasonable and just because the participants--and millions of other good Americans--feel seething rage. 

The primary amplifier of Trump's message is Fox News.

Fox's Steve Doocy said, 
But here's the thing. Those people were so frustrated because they had been told by the President of the United States that the election was stolen from him and the system was rigged against him. Uh, other Republicans did win, but it was rigged against him, so that's why they were frustrated. So, ultimately, he--he incited them to go down to Congress, uh, yesterday, and give 'em a piece of your mind--and they did that--except Congress had evacuated so instead some people looted and it was declared "a riot" by the police.

Fox's Brian Kilmeade put it this way:
I think Americans, I think Republicans can be forgiven for the skepticism, because whether or not an election was rigged, it certainly feels like society is rigged right now, from the complete squelching of dissent, on college campuses, inside the media institutions, to being lied to about the Hunter Biden story, to watching President Trump impeached, every step of the way watching President Trump impeached--his legitimacy questioned--you deal with that, not just four years but decades. You have to think, if not an election, an entire society is rigged against people who hold my values, and at some point you begin to understand that kind of skepticism.

 

Fox's Pete Hegseth said,

I talked to a lot of [the Capitol rioters.] They were hopeful that something could be done, but most of them acknowledged it wasn't going to happen. There were there to support the President of the United States and defend our republic and stand up and say "I just want a fair shake." I understand what this country represents. I see how the left is trying to tear it down. And I see one man in Donald Trump who has been willing to fight undeterred the poisons of political correctness, expose the media for what it is, a left wing cabal completely silencing communication across the board. They told us Russia was the biggest problem we had for four years--until they dropped it. And it was exposed for being totally false. So you don't have to believe the election was stolen to know that the system has begun to undercut people who love our country. That's what they were there for. 


One way for Americans to understand Fox anchors--and Franklin Graham, in yesterday's post--is to see them as partisan business-people, each working to motivate and preserve a paying audience. Graham is in the religion business; Fox in the advertising business. They will say what needs to be said. How crazy for Hegseth to complain that he completely silenced across the board. He is on TV!  And isn't Kilmeade doing dissent right then, and didn't he and other Fox hosts help Trump to question Obama's legitimacy?

What are these people thinking?  

Some of it is tribal, their leader-hero screwed up, but their instinct is to rally behind him. Stand by your man. Some of it is partisan; Republicans are Republicans. Some of it is the bigger issue of resentment that Trump has spoken to for five years. It has been nurtured and grown into seething rage sufficient that thousands of people gathered with weapons and banners to carry out a revolt against their own government. 

They resent the changes that are happening in the modern world. They are being displaced as the default "regular" Americans. They are one of many now, not unquestioned in place solely on top of the pyramid of "normal" and privilege. The country is more urban, more cosmopolitan, more diverse. Power is shared more broadly, including among people who many Americans thought of as outsiders and marginalized. Now they fear that they--a heterosexual White married Christian--are maybe the outsiders. They aren't, but they fear it and they see change happening and they observe the left as pushing the change. They are pushing back.

The times are a-changing and a lot of people are uncomfortable with that-- uncomfortable enough that they would destroy America's government to "take back the country." Trump said they were right to do it. It was fighting back. Trump will make America great again.

And so we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.



8 comments:

Art Baden said...

I am shocked, just shocked, that you would assert that the glorious patriotic MAGA movement, our brave Senators Cruz and Harley, the FOX truth tellers, that man of God Franklin Graham, and our beloved President, defender of the faith, are only in it for the money?

Rick Millward said...

"an entire society is rigged against people who hold my values."

That's the lie.

This morning American patriot and statesman Chris Christie stated that Republicans "have to stand by their principles", which leaves me asking, "Tell me again, what are they?". We keep hearing over and over the lie (Big Lie) that in some way certain Americans are being cheated.

How and by whom? Democrats? Hardly. But part of the lie is that Democrats favor African Americans to the disadvantage of others, giving them "free stuff" which apparently is being taken directly out of their garages in the dark of night. That's enough to generate the kind of outrage we saw last week, enough to start a "civil war".

Now some of these folks are propagating the lies for money, to be sure, and as far as I can tell that's the main Republican principle at play.

Art Baden said...

Here you go, Rick,
Republican Principles:
1. The needs of the rich and powerful must be met,
2. See 1 above

Rick Millward said...

"1. The needs of the rich and powerful must be met."

If so, what are those needs?

Mediaeval society was basically two tiered; nobles and peasants. Nobles had wealth and status, peasants, basically nothing...maybe a donkey. The system was enforced by violence, with religion providing a buffer; nobles were chosen by God.

Fast forward 500 years, still basically the same system, but some ideas have gotten traction; "all men are created equal", etc. If any one thing has been a constant in this period it has been the advancement of basic human rights, and the resistance from the established order.

The so called "middle class" sees itself aligned with the nobles but John Lennon expressed it in "Working Class Hero":

"And you think you're so clever and classless and free
But you're still f***ing peasants as far as I can see"

Diane Newell Meyer said...

Several articles have recently been published showing that it is not so much the poor working (or not working) class who are supporting trump, but instead it is those with some affluence and middle class status who are outraged and afraid of losing their privilege. It was mostly white middle aged, middle class men, (and some women) who attended the rallies and capitol building assault. They flew in first class and stayed at expensive hotels.

Of course many of these people do not realize that they are within a couple of paychecks of losing it all, including their homes, health insurance and their fancy vehicles. That is what should cause them to be outraged.

John C said...

Peter identified the dangerous direction of this movement back the 2016 Primaries when Trump annihilated everyone else on his ticket. Peter said that he "delegitimized" them as leaders, but then welcomed back those like Cruz who slithered back to follow him. Throughout Trump's "reign" he has used the delegitimization tactic as his hammer to great effect, including delegitimization of facts - thereby creating a whole new reality for his followers and enablers. It turns out delegitimating not that hard to do (and is now in the GOP playbook), and more dangerously it leads to contempt and hatred for "the other". Conspiratorial mindsets are fertile ground of the gullible. Even remote plausibility (e.g. Pizza-gate/sex traffic?) quickly turns to "facts" and it spirals down from there.

Many are shocked and surprised at how far this has come; but should we be? Delegitimization ultimately denies personhood, and once that is done you can treat the "other" any way you want. Almost all genocidal horrors start that way. Jews in WWII, Tutsis by Hutus (neighbors butchering neighbor); the Rohingya today; or wars between religious sects even within the same religions.

The double-edged sword of the First Amendment is that you are free to say anything you want, including lies that will unleash the worst impulses of the masses against each other. In court, words matter, and Trump may be able to dodge legal guilt with plausible deniability; he didn't actually instruct them to ransack the Capitol and threaten lives.

It isn't "the day the music died" that has "Satan laughing with delight"

John Flenniken said...

Most people born today grew up knowing the South is Republican and Christian. The fact that the South was in the Democratic Party before 1965 is not an experience most Southern Republicans can believe. The Civil Rights Act made that change happen at lightening speed as Dixiecrats (as they were called) switched immediately to the Republican Party resulting in Johnson's famous quote "We've [Democrats] lost the South for a generation." You can draw a straight line from white resentment towards desegregation being "forced" on them at the point of a bayonet when desegregating Ol Miss to the present discontent. Unfulfilled promises of Reconstruction and everything after 1867 set in motion long memories of little slights upon little slight. As environmental and land use laws and regulations impacted rural America a new group grew up facing their loss of privilege to farm, ranch and mine as their family had for years before. Then globalization impacted the price of their products and markets driving many families from their family land as bankruptcies skyrocketed. Suddenly the Southern Democrats and the Sagebrush Rebellion joined forces as a natural fit. Heritage denied. In Wyoming, a Native American said to me; "Well, now you know how we felt being denied our ways." One protestor, in fur and buffalo horns brought that image into the Capitol Building.

With Covid19 killing more and more Americans daily, the potential for sever economic decline, continuing economic disparity, racial inequality and the rising tensions from our foreign enemies Joe Biden has a presidency in front of him that has taken on Herculean proportions. I will be watching to see how the blend of thinking and policy that come from Joe Biden, an accomplished politician and Kamala Harris, a lawyer prosecutor meld together. I'm hopeful.

TuErasTu said...

There's an obtuseness about Trump, among so many in our fair republic, that it calls to mind that brilliant Onion headline, ostensibly in a 1937 newspaper:

"German Jews Concerned about Hitler's 'Kill All Jews' Proposal."