Monday, November 9, 2020

Democrats and Self Reliance

     "Though the wide universe is full of good, no kernel of nourishing corn can come to him but through his toil bestowed on that plot of ground which is given to him to till."

       Ralph Waldo Emerson, Self Reliance


Self Reliance is a deep-seated American value.  And darned if Americans want to pay for someone else's sloth, improvidence, or bad luck. 


We want to be fair. We also don't want to be chumps. That goes for Democrats and Republicans both.

Republicans think of themselves as the party of self-reliance. Democrats are more inclined to support group services and Republicans to resist them. People "vote with their feet," which means that people choose to live in neighborhoods that seem "right" for them. Democrats dominate the cities. People in cities get and pay for services that are essential when people live near each other: sewerage systems, water systems, mass transit. They share utilities. Rural people don't have most city services. They have wells and septic tanks and when they go bad it's the homeowner's problem. The urban/rural divide in voting behavior syncs with each Party's traditional orientation toward taking care of oneself and expecting the other guy to do so as well.

At time of war or communicable disease the goalposts get moved a little, but not without stress. Under certain conditions, we are all in this together, sure, but we are still on the lookout for people using the situation to game the system. America is struggling with diversity and its multitude of cultures, and it has from the first conflicts between White settlers and Indians, between Whites and Black slaves, and between the different cultures and religions of the British colonies.

In a multicultural nation, different ethnicities give ample opportunity for people to generalize, to profile, to scapegoat. Trump played on that, more heavily and directly than Republicans had in the recent past, but the desire not to be a chump is bi-partisan. Democrats and Republicans both are conscious of whether others are trying to grab more than their fair share from the broad social pot. People look for cheating, both up at the very wealthy, and down at people below them in income. If Democrats ignore that reality, or define it as immoral selfishness or racism, they are doomed to continued electoral misery. Those are Democrats they are insulting.

Bright blue California voters decisively defeated a ballot measure on a state constitutional amendment that would have allowed race to be taken into consideration by state government. It was essentially yes or no on affirmative action. California voters said NO. It just didn't seem fair to them that some groups got special advantages, even if they started out poor and discriminated against.

I will repeat what I wrote shortly after the election. Yes, Americans excised a President, but this was primarily a rejection of Democrats. American voters nearly chose to keep a deeply flawed, dangerously narcissistic, authoritarian scofflaw and a constant embarrassment even to his supporters, rather than accept what Democrats were offering.

Michael Trigoboff has submitted Guest Posts in the past. He teaches computer science courses at Portland Community College. Programming computers involves objective, highly specific commands. Loose, rough, approximations don't work. People can either do the work correctly or they cannot, and not everyone can. It can be demanding for students, but for a purpose. The clients of those future students need work done that actually works. Customers of those clients, people who click a "Submit" button on an order to buy something, expect the computer to respond saying the purchase was completed, not see some gear spins endlessly and then a report that the purchase order was lost in the ether.

Two days ago this blog warned Democrats that the woke university-oriented wing of the Party was out of touch with the voters. Trigoboff sent this comment:


Guest Post by Michael Trigoboff 


To start with, I am happy that Joe Biden won. For whatever reason, I wasn’t that bothered by Donald Trump‘s personality, but his incompetence was unforgivable.

Trigoboff
In honor of Saturday’s events, I wore a blue and red plaid shirt. It had more blue than red, but not by that much, which is a reasonably accurate expression of where I stand politically.

I was raised in a left-wing Jewish family in Brooklyn, New York. We were Democrats. Voting for a Republican would have been unthinkable. 

We believed in the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 60s. I still remember a TV cartoon from back then — a peach pit and an apple core on the back of a train, singing:

As the peach pit said to the apple core,
“The color of our skin doesn’t matter anymore.“


I liked that cartoon.

My grandparents arrived in America from Eastern Europe around 1900. They came here to escape anti-Semitic persecution and build a better life for themselves and their descendants. I owe my life to their willingness to take that difficult journey. If not for their courage, my parents would have died in The Holocaust.

We believed in working hard, doing well in school, and building a good life through sheer achievement. America gave us the opportunity to do that. We believed that opportunity should be extended to everyone.

I no longer consider myself a Democrat. As Ronald Reagan famously said, "I didn't leave the Democratic Party, the party left me." They left me when they began to abandon a belief in individual achievement for a commitment to group rights, and advocate equal outcomes instead of equal opportunity.

The current wave of wokeness sweeping through academia, corporate America, and the Democratic Party is exactly that. The woke believe that all “disparities“ need to be corrected. If a particular minority is “underrepresented“ in some job category, they claim that disparity by itself is proof of discrimination, and they advocate taking measures to equalize representation. But If no group can be underrepresented, it follows that no group can be allowed to be overrepresented.

The percentage of Jews in various professions is far above their share of the population. Jews are overrepresented among Nobel Prize winners. Is that a problem that needs to be “corrected?“ Did that happen because there is so much discrimination in favor of Jews? Do the advocates of wokeness think there is something like “Jewish privilege?“ Should Jews be banished from professions in which they are overrepresented?

I could say the same sorts of things about immigrants from Asia, India, or Nigeria. The example of Nigerian immigrants in particular contradicts the claims of the woke. How did these Black immigrants succeed so spectacularly if America is so institutionally racist against Black people?

Wokeness is a war against excellence and achievement.

These woke beliefs are a threat to the principles that I have lived by for my entire life. There is no way that I will support a party that adopts them even slightly. Joe Biden said he wanted to be a President for the entire country. That won’t work if he allows woke ideology into his administration.



18 comments:

Dale said...

I have been a Sanders supporter, phone banked and texted for Biden/Harris on behalf of a group called People's Action, many hundreds of (mostly young) activists who also mostly supported other candidates in the primaries earlier in the election season. I watch the left-leaning but very fine news program, Democracy Now, 5 days a week. I listen to podcasts on the Intercept, where they interview people like Rashida Talib and Ilhan Omar and Mike Siegel and other progressives. I have not encountered this "woke" ideology you love to write about, or even heard the word "woke" on any of these news platforms or among my activist peers. I am coming to the conclusion that "wokeness" plays the role for those who want to constrain our political ideas and keep them in the corporate "center" that the mythical bonfires from "bra burning" played in the past for those who weren't ready to engage with the emerging ideas about sexism and women's equality.

Sally said...

Unfortunately, all the hoopla and attention on the presumptive vice presidential nominee puts this dream to quick rest. It is 100% identity.

As far as I know, gender & ethnic studies, along with “critical race theory” have a stranglehold on academia outside of engineering and business. Total lock on medical academia.

Check out the new reinvented Hippocratic Oath.

Check out Harris’ equity declarations.

Rick Millward said...

woke...from the Urban Dictionary:
The act of being very pretentious about how much you care about a social issue. Example:
"Yeah most people don't care about parking spaces for families with disabled pets. I wish they were woke like me."

We all should lighten up a little. One of the ways we got through the Trump era was through a sort of black humor.

He was hilarious, except for the dictator part.

Maybe wokeness is a little precious, but it represent real disparities that were exacerbated by the collapse of the Republican party and subsequent rise of the overt racism of Trumpism, and it's pretty benign compared to jerks with AR-15s.

Embrace your inner woke, good things are coming.

Rick Millward said...

No one in this society is self-reliant, except, as you rightly note, for septic tanks.

The myth of self reliance as a political virtue is laughable on its surface, yet it persists as arguably the most Regressive trope we must suffer through. You may well have touched on the single most important issue we face. Somehow, I would think by example, we need to persuade those among us who cling to this notion that they are misled, misinformed and at worst, simply delusional.

There's quite a bit of angst about the large Republican turnout, but my sense is that this will be the peak and subsequent elections will erode what was essentially the last gasp of Trumpism, and in general the the idea of a cult of personality as a political asset. Republicans especially should be wary of this going forward.

In other words, career politicians may not be our best leaders, but they are waaaay better than Reality TV performers.

Republican lust for power for its own sake has led them to ruin. Best case going forward is that they reconstitute themselves as a minority, but if they don't strongly disavow the white supremacist elements in their party, they will continue to lose ground. The bottom line is that this is what this election was about, and will continue to be.

Let's not forget this immutable fact: If one supports racist, one is racist.



Michael Trigoboff said...

So wokeness isn’t a problem at all, Rick? Read this, from a liberal source:

link

Ely Schless said...

"Wokeness is a war against excellence and achievement"

I'm no fan of wokeness generally because its so ambiguous a word.But Michael's statement and similar black and white descriptions of 'what Democrats think" is why we are in the divide we're in. It would like me me stating that Republicans hate minorities. Its not true and serves only to bolster one's party. Useless sound bites; not very helpful.

I expected a more thoughtful post from Michael, who usually avoids such hyperbolic, stereotypical, broad brush statements.

Sally said...

“ we need to persuade those among us who cling to this notion that they are misled, misinformed and at worst, simply delusional.”

You seriously think that’s gonna work?

“You are an idiot and I am here to tell you why?”

Good god that’s the problem not the solution,

Michael Trigoboff said...

Dale,

They don’t say “woke” anymore because it has deservedly become a term of derision. But the ideology behind it is definitely active and metastasizing.

Wokeness is a huge probably problem in academia. It is becoming a huge problem in the corporate world as well. Examples of totally irrational cancel culture are very easy to find if you are interested. Just look at what happened to James Bennett at the New York Times, for example.

Wokeness has basically “jumped the shark.” You don’t hear that word in left-wing media anymore because it has become too embarrassing.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Sally,

Wokeness and critical race theory are now creeping into STEM. The current idea Is something called “equitable grading,” which will theoretically produce equivalent failure rates among all the different ethnic groups. I guess we’ll see…

Michael Trigoboff said...

Ely,

I never said “all Democrats.“ I am opposed to wokeness. There are many Democrats who are not woke.

Rick Millward said...

Letter from Birmingham Jail (ext)
By Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., 16 April 1963

"First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season."

Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection."

Herbert Rothschild said...

Trigoboff's characterization of the effort to end disparities based on race and ethnicity is a caricature. His understanding of providing opportunity to thrive to those who have so long been denied it is seriously deficient. It put me in mind of the following story: I was running the ACLU chapter in Baton Rouge, Louisiana when the 1972 amendments to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act were passed. They required schools to give female students opportunities in athletics equal to male students. One high school in the area said, "OK, they can try out for the football team." Affirmative action was always about taking into consideration the complexity of a situation, including the abiding effects of historical oppression and bias. I've been struck by how little resistance there has been to the affirmative action requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, even though the ADA mandated very costly special treatments, from elevators in two-story buildings to assigning personal assistants to blind college students. In comparison, what affirmative action for blacks has mainly asked is to change our attitudes. The handicaps of the disabled are obvious and obviously not their fault, whereas recognizing the handicaps of black Americans requires white people to acknowledge and take responsibility for the consequences of centuries of terrible abuse.

Anonymous said...

I ranted against white woke. But smug is smug. I got mine why don’t you have it too.
Michael needs to get pulled over and worry about his hands being on the steering wheel. He needs to pack a gun in public dressed in camo. He needs to talk with a strong Jewish accent in Walmart dressed as an Hasidic Jew . He needs to put on blackface make up put on a blond wig wiggle into a dress and high heels and teach his class with a lisp. He needs to take the bus downtown during morning rush and wear a suit and tie and carry a lunch pail. He needs to go to a gay night club and dance. He needs to dress down sit on a curb downtown at night and drink cheap wine and then get the cardboard out of his car and sleep in an alley. Why? I don’t know.
Maybe he might find humility, awareness, ..he might become woke. Black,gay, asshole woke. Any woke would do.

Sent from my iPad

Michael Trigoboff said...

Rick,

If “deep understanding“ involves the acceptance of toxic ideologies like critical race theory, you can count me and many other Americans out.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Herb,

I don’t deny that a particular subset of the black population needs help. But the method that liberals have chosen, racial quotas disguised as “affirmative action,“ is too destructive of important values like achievement and excellence for me to support.

And if you look at college completion rates among black students, you find that they are terrible. In part, that’s due to the “mismatch” of their academic abilities to the level required at the institutions that admit them by lowering standards for them. This is why black students tend to end up at the bottom of their classes and drop out. They would likely do perfectly well if they were admitted to colleges whose requirements matched their academic abilities.

It’s not the need for help that I disagree with, it’s the incompetent choice of a destructive tool.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Anonymous,

I was a hippie in the 1960s. I experienced all kinds of discrimination, much of it from cops.

You don’t know me, and you don’t even have the courage to come out from behind “Anonymous“ and comment with your real name.

Ely Schless said...

Wokeness sounds an awful lot like weakness. Woke. Weak. Weakness is the real issue that seems to be driving Michael's narrative.

I've worked in advertising where subliminal and seemingly minor attributes, like color or shape can affect our perception. Now,I know the posters here are way too smart to be subliminally mislead by something so simple. But it's conceivable. What if instead of woke, the word was, say, Bright? Or Hardened? Could that change Michael's perception of the 'woke' movement? The term 'woke' implies that others are asleep, which is condescending and divisive.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Ely,

The opponents of wokeness did not invent the term. The advocates of it did.