Wednesday, April 20, 2022

Campaign to be Oregon's Governor: 34 choices.

Oregon Update:

19 Republican candidates are still in the race. 

15 Democrats are still in. 

One Un-affiliated is in: Betsy Johnson


The election for Oregon governor simplifies from 35 choices down to three: One Democrat, One Republican, and Betsy Johnson.


Baskin Robins: 31 flavors

Oregon's 19 Republican candidates no doubt consider themselves unique and highly differentiated from one another. I don't see it. Their campaigns are honing details of language and policy, and possibly on the margin it will move a few primary voters to pick one candidate over another. Someone will win. But the weight of being a Republican means a single message will emerge in the general election: Opposition to Oregon's current governor Kate Brown, and general loyalty to the national GOP message of Trump-style populism. Republican candidates either embrace Trump or they offer general agreement with Trump policies. Either they say Trump won the 2020 election in a landslide and the election should be overturned, or they say that a lot of Republican want it overturned and there are always questions to be asked and they don't disagree with people who share Trump's position. Meanwhile, on Oregon issues, they say a Republican governor has a role to play: Be an intractable voice of opposition and resistance to Democrats. Stop Kate Brown and her successor.

Oregon's 15 Democratic candidates boil down to two: Tobias Read and Tina Kotek, the only viable candidates. No doubt they perceive themselves as differentiated, but as with the Republican candidates there is a single message that gets through: Oregon is a blue state and voters here want green, progressive government and that is what they will deliver. Kotek suggests she will deliver current policy more boldly and efficiently because she is experienced and tough. Read says he wants change, but doesn't suggest any disagreement with the status quo. It boils down to tough woman or nice guy. Either way, either candidate will be carrying out approximately the same policies. A Democratic governor would be a force to continue Democratic governance.

Betsy Johnson is a well-funded independent candidate. Her message is moderation. She says she will stop the fighting between the parties. 
I'm running as an independent candidate, loyal only to the people of Oregon. As governor I'm going to take the best ideas from both parties, and force them to work together. I don't worry about making the extremes happy. I guess you could call me an equal-opportunity pisser-offer.
She has been in public office for two decades as a renegade rural and pro-timber Democrat. She is independently wealthy. She has raised some $6 million dollars so far, primarily from wealthy people. I expect her to be criticized for all the money she has raised, but I don't expect it to hurt her. She looks and sounds like a fully-formed politician with a well-established reputation for independence. She is nobody's pawn. 

Democrats fear she will take substantial votes from whoever wins the Democratic primary, and for good reason. She passes the litmus test Republicans fail. She says that of course Biden won. After all, he got the most votes. She won't feel pressure to play along with some national Republican effort to persuade governors and legislators to void electoral votes if a Democrat wins the election. After all, Arizona's Doug Ducey and Georgia's Brian Kemp are Republican pariahs. Liz Cheney is worse, a traitor. She needs armed guards to protect her from attack. Whatever else, Betsy Johnson will tell Trump to bug off.

Johnson will have appeal to voters outside metropolitan Portland. Historically, Oregon's jobs were based on natural resources, primarily forest products and agriculture. Democrats in Oregon chose to please environmentalists, not loggers, farmers, and ranchers. It was a choice, and it has generally worked out for Democrats. There are more people who think of themselves as green than there are loggers. Democrats became identified with people who hike in the forests, not people who work in them. The choice has a price. Democrats lose rural precincts three-to-one, or worse. Many of those people used to be Democrats. 

Here she is. 


10 comments:

Michael Trigoboff said...

Probably as no surprise to anyone around here, I am likely to vote for Betsy Johnson.

The Republicans are too nuts, the Democrats are too woke. If I had to, I might have chosen nuts over woke. Thanks to Johnson, I may not have to make that choice.

Michael Trigoboff said...

I just mentioned Betsy Johnson to my wife. Here’s her entire comment:

“No way. Cantankerous old bat.”

:-)

Rick Millward said...

I suffered through the speech on her website. She's right leaning, very careful not to offend the Trumpsters, and blames Democrats for non-partisan problems. Either she's blind to what the Republican party has become or she's trying to pander to both sides equally. Neither is particularly laudable.

That said, I think Ms. Johnson will appeal to Republicans more than Democrats.

Bob Warren said...

The Republican party will settle as usual on some idiot who has more money than brains to run as their candidate for governor! God only know where they dug up the last several that included failures in fields ranging from professional sports to medicine. The Republican Party's support for a treasonous monster like Donald Trump has exposed the paucity of any real desire to enrich the lives of all Americans.
Bob Warren

M2inFLA said...

Betsy Johnson will attract voters from D, R, and NAV. Possibly will get more than 50% of the vote, too.

Mc said...

It's very clear the republicans really have no policies that help people.

The party is all about ruining government so corporations and US oligarchs have more power.

Has any Independent candidate ever helped a Republican candidate win the office? Al Mobley ring a bell?

M2inFLA said...

Again with the broad paintbrush. It's tiring.

There are many fine Republicans AND Democrats, just as there are idiots on both sides that one wonders how they ever got so far.

This Republican has faired well thru the years regardless of who's running (ruining? 😉) The country.

I'm not in the class of the oligarchs, nor am I wanting to be. I have my health, as does my family. Family members are officers in the US Army, as was I.

We've worked hard over the years, and are well prepared for retirement and our sunset years.

We weren't happy seeing Oregon decline so we moved elsewhere to have a better retirement life. We've also been fortunate enough to travel the world for business and pleasure.

I'm a 1st generation American; my parents, aunt's, and uncles were working class laborers in the steel mills. Even I did a stint there to earn money for college. Also the first family member of my generation to graduate from college.

We all make choices that lead to our success or failure.

Don't assume or judge just because some voter roll has a D or R after our name. It's much more complicated.

Michael Trigoboff said...

I totally support wha M2inFLA said.

Mc said...

Labels provide simplicity and convenience. Yes, they can also lead to incorrect stereotyping.

But the republican party has been on the wrong side of supporting this country for as long as I've been alive. Certainly more so recently.

I'll take my chances, and spend my time with and money on those who reflect my values.

But I certainly won't vote for an R as long as I live. That's a promise.


Mc said...

I'm sure she will since that's much of a measuring stick.
Doesn't mean she will win though.