Wednesday, October 13, 2021

The COVID workplace

We notice the big things in real time. We don't notice the very big things until later.


Workplaces are changing, maybe forever.


We have all heard the idea that fish don't notice water. They notice food and predators, because those are very important to their survival and they are in their environment. We presume they do not notice the water itself, though, because it is the environment.

William Shatner is in the news now. He is a robust-looking 90 year old, and if all goes well he is going into space, for real this time. William Shatner has an outsize role in my consciousness. Star Trek was the one scripted TV show watched by people I knew in the late 1960s. Groups of college classmates would gather together in living rooms and common areas to watch that one TV show, drink beer, and shoot the bull. Otherwise TVs were off unless a president was making an Oval Office announcement.

What we may not have noticed because it was too obvious was that Star Trek was a "workplace drama." The Starship Enterprise was a job site. The crew members were co-workers and the basis for the drama was the interaction of those fellow employees. Workplace dramas are a genre. Even people who watch very little TV can identify them: The Office, 30 Rock, Boston Legal, LA Law, Grey's Anatomy. The office setting is convenient for a TV show, with limited sets. An office puts people in close proximity, and give them a reason to interact, so we can see characters develop and stories unfold. Besides, workplaces are the natural place where our lives play out. Workplaces are an alternative family. Co-workers are people we interact with closely five days a week. 

What is happening right now, while the punditry is focusing on important things like a pandemic and Afghanistan and China and inflation and everything else, this office workplace family is going through a separation. It is mostly amicable, but it is a separation nevertheless. Maybe the family members aren't even drifting apart, even though the members might only rarely see each other in real life anymore. Or ever. Office work by professional, technical, management, and back office support is moving remote. It was "special" for COVID, supposedly temporary, but it is turning into the default. A lot of people seem to prefer it. Bosses, too.

People work connected electronically, not spatially. We don't have "workplaces" any more, except maybe for special occasions. We may be going through the cultural and workplace equivalent of water for fish. Our assumptions about "workplace" may be very different in a decade or two.


For three decades I went to the office to do my work as a Financial Advisor. Back about eight years ago, a couple of years before I retired, the company I worked for changed their opinion on working from home. Instead of it being essentially forbidden, it became enabled. The office established "remote access" technology which brought a version of the workplace desktop to a home desktop computer, a change that allowed Financial Advisors to do limited work from home. The unsaid message about remote access was that it was the exception. It was a fallback arrangement in case we were having a sick day, or in case of another 9-11 attack. That was then. Now almost everybody works remotely. Advisors have an office, and there is a branch office, but it is not clear to me why. The place is nearly empty.

There are a multitude of corollaries that flow from "going to the office." One is the nature of real records. The concept of getting things on paper has changed. In a face-to-face world, there were pink "While You Were Out" slips of paper. Now notices and assignments are shared electronically. In the COVID world a paper signature is inconvenient, so there is a work-around that has become common: Electronic signatures. The process is so simple that even elderly clients can manage it. The electronic record is now the "real" record. 

Video connection via Zoom or some equivalent system is now commonplace. People have gotten better at it over this year. People know how to mute themselves. Even the first wave of Boomers, now people in their 70s, have generally figured out virtual meetings. A board meeting of a dozen people might be more productive than one done in "real life," except that the very notion of "real" is changing. As with documents, the electronic version is the real one.

The distinction between hands-on work and virtual work exacerbates the giant fractures in American life that are coincidental with the partisan divide. Democrats are the party of college-educated office workers in cities, especially women--the kind of person most likely to be working remotely. The archetypal voter in the Republican base is a non-college educated person who works outdoors or in factories that make something tangible.  Fields are not plowed remotely, nor is oil drilled, coal mined, nor delivery trucks unloaded. Some work in the world is done by real people touching real things. The divide in political sensibilities between a female office worker in a city and a male working in an industrial setting was profound before COVID. This is one more thing widening the divide between the two groups.

Big changes take time to ripen. Possibly Americans will decide that they want to go back to the office, but the early indications are the opposite. People who can work remotely are choosing to do so.

9 comments:

John F said...

Another example of Democrats in a virtual world - Trump holding MAGA Rallies in person while Biden held virtual rallies and conventions. The closest face-to-face for Biden was the Drive-In Acceptance speech with a satellite link. Or another example - virtual warfare with a drone in the middle east controlled by a “pilot” in Tampa Florida, death on the ground is real.

Anonymous said...

Government workers have been working remotely for more than one year, and if you've ever tried doing business with them, the service is terrible and inadequate. People are not as productive when they work out of their houses with all the distractions, and the consumer pays for it by getting lousy service.

As for William Shatner, he's a 90 year old alcoholic, and he looks like death warmed-over. He's not robust.

John C said...

Good observation Peter. 90% of our (on-shore) software development teams work remotely too, as we have better and better collaboration tools for delivering transactional work. Even people who are located in my office often meet on-line rather than getting up and meeting in a physical conference room. While our "digital fluency " gets better, there are some things where direct human interaction is superior- and that's the collaborative/creative process. I recently went back into the office to meet in person with 4 people for strategic planning for a new product. Three other people joined via hi-def video and audio. The differences in level of engagement and energy was remarkable. The non-verbal queues and give and take was so obviously different. Humor was more spontaneously interjected and at the end we all agreed how the quality and speed of our collective efforts was improved in person. One of the people dialing in mentioned "you guys" referring to people in the room, when in fact he was a critical contributor to the discussion, so there was a sense of being "outside". I wonder if over time, those companies that rely on creative collaboration as a competitive edge will be less competitive than those that have more in-person interactions? I have observed that my informal but regular contact with Sr executives in (our sparsely occupied) office has likely enhanced my social and political capital within the organization.

One other thought - it will be interesting to see how remote work causes the regional political landscapes to change as the educated tech and management workers move to small towns and rural areas - as many of my colleagues are doing.

Mike said...

My employer wanted us to work from home when we weren't on the road, and save money on office space. The problem is that we had files that were supposed to be kept secure, computers that needed to be upgraded on the network and people I needed to speak with rather than text. Since I would need to dedicate one of our guest rooms as my office, I told the employer I'd be willing to do that if they paid me rent. We kept our office.

One of my favorite Far Side cartoons shows a caveman standing at the entrance to his cave with a herd of gazelles in the distance and a bunch of spears sticking out of the ground. He's saying to his mate: "You know, I don't think this telecommuting is all it's cracked up to be."

Rick Millward said...

Whether "Star Trek" or the remote workplace the common denominator is imagination.

The allure of "Star Trek" was the tech. The "Enterprise", "beam me up, Scotty", "dilithium crystals" and "phasers on stun". "Warp speed" suggested that the theoretical speed of light could be overcome. Similarly, before we could transform the workplace creative minds had to invent the hardware and software to enable it.

Today the flight was a success, though I'm not sure how much science was done. I guess it was a useful as test flight and PR exercise. It's becoming more and more evident that one day space travel will be as prosaic as jet travel, with astronauts in yoga pants.

Interestingly, sadly, FOX didn't follow the countdown in real time, preferring a segment on the Petito murder, once again failing as a credible news organization and inferring that it wasn't an important event.

Captain Kirk notwithstanding, it is.

Art Baden said...

The advent of air conditioning, the television, and the back yard replacing the front porch, were all huge factors in the alienation of people from their neighbors in their communities. Now the remote workplace brings this alienation to our work communities. We are a social species. We are hard wired to be with and cooperate with one another. This may not end well.

Low Dudgeon said...

With the remote office, no more Lt. Uhura or Yeoman Rand at arm's reach in barely-decent skirts, either. Still, Jeffrey Toobin-style multitasking is also an option, albeit a risky one. That reflects technological advancement since the late '60s conception of the 22nd century. Somehow I doubt Captain Kirk today would be able to fatally expose insecurities in a series of oddly-vulnerable supercomputers by means of some rather simplistic Socratic inquiries....

Mc said...

People!
Shatner is an actor.

bison said...

The comment" the backyard replacing the front porch" is worth pondering