Monday, December 7, 2020

Rudy Giuliani and George Floyd can't breathe

      "If one man dies of hunger, that's a tragedy. If millions die, that's a statistic."

        Attributed to Joseph Stalin


Stalin probably didn't say it, but we get the point.

If a man dies of suffocation, and the video cameras aren't there to watch it, does it really shock us?


Almost as many Americans died from COVID yesterday as died on 911. I cite that statistic because TV news casts cite it. They are trying to remind people of how Americans felt in the moment and aftermath of the 911 attacks. It shocked us. The horror. They are trying to turn COVID statistics into a tragedy. 

It doesn't work the same way.

We saw 911 on TV. We saw people jump from 100-floor buildings, saw them in the air. We could imagine their last moments, being burned from behind, facing the open air, jumping into certain, ugly death. We saw people choking on dust and smoke, staggering on the sidewalks, the lucky ones. We learned about villains, who they were and how they plotted. The 911 events got our attention: Surprise, horror, real people and faces, victims, and villains.

For most of us, our experience with COVID is statistical. Day-to-day what we experience are efforts to avoid getting and spreading it. COVID patients are out of sight;  HIPPA, masks, and isolation sees to that. Many of the victims were already segregated and warehoused in facilities for seniors. Seniors have experience with this reality: we become invisible.

The dying-of-COVID part mostly happens to people we don't know, reported without a name, by age and notice that he or she had co-morbidities--the relevant statistics. Their obituaries will talk about their lives, careers, and loving families, but the notice of COVID death will tell the important thing, how close we were to dying anyway.

The most famous person to die of COVID, Herman Cain, was photographed two weeks before he died maskless at the Trump rally in Tulsa. In life, he was a frequent pro-Trump commenter on Fox News. The establishment media did not dare openly say I-told-you-so, or directly blame Trump. A single death is a tragedy, after all, and Cain complicated things. He was Black, and Black people mostly play for the  Democratic team. In fact, he played for the other team, Trump's team, so the job of mourning and self-reflection was the rightful task of Republicans, Trump, and Fox. They didn't do it. He became invisible. He was an embarrassment. He contradicted the Trump/Fox narrative.  

Cain never got his due.

George Floyd did. Upon his slow public death, Floyd became a Democratic symbol of Black suffering under unjust policing by careless, maybe overtly racist, bad White cops. We saw him struggle. "I can't breathe" were his last words. His death seemed personal and deeply wrong to many Americans. It moved opinion on policing, until the story changed from George-Floyd-the-victim to George-Floyd-the-criminal. Then the story got lost amid protests that disintegrated into arson and looting, and then the main story became liberal tolerance of Black and Antifa lawlessness and White anarchists destroying statues. Democrats lost control of the story. 

Rudy Giuliani is "Trump's man." Democrats disagreed with him and loved mocking him. Just look at Rudy Giuliani, over the hill and now pathetic. He made arguments that got shot down by Republican judges. He spoke at the Four Seasons Total Landscaping screw up. His witness seemed drunk. He sweated and looked unwell. His hair dye dripped. He farted. Loser!
 
It was a fair fight. Giuliani called Democrats disgusting Communists out to destroy democracy by stealing the election. Democrats called him pathetic, a crook, and out to destroy democracy by circumventing the election.

Republicans should care passionately about Giuliani. He is their gladiator. He is their hero, saying fearlessly what many Republicans want to hear, that Trump is a great president and Democrats are crooks.

It is possible that he will become the Republican version of George Floyd, a powerful symbol. Giuliani is in the hospital with COVID. Right now the story is "he's doing fine." That is on-message for Trump and Republicans: Don't over-react to COVID; you will get well. But COVID statistics embed a frightening message for 76-years-old White people. About 4% of them who get the disease die from it, and a much higher percentage if one is among those sick enough to be hospitalized. 

Giuliani will be a symbol of courage--going maskless around the White House and at hearings, fighting for Trump. That is baked in. What we don't know is whether he will also become a symbol of COVID recklessness, and the consequence of underestimating the disease. That would be off-brand for Trump, but this story cannot be easily managed any more than the George Floyd story could be managed. Giuliani dying would be a story with a life of its own, and Democrats would attempt to hijack it the way that Republicans hijacked the George Floyd story.

If Giuliani can't breathe, we may see some sign of it. Giuliani on a ventilator could become a symbol of COVID suffering and death, and a cautionary tale reminding Trump-supporting COVID-minimizers that Americans need to be a lot more careful. He might become a symbol of Trump failure, that he could not even protect his own, and that everything Trump touches, dies.







8 comments:

Rick Millward said...

You are leaving out one thing.

All these "warriors" are being paid.

Who knows (or cares) what their principles and values are? They are mercenaries, and as far as I can see that's all El SeƱor can find to defend his lunacy.

Our empathy should be reserved for the innocent.

On a personal note; I spent an afternoon with Giuliani once. Yeah...all that.

Meanwhile Republicans cower and tremble, terrified they will fall under the disapproving gaze of the Almighty. Only thing is it's an altogether different Almighty they should fear.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Amid all of this trashing of the current Rudy Giuliani, we would do well to remember the earlier version of him, before his bout of prostate cancer and the treatments for it seem to have deranged him.

In the 1990s, New York City was going down the tubes due to crime and general social disorder. It got so bad that even liberals on the Upper West Side voted out the city’s first black mayor*, the dysfunctional and useless David Dinkins, and voted in conservative Republican Rudy Giuliani instead.

Giuliani and his police chief straightened things right out with a combination of “broken windows policing” and “stop and frisk.” They made New York City prosperous and orderly and safe.

Now those policies are being reversed by liberals, and crime and disorder are on the rise again. I wonder how long it will take for liberals to cry uncle and help elect Rudy Giuliani-style mayors again to clean things up in their cities.

I live in a suburb near Portland, which is pretty far down this path. Downtown is a dystopia of boarded up windows, graffiti everywhere, homeless camps on every street, and (still!) “demonstrations” (i.e. violent riots) by antifa and its ilk. Everyone I know who lives in the city is fed up.


* I mention this as an indication of how desperate the liberals must have been to vote against him.

Rick Millward said...

Regressive mythology about "get tough" Giuliani and his felonious police commissioner (pardoned by Trump BTW) persists even though it's been debunked. To wit:

https://www.nber.org/digest/jan03/what-reduced-crime-new-york-city

"Skeptics believe that it was the economic boom of the 1990s - a "carrot" that encourages people to remain on the straight-and-narrow - that brought about the drop in crime rates in New York City and the nation. The national unemployment rate declined 25 percent between 1990 and 1999, and by 39 percent in the city between 1992 and 1999. This study shows that a single percentage point decline in the jobless rate decreases burglary by 2.2 percent and motor vehicle theft by 1.8 percent. Increases in the real minimum wage also significantly reduce robberies and murders: 3.4 to 3.7 percent fewer robberies with a 10 percent increase in the minimum wage and 6.3 to 6.9 percent fewer murders."

Those that fret about crime and homelessness conveniently overlook that they are mostly caused by economics, and while politicians "on both sides" love to take credit for prosperity it's much more complicated. Income inequality, diminished resources and Regressive short sightedness ("no stimulus for the underserving!") are just a few of the many factors. Oh, and let's not forget the now admitted racism of "stop and frisk", and worse tactics that have driven people into the streets.

Michael Trigoboff said...

I will refrain from pointless name-calling, and post a counterpoint article that expresses in much more accurate detail what caused crime to drop in New York City in the 1990s:

link

Michael Trigoboff said...

From the article that Rick posted:

The contribution of such deterrence measures (the "stick") offers more explanation for the decline in New York City crime than the improvement in the economy, the authors conclude. Between 1990 and 1999, homicide dropped 73 percent, burglary 66 percent, assault 40 percent, robbery 67 percent, and vehicle hoists 73 percent.

Rick Millward said...

"In a prepared statement the Mayor attributed the unprecedented drop in the crime rate to the NYPD PreCrime Unit, with its "precogs" who were able to stop 88% of homicides and almost all car jacking before they happened"

Dale said...

in addition to the facts brought out above by R. Milward, it was Mayor David Dinkins who got things moving in the right direction in New York city and laid the groundwork for subsequent leaders. Just as Trump took credit for Obama's economic recovery, Giuliani has always claimed credit for what Dinkins accomplished.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Dinkins laid the groundwork? Really?

Post a link.