Gillespie ads target criminality of Latinos. Latino ad targets racism of Gillespie supporters.
That was a mistake.
Gillespie ad: 30 seconds |
In Virginia a more disciplined Republican candidate, Ed Gillespie, attacked gangs. The racial appeal is there, in dog whistle form, but he is more subtle than Trump. The gangs are Hispanic and he showed pictures of tattooed Hispanics, but he didn't attack Hispanics as Hispanics.
The Democrats ended up giving Gillespie a big boost.
Click Here: 60 seconds. |
The Latino Victory Fund PAC certainly thought so, and that is what boosted Gillespie. "We refuse to stand by as Gillespie slanders our families and portrays our community as thugs, criminals, and gang members."
They responded by what they may have thought was a response in kind. It wasn't, because they picked the wrong villain. Their ad has a collage of images reflecting a person who they thought represented southern white racists: a pickup truck with a Confederate flag, a heavyset white male wearing dark glasses, a Gillespie bumper strip. The driver is roaming city streets attempting to run down Hispanic, black, and Muslim children.
The Latino Victory ad backfired badly. It failed because it attacked a demographic of voters, some of whom are voters that might be Democratic voters. Of course the actual person depicted in the ad (a man murdering dark skinned children) is not a likely Democratic voter, but the ad put together cultural stereotypes reflecting working class white men: the pickup truck, the heavyset white male, and made him a villain It was a class issue. That message is out there. The overall election between Northam and Gillespie is approximately even according to current polls, but look at the polling on college vs. non-college voters. Non college white are voting almost 3 to 1 for Gillespie. Working class men know they are considered the enemy.
Quara poll |
Democrats did this to themselves.
Privileged racist. a safe villain. |
It is suicidal, however, to sweep overweight pickup truck drivers into the tribe of deplorable racists. A great many of those people are your voters, or could be. Working class white men in pickup trucks feel resentments, but they are as likely to resent Wall Street predators, bad bosses, crony capitalism, privileged polluters, and that young man in a polo shirt. Their villains are Democratic villains. Democrats and their allies shoot themselves in the foot when they draw a wide net finding racists. Even people with some racial resentments don't like being told they are racist. They think David Duke, people with Nazi torches, and that young man are the racists. They define themselves in opposition to them, not with them..
Another lesson for Democrats and the Latino Victory Fund: most Americans do not identify with gang members with face tattoos. It is safe to say you dislike criminal gangs, even when they are members of an ethnic group ally. Your friends and supporters and donors are not criminal gang members. Those gang members prey upon your own community. Gillespie wasn't slandering your community as thugs, criminals and gang members." They took the bait. They identified themselves with the criminal gangs.
The correct message would be vigorously to reject criminal gangs as representing you in the slightest. Your community is a group of hard working law abiding people.
1 comment:
"A great many people who voted for Trump did it despite, not because of, his racial appeals."
Sorry, wishful thinking, racism is not a matter of degree. They did not vote in spite of, they voted because of.
The best we can hope for is some Trump/Gillespie voters might not recognize their racism and, after reflection, educate themselves and make a life change.
Racism endures because of equivocation. No need to tie oneself into semantic knots...it's simple.
As far as the Latino ad goes, I would say it was intended to shock. It wasn't to0 long ago that the behavior depicted was a reality, and the threat is real again.
Post a Comment