Saturday, March 28, 2020

Biden: Time to re-evaluate


At a time of worry, humans don't look to the nicest leader.


They look to the strongest leader.


The coronavirus changes everything. Democrats have a problem.

Joe Biden wins the category of compassion and empathy. Biden understands the pain of grief and the humiliation of the parent who loses a job. Sentimental, good guy Joe. By contrast, Trump is very comfortable looking cruel. He know who his enemies are and he wants to crush them.

Likable, approachable Joe Biden
Democrats are stuck in the past if they think this gives Biden an edge. Not anymore.

The economy is in chaos. The monetary dashboard has gone haywire because the indicators policymakers normally use aren't relevant. The economy is led by a disease, not a business cycle. Businesses are closing, people are out of work.

The politics of the nation feels chaotic, too. The rise of populism on the right grew out of ideas spoken by Barry Goldwater, made eloquent by Ronald Reagan. Government was the problem. Under Newt Gingrich's influence bipartisan cooperation was the problem as well. For government to shrink, the public needed to learn to have contempt for it, and they did.

In the aftermath of the bailout of the banks in 2008 and 2009, the public realized that the guilty wealthy had been saved by the many. It confirmed and accentuated populist discontent on the left as well. Both Trump and Sanders say the institutions of government-- from the campaigns, the election counts, the elected officials, the operations of government itself, and the media that covers it--all are biased and corrupt.

Democrats looked at Sanders, saw a proud disrupter, but one who had failed in his hope to grow the left with new voters and failed to unify Democratic voters who had been comfortable with Obama. Sanders represented risk; Biden represented calm. Democrats chose calm.

Americans had a choice: Chaotic Trump vs. Biden Normalcy.

Then the coronavirus.


Normalcy is not an option. Between economic chaos and the health fear, we are in wartime. An enemy invader haunts the streets. There is invisible death on any doorknob, grocery cart handle, dollar bill, and the air we breath. Cancel everything. Shelter.

Americans observe failed states and don't perceive their relevance, but there is a lesson In mafia controlled areas, in drug states, in battle torn areas: security comes from the barrel of a gun, not the rule of law. People seek strength. They want to ally with it and have its protection. The shared agreement--the social compact--dissolves. It is an emergency. America just voted a two trillion dollar special deficit. The old rules no longer apply.

It's a new election environment. The safe, low drama candidate is no longer possible. 

Biden is singularly unsuited for the role of wartime president. He doesn't look or sound strong because he isn't strong. He doesn't project competence. His addled gaffes aren't harmless or endearing anymore.

Trump, too, is ill-suited for the job of wartime president, but less so. Trump is patently, obviously self-centered. A wartime leader projects a singular focus on the needs of the polity he leads. Trump fails that test. He shirks blame. He shamelessly, openly craves adoration, displaying a weakness for flattery. He takes the easy road, not the responsible one. Still, Trump can argue that what is good for Trump politically and personally is good for the country.

I expect that to be a winning argument.

Can Biden grow into the role of the strong, resolute leader who communicates competence in a crisis? Maybe, but I have not seen it, either in person or on television, and I ached with desire to observe it. Biden is who he is, a nice sentimental guy, suitable for leading us back to normalcy.

But there is no normalcy. That was last month, not now. If Biden realizes it on his own, he will drop out. If not, Democrats would be wise to push him out.


6 comments:

Rick Millward said...

I see your point, but this judgement is premature. The problem Democrats have is that criticizing the administration looks opportunistic and Trump benefits from this. The time to raise the alarm was last year and they were neck deep in impeachment, as was the media.

The response is another matter, but Democrats are involved, so it's politically moot.

As of now, most of the country is not panicking. This will change when the full force of the epidemic hits the midwest...MAGA country.
By the time the administration delivers the response, if at all, every state will have thousands of victims...too little, too late. (I desperately hope I am wrong!) The fire truck will arrive, but the house is burned down. When Republican governors are in New York's position, they may reconsider their allegiances, beginning with Florida.

The epidemic has laid bare the weakness of wealth inequality and a for-profit healthcare system.

The economy isn't likely to recover by November, and Trump bragging about how strong it was before and blaming the pandemic will only bring attention to his shortcomings and lies. Look for them to suggest investing stimulus checks in the stock market.

I agree that VP Biden is not our best candidate against the Regressives, but voters have chosen. So far he is beating Trump by an average of 7 points, and with a strong VP that should improve. Obama will help, too. You are right in that people gravitate to strength, but it has to be paired with competence, and competence is Trump's kryptonite.

You suggest VP Biden should step down. Who then?

Anonymous said...

Obama/Biden normalcy led to Trump's election. If Democrats have nothing better to offer, they kinda deserve to lose.

Biden is touted as a man of empathy, but he explicitly said he has no empathy for the struggles of young Americans. This is not an ancient statement, it's from 2018. A victory for Biden would be a slap in the face to young Americans.

I've seen some comments that Cuomo should be the nominee after dumping Biden. But Cuomo is currently trying to cut the Medicaid budget for hospitals in the midst of the pandemic.

If Democrats want to win, the best nominee is Gavin Newsom, governor of California. His actions with the early shelter in place order have made crowded California a state with few infections, relatively. He's competent, plus he is Mr. Charisma.

Andy Seles said...

Rick said: "The epidemic has laid bare the weakness of wealth inequality and a for-profit healthcare system." Gee, which candidate has been hammering on these two issues forever? No mention of Bernie Sanders in this conversation anywhere...just like mainstream media. No mention also of the recent allegation by Tara Reade, a former Biden staffer who has accused Biden of sexual assault that happened in 1993 (an assault that she reported to her mother, brother and a close friend, verified by the latter two). This just adds to Biden's baggage. There is even talk that the establishment overlords are planning for Biden, if he miraculously wins, to turn over the presidency to his VP soon after the election. The virus, Trump and threat of martial law, primary postponements, a weak Democratic party that feels it must constantly give in to Republican blackmail (the bailout actually amounts to over 4 trillion dollars, mostly going to Wall Street)...all of this putting us on course for undemocratic, third world status. We have "a rendezvous with destiny" and whether the average American citizen is ready for its challenge is, I believe, in great doubt.

Andy Seles

Ralph Bowman said...

Biden Out


Cuomo speaks and analyzes is showing a direct aggressive response to the chaos by laying out the facts without spinning. The adult in the room. Not liked by liberals because he watches the bottom line. Probably has plenty of baggage, so does Biden.
But Democrats need a forceful in charge man to put up against Trump. This guy would cut him to ribbons. Not a pretty face, NEW YORK all the way. Couldn’t wear a cowboy hat , but yes a hard hat. Could he talk to people in Montana? He could at least hear and listen, yes and drive home the policy, first impressions.
I’m a Bernie supporter...but he is too old and now is gone.

Crank up for Cuomo .

Ralph, the whore.

Q Crain said...

I believe these comments show: Dems have lost.

Biden's gap is nil, if their really ever was one:

"
More telling is the gap in the intensity of that enthusiasm, which can translate into who turns out to vote and who might not. Among registered voters who support trump, 55% say they are very enthusiastic about backing him while 32% say they are somewhat enthusiastic. Among Biden's supporters, a far smaller 28% say they are very enthusiastic while 46% are somewhat enthusiastic.
"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/poll-shows-trump-and-biden-in-a-competitive-race-for-the-white-house/2020/03/28/515cb8ba-7037-11ea-b148-e4ce3fbd85b5_story.html

From the same article/WaPo-ABC News poll, trump is +10pts (52%/42%) "trusted more to handle the economy"??!!

it's over.

TuErasTu said...

I don't agree on the premise. FDR was a gentleman and seen as nice by the public, offering a stark contrast to the strong-man dictators in Germany, Spain, Italy, Russia, Japan, everywhere. Wilson, in the Great War, was an academic and university president. Nice-guy Eisenhower led the invasion of Europe, outshining tough guys like Patton, and then led the Cold War, too. Trump's an incompetent idiot; Biden is plenty strong enough to lead.