That leaves two choices for Democrats: Tina Kotek and Tobias Read
At a distance, they both look about the same. Tina Kotek and Tobias Read both have good experience in government. Kotek has been Speaker of the Oregon House. Read is the State Treasurer. Both are liberal Democrats. Both are from the Portland area. They are both compassionate, earnest liberals, concerned about homelessness, poverty, justice, policing, climate, and wildfires. They are both part of the educated, urban, diversity-conscious, blue-state political mindset that shapes the modern Democratic party. I suspect they would vote identically on nearly every state or national issue put before a legislative body.
The Oregon primary election is May 17, less than six weeks away. The two remaining candidates are establishing different brands.
Tina Kotek |
I observed Kotek at an event in Ashland. She was asked about two embarrassing failures of state government, the fact that Oregon is the slowest of the 50 states to have TSA-ready driver's licenses, and the Oregon Employment Department's delays in delivering emergency unemployment checks during the COVID shutdown. Her response was that it wasn't her department, since she was in the legislative, not executive branch of government. She said that some changes should be looked at. I considered the answer an important "tell." It was a softball pitch for such a skilled and articulate politician. It was an opportunity to denounce bad administration wherever she see it and to share the frustration felt by all Oregonians, undoubtedly including Governor Kate Brown. She appeared not to want to be critical. After all, she is on Oregon government's team.
I told her one-on-one that I thought her answer made her look like an apologist for an unsatisfactory status quo. It is OK to fire and replace people who do a job poorly, I said, especially when the error is on Democrats. There is no need to defend bad government. She nodded and said she will handle a question like that differently in the future. I can accept a "yes" answer, and maybe she will adjust. But the incident revealed to me her first instinct and mindset. She is a loyal part of Oregon's Democratic-led government and the logical successor to Governor Brown. She represents continuity.
“Continue the status quo in Salem or vote for Tobias Read, someone who isn’t afraid to confront the urgent challenges we face in Oregon.”His positions on issues do not strike me as markedly different from Kotek's--or Governor Brown's. Both Read and Kotek say homeless encampments in Portland are a dangerous eyesore and cruel to the people encamped. Read says we need to set up shelters and make campers go there to get them off the sidewalks. Kotek says to set up shelters and try to make them leave. That is a distinction too subtle for anyone but their campaigns to notice. Read insisted that students be back in classrooms a couple of months before students were, in fact, back in classrooms. It is a distinction now moot. Kotek is politically vulnerable for having pushed the energy cap-and-trade bill opposed by rural Oregonians, but Read's Facebook page promises to "lead the effort to decarbonize our economy." This will not be a differentiator.
However, his new TV ad makes a clear branding distinction, if not a policy one. Without mentioning names he is positioning himself as not Governor Kate Brown, not Tina Kotek, and not the status quo. Watch:
Click: 30 second ad |
So far, Read is the candidate better positioned as the change agent.
[Note: I have made campaign contributions of approximately the same size to Kristof, Read, and Kotek.]
8 comments:
In a a recent debate between Kotek and Read, Kotek answered like she was reading off a script put together by the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. She was totally robotic and predictable. Read at least came across as a human being, functioning in real time and answering questions honestly.
If you vote for Kotek, you’re voting for an ideology. If you vote for Read, you’re voting for a person.
I just switched my voter registration to Democrat so that I could vote for Read. I might vote for Betsy Johnson in the fall, though.
I find I'm quite bothered by Kotek'a response to your one on one conversation. If she were a "truly skilled and articulate" polician, or even better, a Leader, she would never have responded with the "Not my Fault" trope. I'll be voting for Tobias in the Primary.
I think either would do a good job.
A problem I see is a lack of civics:
The public/voters think politicians are magicians who can do anything, and the politicians don't correct that.
I recall, decades ago, a local race where a candidate was touting their antichoice beliefs as a dogwhistle.
Tobias Read has a huge vulnerability, I think. Despite being urged to divest the funds under his control--principally the PERS fund, from fossil fuels, he stonewalled, hiding behind a problematic interpretation of the law governing investments. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, it's been revealed that Read made investments in Russian fossil fuel companies. Now he can't get them out or unload them. The figure I heard was $1.5 billion.
I think if Republicans choose someone reasonably sane, and some decent credentials, we are in big trouble. If Democrats don't shed the finger in the wind, let's not hurt anybodys feelings image, we're going to get clobbered.
"...Her response was that it wasn't her department, since she was in the legislative, not executive branch of government."
This is telling, a truthful response.
Years ago, a good friend ran as a Democrat for a State Representative position. I asked him whether he got funding from the Party. A simple no, as he told me he was informed of the rules when running and expecting campaign help. One doesn't bite the hand that feeds them.
I think Kotek would be an effective Governor. She just has the wrong plans for fixing Oregon. The Progressive platform just doesn't work.
The difference is that Read is positioning himself to be perceived as a centrist. He is raising the same issues that the Republicans are: homeless blight and education. Dems will need to be centrists or they will lose to Betsy Johnson, who is raising a lot of money. Michael isn’t the only one on the Read-Johnson continuum.
The $137 million held in Russian government currency and Russian company investments is being divested and represents about 1/10th of 1% or the $135 billion in total funds administered by the state treasury. You heard wrong, Herb.
Post a Comment