"You can't understand Pennsylvania unless you understand coal."
A Washington Post article describes a modern coal mine in Western Pennsylvania coal country.
The article is eye-opening about coal and the people who mine it. It is also a heads-up about the new Washington Post.
![]() |
Coal rolls by on a conveyor belt |
Democrats can blow off reading this, and I expect many will. Damned if they are going to read anything that makes coal look like anything but a crime against humanity and the Earth. Democrats sneer at coal, calling it 18th-century technology in a world of high-tech renewable solar and wind. God help a Democratic politician who forgets the simple truth that coal is evil.
Democrats almost certainly cannot win the White House without winning Pennsylvania. Twice Pennsylvania's coal country voters overwhelmingly voted for Trump and tipped the state's vote to him. The consequence of Democrats not understanding coal is that America elects an authoritarian president who reverses every green energy policy achievement beloved by Democrats.
The message of the Post story is that coal is highly automated, that it grinds out and conveys thousands of tons a day of coal from deep underground to railroad cars to power plants. The people doing this work get paid some $100,000 a year. It is a "single worker" job, a coal executive explains. A man can support his family, and the wife can stay home with the children.
The article normalizes coal. It describes safety equipment and safety procedures. It describes the elevator that brings miners 800 feet down to the worksite as similar to the large elevators one sees in modern office towers. It describes second, third, and fourth-generation coal miners. It quotes people who are happy with their work. It describes coal as an important part of the country's energy mix now and for decades to come.What it does not do is treat coal as a stinking embarrassment to be held at arm's length by decent people.
I note a similarity to the Portland story, but in partisan reverse. Democrats treat the coal industry the way that people in the Fox News-MAGA-Trump bubble treat Portland. They hear nothing of Portland except "Democrat run city" burdened by antifa, riots, and misery. Even Oregon Republicans who should know better are blinded by the orthodoxy. They ignore or discount any sign of a normal city functioning normally. They would be kicked off the team if they expressed a neutral view of Portland.
My sense is that Democrats generally treat the coal industry the way that Trump and MAGA voters treat Portland.
I consider The Washington Post feature article to be neutral and descriptive -- and for that reason I consider it noteworthy. I don't believe The Post would have published this article two years ago, back before Jeff Bezos re-aligned his newspaper to become more Trump-compliant. Two years ago a coal industry article would show photographs of toothless people with blackened faces on ventilators living in unpainted dilapidated houses. This is different. The article describes the coal industry the way that people living in western Pennsylvania coal country see themselves, as people making a life producing something the world wants.
I am not trying to persuade Democratic readers to remove their rooftop solar panels and install coal furnaces in their homes. I do think that Democrats need to have a better understanding of how people in red areas understand the world. A neutral article on coal country will feel weird to Democratic readers. They may resist every sentence, but it is a worthy endeavor in political empathy.
Republicans in my area complain bitterly about how Oregon has a Democratic supermajority and that Republican candidates cannot win statewide offices. How unfair! They respond by spending more money on campaign ads. They need to wise up to the fact that leaders in their party lie about Portland and express open contempt for it. Metropolitan Portland has about half the state's voters. There should be no surprise that they reject Republican candidates by four-to-one margins.
Democrats, for their own part, need to wise up, too, about Pennsylvania. Or not, and keep losing elections.
[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to: https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.]
13 comments:
I certainly think coal is necessary and a choice between Trump and coal is obvious. Keep working on solar energy, but allow coal its place. We need to be more tolerant of others where it’s possible to do so for both sides.
Your rude and insulting shtick is getting old. But it is good that you finally discovered that there are coal mines in Pennsylvania. You probably are not familiar with the song and movie "Coal Miner's Daughter" (Loretta Lynn..Kentucky).
Some readers might be interested in this website:
coalcampusa.com
And the book by Loretta Lynn published in 1976.
Thank you for reading me. Please feel free to forward my blog to friends and relatives. My most engaged readers find things they dislike, don't understand, or feel insulted by. It is best if you don't post anonymously, because I delete a higher proportion of those as being low quality submissions, but suit yourself
“Climate” is a religious fixation among Democrats, and a loser as a political issue. For a non-theological scientific analysis, see this:
A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse
Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate
A "coal-perspective" essay from September 30, 2016 published on-line in "The Daily Yonder" (about the upcoming election):
"Speak Your Piece: The Lies We Want to Believe" by Herb E. Smith
There are several ways to generate electricity, each with distinct environmental and financial impacts. Traditional technologies benefit from well-established methods, experienced workers, and mature industrial support systems built over more than a century. In contrast, newer generation methods, while effective, often struggle with challenges such as sourcing materials and training both employees and end users. Currently, fossil fuels maintain dominance due to substantial government subsidies and strong political backing. If these subsidies are removed or support is shifted toward alternative technologies, the fossil fuel industry would face significant disruption. Similar to what occurred in Oregon’s timber industry, such changes are often felt most acutely by the workforce when cost controls are enforced or raw materials become scarce.
Ai yai yai - A report from sycophants to the current fascist regime all under the influence of petroleum dollars. It is noticeably hotter and dryer now than when I was a kid 70 odd years ago. That’s not weather, that’s climate. I understand that there are some non-human factors at work here, but most likely we are all significant contributors to incremental warming and changing of our climate. Coal is nasty highly pollutant fuel. Leave it in the ground. Every dwelling should have solar panels of their roofs, and democratizing energy production should be a national priority. BTW there is growing concern that highly energy intensive AI is a bubble that might burst from advancing technology making the present implementation a very inefficient path.
Trump claims climate change is a hoax. Chris Wright is his energy secretary and one of his obsequious ass-kissers who handpicked the people that wrote the report MT references. Here's an article about it from a more reputable source, for those more interested in facts:
https://www.science.org/content/article/contrarian-climate-assessment-u-s-government-draws-swift-pushback
Tom,
Responding to valid scientific reasoning with invective (“sycophants”, “fascist”) does not reflect well on you. Did you read the report?
Or do you already know everything?
Sycophants and fascist aren't invective; that's just what they are. To consider their well-refuted report "valid scientific reasoning" does not reflect well on you.
Reading my comment for today’s blog, you only need to look at the Oregon 2nd and Pennsylvania’s voter trends. Extraction industries like, coal and old growth timber generated living wages and easy living in wide open areas. Their families are hurt by shifting subsidies and environmental regulations. Trump, accurately targeted their concern and redirected the lost funding and loosened regulations to allow companies to operate. Hiring back and, in some cases, increasing workforce positions. To those affected MAGA is working for them.
Of course, I firmly believe in climate change. It has changed many, many times during the Earth's long history.
I also believe in the survival of humanity.
Evolution and climate change are both very, very long term.
There is nothing we can do to stop climate change. Nothing at all. All we can do is to influence it in many different directions, and make sure we can adapt.
Note well: I view pollution as something completely different from climate change.
Post a Comment