Monday, June 12, 2023

Trump can’t let go

Shouted Question from reporter: Why did you keep the documents?

Trump: This is a witch-hunt.

There is no shortage of song lyrics I could use to headline a blog post on Trump and his documents. 

Cake left in the rain
Much popular music is about loss and heartache.  Sometimes it is heartache felt by others, because by the time the lover gets to Phoenix she'll be rising, finding the note on the door, then she will call and he won't answer, and by that evening she will cry. How delicious for him to imagine. There is loss one feels oneself, like a ruined cake in the rain in McArthur Park, and he will never have that recipe again, oh no.

My career as a Financial Advisor taught me that clients feel remorse from loss far beyond the joy they feel when investments gain value. It is asymmetric. Money -- or value on an account statement -- whatever the high water mark, is theirs, in hand. Getting something equivalent -- money or a new lover -- have a one-fifth, not one-for-one, emotional impact. 

There is a lot of speculation right now about Trump's motives. Why did he take documents with him when he left the White House? At first it might have been honest muddle in the rush of leaving, mixing clearly personal stuff --  newspaper clippings, a passport, and Trump business documents -- with public records. Sloppiness, distraction, and ignorance are easy explanations. The papers of Joe Biden and Mike Pence are in that category.  Each promptly gave up public records when they were discovered.

But not Trump. Even with his history of having hammered Hillary Clinton on her emails and classified documents, he hung onto public documents in the face of increasing demand including letters, subpoenas, and searches. How strange. Trump persisted when it made no sense. He couldn't display what he had. They were now "hot." His possessing them was proof of a crime. He had to pay lawyers to help him try to hang on. He had to communicate instructions in code to tell confidantes to remove top secret documents, which is why he made the "plucking" face and gesture we learned about in the indictment. 

Trump did not want to answer the question of why. Some pundits suggest espionage or a money grift with the Russians or Saudis. Trump is a deal-maker. Jared Kushner had already cashed in with Qatar having overpaid to bail out his impending disaster on the 666 5th Avenue building, and then the $2 billion Saudi investment in his new hedge fund. Trump believed that Joe Biden and Hunter Biden surely cashed in themselves. Trump's documents might be valuable future currency for the Trump family. That would be a motivation.

I don't know Trump's motivation, but I suggest a simpler answer, consistent with Occam's Razor. Air Supply sang it:

I want you always to remember. . . 
I can't let go
I can't let go
I can't let go
You're a part of me, don't you know?

There is no need to over-complicate this. Trump has the simple human emotion of wanting to hold on to stuff. It is irrational and powerful. Trump, like Louis XIV of France, mixed the personal with the title. I am the state, the King said. Trump said he alone could fix things. Trump held in his hands the fruits of his domaine, including its prized documents. It is the hoarding instinct. Below is my favorite cartoon from The New Yorker.

A great many people aged in their 70s and beyond bury themselves in stuff. They live as empty nesters in huge homes so they can keep the objects in their lives. They don't want to lose stuff that they held in their hands. I watched clients make self-destructive, expensive, and irrational decisions about their living arrangements based around the fact that they simply could not bear to discard books they won't re-read, clothes they cannot fit, wedding gifts from decades prior they do not use, rooms they do not enter, trophies and plaques and certificates from achievements long past, places where their children slept decades prior. 

We don't need to stretch for claims of espionage dead drops to pass nuclear secrets. It is all too simple and common. Trump is no different from the old man holding the walker. He just isn't ready to let go of stuff.



[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to https://petersage.substack.com and subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]



18 comments:

Mike Steely said...

The charges against Trump are really quite serious, but as you pointed out yesterday, they pale in comparison to his coup attempt. In spite of his blatant criminality, Republicans are attacking the DOJ instead of him. Even Trump’s rivals in the primary depict his indictment as persecution. The reason, of course, is because the vast majority of Republicans still support Trump regardless of the facts.

Some may propose complex sociological reasons for this, such as wokeness, globalist elites, etc., but I suggest a simpler answer, consistent with Occam’s Razor: the GOP has gone insane. Trump is a psycho and his supporters are as crazy as he is. Hillary Clinton was too right – they’re a basket of deplorables.

Rick Millward said...

If that's the reason, and I'll grant it's a possibility, then he should argue an insanity defense.

If you are right, then it's colossally stupid. What is puzzling to me is that more enablers are not being held accountable for their actions. Everyone involved knew they were breaking the law, starting with the Chief of Staff and on down, yet only the valet (the valet!) is being charged, for lying.

Not only that, but this was certain to be exposed at some point.

Have they all have traded testimony for immunity? It looks like it. So much for loyalty. Makes you wonder if someone dropped a dime. Now there's something to speculate about!

Jonah Rochette said...

These commenter like song lyrics:

Memories they can't be boughten
They can't be won at carnivals for free
Well it took me years
To get those souvenirs
And I don't know how they slipped away from me
--John Prine, 1972

Doe the Unknown said...

People buy and keep big houses as a wealth display. Obviously, there are things about big houses that make them more comfortable; spaciousness is a selling point. But a couple of empty nesters in their late seventies in a 3000 or 4000 square foot house with four bedrooms are telling you something about their standard of living, even though they probably don't say so in words. This sort of wealth display is characteristic of the baby boom generation to a greater extent than for previous generations, as demonstrated by the steady increase in the size of homes built over the last fifty or so years. If one wants to downsize at retirement, there are plenty of places to go. However, it's been said that home builders in southern Oregon build ample affordable housing--affordable for California retirees who can buy a third again as much house here as the one they sold in California.
As for Occam's razor and former president Trump's pending federal charges: He thinks he has the power to do what he did. He plans to be president again. Whatever "rule of law" might mean for Democrats and others who oppose him, he gets to define what it means for himself and his sychophants; for him, that's the point of having power--you get to do what you want. Will the jury defer to his claims of power? Don't assume at this point that the trial will be as easy as Bill Barr says.

Dave said...

Trump doesn’t feel good unless he is testing the boundaries of what he can get away with. Not supposed to look at the eclipse, but he can because he is Donald Trump. Not supposed to grope women, but he can because he is Donald Trump. Not supposed to…has quite a long list.

Anonymous said...

As President, Trump had legal authority to classified information. Joe Biden did not.

Why did Joe Biden ILLEGALLY have classified documents stored in 5 different locations? Joe Biden didn't have a legal right to those documents. Joe Biden is a criminal.

John F said...

In the situation Peter Sage describes with aid of the cartoon, an old man hoarding stuff like an Army souvenir of a live grenade, the State must step in and deal with the situation that no longer resembles a stuffed and messy garage. At times like this the state must take action like simply calling the bomb squad to remove the war souvenir and adding a caution that he had better not be withholding similar war souvenirs. The State must act justly if the old man shows up at the neighborhood picnic with another live grenade, at that point, we have a crime and the law must act.

In the case with Donald J. Trump's retention of presidential papers and national secrets, he has attempted to impress a group of photo journalists by waving around a secret document of our county's planning for a potential plan to use military force to protect our nation and/or our interests in the world from an aggressor. Tantamount to walking into every domicile and business in our republic with a live grenade.

Yes he is an old man that has shown himself to be self-absorbed, vengeful and narcissistic to the point of all disregard for everything and anything that might harm the citizens in our republic so long as it does not harm him. This tendency of Donald Trump is reason alone to keep him from the presidency again.

Now the prosecution's job now is to charge the offense(s) as the court would if he is the old man at the picnic with a live grenade. Jack Smith has clear evidence to present to the jury to deliberate on the nature of the crime presented and to consider whether or how the court should treat this old foolish, narcissistic old man. We must trust our legal system to function and wait for a verdict. Until that moment when the jury renders their verdict Donald J. Trump is to be presumed innocent.

Mike Steely said...

The anonymous comment pointed out only one of Trump’s defenses: Whaddabout Biden? There’s also the Whaddabout Hillary Clinton and Whaddabout Mike Pence defense, not to mention Deep State, Hoax and WITCH HUNT!!!! These have obvious appeal to his cult of whackos, but I doubt if they’ll fly in court, even with Aileen Cannon presiding.

John F said...

Reply to Anonymous -

Merrick Garland has appointed Robert Hur, a one time US Attorney appointed by Donald Trump, Special Counsel to investigate the situation regarding Joe Biden's handling of classified documents as vice president.

So Biden is being treated exactly as was Donald J Trump with the notable exception that Biden remains completely candid with the investigators allowing searches, returning documents and questioning without needing to issue subpoenas or impanel a grand jury. We still don't know whether there will be charging recommendation regarding Joe Biden's case as the investigation continues.

I cannot emphasize enough the difference in these three cases, Trump's foot dragging and refusal to return documents to the National Archives when requested; and, the contrast with Mike Pence and Joe Biden throwing open the doors and making people available for the FBI searches wherever the led.

At present Investigation into Mike Pence's holding but returning classified documents has concluded with no charges filed, Biden's investigation continues, and Donald Trump is indicted for willful retention of classified documents and presidential papers that don't belong to him as a citizen. Furthermore the case will be heard initially by Judge Cannon as Trump appointed Federal judge. Trump is not being charged with witchcraft he is being charged with violations of the espionage act and obstruction of justice. Please read the indictment published online.

Ed Cooper said...

It's simply not possible to have a conversation with anybody this wired into FAUX and NewsMax or Breitbart.

Ed Cooper said...

Thank you, John F. A sincere qyestuion; Do you think anybody besides the large majority if the readers of this Blog will heed your cautions as re: President Biden, or even Mike Pence ?

Anonymous said...

Clearly, Trump put such great stock in building a Presidential Library of apt stature that he decided to act as his own archivist, securing his vital papers. That’s your answer.

Michael Trigoboff said...

I have some questions:

Given the way our legal system works, can Trump be tried and convicted before the 2024 election, or will he be able to drag the legal process out well past that date?

Suppose Trump is convicted before the 2024 election, but runs and wins the election anyway. Will he then govern the country from the Oval Cell? Will he be able to pardon himself?

The ship of state is setting sail for uncharted waters. As the old Chinese curse says, “May you live in interesting times.“

Mc said...

The POTUS cannot pardon themselves.

A conviction of anything that doesn't involve sedition does not disqualify one from holding the office.

Mc said...

This is worse than Watergate.

Nixon faced only obstruction of justice, and not involving national security.

Trump likely sold or hoped to sell the documents.

Mike Steely said...

Speaking of the ship of state, those who believed America so exceptional that it can't happen here must have forgotten about the 'unsinkable' Titanic.

The differences between the Biden and Trump cases are so well-documented that people still making the false equivalence are obviously being deliberately obtuse and will never be convinced by facts.

My question is, will the Secret Service have to go to prison with him?

Anonymous said...

Michael T: “Justice delayed is justice denied.” You would think that 18 months is plenty of time to get the case tried, given the specificity of the indictment. However, you are correct, Trump’s strategy will be to run out the clock. And to constantly fund raise on “witch-hunt,” defund the FBI and victimhood. Not the best look for a front runner…?

Ed Cooper said...

I strongly suspect Prince Mohammed bin Bonesaw has copies, if not original of all the juiciest parts concerning Iran and or Israel. Jared Kushner didn't get $2 Billion because he's some kind if investment genius.