Sunday, August 1, 2021

The Shrinking Medford Mail Tribune

The News environment has changed. There is less local news. Much less. Especially in the newspaper.


That isn't news to anyone.


Tam Moore is a familiar name in Southern Oregon. He is a lifelong professional journalist, except for a four-year period when he was a Jackson County Commissioner in the mid-1970s. He is civic-minded, active, and involved in the institutions that make a city a good place to live. I consider him a community builder, now and for over fifty years. He wrote a Guest Post here in June, saying he was a Republican, but hoped his Party changed from within. He has seen the changing news landscape both as a subject of journalism and as a professional, working journalist.

Southern Oregon is facing a milestone, and he has a story to tell. 


Guest Post by Tam Moore 

                              Shrinking Tribune

My last Saturday local newspaper came July 31. I didn’t cancel my subscription to the Mail Tribune, since 1989 the daily newspaper for Medford, Oregon.

The Tribune, like most of Oregon’s daily newspapers and a host of dailies across the country, went hybrid August 1: A combination of four print editions weekly and daily Internet posting to digital editions. 


Tam Moore, center, with John Darling and Anne Batzer

Oregon probably has just six remaining daily newspapers—and one of them, the largest in circulation Portland Oregonian, does home delivery only four days a week. One of the dailies I used to read regularly is all digital. Things are changing rapidly; I can’t be sure of the count beyond a quick web search. 
 They haven’t told me how my pre-paid MT subscription – now in its 54th year—will prorate the loss of three papers a week. I bet things are tight at Rosebud Media, publisher of the MT and the smaller Ashland Tidings. The Tidings, established in 1876, vanishes in the shake-up, replaced by an “Ashland” edition of the Tribune.

Some numbers tell the story, without even getting into “hits” on Internet sites.

When I moved here in 1967, as a junior executive with a television, radio and cable TV outfit, the MT circulation was about 29,000 households. It would grow to over 30,000 and the six-day a week Tribune expand to publishing a Saturday paper in 1989 – then under ownership of the Ottaway Newspapers. 

When I checked circulation data after reading my last Saturday paper, the Tribune reported delivery to 17,138 subscribers. That’s in a county with 88,241 households according to the latest Oregon population estimates, and a two-state Medford Designated Marketing area with a population of 394,810 people living in 184,570 households. Advertisers need penetration of a market to make ad buys worthwhile; governments and community groups need a way to communicate with citizens.

We journalists – I’ve been a member of the Society of Professional Journalists since 1954 -- had trouble with  transitions in news delivery over recent decades. TV and radio news, where I spent the first half of my career, were tough on newspapers. Then came the Internet in the 1990s and stories originating with on-the ground professional reporters were popping up for free as Google and other search engines dug into the fast-multiplying digital files. Traditional media couldn’t figure out how to monetize the content they produced.

On top of that, the proliferation of opinion commentators on cable news and Social Media news aggregators gave readers more sources for information – and viewpoints—than most could handle. Pew Research Center 2020 data show “explosive audience growth” for cable news channels in the presidential election year – Fox News’ average audience increase by 61 percent, CNN’s by 72 percent, while local television news audiences gained just 4 percent. 

Newspaper advertising revenue fell off in 2020, Pew reports, to the extent that paid subscriptions were bringing in more money than sale of advertising. Political advertising on local TV stations, on the other hand, topped $2 billion nationally among five major publicly-held local TV station groups. Digital advertising – those ads which pop-up while you are on the Internet, billed almost $250 billion in 2020, with $102.6 billion of ads on smartphones and other mobile devices.

All of this should  worry those of us concerned about a functioning democracy. Voters need information when they go to the ballot box. Government at all levels, from special districts to the Congress of the United States, needs to hear from the governed in a timely way. It takes reporters and editors to gather the news--to tell us what government is considering, so we can make our views known to the decision-makers. Without successful media companies, there won’t be folks on the ground asking the right questions and digging into the public record. 

The problem is beyond no Saturday paper. Collectively we need to figure out a successful business model for collecting and sharing local and regional news.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Presently, electronic media and social networking reinforce my views. The news is filtered through a series of algorithms and AI refining exactly what I am presented. Very little news makes an appearance on my screen without first being sorted to appeal to my preferences. Why? Paying reporters to write stories and collect news to report is expensive. It’s much easier to use a clipper service tailored to infotainment and key-worded for easy sorting. The old days are gone. The little community newspapers featuring local stories written by local reporters is dead, at least it is here where I live.

Art Baden said...

Creative destruction is often more destructive than creative

Bob Warren said...

Tam Moore provided your blog with an intelligent analysis of the present
status of what has become a huge question mark: The Medford Mail Tribune.
But why doesn't Tam Moore engage his obvious intelligence to the enigma and
disgrace of being led (the Republican Party)' around by a lying scumbag
like Donald Trump? You can't have it both ways Tam, the 'Republican Party
has ceded the high ground and to its everlasting disgrace will be
identified with a man who advised males to advance their relations with the opposite sex by simply "grabbing them by the pussy". Tam, is that man your role model? My suspicions about your moral integrity have been aroused.
and will color every word you utter.
Bob Warren

Michael Trigoboff said...

This was predicted in 2006 in an amazing video, EPIC 2014.

It didn’t get everything right, but it got a lot right.

M2inFLA said...

I pay for subscriptions to the Oregonian, Pamplin media papers, NY Times, WSJ, the Orlando Sentinel, and a few other local community papers here in central Florida (I lived in Oregon for almost 45 years).

All those are online only now, after years of getting the NYT, WSJ, and Oregonian when I lived in Oregon.

I've always assumed that advertising paid the bulk of newspaper operations, with subscriptions paying only for the delivery and printing costs.

Without advertisers, it's difficult to pay for the news gathering costs. I easily saw this over the past several years I lived in Oregon.

Worse is the news targeted to eyeballs; much reinforcement of reading habits and preferences. Readers don't always read outside their silos.

As for reading news online for free... nothing is truly free, as news gathering costs. One gets what they pay for.

The internet and social media provides access to a lot for free. Google and other search engines help the inquiring minds. Unfortunately, there is only so much time that people are willing to spend doing that to get the big picture.

Here on this blog which I've been reading for several years, the personalities demonstrate just how big their silos are, and what is used to fill them.

Keep up the good work, keeping me somewhat informed about my Oregon.

Sally said...

Where’s the Mail Tribune’s coverage of city and county government? The last couple of years are the first time in my life I have not subscribed to at least one local newspaper. It also has a demonstrated propensity for mixing front page reports with editorials that look to be leading them.

The Oregonian has become about as bad as the city it publishes in and for. The Register Guard was the last best newspaper in the state, decimated a few years ago now. The Albany Democrat Herald had the last best editor/editorial writer, Hasso Herring, now long gone, and highly reminiscent of Eric Allen, long long gone. The Bend Bulletin may be hanging on. The Portland Tribune has merit.

New models are going to replace old ones, for better or worse. Speaking of long gone, my sentiments about local newspapers, and many if not most national ones as well.

Sally said...

As for your diatribe, Mr Warren, the post you are looking for is here.

http://peterwsage.blogspot.com/2021/06/confessions-of-republcan-in-name-only.html

Turns out I commented on that, also, ironically (or not) about the local news.

Ralph Bowman said...

The Linotype was replaced by Dr Wang’s word processor. The mimeograph was replaced by the copier. The microcomputer killed machines with solenoids. And on and on. To me, the cellphone will kill the the big production houses of media. The young lady who stood with her cell phone and captured the murder of George Floyd was a type of journalist. Maybe journalists these days need to send a swarm of people capable of holding cellphones to the place of the story, arm them with questions, and receive broadcasts back to the “ educated journalist editor” who culls and determines the truth of the story. Funding? Donors , grants, pop up ads?
I hope this not insulting to Mr Warren. I love my local paper. But the advertisers who support newspapers are planning the demise of the wrap around and insert ad format and replace with aps on the cell phone, bigger discounts with the digital coupon at Albertsons.
Thank you for your courage. We need vision, far beyond the crap flying over the internet and cable stations.

Michael. Steely said...

To Sally:
It sounds to me like Mr. Warren is stating the obvious, and that's not a diatribe. Donald Trump, an obvious psychopath and compulsive liar, is the undisputed leader of the Republican Party. Pretending to believe his biggest lie, that he won the election, has become the latest litmus test for being a real Republican as opposed to a Wacko In Name Only. As such, there is good reason to question the integrity of anyone who follows such anti-American leadership.

Sally said...

@michael steely

Of course you think that.

It just wasn’t the subject.

Mike said...

Back@Sally

You may not have noticed, but it was Mr. Warren's subject.

Bill said...

But it wasn't Tam's, or Peter's. Warrens comments on Trump support were off topic and deserve to be ignored. Having watched Tam over the years, I doubt seriously that he is a Trump supporter, anyway. Not all Republicans are.