Monday, May 27, 2019

Typecasting Bernie Sanders


Bernie Sanders carries a burden. Americans have a mental category for him, and he looks the part, sounds the part, and his biography confirms the part.

Engaging, but ultimately abandoned.

Social critic.


We need social critics.  

Shakespeare's fools are truth tellers to kings. But they aren't kings. Cassandra was right, but not believed. Jeremiah heard directly from God, and his reward was to be thrown into a cistern to starve. 

Hollywood knows the character, the network news anchor who was mad as hell and not going to take it anymore! (Network, 1976)

Comedy has a version of the role: the gruff, grumbly old men characters of the Muppets. 

We saw his appeal to voters, and it persists. Bernie Sanders and his message reached its apogee in 2016, as the social and political critic warning that Hillary was a mistake. He was right. He--like Trump--understood the unrest among voters in both parties against a self-satisfied status quo establishment. He warned us. We should have listened.

Grumpy old men
The trouble with Jeremiah, Cassandra, Shakespeare fools, and Bernie Sanders goes beyond the fact that they aren't listened to. It is that they read as social critics, not leaders. 

Sanders will get a significant block of votes, perhaps enough to win a Democratic primary. That is the risk for Democrats. He might get cast in the wrong role: Party leader.  Bernie succeeds as policy critic and visionary, but would be vulnerable as a leader.  He is the wrong person for the part.

He would be the easiest candidate for Trump to call extreme. 

1. He is leading under a banner and label that frightens people.  Voters will support a Jew (93%), voters will support a candidate over 70 (63%), and voters are generally open most other identity categories of people including now a gay person (76%) and atheist (60%), but voters are very uncomfortable with a "socialist." Click: Gallup

 Bernie Sanders calls himself, proudly, a "Democratic Socialist." 

He gets credit for this within the political left. See his courage! See his steadfastness over time! This is why he will get votes, maybe even a plurality. But it is a crushing burden in the general election. Only 47% of voters in 2019 say they would support a "well qualified candidate in their party who called himself a 'socialist'". More ominous is that this number has not changed since 2015. Sanders had four years to re-teach Americans the meaning of "socialist" and assure people it just means FDR and Social Security, and it hasn't worked.

2. He is leading on health care in a direction that frightens people. Americans overwhelmingly want changes in the health care system, but a great many people are personally satisfied with their own situation and don't want to lose it. People who have Medicare are set. Also, people who work for large organizations with employer-supplied health care have something good they don't want to lose. 

These older, secure  people turn out to vote. These are the people with "family wage" situations, those educated people in the new sweet spot for Democrats. They are comfortable, educated people OK with diversity, rainbows, and the Democratic message on immigration.

But they don't want their health care screwed up.

Click: The Hill poll
Sanders' position is the least popular position, when voters are given options of how they would like America's health care to be arranged. Only 13% of voters want universal single payer Medicare for All.  

Some 26% of voters prefer the government offering a government plan but with people being able to keep private insurance if they want to. And 32% favor a government program with individuals being allowed to buy supplemental private insurance on their own.

Unfortunately for Democrats, the most active people within the party are the young people who are in a different mental universe from older people who associate "socialist" with the USSR and the DMV, and people getting and enjoying their current health care. Many are intolerant of anything but Bernie "socialism" and "Medicare for All."

Why do I say that Bernie Sanders is a social critic and not a leader? Hasn't he led Democrats to the left?

Yes, he has, on policy. But not personally.

In the US Senate he has not been a team leader, and indeed he has kept himself off the team. He isn't a Democrat; he just caucuses with the Democrats, and he makes that point with pride. 

He plays the role of point of the spear, not the team captain. 
Rembrandt's Jeremiah: He warned them.

Trump and the GOP are already locking that bit of type-casting into place: "Crazy Bernie," the wild-eyed visionary, with his lamentations and dangerous policies, the guy out there on the extreme. The guy who cannot even get Democrats to join him.

The socialist who wants to take away your health care.

Bernie's supporters who are sharp critics of the non-Bernie Democrats are part of the problem for Sanders. 

His supporters won't let him lead a coalition. It is Bernie or nothing, and he is one of a kind. So he stands alone.



6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Even though Biden is the current front-runner, he won't get the democrat nomination because of his Chinese and Ukrainian connections. You can poh-poh it, but the voters will ultimately reject Biden. He has too much baggage.

Bernie won't get the nomination because he's old, and he looks old, and because Trump will destroy him, and the voters won't vote for a communist.

Who will get the democrat nomination? It's going to be a "wild card" candidate, like Jimmy Carter was. It's going to be someone who is not currently at the top of the polls. They will be somewhat of a political unknown like Carter was. My guess is that it will be Kamala Harris (she has money), or it could be Mayor Pete (who is an outlier). Most of the other democrat candidates don't have enough support to get to first base. I don't think that it will be Elizabeth Warren either.

Up Close: Road to the White House said...

The adjectival form for Democrat is "Democratic." In a sentence it would be: "The Democratic nominee is . . . . " Not "democrat."

Rick Millward said...

Sen. Sanders is a leader, and I think casting him as "too whatever"...old, shrill, etc. is simply a narrow view of his legacy.

If one followed him through the Bush years, as a voice in the wilderness, and up to the present you can see that his message, European style social democracy, has caught on, although he himself has past the point where he can take the movement any farther on his own. He has inspired others, younger, who will lead the US out of the current chaos, as well as millions of voters and that achievement cannot be denied. In the next election 5 million will vote for the first time, and these young people are more engaged than previous generations, thanks to the internet. and they believe that Bernie speaks for them.

In my view Sen. Warren is best qualified to be his successor, mainly because "our revolution" will be fiscal. It's going to be tax policy that will enable the changes to healthcare, education and environment necessary for the survival of the American experiment. Maybe it will turn around in the next election, but it may take another four years. I think we can be assured that Bernie's work will continue, especially now that it's firmly established in the electorate.

The anti-intellectual, populist fad will eventually be seen as bankrupt and a fraud, hopefully soon, and Trump and his wannabes will be consigned to the trash heap of history, a footnote on a Wikipedia page, and probably a Netflix mini-series.

Diane Newell Meyer said...

I agree with Rick Millward, above, about Elizabeth Warren and will do what I can to promote Warren for as long as feasible.
Those pieces of the pie chart on the Harris poll show that the majority of people support the government role in Health care, and if you add up the pie pieces of that support, it means that the public is ready for some kind of Medicare for all, with options to keep their own insurance. If their premiums, co-pays, and other health costs are added up and compared to the increased taxes necessary, it will show that they will save cash with the govt. sponsored option. Some European countries use that kind of system effectively.

Anonymous said...

Here is the most recent Monmouth Poll: (May 23rd)
Biden - 33%
Sanders - 15%
Warren - 10%
Harris - 11%
Buttigieg - 6%
O'Rourke - 4%

The heart, soul, and energy of the current democrat party is with the younger voters, such as like Kevin Stine. Those younger people don't want an old dinosaur candidate. They want someone younger and more vibrant like them. Throw-out senior citizens Biden, Bernie, and Warren, and that leaves you with Harris and Buttigieg, who will probably be the favorite of younger voters like Stine.

Andy Seles said...

I agree with Rick and Diane. BTW, the Gallup poll also shows that it is the young folks who don't give a rat's petootie about "socialism" or ageism and are feelin' the Bern. This matches my own experience with young locals. I dropped in at Life Art in Medford a couple of weeks ago and mentioned to Phil Ortega (Phil's a great guy who does incredible community work) that a couple of kids outside had told me they supported Sanders. "Oh yeah," he said, "all these kids (motioning to a half-dozen kids inside) support Bernie." Having said this, these high school students were not all of voting age...but they will be and they know this economy is not working for them. Liberal elites as well as Trump and their corporate media silos continue to lead voters into "the political cul-de-sac of identity politics," giving cover to the system's continuing exploitation of the Third World, the extraction and commodification of everything on God's green earth and the squeezing of the poor and soon-to-be poor, middle-class.
Andy Seles