Friday, September 4, 2026

Israel: What a fool believes

The sentimental fool don′t see tryin' hard to recreate
What had yet to be created . . .
What a fool believes he sees. . .
What seems to be
Is always better than nothing
         
Kenny Loggins and Michael McDonald, "What a Fool Believes," 1978


Democrats have a problem.

"No room for two states"

Democrats want a two-state solution in Israel. Israelis don't want it. 

Moreover, the Israeli settlements have made it impossible.


Democratic politicians are trying to find some sort of middle ground on the problem of Israel. A great many people retain some sympathy for Israel, a residual from the European Holocaust, refreshed by the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023. But that sympathy has been strained and perhaps ruined by Israeli actions that are read as belligerent, racist, expansionist, dishonest, and manipulative. Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, campaigning to hold his coalition together, bragged that his relentless effort, involving 1000 hours of persuasion, finally got the U.S. to join Israel in a surprise attack on Iran. This reaffirmed what U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged, that Israel forced America's hand into going to war. Netanyahu had nurtured Trump into being ready to jump when Israel said jump. Trump jumped.

The war has worked out poorly.

Israel made it nearly impossible for a Democratic politician to have full-throated support for Israel. The country's actions in the West Bank and Gaza read as ethnic cleansing to a great many Americans.

Most Democrats voice a middle-ground position. The Wall Street Journal expressed it in an article on Pennsylvania's Democratic governorJosh Shapiro.

Mr. Shapiro is Jewish and a strong supporter of Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state. At the same time, he favors a two-state solution, has been critical of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s policies, and has spoken in general terms of using U.S. arms sales to Israel as leverage to change some of the Netanyahu government’s policies.

Here again, Mr. Shapiro seems to have found the point of equipoise.

The equipoise is based on a wish, not a reality. Gallup polling found that only 27 percent of Israeli citizens want a two-state solution.


The politicians with any chance of puling together a coalition to lead Israel don't want it either.

Netanyahu said in June:
The national government I intend to lead is that there is no room for two states between the sea and the Jordan River. Now if you ask me three years ago, before the war, the public was divided on the issue, although I believe most of the public was opposed. A significant portion supported it. I think that has changed.

Moreover, facts on the ground have changed. Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank made a coherent Palestinian state impossible. The "E-1" plan of settlements put corridors of Jewish settlement across the West Bank. The U.N. and European Union have protested, calling it "an existential threat" to a possible two-state solution, because it would "drive a wedge through the West Bank." An Israeli anti-settlement organization, Peace Now, has filed lawsuits trying to stop settlement expansion. They wrote:

The government is trying to sign contracts with contractors before the (upcoming October) elections so that it will be much harder for the next government to cancel the construction.
I expect Democratic candidates, including future candidates for president, to advocate a two-state solution. It is the sweet spot that tries to be supportive of Israel, of peace, of Palestinian aspirations, of the U.N., of the international community of nations, and most American voters. But it is a fragile message that I doubt will get a Democrat through the 2028 election, because it is built on a lie. Israel wants what it wants: an expanded, Jewish Israel, from the river to the sea. 

I suspect the Republican candidate for president to say the U.S. will help Israel get what it wants. Israel hitched its wagon to Republicans. Evangelicals see it as destiny and God's will. I expect the Democratic candidate for president to be put into anguish because the divides the party and American Jews, but the Israeli tie to Republicans will force Democrats' hand. Democrats will break from Israel and say they are on their own. They can voice it as their own version of America First and  Democras as the more authentic party of peace. 

Israel feels constrained by the tepid, ambiguous support it gets from Democrats, so this will be a painful breakup, a realignment within American Jews and between Jews and the Democratic Party, but it is not a surprise. The breakup has been underway for a long time.
She had a place in his life
He never made her think twice
As he rises to her apology
Anybody else would surely know
He′s watchin' her go


[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]  




1 comment:

Up Close: Road to the White House said...

Entered for Michael Trigoboff:

“The war has worked out poorly.“

It is way too soon to declare defeat or victory in the war with Iran. The situation is still developing. There have been. recent reports that more oil is getting through the Strait of Hormuz than was previously thought, and that significant members of the Iranian regime are gathering their money together and fleeing the country.

It has been true since the October 7 jihadist massacre of Israeli Jews by Palestinians, that the vast majority of Israelis do not believe there should be a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza. The underlying reason for this attitude is that the Palestinians have shown repeatedly for decades that they do not want a two-state solution.

The only “solution“ acceptable to the Palestinians is a one-state solution consisting of a Muslim majority containing (at most) a small and subservient Jewish minority. Read Tomorrow Is Yesterday by two Palestinian-sympathetic authors, which makes this very clear.