Tuesday, December 5, 2023

Image of God

What if religion -- Christianity even -- is a force for good in the world?


Christianity has a message. It isn't OK to dehumanize your neighbor. Or even your enemy.


No one is a vermin.



Today's Guest Post is by John Coster. He studied Theology and Society at Regent College while continuing his career managing multimillion-dollar development projects for Microsoft, CenturyLink, Toyota, T-Mobile and other high-volume users of electricity. Coster is an unusual combination. He operates at the highest levels in the Seattle technology world; he also does hands-on missionary work in Africa and Asia.



Guest Post by John Coster


Coster

Your recent post on “Thin Veneer of Civilization” highlights the current deconstructionist inertia that seems to be gripping not just the U.S., but much of the western world. Outrage is the dominant mode of discourse, and violence is increasingly seen as the appropriate method to solve our “problems.” Widespread brutality is rationalized and even valorized. Kyle Rittenhouse -- the 2020 Kenosha shooter found innocent at trial -- is a hero with 260,000 Instagram followers and is a budding author. People who seek peaceful solutions with thoughtful civility are seen as weak and feckless (a popular insult these days). 

 

We wonder whatever happened to our 20th Century enlightened minds. What happened to the “war to end all wars”? I propose that the degradation of our civility rides the tail of a post-Christian age.

 

In Tom Holland’s epic book “Dominion, How the Christian Revolution Remade The World,” he poses the question, “How is it that a cult, inspired by the execution of an obscure criminal, in a long-vanquished empire came to exercise such transformative and enduring influence in the world?” He goes on for the next 542 pages to trace the influence of Christianity through history to the modern day, from calendars to the whole idea of human rights. Holland is not the only historian to observe this phenomenon. Duke University’s Kavin Rowe, in his much smaller book, "Christianity’s Surprise," chronicles many of the same historical themes.

 

Notwithstanding the ancient Sumerian or Hammurabi codes or other written forms of governance that were designed to promote social order, the pre-Christian world was a brutal and inhumane place for most people. Leadership was gained and maintained through ruthless conquest. Holland’s depictions of horrific public shaming, torture, and execution of not just enemies, but disloyal citizens, is disturbing reading which shows the true hearts of men.

 

Leaders also used religion and mythologies to legitimize their regimes and keep the populace subordinated. The pre-Christian world did not recognize the personhood of people. Human life was not considered sacred. Humans were useful for securing and preserving power, but the idea of an intrinsic human right did not exist as a concept.

 

Jesus’ teaching to love your neighbor, indeed love your enemy, was revolutionary to first century Palestine. He taught and modeled servant leadership, sacrifice, forgiveness, generosity to the poor, and caring for the vulnerable. His message had no logical upside in that cultural context. He taught that all people, regardless of age, gender, race, tribe, or social status are God’s children, made in God’s image – or “imago dei.” That is what makes us sacred and of infinite worth. His message had no logical upside in that cultural context, yet his following “went viral” after his death and resurrection. His followers did the craziest things – rescuing babies that had been discarded, setting up the first hospitals for ordinary people. Emperor Julian the Apostate chastised his pagan priests because the Christian’s were embarrassing him with the sacrificial compassion they showed to those who were not their own. The culture was shifting but not because of government.

 

Fast forward to the Medieval period where an obscure clergyman, John Comenius, promoted the idea of public education for the masses. He reasoned that every person should be literate so they could not only read the Scriptures (and know God) but also study nature, science and math (and thus know God through creation.) He is still held up in Europe as the Father of modern pedagogy. The guiding principle was human dignity based on being imago dei. You are reading this essay; you are a beneficiary of his vision and techniques. 

 

The Declaration of Independence asserts that all people are endowed by their creator with irrevocable rights of life, liberty, etc. Jefferson was not a Christian but note Jefferson’s theological anchor for that assertion. He knew his audience needed cosmic authority. 

 

The sacredness of personhood was manifested by MLK and the civil rights movement. His "Theology of Personalism" (Ph.D. thesis) informed his insistence on non-violence. Since all people are made in God’s image, then Black people must demand to be treated as such. But violence against the White oppressor would be sinning against their imago dei. Malcom X did not share that view, but later softened when he saw how fruitful it was.

 

The April 1966 Time Magazine’s front cover asked if God was dead. Not an actual god being dead, but dead in the sense that an infinite and absolute god was no longer relevant to an enlightened society. Social observers call our current moment “Post-Christian,” which some may celebrate, but it comes with a price. The emergence of AI means the question of human identity is no longer an abstract philosophical discussion.

 

We live in a time of increasing moral ambiguity. Whether or not you believe in Christianity’s claims (which I do) it is hard not to see that corresponding decline of Christian influence and increase in discord, when it becomes permissible to dehumanize “the other." Social psychologist and agnostic Jonathan Haidt is worried by that decline of religion in America is decreasing social cohesion.  

 

In my view, unless there is an authentic spiritual renewal, our current trajectory will continue. Politics simply mirrors the culture and technology amplifies it.





[Note: For daily delivery of this blog to your email go to: https://petersage.substack.com. The blog is free and always will be.]





32 comments:

Low Dudgeon said...

It depends on the claims made by, or on behalf of, a given religion, eh? Are its teachings, its texts, the sum and substance of humanity, and exclusively so? Is violent punishment a just consequence for heretics, infidels, blasphemers and apostates?

Also, is this world but a test, a staging area? Jesus indeed taught we should love our neighbors and enemies—here. Then after final judgement, all souls will be irrevocably separated into sheep and goats, into eternally saved and eternally damned.

A net gain or a net loss for mankind? The former, IF all begin as sinners richly deserving otherwise-inevitable damnation. Or if one particular religion is destined to be the whole world’s religion? If not, maybe the juice ain’t worth the squeeze…..

Mike Steely said...

Religions certainly can be forces for good to the extent that they promote love, brotherhood and help for the less fortunate, but often they don’t. A recent survey by the Public Religion Research Institute, for example, revealed that nearly one-third of white evangelical Protestants believe patriots may have to resort to political violence to save the country. Religion is too often a force used by the ruthless to divide and conquer, advancing their love of power rather than the power of love.

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace...

Rick Millward said...

You don't need religion to be a nice person.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Doris Lessing once said something like this (I am paraphrasing):

The Catholic Church ruled Europe for almost 2,000 years. When its influence evaporated, it left a Catholic Church shaped hole in the consciousness of the West.

Since then, that hole has been opportunistically filled by belief systems and ideologies with approximately the same shape: Communism, for instance, and more recently wokeism.

Under wokeism: heretics are persecuted; cancel culture is excommunication; sins against the ideology need to be confessed and apologized for; there are scriptures (books by Ibram X Kendi and Robin DiAngelo); there is an anointed clergy (DEI bureaucrats).

God may be dead, but we have (Godless?) religions anyway. is it just a coincidence that DEI is Latin for God? 😱

Dave said...

If you actually follow Christ and his teachings, it is a force of good. The evangelical right have actually lessened many young people from becoming Christian in my opinion. I know many good people who are atheist who might have been otherwise if politics didn’t get so strongly associated with Christianity. I’m thinking the same holds for the religion of Islam in terms of following Mohamed. Were the crusaders really about spreading Christianity or about getting the loot? What used to be the saying, don’t talk about religion or politics?

Michael Trigoboff said...

Imagine there’s no countries…

That’s what we had before the invention of agriculture. Instead we had little bands of people living tribally, sometimes peacefully, sometimes at war with each other. But then some of the tribes became bigger and more organized and invented agriculture and became nations.

Suppose we have “no countries” now. What would stop a nation from arising somewhere and conquering all the little peaceful people?

Idealism is very sweet, and can produce nice things like popular songs. But it’s no way to live in the real world among actual humans, with everything that “human nature“ includes.

Ed Cooper said...

"I like your Christ, but nit your Christianity"
Attributed to Mohatmas Ghandi, a powerful supporter of "Wokeness", before being murdered .

Ed Cooper said...

How many books h Ave been banned by "woke" school administrators ? How many laws have been passed by ,"woke" politicians forbidding the teaching of Critical Race Theory, or Advanced Placement Black History classes in high schools, or how many classes which acknowledge the LGBTQ people are humans have been banned by "woke" educators. Best of my knowledge, NONE. However, Malignant dwarf Ron DeSantis, among others has been leading the charge to do all of the above . How Karmic that the cofounder of the misleading titled Moms for Liberty has been outed as enjoying the occasional menage a trois! While loudly urging the banning if any books which even mention the word "sex". Hypocrisy, thy name is "Republican "

M2inFLA said...

Excellent post today.

Rick Millward said...
You don't need religion to be a nice person.

I agree with Rick, but I'd slightly change the statement to:

You need to believe in something good to be a nice person!

Anonymous said...

It's been about 40 years since I last read the Watchtower publication "You Can Live Forever In Paradise On Earth." That book interprets the Bible to mean that we all will rise from the dead on judgment day, except for those of us who happen to be alive on that day; and except for 144,000 people who already are living in paradise forever, because Jehovah God chose them based on the righteous lives they lived. Those other than the 144,000 will have a last chance to repent. Jehovah's Witnesses already reject the idea of countries.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Religious extremism often causes the rise of an opposite and equally extreme movement. So now we have wokeism and antiwokeism. Common sense lies somewhere in between…

Michael Trigoboff said...

• wokeness, aka
○ social justice ideology
○ origin in critical race theory
• oppressor/oppressed
○ require any conflict to be seen this way
○ any criticism of an oppressed group is prohibited
§ “blaming the victim”
§ “punching down”
○ oppressor groups can be freely criticized/insulted/discriminated against
§ “whiteness”
§ Ibram X Kendi:
§ “Past racial discrimination can only be remedied by present racial discrimination.”
• underrepresentation
○ the only permissible explanation is prejudicial discrimination
○ no other possible cause can be admitted
○ if a specific discriminatory mechanism can’t be discovered
§ “systemic racism” is invoked
§ analogous to “dark matter” in cosmology
○ if underrepresentation is disallowed, overrepresentation must also be
§ direct negative effects on high achieving groups like Asians and Jews
○ only applies to “oppressed” groups
§ no complaints about lack of Asians in NFL, NBA
• equity vs equality
○ implementation of rules to make the numbers come out “right”
○ equal outcomes instead of equal opportunity
○ no recognition of individual effort or cultural influences

Mike said...

As I'm sure most readers know, Woke is an adjective derived from African-American Vernacular English meaning "alert to racial prejudice and discrimination". Beginning in the 2010s, it came to encompass a broader awareness of social inequalities such as racial justice, sexism and LGBT rights.

To so-called conservatives, of course, it means anything that displeases them. But don't bother trying to awaken the unwoke.

Michael Trigoboff said...

“Woke’ has linguistically drifted from its original meaning. It now means precisely what I posted in my previous message.

My post was in outline format, but this blog software did not preserve its indented outline structure. Hopefully, it’s still clear enough to understand, for those who actually want to understand.

Low Dudgeon said...

In the last decade "woke" has increasingly come to signify, especially in the cases of Kendi and his ilk, the dogmatic, simplistic, unscholarly and ultimately toxic dependence upon the identity politics shibboleths of the modern Western left. Disparate group impact replacing disparate treatment as proof of actionable discrimination--by nose-counting--has proven a blight upon American society, harming most those it purports to most protect.

The seeming contradictions abound amid a taxonomy of oppression which folks like Rep. Jayapal decry....selectively. "I have a dream that my four little children will [still?] live in a nation wherein the weight of one's value is determined primarily by the color of one's skin". Right? Oh, and Hamas and Iran are correct about women and LGBTQ. Intersectionally speaking, that is!

Ed Cooper said...

Perhaps it M eans what you wrote "precisely" to you, but not necessarily to other folks, perhaps with more open minds and willingness to see differences not as something to be afraid of.

Mike said...

As I said, to so-called conservatives, woke means whatever displeases them. And nothing displeases them more than diversity, equity and inclusion. It violates their belief that God intended America to be a promised land for white Europeans.

Michael Trigoboff said...

DEI violates my belief that the best qualified person should get the job. DEI violates my belief in excellence and competence and hard work. DEI violates my belief that we should not have racial quota systems. DEI violates my belief that we are all Americans, not irrevocable members of separate tribes fighting each other in a zero sum game.

DEI violates Martin Luther King‘s belief that people should be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin.

Michael Trigoboff said...

I am not “afraid“ of differences. if someone can write code, I don’t give a rip what color they are, or where they are from.

I am opposed to the DEI ideology that I described as accurately as I know how to in that outline.

It’s interesting how people on the left insist on projecting what they are opposed to onto me instead of listening and reacting to what I am actually saying.

Mike said...

After centuries of oppressing certain minorities, the U.S. was finally pressured into granting them equal opportunity. It required giving them a leg up to compensate for those many years of abuse and the lingering prejudice against them, so programs like Affirmative Action and DEI were initiated. White nationalists resent the erosion of their white privilege and the notion that even people of color were created equal, but there’s no credible evidence that such programs result in hiring less qualified people.

M2inFLA said...

Oppression...look at immigration in the late 1800s. Your country of origin resulted in discrimination. Yes, even White Europeans.

Today, it continues, for whites, blacks, yellows, browns, and even political affiliation.

When it comes to attempts at compensation for past oppression, do you want to use a product that results from a best effort possible, or from a best effort from someone who got a leg up because of past oppression.

Each person, regardless of ethnicity, race, political leaning, or intelligence, we need to consider and pick the best person to do the job. Merit and competency tops DEI.

Low Dudgeon said...

Dr. King loved America and his ultimate goal was post-color, not to ahistorically pathologize whiteness (or heteronormativity, masculinity, etc.), much less European culture since the middle of the last millenium, as the qualitatively worst across globe and time. Far from it. He was a classical scholar, which informed his ministry and his intellect as much as the Bible. Mass slavery and exploitation of "lesser" peoples via force reigned in Africa, for instance (and still does), long before the Middle Passage, from China and Egypt to the pre-Columbian Americas. Human history ain't beanbag, and just about every dog's had his day, on top and on the bottom. That's equality.

With the reductionist intersectional group hierarchies generated on the modern left, because "white" or "whiteness" is now all-purpose code for "oppressor", or "advantaged", "white" or white-adjacent can today functionally include Asian college applicants and Jewish Israeli rape victims! "Straight male" is likewise a form of "oppressor", except as applied to certain violently homophobic and misogynistic--but crucially non-white--religionists, whose own days as mass-enslaving, imperialist global hegemons have been far longer lasting and more widespread, and without amelioerative outreach like affirmative action, than those of the European colonial powers. But trendy academic loathing of America and the West trickles down, and spreads out.

Mike said...

Comparing the experience of white Europeans to slaves sounds like something that might come out of the Florida school system. Ditto for the notion that DEI and competency are incompatible.

Woke Guy :-) said...

"Merit and competency tops DEI."

It's a great sentiment, and one that everyone including people like myself who's woke would support 110% ***IF*** everyone started on a level playing field. Unfortunately people DON'T start on a level playing field. Due to the accident of how well you chose your parents, you can be born into life being dealt a pair of Aces, or a shit hand of an off-suit 2 and 5.

The reason DEI is necessary is because we do NOT have a system in which everyone starts from the same starting line, some are literally born with tremendous advantages for any number of reasons that have literally nothing to do with skill, talent, or determination and folks like MF in Fla and Trigoboff like to pretend that isn't the case.

Wake the hell up guys and try using just a tiny bit of empathy for people who weren't born with your considerable advantages and consider that just maybe "they" have talent and skills that are worth nurturing.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Responding to WG:

I am all in favor of helping everyone in this country reach their potential. What I am absolutely not in favor of is lowering the standards of excellence and competence, or of instituting racial/sexual quotas.

Either you can write code or you can’t. And if you can’t, I am not interested in having you on my team just because of what color you are, or the unfortunate circumstances of your life.

M2inFLA said...

My response to Woke Guy,

That's a pretty broad paint brush you are wielding...

You only may know that I lived in Oregon for all my adult career. You probably didn't know that my mom is from Czechoslovakia, and while my dad was born in the USA, he spent his childhood in Czechoslovakia, too, returning to the US after WW II. We were poor growing up, and I was one of the first to attend college

No private K-12 education for me, but some I was smart, despite either of my parents even graduating from High School.

I studied hard, and did well. I started working when I was 10, delivering the daily morning paper near Buffalo NY for several years. I was fascinated with radios and electronics. I did well enough in school to score well on tests, and got a scholarship to get a BSEE at a private college in NY.

I worked during my college years washing dishes during the school year, and at Bethlehem Steel during the summer. I joined Army ROTC and upon graduating, served as an officer in the US Army Reserve while I started my career in high tech.

I did very well, permitting me to retire without worry. I left Oregon for Florida for my sunset years.

My self taught learning and hard work made me what I am today. Not any special help from my parents.

I also gave back to my Oregon community, by volunteering in the K-12 public schools. I served as PTA president for several years. I took middle school students to Italy and Greece.

I feel I have an understanding of what works well or what can be improved, and I do my best to help when and where I can. I continue to do that here in Florida, too.

Mike said...

Since opponents of Affirmative Action base their opposition on an allegation that it lowers standards, they should be able to provide some evidence that it does, but they can’t.

Michael Trigoboff said...

The evidence Mike wants would have to come from social scientists. Social scientists are almost uniformly liberal, and would never study anything like that. And if they did, and they turned up evidence that affirmative action caused a lowering of standards, they would never publish it.

But all it takes is the common sense that one would hope everyone was born with to realize that if you are selecting for race instead of competence and excellence, you are going to get what you selected for and not what you weren’t selecting for.

Just recently, there was a story about how in college hiring for physics professors, they filtered them first by the “quality” of their “diversity statements“, and only evaluated their quality as physicists afterwards. How many higher-quality physicist did they filter out? The process was not designed to answer that question, so it would not produce any of the “evidence” that Mike demands.

Mike said...

In other words, the evidence for Affirmative Action lowering standards is basically the same as the evidence that Trump won the election: people want to believe it so it's true to them.

There's no evidence that it's true, but plenty that it's bullshit. Just a couple examples:

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1099612.pdf

https://www.upstate.edu/diversityinclusion/policies-and-procedures/aa/myth_reality.php

Michael Trigoboff said...

The thing is, Mike probably has not sat through faculty hiring committee meetings and seen the pressure that’s put on everyone by DEI bureaucrats to hire the minority without regard to qualifications. But I personally know people who have told me about things like this.

There’s no “evidence“ because the meetings aren’t recorded. And besides, the almost entirely liberal social science field is not interested in collecting any evidence of the sort.

John C said...

It is rewarding to see my essay stimulate such a wide-ranging, robust discussion. I note that the underlying sentiment behind most opinions here supports my point: that there is a sense of right and wrong regarding treatment of people that can be traced to an historical Christian movement. All of our worldviews are shaped by this whether we acknowledge it or not. This is even if we strongly disagree in how society should be governed.

Human sacredness is not about organized religion or nationalistic expressions of Christendom. In fact Jesus would call those things idolatry – which is considered the worst of sins.

I have been asked – if Christianity is so transformative to turn people’s hearts to do good, then why do many Christians, indeed most Evangelicals – including high-profile leaders, embrace such an immoral leader and his un-Christian values? That’s the top question of thoughtful Christ-followers these days, but if we look throughout history, this is not the first time. Spiritual deception is real and powerful and all of us are vulnerable.

M2inFLA said...

When my son applied to Oregon State as his safety school, he indicated "Other" as his race. His grades were good, as were his SATs and ACTs. He also knew he would automatically accepted because of his HS GPA.

He also had applied to other schools on the East Coast and was accepted to all of them. He also did not consider any schools that wanted to recruit him to play lacrosse.

Fast forward to accepting admissions. My son had told Oregon Star that he would not be attending, and turned down the "Other" scholarship he was offered.

Fast forward to acceptance day of school at OSU. They inquired of my son why my son did not accept. Yes, he earlier got acknowledgement of his refusal to accept admission or scholarship but they wanted to know why, and had assumed he was a minority because he simply selected "Other" on his application. The scholarship was for minorities my son was simply an "Other".