Republicans are going to vote for Trump.
Most Democrats will vote for the Democratic alternative.
It isn't about the message.
"I don't disagree with your view that hardcore Trump supporters will interpret this ad the way you describe. I just don't think it matters."
Peter Lemieux, Politics by the Numbers
Peter Lemieux is a political scientist from Cambridge, Massachusetts who has a firmly quantitative understanding of political science. He looked at this blog's analysis of the Biden ad that showed European leaders snickering over Trump, an ad that I wrote will feed the sense of resentment of people in flyover swing states. It was a bad ad, I wrote yesterday and the day before.
It won't change votes, he wrote me. "Trump's core voters will cast ballots for him no matter what. Trump's supporters are unmovable. His opponents are as well."
Peter Lemieux writes a website, https://www.politicsbythenumbers.org. He was a college classmate who then went on to get a Ph.D. from MIT. He taught there and at the University of Rochester. His site is free of pretty graphics and photos and references to character archetypes and intended and unintended messages. It is a place of graphs, charts, and numbers, built on hard data about polls and ultimate voter behavior.
This blog presumes that people are attracted by some things and not others, that on the margin--especially with people who are lightly informed and mostly unengaged with politics--message matters. Maybe that is the wrong way to look a politics. Peter Lemieux says that swing voters won't see the ad, and they wouldn't care about it if they did.
Guest Post by Peter Lemieux
Peter Lemieux |
There is a group of polling respondents who eschew the "strongly" approve or disapprove answers and might be persuadable. In a recent Morning Consult/Politico poll, for instance, we have 23% "strongly approve;" 17% "somewhat approve;" 12% "somewhat disapprove;" and a whopping 44% who choose "strongly disapprove." Click: politico
Perhaps that 29% who give "somewhat" responses might be persuadable, but I think many of them are just uncomfortable committing to the "strongly" moniker.To me, the electorate breaks down as:
30-35% will definitely vote for Trump
45-50% will definitely not vote for Trump
15-25% might or might not vote for Trump
I would argue that few of the people in that 15-25% are the sort who will react to the Biden ad in the ways Peter Sage describes. Nearly all of those people are in the 30-35% definitely Trumpist category. In fact, given that independents and uncertain voters pay less attention to politics, most of them will never see this ad."
1 comment:
The ad is desperate, an attempt to denigrate Trump and present Sen. Biden as a highly respected world figure. While it may be true it's irrelevant and actually invites a comparison that may not be completely favorable to the Senator.
I find it hard to believe that an undecided voter is unsure of whether or not Trump is a person of high integrity. I guess it's possible but it's a head spinner. Sen. Biden keeps making these unforced errors on top of the Hunter problem. This does not bode well.
There must be some strategy that will win over undecided voters. Let me get back to you on that...
Post a Comment