Sunday, April 5, 2020

Life is unfair. We may take meaning from that.


You don't get average. You get what you get.


     "There is a mysterious cycle in human events. To some generations much is given. Of other generations much is expected. This generation has a rendezvous with destiny."  

      FDR, July 1936, to the Democratic convention



Notice to new graduates
People alive ten years from now will likely have settled on a name for what is happening now. For us, today it is just the news, life.

The virus era might be a blip and over soon. Or, we might be the beginning of something that lasts a year, a decade, or a century. 

Under the best of circumstances it is a semi-vacation for some people, a school holiday for kids, and an inconvenience for retired people. In business and stock market news, it could be the "V-Bottom" and we are already past the worst of it, with businesses and investors anticipating a big rebound this fall. Some people are predicting that and betting that way.

Or, this might be understood as the opening moments of a worldwide catastrophe, the way 1929 is understood in relation to a dozen years of Great Depression, or 1914 or 1939 are understood as the opening moments of long wars.

This could be the beginning of an era of warfare going back to catapults throwing bodies of plague victims over walls of cities in siege. Politics by other means may now mean cyber war, power grid war, and biological war. One need not bomb a factory to shut it down. Send a virus and an enemy will shut it down themselves. Tanks and missiles are so 20th Century.

People speculate. A meme circulating is that it was an accidental escape of a virus in beta-testing, one created before the vaccine to protect the home country was ready, with secret laboratories creating economic destruction of their neighbors. It is cheaper than an aircraft carrier, and indeed the cheapest way to take out an aircraft carrier.

We will hear more of this. Suspicious minds connect dots. There was a laboratory not far from the "wet markets" in Wuhan. An early death was the young, presumably healthy doctor who realized early that a virus was loose, treated the disease, and reported it. He was hushed up and shamed by the Chinese government, an odd first instinct by the government if this were totally innocent and random. Or maybe it was just what the Chinese always do, squelch news of disharmony.

We do not know the wider implications of present era until after we have lived it.

People get dealt different hands, and the hands change with the moment. People who survived the many hazards of their first 80 years are now alive to face this virus threat. Good luck, then bad luck. People graduating from college a year ago entered a robust job market. People graduating this spring cannot get interviews, and jobs disappeared anyway. 

I graduated from high school in 1967, into what we now understand to be the "Vietnam War era." At the time it was expected to be a short skirmish. Men who were college bound largely escaped being drafted into what turned out to be an ugly, long, unpopular, losing war. College youth cheered or protested, largely from a place of comfort and safety.  Non-college bound men faced the draft. Some went to Germany, where they now tell stories of good beer. Others went to Vietnam. Again, experiences divide. Some had pleasant-enough duty far from danger. Others carried rifles in the jungles. Luck. You get what you get.

A prediction and hope.
An ongoing challenge of my work as a Financial Advisor was to communicate how deeply misleading is the financial planning software that made long term projections based on averages. One does not get a 10% nominal return from the US stock market, compounded year after year, even if that is the average. Few people get average. One gets what one gets.

The stock market fell 30% between December 31 and March 31. The long time employee who scheduled retirement on March 31 and locked in a pension annuity based on values on that date is no smarter, nor less smart, than is the person who retired three months earlier. 

The optimists about the virus describe the next two weeks in America as the height of the virus era. Maybe. Some people will get the virus with little effect, and some people will die, including some young, presumably healthy people. It is unfair. It offends our sense of justice. The hardworking, prudent, and virtuous are supposed to be rewarded with good fortune. Sometimes they do, sometimes not.

The randomness and ubiquity of the virus may send a message through the political system. The idea of personal responsibility and results based on personal behavior may be shaken by this virus. Libertarian Rand Paul had symptoms then swam in the Senate pool anyway. If some senators die, people may extract a message. 

The virus might inspire a wave of suspicion and accusation. We will wear masks and gloves. Anyone and everyone could kill us. That may be the takeaway that spreads through the political culture. Or it may go the other way and inspire a new sense of unity and common risk and purpose in a united nation. People may conclude that we share a giant body of life, of germs, of antibodies; we get by because of the behavior of people around us; we are in this together. 

We will see. I suspect we are at an inflection point. 



3 comments:

John C said...

I made a version of this comment on yesterday's post quite late, and Peter thought it was perhaps more relevant for today's blog so here goes again

MHO (and it is "humble") one thing that is already coming out of this, is that the illusion of our entitlement and certainty of what we can know and control is being dismantled. One tiny microbe. We expect too much from our flawed human systems and structures - and those who lead them for our hope. They will always let us down when the stressors and stakes are sufficiently high. Black Swans almost always catch the the masses unaware and they break systems.

People laugh about how Y2K (remember that?) was an over-hyped non-event that simply fattened the wallets of the "Big 5". I was on the Y2K task force and led Risk Group for Microsoft's CIO at the time and we spent untold millions over the 2-3 preceding years finding and fixing systems that would have failed had we not fixed them. The threat was real, calculable and had a timeline - which is why we had the resources and mandate to do it.

Also - in 2006-7 we we rolled out a comprehensive preparation and response plan for the H1B1 virus that Thad mentioned. Fortunately we never had to exercise it. Looking back, I suspect it would have been woefully insufficient of we had faced a COVID-like pandemic. We didn't have the urgent "all-hands-on-deck" unlimited budget of Y2K.

As humans, we are loathe to spend time and money preparing for a threat that we cannot apprehend as real. Nobody ever got elected because they predicted hard times may come and we need to deprive ourselves for a time to prepare for the Apocalypse. And because we as humans tend to be basically selfish, we elect people who tell us however nebulously that our life will be better with them; whether it's "Hope and Change" or "MAGA -you'll win so much you'll be tired of winning". So we get "leaders" we pick, not because they are the best at leading, but because of how well they pander to our base impulses. we call it Democracy.

While this blog is more about politics than moral reasoning, I'm at a point where politics and blaming seem so irrelevant, petty and superficial. Given our finitude, the question for me is how do I act in ways where I don't regret that I should have acted more humanely to my fellow humans after this is over.

Andy Seles said...

Peter said: "The idea of personal responsibility and results based on personal behavior may be shaken by this virus." Well, in this context, maybe not if you are Ammon Bundy or Jerry Falwell. This country has been blessed and cursed by the truth/myth of individualism. Balancing individual desires with the greater good is a goal subject to interpretation...by the individual.

I wish I had John C's equanimity. While I strive for kindness, I still feel unable to not confront injustice where I see it and that often means looking at (and participating in) "how the sausage is made." So, for this individual, it's more about HOW the politics is practiced, not politics itself.

Andy Seles

Anonymous said...

"The question for me is how do I act in ways where I don't regret that I should have acted more humanely to my fellow humans after this is over." Well said, John.
I also get Andy's passion. But today's theme is you get what you get, despite your efforts. Whether by virtue of luck, timing, privilege, lack, or some combination thereof. Here we are at the point of inflection.

What's next?