Thursday, March 17, 2022

Volodymyr Zelensky and Elizabeth Cheney

Heroes show courage and fortitude against their own apparent self-interest, on behalf of something good and important.

Heroes have honor.


West Point's Cadet Honor Code: "A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do."

In the days after 911 we heard the comment about fire-fighters: "They ran toward the burning buildings." They were heroes.

The occupants of the World Trade Towers were frightened crowds, exiting the building, escaping. The firefighters moving up the stairs were doing the hard thing, trying to save lives. They honored their duty. We honor them for that.

Elizabeth Cheney--Liz--repositioned herself out of a GOP scrum of ambitious politically predictable conservatives. She is now in a position of national leadership. She stands out because she stands for something bigger than herself, and she is doing it under fire, against her apparent self-interest. She is condemned for it, but doing it anyway. It is politically dangerous for her. That is what makes her heroic.

Few readers of this blog will think that I share Liz Cheney's overall politics. I mostly do not. She was a steadfast hawkish conservative, a fossil-fuel state GOP loyalist. She is political "royalty," with a family-name brand. She elevated quickly to the number-three position in the House GOP.  She had a future as a GOP loyalist. She was not noticeably different from any other camera-seeking ambitious GOP politician, each more concerned with team spirit than with any higher principle.

We were wrong about Liz Cheney. She has principles. Something was more important to her than her re-election and continued popularity among Republicans. American democracy itself. She was an eye-witness to an effort to overturn an election. 

She could have mumbled and equivocated. It is what other "good Republicans" are doing. They say they don't completely agree with Trump's tweets and methods, maybe, but they certainly agree that a Democrat in the White House is a disaster. She could say the Trump effort to overturn the election got out of hand. It was an unfortunate misunderstandingShe could have finessed this.  

Honor sets a higher standard. "A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do."

Trump was dishonest. His actions were wrong and dangerous. She would not stand for it, nor tolerate people who do. Obeying the will of the people, expressed in elections, is the centerpiece of democratic government. She supports democracy. Period. She stands for something and won't tolerate lying about it. 

A cynic might observe that this is actually a well-disguised act of political self-interest, with Cheney playing the long game.  Perhaps she was betting Trump-worship within the GOP will exhaust itself. Possibly a tape-recording of the Zelensky-Trump phone call will emerge, and it will be obvious that Trump didn't just ask for a "favor, though," but that he really put the screws to Zelensky. Possibly Mike Pence, Pence's aides, or a legal counsel will reveal smoking-gun evidence that turns the tide of opinion. But probably not. People are "taking the Fifth" and GOP voters prefer Trump stick to his story. She was thrown out of the House leadership. She is widely, thoroughly condemned by the people who control her political future. It looks unequivocal: She is running toward the danger to American democracy. She had honor. She is a hero.

Speaking to Congress
Volodymyr Zelensky burst onto the international stage as a hero because the words attributed to him were, "I need ammunition, not a ride." He was staying, not running. The Russians were coming for him. The easy, smart thing to do would be to set up a government in exile. He would be escaping danger. His job was to be there, in danger, symbolizing the principle of Ukrainian democracy. He had honor. He is a hero

Zelensky and Cheney. Heroes.

Amid all the cynicism about politics, humans seek out authenticity and heroism. Sometimes we see it among people we agree with, sometimes with people we do not. But we recognize it and admire it. 

13 comments:

Mike said...


Honor is irrelevant to those consumed by the lust for power. One small example: Mike Pompeo graduated at the head of his class from West Point but bragged at Texas A&M that as CIA director, “We lied, we cheated, we stole.” As Secretary of State, he didn’t hesitate to dishonor the State Department with his disgraceful treatment of the former ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, whom he sacrificed to sate President Trump’s quest for dirt on Joe Biden.

Ed Cooper said...

While I will never trust Liz,Cheney as far as I can throw her, I admire her stand on the Seditionists, and agree, she's taking a huge Political risk. My hope (dim as it is) is that there are enough loyal conservatives left to split away from the Trumpistas and form a legitimate Loyal Opposition, which would not include the likes of Moscow Mitch and Kevin McCarthy.

Ed Cooper said...

Sorry, I hit enter too soon. President Zelensky, is going to go into the History Books alongside people like Winston Churchill, Abraham Lincoln and even FDR, who all held the Countries together in the face of overwhelming odds.

Rick Millward said...

There is a difference between Zelensky and Cheney and it's pretty glaring.

One is standing in opposition to her party, on one, not insignificant but only one, point: its embrace of a fascist cult of personality. The other is standing up to actual fascism, and risking his life.

I predict history will only remember one of them.

Mc said...

I don't think Cheney is a hero.
The legislation she's supported has been so awful for this country, but it's helped keep her in power.

Maybe the bar is pretty low these days.

Michael Trigoboff said...

It is starting to seem possible to me that Russia will lose this war thanks to the fighting spirit of the Ukrainian people and their peerless leader. I will be happy my bitcoins helped them a little.

I wish Biden would send the Ukrainians those MiG 29’s from Poland along with every other weapon they want.

Up Close: Road to the White House said...

REQUEST OF COMMENTERS

I enjoy comments here. Please avoid addressing other commenters. Let's use the Roberts Rules of Order system, and the one used in Parliaments. All comments are addressed to the chair. Of course, other people in the room can hear the comments, but by being addressed to the chair, not fellow legislators, the tone is less an attack and more a description.

I have stopped three different comments from going up today. Argue your point. Not with each other. The same information gets posted, but it feels more like a discussion.

Thanks. Please keep commenting.

Peter Sage

Mike said...

Those who don’t think Liz Cheney is risking her life must not be very familiar with the far-right. The Anti-Defamation League, which keeps track, attributes most politically motivated murders in the U.S. since 9/11 to far right extremists. After the 2020 election, they’ve been issuing death threats to everyone from election workers to school board members, and of course Liz Cheney. We’d be fools not to take them at their word. Jan. 6 should be all the warning we need: Don’t put anything past Trump’s chumps.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Point of order:

Thanks, Peter!

Ralph Bowman said...

Adam Kinzinger needs recognition also as politician of principal. His future is doomed. And since his career is in its early stages he can be dismissed almost immediately . Liz Cheney has brand, Adam is just a pretty face , but his military experience and a desire to set up a dignified Republican Party that has a moral stance is admirable.

Mc said...

Peter, I appreciate your blog and your attempt to moderate.

However, I'm concerned that some of what's posted will stand, no matter how wrong it may be.

I feel it's important for this crowd to call out bad information and opinions that are based on conspiracy theories.

Up Close: Road to the White House said...

Thanks, Mc.

I am fine with calling out bad information and even with disagreement. Anyone can do that, as can people who disagree with that person.

There is a format for this: All discussion is addressed to the chair. Remind ourselves of what one hears in a well run meeting locally or even in the shitshow that is sometimes the Congress. "Madam Speaker, I rise to express my concern about . . . ." It is a breach of decorum to turn to another legislator and say, "You are an idiot and dead wrong." Or even, "You are correct." There is only one "you" and it is the Chair.

The result of that is that discussion is about the subject matter, not the intelligence or virtue of the speaker of a contrary view. Please notice what I am doing here in this comment. I am not saying that any one commenter is wrong. I am not sayiing "you want this" and "you want that." I am speaking impersonally. No one person is being corrected nor need feeling he or she needs mount a defense. I am stating a goal and opinion, not challenging someone else. As soon as a point of view becomes a personal challenge to another, the goal becomes winning, not persuasion.

I want people to persuade. Then the person who had disagreed has the ability to change his or her mind. If the argument is set up as a winner and loser, then no minds can change.

Peter Sage

Low Dudgeon said...

We all agree on the essentiality of honor and truth, on the subject of Ukraine and Russia or otherwise. Today, though, good and decent and sophisticated cross-partisan American patriots have occasion to suspect the sinister influence of Russia not only on/about Ukraine once again, but likewise again on the very Paper of Record.

It may seem eons ago that the New York Times won a Pulitzer Prize it has never disavowed via ace staff reporter Walter Duranty, who assured America that mass starvations in 1930s Ukraine were a lying Western smear, and that Stalin’s purge trials were not only necessary but among the transparent and fair trials ever undertaken.

Today we learn—albeit on Page 20—that the Times is now pushing discredited lies about corrupt self-enrichment and influence-peddling by President Biden’s dirtbag son Hunter! Heck, honest intel luminaries like John Brennan and James Clapper swore on CNN and MSNBC the whole story was fake, naught but Russian disinformation.

It’s one thing for the Times to claim they’ve now “authenticated” the sleazy detrita of a man who left his own wife and kids to shack up with his dead brother’s wife and kids, before leaving them in turn for a hooker who had to sue him before he’d even acknowledge paternity for the, er, love child of that relationship. But the Biden family graft?!

These are the Bidens, not the Trumps for heaven’s sake. This s the duly-suppressed, by news media and social media, election-Eve Biden family laptop data, not the reliable, corroborated and saturation-coverage Steele dossier and Russian collusion Trump investigation. What is the New York Times thinking today? Putin’s reach is long.