Friday, April 16, 2021

Anti-Semitism theory, written in Medford

 Tucker Carlson on Fox:

     "I know that the left and all the little gatekeepers on Twitter become literally hysterical if you use the term 'replacement,' if you suggest that the Democratic Party is trying to replace the current electorate. But they become hysterical because that's what's happening actually. Let's just say it. That's true."


Kevin McDonald, at the Occidental Observer, in response:

     "Of course it's true, and what's being replaced is the traditional White population of the country."



America is experiencing a familiar response to immigration. We have been here before, fearing Catholics into Maryland in the 18th Century; of Irish into Boston in the 19th; of Italians and Greeks and Jews in the early 20th; of the Chinese into California always. Now the target is people from Latin America and Asia. The objections are familiar, too. Those outsiders are essentially different people, with different culture. They are genetically inferior and will debase the overall quality of the American genetic stock. They are dangerous and bring crime. They will take the jobs of "real" Americans and will work harder for less money. They will outvote us and take over.

The chant, "You will not replace us" climbed into national consciousness during the Charlottesville demonstrations. Then-president Trump famously said that there were "good people on both sides."

The fear that culture-changing people are worming their way into America to destroy us has been around forever, but the term replacement has found voice in anti-Semitic publications. They promulgated a theory that Jews in particular are a parasitic group taking advantage of the naive innocence of Americans of northern European heritage. The notion has traction within White nationalist groups. It was voiced in the manifestos of mass shooters in El Paso of Hispanics, in Pittsburgh at a synagogue, and in Christchurch, New Zealand at a mosque. 

Kevin McDonald, the editor of the Occidental Observer, lives in Jacksonville, Oregon, a small town just outside of Medford. He is a retired professor of Evolutionary Psychology at California State University at Long Beach. The Occidental Observer is the intellectual voice of anti-Semitic alarmism in America. I understand McDonald to argue that Jews are carrying out a group evolutionary strategy to control the American host country. He writes that Jews are a coherent race with the group "mind" of a parasite or virus, seeking a larger population to infect and exploit. He is living here quietly under an assumed name--famous internationally as the intellectual thought leader for anti-Semitic replacement theory, but invisible locally except within a local music scene where he talks music, not race theory. (He told an interviewer at Tablet, an on-line Jewish periodical, that he was considering moving from Oregon to Maine. His identity had been discovered by local citizens by happenstance.) 

The Occidental Observer is a "serious" website, with longish, semi-academic articles by writers on the theme of America under siege. It reminds me of National Review for anti-Semites. I have a link to it below, not to promote it, but to warn of it and show its connection to ideas that have become mainstream.

Replacement theory had been a fringe idea. No longer. It has gone mainstream into the GOP and Fox News, not as replacement by Jews specifically, but by the wrong kind of foreigners generally. Within GOP circles, there is less talk of "Jews" than of "George Soros." People who want to get the connection, get it. Immigration is thought to be a calculated and cynical plan by Democrats to flood the country with new Democratic voters. Tucker Carlson is saying it openly and proudly. This is our country and we have the right to say who gets to live here and we don't want our voices over-ruled by unwanted interlopers. They don't respect our culture and laws, and they vote in gratitude to the Democrats who are co-conspirators in the invasion.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net

The fear of invasion by foreigners informs the Trump-GOP theory that the 2020 election must have been stolen. Their theory of the case is that Trump's vote total increased substantially in 2020 over 2016 because of an outpouring of support for this charismatic president; that makes sense. Meanwhile, the vote total for Joe Biden, the frail, senile man hiding in a basement blathering out socialist nonsense, is only understandable if there were votes cast illegally by fraudsters allowing non-citizens to vote. The fear is that the Democratic tactic of flooding the country was already working. Replacement isn't a theory. It is a reality.

The current effort by Republicans to tighten rules for voting have dark roots, but one need not agree with Tucker Carlson or Kevin McDonald to want elections rules to be well-drawn. There are legitimate good government reasons to want elections to be free, fair, and legitimate.  But the subterranean thread of anti-Semitism has come closer to the surface, in the form of Tucker Carlson's open and proud nativism. He speaks of immigrants. It is the anti-Semites who observe and welcome the connection. One does not need to be an anti-Semite to be anti-immigrant, and one does not need to be anti-immigrant to be a Republican, and one does not need to be a Republican to want voting rules to be fair and rigorous enough to create legitimate elections.

So, to be clear, I am not saying that all people who want fair elections are anti-Semites.

But Tucker Carlson did the world a favor by his recent monologues. He brought something out in the open. He is advocating the anti-immigrant nativism that has been the undercurrent of GOP thinking, voiced prominently by Pat Buchanan in 1992, and a sharp reversal of Reagan's pro-immigration thinking. It is the new GOP.  

Nativism and suspicion of foreigners have deep roots in American thinking. Tucker Carlson made it text, not sub-text. Kevin McDonald is applauding.



8 comments:

Dave said...

Gee another link to Hitler like thinking among the republicans, go figure. The south is pretty conservative and pretty racist. I believe good will win over evil, and I call racist thinking, Hitler evil. Trump has made it more ok to be racist, just don’t call supporters that, heaven forbid. It’s not a problem being catholic or Italian,... anymore. Jews will always be singled out for some reason, but in the end humans are marching toward greater fairness, more acceptance of others. It’s just hard to see.

Rick Millward said...

We recoil at white supremacism in overalls, but it's the polo wearing racist that's the real danger. The suit and tie, and the white coat, that gives credibility to hate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_racism

This is the predominant mode of thought that ignorant bigots cling to even though it's been completely disproven, mostly by the revelations from DNA.

"Scientific racism continued through the early 20th century, and soon intelligence testing became a new source for racial comparisons. Before World War II (1939–45), scientific racism remained common to anthropology, and was used as justification for eugenics programs, compulsory sterilization, anti-miscegenation laws, and immigration restrictions in Europe and the United States. The war crimes and crimes against humanity of Nazi Germany (1933–45) discredited scientific racism in academia, but racist legislation based upon it remained in some countries until the late 1960s." - Wikipedia

Republican encouragement of anti-science, for instance their support of "intelligent design" and other religious hokum, has allowed "scientific racism" to reemerge. Now it's called "racial realism", but it's the same thing.

It's always seemed odd to me that Jews are considered a "race". If that's true (it's not) why aren't members of other religions? This for me exposes the insidious nature of anti-semitism.

Anonymous said...

I suppose Native Americans can relate to replacement theory. However immigration is part of life on planet earth. People move to escape persecution and horrendous living conditions.

The racists should be glad that the people coming from North America south of the border are 1) Predominately Christian and 2) Predominantly a mix of indigenous & European (Spanish) heritage. But since they are basically mentally ill, none of that matters. Some people always need a group or groups to hate.

Michael Trigoboff said...

I am Jewish. And yet I am opposed to illegal immigration. I believe that requiring ID in order to register to vote is just plain common sense. I dislike many of the political groups that are supported by George Soros. I am even skeptical that natural selection is the entire and only mechanism operating in evolution.

None of that makes me an anti-Semite.

I think that some accusations of anti-Semitism are like adding 2 and 2 and getting 4,000,000. I think the same is true of some accusations of racism. I think that it would be good if everyone were more careful about making accusations like that.

Up Close: Road to the White House said...

I agree that being skeptical of mass immigration does not make someone anti-Semitic, nor even racist. The occidental observer is, however, in my opinion, anti-Semitic. Or, perhaps to be more precise, it carries articles that I consider blatantly anti-Semitic.

Diane Newell Meyer said...

One small disagreement about Jews not being an ethnic group. I had my DNA done by by MyHeritage a year ago. I am mostly North and west European, but they did say that there is a small chance ("low confidence") that I also have some Ashkenazi Jewish ancestors from Lithuania or Poland, etc. So, there is a distinct genetic component to being Jewish, it seems, that is identifiable, according to this organization. That is not a bad thing, by the way! I was hoping to have something not all WASP-y in my background.

Art Baden said...

Tens of thousands of European Jews tried and failed to get into the United States during the late 1930s, by which time Hitler’s plans for a “Final Solution” were beginning to be believed. But restrictive immigration laws written in the 1920s, in response to perceived communist leanings of Jews and Italians, did not allow for the massive number of potential Jewish refugees from Europe. And FDR was running in 1940 for an unprecedented 3rd term, and was already being branded as a socialist “Rosenfeld” by right wingers, so he did nothing to help the potential refugees. Ships full of Jewish children were turned away from New York harbor. Millions died in concentration camps across Europe But our immigration laws were upheld. Illegal aliens were not allowed in. Glory Hallelujah!

Michael Trigoboff said...

I haven’t ever read the Occidental Observer. I am perfectly willing to accept Peters’s judgment about it.

We Jews are kind of an odd case. We are a religion and a tribe. Some of us consider ourselves part of both, others just part of one. Personally for me, the tribal identity is very strong, but I am not very tied to the religion.