Wednesday, March 2, 2022

Fog of War.

Putin says he considers Russia and Ukraine to be one country. 

No shock and awe. Yet.

No analogy or extended metaphor is perfect, but something needs explaining

Russia is invading Ukraine, but not crushing it, at least as of this morning.  As Putin describes it to the Russian public, this is more an intervention than invasion. After all, Ukraine is part of the Russian family. Ukraine was seduced into the clutches of a malevolent cult, in this case the West, and this is a rescue mission. As of now, we are not seeing massive aerial bombardment that would terrorize Ukraine and destroy its seat of government. Russia has the capacity to do it. Russia had been restrained, measured against what it could do. We were not seeing shock and awe.

That may be changing. We are hearing word of the intentional destruction of Ukraine hospitals and kindergartens. It may be true. Or not. We don't know. The Russian public heard that Ukraine crucified a three year old boy because he spoke Russian. I am skeptical of everything.

Putin outlined his understanding of the greater Russian land and people back in 2005, and he reiterated it in a speech just prior to the invasion. 

Ukraine is not just a neighboring country for us. It is an inalienable part of our own history, culture and spiritual space. Since time immemorial, the people living in the south-west of what has historically been Russian land have called themselves Russians.

Historically Ukraine is the cradle of Moscow-centered Russian civilization. In Putin's view, Ukraine was kidnapped by a suitor whose real intent was damage to Russia. The West, he said, wanted to deprive Russia of its natural borders, and forever burden it with ethnic and cultural incoherence. Putin wrote:

The Ukrainian authorities — I would like to emphasize this — began by building their statehood on the negation of everything that united us. . .. Ukraine itself was placed under external control ... a colony with a puppet regime.

He said the West engineered the ouster of Viktor Yanukovych, the Russian-leaning Ukraine president, who was replaced by European-oriented leaders. Ukraine's government is illegitimate, he tells the Russian people.

Is Putin's description objectively accurate?

Ukraine is a borderland. It is accurate and inaccurate. Some Ukrainians consider their country a sibling with Russia; others a second-cousin forced into a bad marriage. Ukraine's rural peasantry endured genocidal starvation by Stalin's policies.  Obscured by the grotesque inhumanity of Hitler's holocaust was the prior genocide carried out by Stalin. Stalin killed three million Ukrainians for the benefit of Russians elsewhere. Ukrainian farmers' food was confiscated and sold abroad to get the foreign exchange needed to build factories. He literally, intentionally, starved Ukrainians to death. Stalin and Communist Party officials justified it as the cost of creating an urban proletariate necessary to sustain a Communist revolution. A decade later Ukraine citizens fought and died in huge numbers to protect the Soviet Union from Nazi Germany. The history is complicated.

There are 200,000 Russian troops in Ukraine, but we are apparently seeing Ukraine citizen deaths in the many-hundreds, not the hundreds of thousands. Look at this bit of Twitter video. Unarmed Ukrainians mob a vehicle with Russian soldiers. Notice what the armed soldiers did when under attack. They sped away. No one was shot or run over. 

Click

Americans don't know what is true and untrue in Ukraine. That includes this video. What will be unmistakable will be shock and awe against Ukraine, if it comes. 

5 comments:

Mike said...


Based on the response of Ukrainians to Putin’s “intervention,” they don’t seem to consider themselves Russian. The question in my mind is why so many Republicans are in such awe of Putin. I guess they just like psychotic bullies.

Anonymous said...

Putin is old school. That is his problem. But he is making his problem everyone's problem. Still fighting the last war. Like the people in the South who haven't gotten over losing the Civil War. Or racists that haven't gotten over Civil Rights.

Mc said...

Truth is a war's first casualty. It's why I'm not watching much coverage (PBS only).

But don't think this is anything new.
History has shown the US also has a history of lying to its citizens to get this country in to needless wars.

Mike said...

Mc is too right. Having learned nothing from Vietnam, 'W' had no qualms about lying us into Iraq.

Sad but true: When Colin Powell gave his infamous presentation on Iraq's bogus WMDs, the UN security council covered up a tapestry reproduction of Picasso's anti-war painting "Guernica" so as not to offend American sensibilities.

Brian said...

Propaganda is a real and arguably important thing in war, and perhaps peace. I believe the US should refrain from acting materially but cannot discount the need- from a geopolitical perspective- to "prepare" a population for yet another war so close to ending the last one.

As a bystander it becomes quickly tiring to see reports of high death tolls and egregious war crimes only for them to be retracted in the following day or two.

I think I will also sit back and wait for some of this fairy dust to settle, because right now I have no idea what's really going on.