"Peter, can you believe the utter nonsense people believe?"
People call or write me to tell me about some new conspiracy circulating within social media.
Despite its remarkable success in explaining the fundamental particles and forces that make up the universe, the Standard Model’s description remains woefully incomplete. It does not account for gravity, for one thing, and it is similarly silent about the nature of dark matter, dark energy and neutrino masses.A beam of positive pions—lightweight particles made from an up quark and a down antiquark—decay into muons and muon neutrinos. The muons are collected and channeled into an orderly circular path around the magnet, which they will circle, at most, a few thousand times before they decay into positrons. By detecting the direction of muon decays, physicists can extract information about how the particles interacted with the magnet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKxQTvqcpSg |
My presumption is that most readers have only the foggiest idea of what is described in the Scientific American article. This is a new presumed discovery but takes place in a century-old re-understanding of some conundrums about the apparent speed of light. The effort to make sense of those conundrums caused people to reimagine reality. The new understanding seemed to contradict every common experience of sense and nonsense. In the realm of 20th and 21st century physics light is both a particle and a wave depending on whether it is being measured, time is fluid, and gravity is an illusion based on the warping of space, and things created in one place appear to change instantly at the source depending on whether someone at a distance and later in time intends to measure them. Strange.
There are right wing news sites that have serious-appearing people insisting on the truth of wildly improbable things. Scientists, too.
If the above twelve-minute video leaves you confused and wondering if your whole understanding of the universe might be wrong, here is another on the same subject, this one beginning with the mind-bending words,
"Over the course of your life your feet will age approximately one second more than your head due to gravitational time dilation." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKD1vDAPkFQ
Here is the physics lesson you might have seen--or skipped--during college: Two hours and 31 minutes on Einstein's special theory of relativity, explained by Brian Greene.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKJuC5CUMgU |
I conclude with a simple takeaway: Humans believe things we cannot see, including things that don't "make sense."
Which seems more weird and less possible? That Hillary Clinton, bored by running for President and wanting to earn money, chose to do so by operating a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor? Or that a person who falls off a roof of a building is headed toward the ground because he is bending time.
7 comments:
SMART
Old English smeortan (verb), of West Germanic origin; related to German schmerzen ; the adjective is related to the verb, the original sense (late Old English) being ‘causing sharp pain’; from this arose ‘keen, brisk’, whence the current senses of ‘mentally sharp’ and ‘neat in a brisk, sharp style
Some ain't so much...
I confess as hard as I try it's very difficult for me to grasp theoretical physics, almost to the point of physical pain. It is both humbling and inspiring to see better minds making sense of our world and I'm grateful for it.
In the same way I find it hard to understand how a 21st Century human being can still hold a belief in an anthropomorphic god in control of the universe, past, present and future, and who will judge their behavior in an afterlife. I do understand that such beliefs are founded in superstition as a way to explain natural phenomenon. It's not hard to see that a person with these beliefs would also be vulnerable to other contrary notions.
I think where this gets into false equivalency is that science doesn't require belief without questioning.
"We take on faith that these invisible things are somehow removed or neutralized by soap and water..." No we don't...it's provable science, faith has nothing to do with it.
"While most viruses, including COVID-19, are held together with fat, soap dissolves the lipid envelope of the virus and inactivates it. When you rinse everything off, the soap carries away the germs with the water, making soap one of the most effective tools against viruses."
The people we are having trouble with are a group consisting of mentally challenged people and Republicans, who know better but who are taking advantage of them for personal, political and financial gain.
That's not hard to understand. I'm smart enough to see that.
The problem isn’t that lots of folks who may either be undereducated or prone to believing in superstition bought into Birtherism or the Big Lie. The problem is that powerful and influential people who do know better - many of them Ivy League graduates - not only enable, but full throatedly promulgate these idiocies - in order to maintain their grip on money and power. It is not a problem of an undereducated proletariat (to use a Marxist construct), but rather of a morally bankrupt elite.
Honestly, did Ted Cruz, Rupert Murdoch, Sheldon Adelson, Tucker Carlson, Josh Hawley, etc. truly believe that Barack Obama was born in Kenya? Of course not, but it became in their personal interest to enable the man spouting the filth. When Lindsey Graham said that the Republican Party could not grow without Donald Trump, he said it all.
The problem in America is not poor education, it is the moral bankruptcy of so much of the right wing political and economic elite.
The German generals and corporate plutocrats who enabled Hitler thought that they could control him. They thought he was a useful idiot they could latch onto to protect them from socialism.
Jan. 6th was a wake up call. Trump was not the useful idiot. His enablers were, and are.
Then there's religion.
Muons were discovered in 1936 according to Wikipedia. You’ve conflated general theory w quantum mechanics and quantum mechanics doesn’t really jive w the general theory hence the continued search for a unified theory which Einstein spent the last twenty years of his life looking for. Nevertheless my comment may not be apropos and isn’t any type of criticism other than the layman should prob stick w genl theory because nothing about it has ever been proven to be untrue.
The scientist/researcher carries with them a bias. In many cases, a belief that something "proven" is actually false. Or that something that they "think" is true, yet unproven, is really disproved by their work and paper they wrote. Most often the nature of scientific inquiry challenges the new idea. That is the true nature of scientific inquiry. Peer review testing and acceptance or denial.
Sometimes a charlatan puts on the mantle of scientist to hoodwink. The example the springs to mind is the the mercury preservative in childhood MMR vaccine is responsible for the growing cases of autism. One research paper written using statistical analysis and a few tests involving neurological effects on lab animals produced a "research paper". Lancet published that paper showing a correlation between inoculation with MMR and the development of autism. What the paper left out was that the mercury preservatives were used in the past but not now. An in the past there wasn't the frequency of childhood cases of autism that there is today. Furthermore, when their lab results were called into question the data proved to be falsified. Lancet publish a retraction but parents seized upon the initial paper as "proof" of a problem. The lie was now out there. Parents could question vaccinating their children and not get booster shots for themselves leaving a population exposed to infinitely more dangerous measles that has swept through unvaccinated communities. When confronted with the truth about the study they cling to the belief that their child's autism is a result of the vaccination. Baseless but comforting as parents need not look for other causes. Now research into the field of study has left many junior researchers fearful of pursuing the cause of autism as a research project least they be shunned by their institution.
The history of science is full of stories where politics and religion trumped the facts presented falsehood trumping fact. Snakeoil salesmen and Big Lie spreaders have seized upon the gullibility of people by using "scientific language"and "legal wording" in an attempt to get you to buy their product or idea. Shameful! When you want something so desperately to be true you can convince yourself to believe the damndest things.
Go sit all day long in the classrooms of your grand children. Watch who is learning and who isn’t. Teachers try, oh do they try! But you will be amazed at the lack of curiosity displayed by the students. Why? Lack of books in the home? Incurious parents who never liked school themselves? Kids dragged around from relative to missing parent and back? Today’s children have huge gaps in their learning ...can’t identify where a country is located in the world, have no knowledge of history , barely can read pages from a text book, absolutely no idea about leaders local or National, yet know all the latest rap stars and can recite their lyrics. Many cannot even read a ruler. These kids are ripe for fake news, science, whatever...I personally think free education babysitting service is not working because learning is not respected in this country, Look at teacher pay. Look at the group goop cooperative learning in which the bored capable carry the indifferent slackers. GOOD JOB! Get a star for anything. Have a pizza party for good behavior. Easy to turn out Qanoners ripe with happy Nazi flags and big gulps.
Christian,Catholic,Charter,Magnet, home school dummy worksheet happy, and whiteflight corporate voucher phony government subsidized pig troughs..certainly not the answer. You got me..I don’t have a clue anymore. And now distance learning!! Barf. Let’s go play baseball.
Your turn........
It really is wrong to say "I believe in science," Peter. Belief is for things that can't be proved. I don't BELIEVE IN science, I ACCEPT THE FINDINGS OF science. There's a huge difference, built around the fact that good scientists always change their minds when presented with better evidence. Believers tend to harden their beliefs under the same circumstances.
Post a Comment