Thursday, August 10, 2023

Covid assessment: A physician looks back

"We got it right and we got it wrong."

December, 2020. A physician warned us:

   "Our hospitals, doctors, and nurses are at the breaking point. Clinicians are angry and frustrated at reckless virus- spreaders who whine about masks. 
     Will you agree not to get treated if you get COVID?"


In the first months of the Covid pandemic America's medical community and public health authorities were feeling their way. Something big was happening. People were dying, but we weren't clear yet what it was, how it was spread, who was at risk, whether there were long-term consequences after the original Covid infection, and what were the tradeoffs between infection control and business-as-usual personal freedom. 

College classmate Eliot Nierman, M.D., is back with a view of our medical response to Covid, now with the perspective of time. His prior post got widespread circulation by readers of this blog. It warned that the country's hospitals were filling up with people who weren't taking Covid seriously enough. He recently retired from his long career as a Professor of Clinical Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania Medical School.  


Guest Post by Eliot Nierman

We got it right and we got it wrong.

Science is messy. Discoveries and making use of knowledge is not a straight path. It is full of twists and turns, dead ends, wrong moves and reversals. For the first time I am aware of, the general public got to view this confusing reality first hand with the miracle that was the scientific and medical response to Covid. Why do I say miracle when there were mistakes and so many died? Millions of lives were saved due to discoveries and advances in treatments that usually take years and decades but with Covid only took weeks and months. 
In 1976, when I was a medical intern in Philadelphia, there was a severe outbreak of a respiratory disease amongst a group at a Legionnaire’s convention. Even though it was caused by a bacteria which is much easier to discover than a virus, it took six months to identify the causative bacteria, a previously unrecognized bacteria that had in retrospect caused outbreaks at least 20 years earlier in the 1950s! AIDS was first clinically observed in the U.S. in 1981. The cause was unknown. It was not even initially known if it was an infection. The virus that causes HIV was isolated two years later. It was not until 1985 that there was agreement that the virus isolated by different researchers was the same and the cause of AIDS. Unfortunately, as is the case with Covid and global warming, there is “HIV denialism” and conspiracy theories. As in the case with Legionnaire’s, in retrospect there were previous unrecognized AIDS cases at least as early as 1959 in the Belgian Congo and in the 1960’s in the U.S.! In 1985, the first test for HIV was developed and in 1987, the first antiretroviral drug, AZT, that partially treated HIV became available. In 1995, effective treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy became available. There is still no vaccine for AIDs.

Covid was first identified in China in December, 2019. The virus was identified in January, 2020 and tests were developed within a couple of months. The previously existing antiviral drug Remdesevir was found to be of value in severely ill patients in 2020. Vaccines were first available in December, 2020. In 2021 an oral antiviral protease inhibitor, Paxlovid became available. What had previously taken years was accomplished in about a year or even less. Amazingly fast and an incredible success story!

The initial approach to Covid was epidemiological, an attempt to prevent the medical system from being overwhelmed. This was successful in saving lives --  as shown in comparison to the Swedish approach to not have restrictions --  and in keeping the medical system from being overwhelmed. However there was a huge economic and social cost. Mistakes were made in terms of initial recommendations to not wear masks (in part to save them for medical personnel) and then to recommend wearing them outside. Fortunately our economy now seems to have largely recovered except for some continued mild inflation. In the past couple of months, U.S. mortality rate finally decreased back to pre-Covid levels, i.e., no excess Covid deaths. 


2020

The biggest mistake was the prolonged overemphasis on remote schooling. Children have been much less vulnerable to Covid and have been shown to not be major vectors in the spread of Covid. This was recognized early enough in the pandemic that the damage should have been limited by changing to in-person-schooling-with-masks much earlier. Unfortunately, politics and vested interest groups prevented the earlier implementation of more enlightened approaches and the cost in lost learning as measured on reading and math tests has been huge. The other big tragedy has been the conspiracy theories and the politicization of vaccination resulting in hundreds of thousands lives lost that should have been saved. We physicians met way too many severely ill unvaccinated patients who asked to be vaccinated, sadly when it was too late to have any benefit.

Science is objective and nonpartisan  We have all greatly benefitted from the advancements due to it even when it challenged what we thought was how the world worked. When we try to pick and choose conclusions based on our beliefs, we lose those benefits and return society back to the times when ill-humors caused disease and blood-letting was the treatment  Anyone who wants that approach is welcome to it. Just don’t expect the rest of us to suffer with you.

 



[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to: https://petersage.substack.com and subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]



19 comments:

Peter c said...

Anytime you mix politics with anything, whether it be science or religion or whatnot, it always turns out wrong. Trump tried to tell us that Covid was not any worse than the common flu. Lots of his followers believed him and died. Oops. (I know, it is hard to feel sorry for them.) People drank Drano. They died, too. Scientists are not always right. That's why there is always peer review. That leads to more research and better results. It's a system that works.

I once read that some Congressman in North Carolina said that solar panels were bad because they took energy away from the sun. Huh? When it comes to science, politicians are not always the best source.

Fun fact: 95% of those that died from Covid were over 50.

More: Most of the people who died from the Spanish Flu were between the ages of 20-30. That's because people at that age have a strong immune system. Their immune system attacked the virus so hard, it killed them. Older people with a much weaker immune system were not attacked as strongly so, even though they got sick too, they didn't die. See, being older isn't always so bad after all.

Mike Steely said...

The nation now has a severe shortage of doctors and nurses. One of the reasons was the difficulty and frustration of treating so many anti-maskers and anti-vaxxers. Here in Medford, conspiracy theorists demonstrated outside the hospital while inside, the doctors and nurses worked their asses off and put their own lives at risk trying to save the victims of COVID, many of them unvaccinated.

One of the things we got wrong was failing to set up ‘alternate reality’ clinics, where whackos could be treated by their peers with ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, Clorox or the quack cure du jour. It might have spared overworked hospitals some of the misery of dealing with the countless thousands of anti-vaxxers who died of stupidity.

Michael Trigoboff said...

If the establishment acted with integrity, there would not be such widespread distrust of them.

They initially told us not to wear masks. There were “good intentions“ behind that, but it was still a stupid lie and people noticed

They told us for years that the “lab leak“ hypothesis was not only wrong, but “racist“. In part, they seem to have done this in reaction to Trump. The majority of the country, which is not as reactive as the media elites, noticed the lack of straightforward truthfulness.

Things like this erode trust, and rightfully so.

The establishment needs to tell us all of the truth, all of the time. There may have been a time when paternalistic lying was a workable strategy for the elites; that time is long gone.

Mc said...

Michael,
Viruses evolve. Our scientific understanding improves.

It's not a lie when the facts change. Unfortunately, some politicians care not about the truth or people. You seem to give them a pass.

Millions died because of the MAGA lies. That is also a fact. Trump supporters made up the majority of deaths, studies have shown.

Think about the previous pandemic, H1N1, and how that was successfully managed during thr Obama administration.

Mc said...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2022/06/06/people-living-in-pro-trump-counties-more-likely-to-die-from-covid-study-finds/

This is also evolution. Believing political BS is bad for your health.

M2inFLA said...

1. Masks only restrict the emissions of mucus for those coughing or hacking. They never had the ability to filter out the virus.

We wore masks.

We also easily smelled tobacco and marijuana smoke, as well as smoke frome fires and cooking odors while wearing them.

The airborne COVID virus is much smaller in size and will not be filtered by a mask, unless clinging to some coughers spittle.

2. Our political leaders to this day are to be blamed for much of the misinformation, including booth D and R leaders and candidates. It didn't help when both parties misled us all


My wife and I are fully vaccinated several times over. Only now we are finding the genetic advantages we both had.

Still COVID free, and we traveled the world during the pandemic. We thank our good health and active life.

Dave said...

Science does its best to seek facts, not beliefs. When something is presented it must be confirmed. Mankind’s great strides have come about through the scientific method really since about 1600 awaiting the great Issac Newton birth in 1643. Does science make assumptions that prove to be wrong? Yes but it corrects those mistakes when fact suggests otherwise. So the medical professionals were wrong about some things, they we’re doing the best they could with the facts available to them. If only politicians would follow the scientific method. I view scientists as our true heroes.

Mike Steely said...

Trying to address a pandemic caused by a novel virus was well-described as trying to fly a plane while building it. When enough masks became available, credible medical, media and government sources repeatedly urged the public to use them and provided the rationale. When vaccines became available, the same sources repeatedly urged the public to take advantage of them, providing the data on their safety and efficacy. It’s pretty ridiculous to then blame those sources for the ignorance of those who preferred to swallow crackpot conspiracy theories.

We’re living in the Disinformation Age. People need to learn how to tell fact from fiction or we’re liable to get an out-of-his-mind entertainer for president. Oops, we already did.

Michael Trigoboff said...

There was never scientific disproof of the lab-leak hypothesis. Instead, there was a PR campaign to condemn the hypothesis as either “racist” or somehow anti-science.

The correct scientific position early on would have been, “We don’t know.” But there were thumbs on the scale that had nothing to do with science.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Mc,

I do not give the anti-vaccine morons a pass. Let them compete for a Darwin Award, and let natural selection take its course. I feel bad for the people they mislead, but it was our self-discrediting national establishment that created the opening for these idiot demagogues to exploit.

They are not the ones who discredited our national establishment. The establishment did that to itself.

Mike said...

Let’s get real. At the end of the day, the origin of the pandemic is a scientific question. Virologists who study pandemic origins say there is "very convincing" data and "overwhelming evidence" pointing to an animal origin. In particular, scientists published two extensive, peer-reviewed papers in Science in July 2022 (The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan was the early epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic | Science), offering the strongest evidence to date that the COVID-19 pandemic originated in animals at a market in Wuhan, China.

Of course, that conflicts with the wingnut conspiracy theory that Dr. Fauci and the Chinese created the virus in the Wuhan lab and unleashed it on the world, so don’t expect them to be swayed by science.

Mc said...

Climate change makes us more susceptible to zoonotic diseases. The natural buffers between humans and disease-carrying wildlife are being eroded.

We will have another pandemic.

Mc said...

Who is this "national establishment" bogeyman?

The problem has been (and will continue to be) people who deny science and refuse to respect others' fact-based actions. During the pandemic that problem was overwhelmingly caused by conservatives.

Just as with reducing gun violence, thoughts and prayers are useless.

Religion is for people who don't understand science.

Mc said...

Ok, next time you go to the dentist or have surgery tell them to not wear their masks.

In addition to reducing COVID spread, masks also reduced levels of flu activity.

Mc said...

No, the political spectrum is not equally to blame for COVID misinformation.

The misinformation was overwhelmingly coming from the conservative side.

See link above regarding higher death rates in Trump-supporting areas.

And of course, Rush Limbaugh who also mocked prevention, claiming falsely there were 18 viruses prior to COVID-19.

Trying to "bothsidism" the pandemic deaths is lying.

Trump failed this country in so many ways, as Republicans always do.

M2inFLA said...

Mc,

You misunderstand my comment about masks. Doctors and dentists wear masks to prevent their spittle from being inhaled by their patients, and to reduce their own inhaling of their patient's spittle emissions.

A mask doesn't stop smoke or odors, or freeflying, airborne virii.

As for denying effective vaccines, please review D candidate responses during the 2029 campaign, and the R candidates and president accelerating development of the vaccines.

And Fauci initially denied gain of function research and the funding that the US supplied to Wuhan and others.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Who is this "national establishment" bogeyman?

The mainstream media; leading science organizations, like the NIH and NSF; academia.

The usual suspects…

Michael Trigoboff said...

Dr Fauci was apparently instrumental in funding “gain of function” research on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Once the pandemic started, he worked hard to obscure and obfuscate his involvement. It doesn’t take a whole lot of deep thought to see why he might have done that.

Look up Peter Daszack and EcoHealth Alliance if you’re curious.

I will repeat that we don’t know for sure the exact origin of the pandemic. “Don’t know” means that all the possibilities, including a leak from the Wuhan laboratory, are still on the table.

Mike said...

Yes, Michael, we all know that Dr. Fauci was conspiring with the Chinese to create a deadly new biological superweapon. If you want to arrest him, I hear he's hiding in the basement of Comet Ping Pong Pizza with all those Democrat Satanist pedophile sex-traffickers.