Friday, April 29, 2022

Storm clouds: Oregon as Blue-State microcosm

Oregon is reliably blue. It is a Democratic "gimme."  Isn't it?

I have been accused of "doom posting." I deserve that. 

I see problems. Biden is looks old. Inflation. War in Ukraine. Homeless people.  Drought. Gasoline prices. Help wanted signs but people cannot find workers. Problems at the southern border. Problems, problems. 

Some of my "doom posting" may come from where I live, in Medford, down at the bottom of the map, far from blue Portland.

COVID. It hangs over everything. I saw the frustration of many people being told to wear a mask long past when they personally were worried about COVID. I am 72. I do worry. I hear about "long COVID" and lingering effects. Many people don't share my concern. Maybe they already had gotten COVID and think they won't get it again. Maybe they are young and think themselves invulnerable. Maybe they just don't care much. To a great many people, masks and vaccinations didn't signify safety or courtesy or keeping hospital space available. It was an irritating imposition by a tyrant scold governor.  

On Wednesday my mailbox contained a giant postcard on stiff paper. It was 8 1/2 by 13. Here is the front:


She is a Democratic candidate for governor. She was the longest serving Speaker of the Oregon House until she resigned to campaign full time. She has a simple message: Oregon is blue, she has delivered, and the best is yet to come. She takes deserved credit for Oregon being on the forefront of progressive policy. She said she pushed through the strongest reproductive rights law in the country, put Oregon on a path to 100% clean energy, passed a first-in-the-nation rent stabilization law. 

She has doubled down. If you like what you see, thank Tina Kotek. 

I doom post, in the eyes of  Democrats, because I think an oscillation of public opinion is in the works. The riots in Portland in 2020 changed opinions. A recent poll published by Oregon Public Broadcasting show that the national malaise is present here in blue Oregon. Only 18% of Oregonians said Oregon government was on the "right track"; 73% said "wrong track." On the economy, 65% said it was poor or very poor. 

The trend for the current Democratic governor is negative. President Biden is 63% negative.



The bright spot for Democrats is Donald Trump. If Republicans want to tie themselves to Trump, Democrats should let them.




Give Tina Kotek credit for authenticity. She is who she is. She sent a "Fight for our Daughters" postcard yesterday, Thursday. It is similarly and on stiff paper:



In my post on April 14 I observed her "progressive feminist vibe." All the direct-to-the-camera endorsers in her TV ad were women. That is fine with me, but as a matter of strategy--especially in the interests of diversity and inclusion--I thought perhaps a male might be inserted somewhere. Perhaps in a "family" shot. Some token, to let voters know she wanted votes of men, too.

I am not complaining. Men do just fine in America. But as a matter of strategy and positioning, I notice she makes a big statement by a woman for women, on both sides of this postcard ad. There are a lot of men who vote. There are a lot of women who have husbands and sons; they also vote. My own sense is that including men in a message about empowering women does not diminish women any more than including a person of color in an advertisement diminishes White voters. We are in this together, aren't we? 

Kotek made her choices. Hit progressive policy hard. Hit feminism hard.  It is narrowcasting. Get her people motivated. 

Will her strategy work? She is busy raising money, including calling me again. I presume she will spend money she raises on messages like the ones I got in the mailbox. I wonder if she isn't digging a deeper hole for herself by doubling down. In fact, I think she is.

I may be wrong. Possibly I am just an out-of-touch doom poster.







9 comments:

Michael Trigoboff said...

Kotek’s campaign is a standard-issue example of the far left progressive strategy. “Let’s turn out our base, and to hell with everyone else.“ That might have a chance of working if far left progressives were a large portion of the electorate; but they are actually something like 8% of the electorate.

Betsy Johnson is aiming her campaign at the center. There are a lot more voters in the center then either the far left or the far right. I think Johnson has a real shot. Portland’s smug blue bubble has a good chance of being popped this fall.

Rick Millward said...

Unfortunately, all women are not united behind Progressive values. If they were they would run everything, which would be fine with me.

An example was the anti-suffrage movement in 1920. From a pamphlet at the time:

"...(it) suggested that if women began doing the work of men, they would become uglier, less feminine, less desirable."

These patriarchal attitudes are still with us despite all the progress that has been made.

I hope Ms. Kotek wins the primary, but either Democrat will do. The other side, including the "Independent", is pretty scary.

Michael Trigoboff said...

I agree with Rick that patriarchal attitudes are still with us. Why? There is significant evidence that those attitudes have a biological/evolutionary component.

Here’s an example: societies with the weakest enforcement of gender roles (e.g. Sweden) have the lowest participation of women in STEM fields. Apparently, given the highest possible degree of gender role freedom, even women who possess the underlying abilities still tend to be more interested in other areas of endeavor.

John F said...

I predict the upcoming election will be a reset. When times are tough, as they are for most Oregonians at the moment, the tendency is to preserve what you have. Republican governors have a solid history in Oregon. The current political climate is blowing their way. BUT, the change candidate on the ballot isn't from either party. The two candidates that have the most to offer Oregon are not flashy or hidebound progressives.

Oregon is facing drought in almost half the State. Our aging infrastructure needs immediate attention. Rural healthcare is nearing a crises. Housing and homelessness has become a political football resulting in little progress. The current budget doesn't reflect these needs.

May 17th will be an indicator of just how strong the changing wind is and whether it gathers strength leading into the General Election.

Mike said...

One of the reasons for the Democratic majority in Oregon is the nature of the competition. We’re talking about people who walked off the job rather than address climate change and declared the Jan. 6 insurrection “a false flag operation.” Many want parts of Oregon to join Idaho, too clueless to realize that it’d be easier for them to move to there than to move Idaho here. Maybe they need a better platform.

Unknown said...

"My own sense is that including men in a message about empowering women does not diminish women any more than including a person of color in an advertisement diminishes White voters."

This.
I've been consuming discourse from within the radical left (I myself am a libertarian socialist, so I'm quite at home) since around the beginning of last year, and one thing I see constantly from my community is exclusive messaging. For example, some activists claim that cis straight white men should stay silent on issues that affect minorities. This only alienates them from the issues at best and enrages them against left-of-center ideology at worst. And while the right will always construe any leftist messaging to be exclusive of cis straight white men because the vast majority of their voting base is the latter sans education, we have control over the messages we put out and should really work harder to control the narrative. The harder it is for compilers such as libsoftiktok to find messaging that seems to reinforce this alienation from leftism, the easier it will be for us to spread our actual ideas. Controlling the narrative requires inclusive messaging; to deny such is to reject intersectionality.
I appreciate the intersectional feminist lens, Peter!

Mc said...

Sweden, a socialist country, has some of the happiest people on the planet.

That's a good measure of a country's "prosperity".

Mc said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Mc said...

... and which party has opposed infrastructure and revamping health care?

The republicans.


If you want to destroy our system of government, vote republican.