Wednesday, March 13, 2024

Getting rid of the Romneys

"Mamas, don't let your babies grow up to be cowboys. . . ."
         
Went to Number One in 1978 when covered by Waylon Jennings and Willie Nelson


Do GOP voters want their sons to grow up to be just like Donald Trump?

The GOP has changed out from under its voters. In a rally last week in South Carolina, Donald Trump said that MAGA "represents 96% and maybe 100% of Republicans." He said,  "We’re getting rid of the Romneys of the world. We want to get Romneys and those out."


Mitt Romney used to represent the GOP. He is a "square." 

I think the term "square" still exists, but the Urban Dictionary calls it an "old fashioned" term, popular in the 1980s and 1990s. It had meaning in the 1950s, when it was the opposite of "cool" and in the 1960s, when it was the opposite of "hip." Squares are "Boy Scouts," both literally and figuratively. Real squares become become Eagle Scouts, and parents are proud of them. Squares go to church. Squares are good sports. Squares aren't rebellious against respected figures of authority -- their parents when they are children, their principal and teachers at any age, law enforcement when they are adults. Squares don't cheat on their taxes -- or they feel guilty about it when they do. If squares cheat on their spouses, they feel guilty about that, too, and hide it. 

In politics squares like Romney want a balanced federal budget because they have a sense of obligation about paying for what they get. Squares have a strong sense of self-reliant rectitude, so they tend to support policies that come down hard on people who are poor or in trouble. Squares blame them for having made bad choices. That contrasts somewhat with Democrats and non-squares, who are more likely to blame "society" or "systemic" things for bad outcomes. Republican squares point to the individual and put responsibility on him. Republican squares think character matters. 

That is a big deal for squares: Character. 

I have had long, good relationships with people who generally vote for Republicans. As a county commissioner and in a 30-year career as a financial advisor, I worked with Republicans all the time. The kind of people who acquire wealth by accumulating it slowly over decades tend to be "squares," and about half of them were and are Republicans. They did their homework in school. They entered careers. They were prudent. They saved. And in America in the late 20th century such people often -- I would say usually -- acquired some wealth. After all, they played by the rules of middle and upper-middle class "squareness," and it worked out. I helped them accumulate and manage that money.

I like "squares." 

My great wonderment is how GOP voters, and especially GOP leaders in the community, in political offices, in religious institutions, and in businesses, have so thoroughly accepted Donald Trump as the leader of their party. 

Trump, center. At age 13 Donald Trump was sent to a military school -- a reform school -- by his father

Trump is the opposite of square. He represents and carries out every element of bad character that a square dislikes. Squares work hard to teach their children not to be like Trump. "Soccer moms" and "soccer dads" watch their children flail away at kicking a soccer ball on Saturday mornings so that the children learn the rules of fair play. Teams line up to say "good game" to the other team. Kids who act out or taunt opponents are called out on the spot by the coach and forced to apologize. Kids learn to respect the line calls, the yellow cards, the red cards. 

Parents teach their sons to be respectful of girls. They teach them to be prudent with allowances. They teach their children that ambition is good but cheating is bad. They teach their children that selfishness is not just morally wrong but that other people notice it and it backfires. They teach children not to lie. They teach their children to respect our democracy. They teach their children to be ashamed of themselves when they misbehave.

An infection -- a communicable virus -- has swept over Republican voters. It is a thought disease. Yet Republican squares -- people who work hard to teach their children good character -- accept and defend Trump. It is an odd kind of mind control. Down is up. Bad is good. Bearing false witness is OK. Adultery doesn't count. Stealing and hanging on to documents doesn't count. Lying about an election and trying to overthrow it is OK. Fortunately, the infection seems personal to Trump and it may not survive him. When he goes, the infection may disappear. Trump's mimics and cheerleaders don't appear to have the same power to capture the minds of GOP voters. A commenter here called it a disease, Metastatic Trump Disease, and it has changed the GOP for a while. 

Maybe it is less a disease than it is the power of fame in our current culture of celebrity. Republican eyes are blinded by a bright light. Trump is a star, the most visible human in America now. "When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.”



Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to: https://petersage.substack.comSubscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.]



14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Is Joe Biden a "square"?
Is Nancy Pelosi a "square"?
Is Jeff Merkley a "square"?

Woke Guy ;-) said...

I think in this case Peter you're underestimating the capacity for squares to wish their boring lives were different. I agree that Mitt Romney truly seems like a fully authentic square who fervently believes in all the values you laid out, but I suspect a large number of Republicans who you would consider squares are much less committed than Romney is. For people like that seeing a rule-breaker like Trump seemingly get away with all his craziness likely offers a thrill of excitement that is sorely lacking in their own lives.

Even if they personally can't or won't behave like that, through Trump they can vicariously live out their wilder side.

It also doesn't hurt that Trump is openly and proudly racist and exist, two nasty personality defects that prior to Trump had been frowned on publicly at least. If you look at polling it is an objective fact that over 80% of Republicans who call themselves MAGA hold views that can only be described as racist.

The squares and the racists teaming up to go to bat for "Honest Don"... what an absolute disgrace.

Up Close: Road to the White House said...

Answer: Yes, all of them are. Most successful Americans are squares, more or less. They work hard. Don't conspicuously cheat. Don't go bankrupt. Don't get crossways with the IRS or the police. Don't have sex with porn stars. Don't cheat vendors. Don't steal from their foundations. Don't lie to their banks.

Trump made a virtue out of being a rebel who fights authority figures and makes them the bad guys. It is the same spirit of rebellion that marijuana smokers had in the late 1960s: the cops are narcs and they are the bad guys. The U.S. government is the bad guy. The FBI and CIA are the bad guys. People with short hair are the bad guys. It was youthful rebellion, but most Boomers grew out of some or all of it. Now they oppose flagrant lawbreaking.

Peter Sage

Mike Steely said...

“An infection -- a communicable virus -- has swept over Republican voters.”

As I’ve said before, today’s GOP is proof that insanity is contagious. Now Trump’s daughter-in-law is co-chair of the RNC. Meanwhile Trump and one of his former advisers are spreading the notion that Biden is flooding the country with illegals so they can get them registered to vote for him (I am not making this up: Cleta Mitchell, Trump push false claims of noncitizen voting : NPR).

It wouldn’t surprise me if their next step is encouraging White Supremacists to guard the polling stations. It may sound crazy, but they are. Remember, we’re talking about a much-loved maniac who thinks Hitler did a lot of good things.

Low Dudgeon said...

I read the subheading as, "Mamas don't let your babies grow up to be Romneys". Perhaps a cover by the late Trump fan, Toby Keith? But seriously, Romney the "square" is rejected by Trump fans in favor of Trump because Trump is seen as a fighter against the Left.

Never mind how dumb, dishonest or self-defeating Trump's fighting so often is: Romney by comparison made nice and gave in, even though he was unfairly savaged in 2012 anyway (would Obama repeat today his smug debate dismissal of Romney's focus on Putin's Russia?).

Perhaps the true power of fame in our current celebrity culture is the power to transcend institutional memory--of Trump as ersatz progressive on e.g, abortion--or to survive cancel culture even when cancellation is so richly deserved on the merits.

Trump confounded "The Libs" (and many others beside) in 2016. That's the basis for his apparent immmunity. Fortunately indeed it is personal to Trump, and surely it cannot survive yet another election setback. Regardless, what a toxic coarsening he represents.



Mc said...

Correction:
TFG fights anyone who tries to hold him accountable.

He's a bully. His supporters are fools.

Mike said...

The only possible way Trump could suffer another election setback would be due to a repeat of the massive voter fraud that didn’t happen in the last one. He’s already priming his cult followers for it by claiming Democrats are registering undocumented immigrants to vote. That ought to motivate the whack jobs to haul out their AR-15s.

Michael Trigoboff said...

It’s all about winning, not principles, on both sides.

Democrats contribute money to Republican primary candidates who they think will lose in a general election; not exactly principled or ethical, but it leads to wins.

Republicans support Trump because they think he is a useful weapon against Democrats.

The Darwinian nature of politics seems to select against principles.

Mike said...

Darwinism is based on natural selection, in which variations on genotype that increase an organism’s chances of survival are preserved and multiplied from generation to generation at the expense of less advantageous variations.

Acceptance of such basic principles as truth and justice by the individuals that compose society is what enables it to function. Abandoning them would be the opposite of Darwinian for our republic. In nearby Haiti we have an example of politics without principles - not a very advantageous variation.

Michael Trigoboff said...

My point about Darwinism referred to electoral success, since that’s what is rewarded by the Darwinian selection process in our politics.

Whether or not that particular Darwinian process leads to a functional society is a different question that I was not addressing.

Mike said...

And my point is that voting for people without principles isn't conducive to the survival of our republic. By doing so, people are voting against their own best interests. That isn't Darwinian, it's just stupid.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Point A and Point B are different and might even both be true.

Expressing Point B as though it is in violent disagreement with Point A is a fundamental error of logic.

How many angels can dance on the head of a disagreement about the definition of Darwinian?

https://youtu.be/X7MziVYtAgY?si=-lC_yk8FCZpTEeVK

Mike said...

Good point, except my definition of Darwinism is from the encyclopedia. Nor was there anything violent about it - just a matter of what qualities we would like to see survive.

Michael Trigoboff said...

https://youtu.be/ohDB5gbtaEQ?si=qun58xVjT3u9NzMV