Monday, June 1, 2020

1968. I have been here before

I am older now. I have seen this road.


It is a bad stretch, and it will get worse.

1968

From Facebook, a comment on yesterday's blog post:

     "Peter Sage, You keep posting these Pro Pig propaganda. At some point it might be that you're not looking in the mirror anymore. You are an old white guy telling a black woman, fighting for justice, what's acceptable to say. Check your privilege, my friend. Now is not the time to spread your anti-progressive, anti-change, pro Neo-liberal attitude. Do it somewhere else."

The year 1968 was a miserable year in America. 

Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy were assassinated. Urban neighborhoods were in flames from riots. The war in Vietnam escalated, and every day we got a report of more American deaths. Politics was in turmoil. The Democratic Convention turned into a police riot on the floor of the convention hall. George Wallace drew big crowds goading Blacks and college students. The generation gap between young people with long hair and their parents in the WW2 Greatest Generation was at its height. Billboards told us to cut our hair. The draft was forcing people just like me, age 18, to go fight in an immoral war.

Actually not people just like me, which was another problem. People who could go to college, and stay there making regular progress toward a degree, could get deferments and spend the war years in classrooms and newly co-ed dormitories rather than in Vietnam. Sweet duty. It accelerated a trend that would grow large in leftist politics, a division between the liberal college educated and future-prosperous leftists, and the non-college future working person. 


1968: The news was of turmoil, daily. Like today. 



News this morning
Many young politically active people of my era thought the turmoil politically useful, that we were shocking and changing America. After all, America was complacent and only turmoil would get its attention, sometimes with direct action and maybe even those urban riots. Students forcibly occupied my university's administration building--direct action. Other protests in urban, mostly Black neighborhoods, experienced fires and looting. 

College students might have gotten a clue how we appeared to the "regular Joes" from the fact that the police forces that removed the "direct action" students from the university building were rough and angry. They did not see students as fellow fighters for economic and social justice. To them we were privileged hooligans. Some of my classmates were surprised and indignant at the rough treatment.

Didn't they understand we were the "good guys" fighting for righteous causes?  

No they didn't.

1968, The "Law and Order" election. Nixon won it, a task more difficult because George Wallace won almost ten million votes and five states, running on a blunter, rougher version of the same issues as Nixon. Between the two they won 41 million votes to Hubert Humphrey's 31 million. 

It was a wipeout for the left. 

Nixon, in his convention speech said, "As we look at America, we see cities enveloped in smoke and flames. We hear sirens in the night. . . We see Americans hating each other; fighting each other; killing each other at home." He had his issue: stop the chaos.

My generation underestimated something fifty years ago, especially when we thought that urban riots and looting were sending a useful message of frustration with an unjust status quo. We underestimated the public's appetite for order.


Joe Biden has the opportunity to be the symbol of social order. This turmoil could work to his advantage because Donald Trump is so firmly temperamentally oriented toward creating disorder. He has thrived by picking fights and throwing gasoline on political fires. He has benefited from stirring the pot. He could screw this up for himself and look like part of the problem. This could--possibly--break Biden's way, but that is not the history I remember. 
Denver responds to protest riots

What I experienced was that in an era of chaos Americans move toward a political leader who speaks of using no-nonsense blunt force. Looting and arson appear to need overwhelming strength to combat them, not parsing between peaceful protest and violence. A majority of American voters think war zones require warriors, not diplomats. Amid chaotic conditions it all looks like a war zone.

The year 1968 was a miserable year for America--mitigated for me personally by my idealism, my youth, great music, and a zeitgeist that assured me that we young people were changing the world, and everything would be great. 

It wasn't great. The protests, once they got out of control, which they quickly did, were scaring people, so they did what a majority of scared people do: they called the police.








7 comments:

Anonymous said...

The cause is justice! The optics are bad! Even the people involved are stunned at the damage and weep for their cause, dashed by "a few" who made their noble march appear to be a craven image of hating the system and everything standing around them. These riots have changed peoples minds in a way unintended. As usual, the further you are away from the street and survey the damage there is little doubt left in your mind that these are not the people you want to support or the direction they want you to take. The vote this fall will be along those lines too.

Michael Trigoboff said...

https://youtu.be/SHhrZgojY1Q

Thad Guyer said...

"Riots by the Poor and Oppressed Always Fail"

America has a stunningly long list of riots throughout our history. Most white Boomers recall 1968 anti-war riots and Chicago Democratic Convention as paramount because we had a life and death personal stake in those-- avoiding getting killed by the Vietnam draft. I refused to leave my Miami Beach lifeguard job for college, so I got drafted into Army infantry right after Chicago. But with a little nudge we Boomers can also recover memories of the "Long Hot Summer of 1967" with over 100 race riots, and then 15 more major race riots following MLK's assassination. By 1965, my dad was sympathetic to blacks and MLK-- until the burning and looting after the assassination. He similarly condemned anti-war violence by white college students. But with never ending violence and the breakdown of law and order, Nixon was his choice over what he considered to be a flock of violence-tolerating Democrats.

As a Boomer, I have learned that the two things riots by the poor and oppressed achieve is wrecking minority neighborhoods, and bolstering the political careers of leaders who take a hard stance against them. Indulging rioters and looters is a sure recipe for losing majority support. The winning candidate may (but need not) express support for the causes of justice by peaceful protestors, but he or she must unequivocally condemn those who riot and loot.

Joe Biden is failing this test. In fact, he fails almost every race test. First, with commentators saying every night of the riots that "for years anybody could see this black rage coming", what does Biden do? He runs against three highly qualified black leaders, Kamala Harris, Corey Booker, and Deval Patrick. That message was unequivocal-- "I am more qualified and electable than any black candidate." Second, Biden tells a black journalist that if he has doubts about voting for Biden, then he "ain't black". A white man is allowed to say that to a black man, on what planet, and what's next, colloquial use of the N word? Third, right before the riots Biden said that while he is going to pick a woman, he was not yet committed to a minority VP. What message does all of this conduct send to blacks? Certainly not hope, self-esteem or feelings that things are changing.

But Biden saved the worst yet until Friday and today when fending off sustained "pushing" by black leaders for Obama-Biden having done so little for blacks, and Biden publishing nothing concrete to help them. Quoting 19th Century Danish theologian Soren Kierkegaard (whose earliest political writing attacked women's liberation-- so weird!), Biden explained today that the aftermath of the police murder of George Floyd shows that all whites are racists:

"Ordinary folks who don’t think of themselves as having a prejudiced bone in their body, don’t think of themselves as racist, have kind of had the mask pulled off.

On Friday, he said all whites are complicit not just in the racism but in the violence too:

"With our complacency, our silence, we are complicit in perpetuating these cycles of violence."

In neither speech did he condemn the violence, rioting and looting. Instead, his campaign was forced to issue a brief and equivocal statement which, as the NYT characterizes it, "somewhat shifted his unapologetic tone." See New York Times, "Joe Biden Listens to Anguish at a Black Church in Delaware" (June 1, 2020).

To any politically attuned Boomer, it is absurd that Biden does not forcefully condemn the violence, rioting and looting. He is positioning himself to leave us to a second Trump term. I hope and think there is at least a small chance that we will dump him at the convention-- without riots.

Andy Seles said...

Peter, "If you can remember anything about the sixties, you weren't really there." (Paul Kantner, LOL).

So, Nixon got elected because of the weak-kneed, mostly white middle-class who felt their property was being threatened? Guess that pretty much sums up America's priorities: Law and order first...which explains why neo-cons, neo-fascists and neo-liberals alike have supported the militarization and funding of police departments to the detriment of other public services. A question we may want to ask is, "have we reached a tipping point where the bourgeoisie has been so decimated that they are no longer willing to support the 'professionals,' let alone the oligarchs, that choose, for example, space exploration, over feeding the masses?"

"Tin soldiers and Trump is coming,
We’re finally on our own.
This summer I hear the drumming,
More dead before the vote." (sung to the tune of "Ohio" written 50 years ago by Neil Young)

Andy Seles

Ralph Bowman said...

Not 1968

This is a replay of 1965 and 1967?
Black riots 1965 Watts riot over a traffic stop. 1967 Detroit Riot over the police raiding an unlicensed after hours bar. 1967 Newark riots over cops beating of a Black cab driver plus the other 14 cities that had riots the same year...Blacks and cops.

I worked with a salesman who was a cop during the Detroit riots who told me “we targeted the drug dealers , killed them and threw their bodies into the sewer system”.

Today’s riots may expose the law and order people enforcing the will of the 1%. No idealism here; maybe among the white youth supporting Black Lives Matter. Middle class Blacks expounding the bad, bad, bad then falling back into “all get along”. However, suddenly one of them tells their story of being pulled over, being humiliated by white privilege. Poverty, broken schools, bad air, outsiders. The American Dream dismissed. This is deeper than a rap, hip hop, taking the knee by a sports figure.
Standing around waiting for something to happen. Over there a burning car. Smashed window. Shop lifting. Graffiti. Flash bang. Rubber bullet hits an exposed throat. Hands up. Chant. What is actually happening? Nothing in two months. Covid riot tee shirts. Flash bang fireworks for the Fourth. New building investments. Tax breaks for the new investors. Gentrification. Removal.
OR bigger forces at work?

Andy Seles said...

Quick true story for a reality check regarding what we really have to fear:

A couple of years ago, right after Trump's election, a friend of mine, while in Stamford Ct., noticed that the new Trump tower had been completed. He'd been a Hillary supporter and thought he'd check out the hotel. He walked in, approached the concierge and asked if he could "just look around." "Why?" he was asked.
"I just want to check out 'enemy territory," he replied with a laugh.
He walked around the foyer for a while and then left (you probably know what's coming).
He walked a block or so to the steps of the neighborhood library where he was accosted in public by four armed police officers. He was frisked and detained for a half hour and released. Three months later an FBI agent visited his home and told him that, without his knowledge, he had been under surveillance for the last three months and that he was now "cleared." While he had protested against the Vietnam and Iraq wars, he had no arrest record...not even traffic violations.

Andy Seles

John C said...

Peter
Not sure I agree with your premise. The anti-war efforts of 60's were seen as hippies against "The Establishment". Hardhats beat up protesters. the Peace Sign was called the footprint of the American Chicken. This is different. The protests and marches today are multiethnic, multicultural, even multigenerational. Middle aged white women are beat up by WTO-styled storm-trooper thugs. Ordinary people are more frightened of the police than the protesters.

The classic distinction between uncertainty and risk is that risk is calculable, and uncertainty is not. With all due respect, I would say with today's proliferation of information technology (Sele's story above) that knows no borders nor limits actors; today's multi-generational, multicultural demographic, a jobs-economy in tatters and a Machiavellian-embodied "leader"; I'd say there are enough variables between now and what you saw in the 60's to make mere correlations much less causal relationships valid. too many variables. It's all just speculation.