Thursday, November 14, 2019

Mayor Pete in Manchester: "the boomer candidate."

Pete Buttigieg

     "We don't like him even a little bit. . . . Neoliberal lapdog to the establishment elite. A joke of a candidate. I am a HARD pass on Pandering Pete."

         Comment on my Buttigieg blog post



Progressive Millennials say NO to Pete Buttigieg.


He represents the status quo and the meritocracy.


The voiced Buttigieg message has evolved. Early in his campaign.he talked about generational change. No longer. In New Hampshire he talked about national unity and keeping your health plan if you were happy with it.

Those are fighting words to some. National unity is boomer talk, and that is where Mayor Pete is finding his fans. Young progressives want a politician to fight for change, and that's not Mayor Pete.


Buttigieg is at the fracture point within the Democratic Party. There are two constituencies, two messages, two policy prescriptions, and two fundamental ways of thinking about the state of the American economy and its politics

One vein within the Democratic Party is built around successful urban, cosmopolitan knowledge workers, especially people with college or post college training. These are people who are succeeding in the modern global economy, the meritocratic Democratic Party. They want improvement. They are OK with reform. They want people to get along. 

This includes the traditional Democratic donors, older prosperous liberals, i.e. boomers. Hillary Clinton represented this vein. So does Pete Buttigieg.

Facebook comment on Buttigieg
The alternative vein is the progressive/socialist version voiced by Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. It calls the unity vein elitist and out of touch with working people. It says that Democrats are appealing to managers and professional people, not hourly employees, and that explains why the supposed "blue wall" collapsed. 

It condemns meritocracy as a trap laid by the comfortable older generation, the people who played by the rules of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, and found success, and who assume the old rules still apply. But they don't, say the progressives.  Young people have college debt not experienced by the boomer generation, because boomers defunded higher ed. There are fewer unions and lower incomes, but higher national debt, the debt handed down from the boomer generation to the millennial generation. There is plastic in the ocean, coal plants on the ground, and carbon in the air, all problems boomers have bequeathed to the young.


Click: Kristal Ball
Understood from the point of view of frustrated young voters who feel burdened by an economy stacked against them, the comfortable boomer generation is not an ally; they are the impediments. And Pete Buttigieg has thrown in his lot with boomers. He is their good boy, their good example to show anyone can succeed, their excuse for their failure, according to his progressive critics.

Click on the video for exposure to the anti-Buttigieg Millennial viewpoint. It may shock some of my older readers.

Buttigieg represents two very different things to the two sides of the divide. To the longstanding older base of the Democratic Party, especially educated liberal donors, Buttigieg is an attractive candidate. Bring America together. Keep the Medicare privilege. Don't rock the boat. 


To the struggling millennial left, Buttigieg is a neoliberal lapdog traitor. 









7 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm surprised that Pete Buttigieg is leading in the polls in Iowa.

https://www.kcci.com/article/new-poll-shows-pete-buttigieg-with-iowa-lead/29795870#

What this says is that middle-America doesn't want to go socialist like Sanders and Warren. Buttigieg and Biden are at the top of the Iowa polls.

You can't win the presidency without middle-America, and it's clear middle-America doesn't want Sanders or Warren

Buttigieg could win the democratic nomination by default. Sanders and Warren are old socialists that the majority don't want, and Biden is still waiting to implode from scandals. That leaves Buttigieg alone at the top of the heap.

The big-money democrat establishment won't allow minor leaguer Buttigieg to be their nominee, so I still expect Hillary to enter the fray.

Anonymous said...

The Millennial Vote is an illusion. They’re the least likely to vote. They are the least informed on the issues. They have been and will continue to be marginalized. Trump is President because they stayed home in 2016. I cannot see a way forward with Bernie the Socialist (not even a Democrat) and Elizabeth Warren a hard left Progressive. The change needed while the country heads into the ditch is to take control of the wheel and steady this Ship of State. That is a moderate position.

Rick Millward said...

This candidate reflects a somewhat confused set of values. His demeanor is comforting (Obama). He doesn't appear to have a signature program. (Clinton). Though in an oppressed minority he doesn't seem to be an activist for it, opting for the "battle won! 'nuff said" position, which is far from reality.

I think he could have a great future, and has some genuinely impressive communication skills, but this run has a line cutting kind of vibe, and way too much policy vagueness.

Let's face it: "I know Barack Obama...he's a friend of mine. You're no Barack Obama".

Art Baden said...

Interesting the anger against Buttigieg from the socialist wing of the Dems. Statements like “I’d rather vote for Trump than Peter the CIA spook” are depressing. Assuming that the prior poster honestly believes their assertions, and isn’t some reactionary trolling this blog; it points to an interesting facet of human behavior - we tend to direct more animus towards those closest to us than those farther, irrespective of the danger they respectively pose to us. Trump has consistently proven his immaturity, his tribalism, and his adherence to furthering the interests of the wealthy and powerful with his tax and deregulation policies, and his subservience to the reactionary religious right with his judicial picks. But Pete Buttigieg is worse? No. He is just an easier target, because he is a closer target. Trump’s policies cause no cognitive dissonance for those on the far left, but Buttigieg’s lack of adherence to the far left’s dogmas is far more threatening to that mind set. If a young gay Democrat doesn’t support every facet of my dogmatic world view, then either I need to reassess my beliefs, or he is a turncoat apostate, a CIA spook. Cognitive dissonance is powerful.

Quercus said...

Maybe it's your cognitive dissonance, Art, that causes you to think that any Dem must be better than Trump.

Trump is a clown and a con man, brought to us by the profound failures of the DC Establishment. Obama and Holder stood by and watched as 9 million Americans lost their homes to foreclosure fraud by the big banks. No thanks, I won't vote to return that kind of Establishment to power. Rather go for the Burn it Down option. Maybe we'll see the guillotines rolled out in my lifetime. Certainly it is past time for them.

McKinsey Pete is all-in for Israel's destruction of Gaza, like a good CIA/Mossad puppet.

Democrats are all gaga over Valerie Plame, former CIA, running for Congress as a Democrat.

Me, I still think Harry Truman was right, and the CIA must be abolished.

Andy Seles said...

Peter's assessment accurately describes the two polarities of our Democratic party. I believe he is correct when he states that the New Left "condemns meritocracy as a trap laid by the comfortable older generation, the people who played by the rules of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, and found success, and who assume the old rules still apply. But they don't, say the progressives. Young people have college debt not experienced by the boomer generation, because boomers defunded higher ed. There are fewer unions and lower incomes, but higher national debt, the debt handed down from the boomer generation to the millennial generation. There is plastic in the ocean, coal plants on the ground, and carbon in the air, all problems boomers have bequeathed to the young."

We boomers are not "handing the torch to a new generation" with anything resembling grace. The torch will have to be "pried from our cold, dead hands." Thomas Frank covers our neoliberal failings nicely in "Listen Liberal," but most of us aren't listening, locally or nationally. We have a complicit corporate media abetting our willfully deaf ears as we continue down our path of acceptance of a small group of people having absolute control of our country, aka "oligarchy."

The worst of us can't even muster an ounce empathy for those who suffer from the damage we've caused, while the best of us wrap ourselves in the comfortable cloth of memories from our own protest heydays. No matter, the arc of justice is long (but not necessarily without bloodshed). We have 12 months, IMHO, to change course and validate all that our parents fought for (and against) in WWII. After that...all bets are off.

Andy Seles

Derek V. said...

I have a Peter Buttiege poster in my bedroom, and Pete Buttigieg sheets on my bed.