Monday, April 24, 2023

A Massachusetts Catholic moves to Texas

Duncan McCrann was in an uncomfortable spot. 

College classmate Duncan McCrann wrote an autobiographical comment in a the college's 50th reunion report that he was "a failure as an atheist.” That might make him seem right at home in Bible-belt Texas. Not quite. 

He had a long career as an educator in public tuition-free charter schools that service educationally underserved communities. He wrote classmates saying he had formerly believed that "top-notch education was the magical path to equality and success for disadvantaged black and brown children.” He said he now realized it was necessary, but insufficient. Injustice persisted because prejudice persisted. He said “ending structural racial injustice requires that White people fundamentally change.”  

His neighbors didn’t want to hear it. He didn't want to hear them, especially when they argued that God preferred Republicans. That sends him on a path reflecting on how a Christian practices loving one's neighbors, even when you disagree with them.




Guest Post by Duncan McCrann


Having spent most of my life in the Northeast, I now live in Texas. I like living here in Houston but had to learn the hard way not to talk about politics and religion. 

Early in my Texas experience, we got to know our neighbors. The friendliest ones grew up in Louisiana and we were fortunate to be invited to casual dinners, cookouts, and pool parties. Life was good until I made the blunder of bringing up a book, I had just read named The Death of Character. I had met the author, a professor at University of Virginia, at a small meeting Wisconsin hosted by a philanthropist who, incidentally, was a practicing, Christian. With the encouragement of my Christian-philanthropist friend, I got the book and read it as soon as it arrived. 


The theme was that character in America began to erode, in part, with the merger of Christianity and politics via the creation of the Moral Majority in the 80s. Nationally, the organization encouraged its members to use registration drives to recruit churchgoers to vote for Moral Majority-endorsed candidates who were all Republican. So, the marriage of politics and the Republican party was begun. 

One dilemma in this merger is that the Republicans became the party presumably endorsed by God and Democrats became the enemy of Christianity. Though the Moral Majority as an entity was short-lived, the concept of preaching politics from the pulpit lives on. Prior to that time, there was a belief that good character was informed by religious belief. The Bible and Torah were seen as guidance for the development of good character. Religion wasn't about identity on a team. It shaped ethics. I was deeply interested in this because I had spent the past decade helping private and public charter schools develop character programs. 

The blunder I made was to bring up The Death of Character at a neighborhood cookout. Oops. The topic did not go over well and friendly attempts to change the subject failed. Folks began to take offense. The crescendo was when our host put her foot down and told me pointedly, “If God could vote, He would vote Republican.” She said what the other guests were thinking. Luckily, we dropped the subject, the party went on. I wrote an apology for spoiling things. Fortunately, we never returned to the topic, and via my wife’s loving personality we stayed on the invitation list.

I remain very concerned about the idea of politics co-opting religion. Recently, I attended a very well developed, year-long Bible study that has a lecture and small group discussion. I could not help noticing the little barbs and jokes about Democrats and Catholics. Concerned about the resentment I was feeling, I went to confession to share my negative feelings toward my study mates. The priest was silent for a while, and regarding my study mates he said, “Why don’t you look for goodness in the lives of the men. Try to love them even if you don’t agree with them. God wants us to love our neighbors, our enemies, and those that do not believe as we do. Drop the subject and look to do good in your community.” Good concept.



[Note: to subscribe to the blog and get it delivered by email every day, go to: petersage.substack.com Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]

10 comments:

Rick Millward said...

"I remain very concerned about the idea of politics co-opting religion.

It's actually the other way round.

The founders held the belief that democracy and religion were incompatible, and they were right. Yet, the Christian God is inexplicably all over the founding documents, leading us to believe that they thought their lofty language would hold off the inevitable assault. Unalienable rights is a cool idea. Handed down from a God?

Not so much...

Mike Steely said...

Mr. McCann expresses concern about politics co-opting religion. I think religion is co-opting politics, and there is a difference. The founders intended for there to be no state religion, but White Christian Nationalism has become the GOP base. One of its original manifestations was the KKK of the early 1900s. The bedsheets and burning crosses may be gone, but their delusion that God intended the U.S. to be a White Protestant nation is still very much with us.

Anonymous said...

I agree that many folks who move from the Northeast to the South are in for a rude awakening and culture shock. To some degree, Florida may be an exception with so many snowbirds and retirees in the Sunshine State.

Southern transplants in the Northeast may feel the same way.

Even if you try to avoid the subject, many people in the South love to talk about church and religion. You may be asked, "What church do you go to?" and other similar questions.

If you keep quiet and try to keep your private life private, you may be considered different and suspicious.

Going to a liberal church, which are more likely to be located in cities and college towns, most likely will be frowned upon.

Mc said...

Religion is just another corporate way to control people.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Many of the Founding Fathers were religious. “Separation of church and state“ is not found anywhere in The Constitution. The First Amendment prohibits the establishment of a state religion, not the separation of the state from religion.

Hostility towards religion from the non-religious is a significant component of the polarization we are currently experiencing. Duncan’s idea sounds like a good way to start getting past our extreme polarization.

Herbert Rothschild said...

Did your guest mean to say "marriage of politics and the Republican party"? I think he meant to say "marriage of religion and the Republican party."

Mike Steely said...

The First Amendment makes it clear: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;...” Just in case anyone still didn’t get it, Thomas Jefferson elaborated: “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.”

Of course, the White Christian Nationalists think they know better.

John C said...

A few years ago I came across this well-researched book by political theologian and historian Gregg Frazer entitled ‘God against the Revolution: The Loyalist Clergy's Case against the American Revolution’

He says The Founders were raised in a nominally Christian culture and so they knew Christianity; they knew the terminology, and they were also educated in Enlightenment thought and rationalism. (He terms it “Christian rationalism”) As clever politicians, they knew how to appeal to their audience, and so they were able to couch things in terminology that would keep them popular with the people. Sure, taxation was a big deal, but what really got people riled was the notion that this was a Holy revolution (upper case intended). It was a high moral duty to rebel. Sermons from many (but not all) Pastors of that era were more like political speeches, than Christian teaching.

It seems the Moral Majority just took the Founding Father’s playbook and it worked. So we have today’s Christian Nationalists who are vulnerable to having their faith hijacked because of their inadequate understanding of biblical Christianity.

Anonymous said...

Let's remember why the separation of church and state is so important. Remember the Holy Roman Empire? The Crusades? The Inquisition? European religious wars between Catholics and Protestants? Religious persecution in Europe and around the world?

Not long ago, I saw an ad on tv with Ron Reagan (Ron Jr.) promoting the Freedom from Religious Foundation. I just looked it up and it was founded in Wisconsin in 1978.

The marriage of politics, the state and religion is the highway to hell. History is our teacher if we will study and listen.

Anonymous said...

Freedom From Religion Foundation (typo)