Thursday, March 23, 2023

Gavin Newsom: A Californian's impression.

Gavin Newsom is acting like a presidential candidate-in-waiting.



I have warned in this blog that the California governor is too good looking to be elected U.S. president. Moreover, he was too "blue state." He was too reliable and doctrinaire a liberal. He is too Californian. He has a brand, and it has too much San Francisco associated with it. I have posted here that if he strikes me that way, he would surely strike voters in the battleground Upper Midwest states that way.

I asked a bone fide brand expert about the Gavin Newsom image and underlying reality, as he observed it from close up. Tony Farrell lives in Oakland and has been following Newsom for years. Farrell has done Guest Posts here. He is the college classmate who managed marketing for the Gap, The Nature Company and The Sharper Image.


Guest Post by Tony Farrell


Farrell
"Before Ukraine,” just to make conversation, I would casually ask friends who they thought should or would be the Democratic nominee for President in 2024. (No one ever said Kamala Harris.) I always suggested Gavin Newsom, but no one else ever did. And almost universally, those I spoke to regarded Newsom’s national reputation as fatal. I wonder.


It’s now “after Ukraine” and all’s changed. Now I believe Biden should run and will run.


Nonetheless, Peter asked me to convey thoughts about Gavin Newsom from my personal perspective, having lived in the Bay Area since 1978 (45 years), so I will offer my impressions.


For a long time, I did not take Newsom seriously, as he was too young, with practically no experience except as an entrepreneur; and he was linked to the Getty family, which is just weird. 


He was 36 when elected mayor of San Francisco (succeeding Willie Brown, mentor to both Gavin and Kamala Harris), after representing lofty Pacific Heights on the City’s Board of Supervisors (a powerful group). In the beginning, there was gossipy focus on Gavin’s bodacious pompadour; lots of spurious questions about his sexuality (and other aspects of that). After one of the most bizarre homicide cases in City history (a horrendous dog-mauling in an apartment hallway), Gavin married the prosecutor, Kimberly Guilfoyl--which is also weird.


Most memorably, about 20 years ago, SF Mayor Newsom earned national renown (if not infamy) for issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, in clear violation of California law. All those marriages were annulled the following year in state court. At the time, I strongly believed it was very bad form for a mayor to be a flagrant scofflaw. But, ultimately, many here now see his action as a courageous move toward the right side of history. Perhaps he was a visionary, and his actions helped spur the changes the country now lives with comfortably. It's still very debatable, however.


I met Newsom only once, briefly, after his speech at a gala function in support of the environment. I hate to say it, but I could not stop looking at his pompadour. I think, like Trump, Gavin has an unreal personal aura. He stands six-feet-four, plus two inches for the hair. Moreover, when I closed my eyes during his speech, I swear I could not tell the difference between him and Bill Clinton! I later learned Gavin had been taking speaking lessons from Bill and somehow subconsciously adopted both an Arkansas accent and the rasp. Anyway, I was still not taking Gavin seriously.


That all said, in the 20-plus years that I’ve lived with Gavin on the scene here, I’ve come, day by day for thousands of days, to respect him immensely for his judgement; his political skills; his courage; his empathy; his down-to-earth common sense on almost everything I think about. That includes guns, climate, crime, fiscal prudence, health care, taxes, our propositions, you-name-it. His prompt, decisive actions at the beginning of Covid might have saved my ass. California had none of the medical horrors experienced in, say, New York City.


California has a cartoonish reputation in many parts of the country: The proverbial Left Coast filled with delusional Marxists spouting the worst kind of wokeness. And we have all that, but from the perspective of those of us who live here such craziness resides in minor players like school-board members who want to take the name “Lincoln” off of schools. It's renegade City Supervisors who block efforts to cut regulatory red tape or efforts to address homelessness. 

Tony Farrell and wife, Kathy

Among the “normies” I hang out with here in Northern California--educated and well-off, generally, who now see Trump as a treasonous criminal--our favored players are centrists. These would be people like Diane Feinstein (another former SF mayor); Willie Brown (ditto); Arnold Schwartzenegger (Republican former governor); Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. I believe Gavin Newsom now fits into that pantheon of grounded, commonsensical, good-government types who help run and represent this most remarkable state. California is a state, I must point out, that boasts more Trump supporters than Texas and it sends Kevin McCarthy to Congress again and again. It might be hard to believe, but even Jerry Brown is seen here as a centrist. Brown was my mayor here in Oakland (and married the senior counsel for my old company, The Gap, where Newsom’s sister also worked) and our governor, too. As Oakland mayor, Jerry Brown was long past his “moonbeam” reputation from decades ago. Instead, he was just a super-smart and aware guy with excellent governing skills and a practical approach to leading Oakland and, later, the whole state. 


Gavin Newsom, like Jerry Brown, was educated by the Jesuits. Perhaps that says something about their rigor, truth and intellectual honesty.


Anyway, that’s my personal journey with Gavin Newsom. The question is, is there enough time for the country to make the same journey? Can the shallow, leftist image of Newsom be fleshed out? Can the cartoonish woke image be erased and replaced with one of an extraordinary leader who has demonstrated remarkable governing skills in perhaps the most complex governor job among all 50 states? 


Maybe. I hope so, because I don’t have any other ideas for a great Democratic president.

 


Note: For daily delivery of this blog to your email go to: https://petersage.substack.com. The blog is free and always will be.]



14 comments:

Rick Millward said...

Wow, good looking and smart, what a killer combo!

There is a yearning among some Democrats for a reprise of the JFK presidency. Every candidate is measured against that standard, much the same way Republicans revere Reagan. No matter it's an illusion. Charisma is overrated. If Trump has taught us anything, it's that.

While it was a huge relief that Biden won, I am sad that Progressive's best option is a redux. This society is mired in a false nostalgia on both sides of the political divide, but Democrats don't really have an excuse. With climate and human rights in extremis we should face head on the threat from the right that will only worsen the danger, and that means facing forward and running a woman for President, preferably a POC, and there's an excellent candidate currently in waiting.

Only misogyny, racism and a fetid patriarchy is in the way.

Anonymous said...

Political ads against Newsom outside of California would be excoriating.

Mike Steely said...

"Anyway, that’s my personal journey with Gavin Newsom. The question is, is there enough time for the country to make the same journey?"

I don't believe that would be necessary. He would prevail hands down over Trump or DeSantis, the Republican front runners. I'd love to see him debate either of them.

What I'd really like is for Jeff Merkley to run, but I doubt if that will happen.

Anonymous said...

Americans did not elect George McGovern, Walter Mondale, Mike Dukakis, Al Gore (won the popular vote/robbed), John Kerry, Hillary Clinton (won the popular vote), Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren or Kamala Harris for president. They are not going to elect Gavin Newsom with all that progressive California baggage.

Not all heterosexual women think he is attractive. He might be considered a metrosexual.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Newsom would be a perfect target for populists. He may be washed up after his trip to the French Laundry.

But who knows? Primary season with all of its upcoming surprises awaits us. March Madness doesn’t even begin to compare… 🤷‍♂️

Michael Trigoboff said...

“Not all heterosexual women think he is attractive. He might be considered a metrosexual.“

The country is more likely to elect a retrosexual.

Diane Newell Meyer said...

I hope that Biden runs again, with Harris again. We would get our woman president if Biden had to step down for some reason, and Harris could then show everyone her competence.
I am still sad that Liz Warren did not get more traction.
Newsome seems so competent, and he even won a recall. I hope that if Biden is in, that Newsome bides his time and waits til the next election. People might decide by then that they like what democrats produce.

Mike Steely said...

Mr. Anonymous: Americans did not elect G.W. Bush or D. Trump. They became president in spite of what the voters wanted.

Assuming he's not in jail - or perhaps even if he is - Trump will undoubtedly be the Republican candidate in 2024. That's how crazy they are. Do you seriously believe Newsom comes with more baggage?

Michael Trigoboff said...

GW Bush and D Trump were duly elected by the Electoral College process, as specified in the US Constitution.

Anyone who is dissatisfied with this way of choosing a president is welcome to engage in the constitutional amendment process. Anything else is just useless whining.

Mc said...

He's so washed up he survived the recall and re-election.

Don't hurt yourself with your contortions.

Mc said...

I wish there was a better candidate than Newsom. He's been very successful in liberal areas only.

How about Whitmer?

Diane Newell Meyer said...

How about Hakeem Jeffries??? I am impressed with him.

Michael Trigoboff said...

I liked Steve Bullock and Amy Klobuchar. We sent Amy a significant contribution, but it apparently wasn’t in the cards for her. 🙁

Ed Cooper said...

Where in the Constitution does it say soliciting, and accepting help from hostile foreign Governments is permitted ?