Texas is both a real physical place--a state--and Texas is a concept in the public mind.
Texas has been undergoing a fundamental shift in reputation.
Or not.
The Texas of my youth was the Texas where John Kennedy was assassinated. In the 1960s the word "Dallas" had meaning. It was a hotbed of conservative nastiness, and media reports preceding Kennedy's trip to Dallas speculated on whether the trip was safe for him. Dallas was hostile territory. Kennedy would headline a motorcade, but he would be accompanied by his Texan Vice President, Lyndon Johnson, and by Texas' Democratic governor. Kennedy was Catholic, a New Englander, a Democrat, and was increasingly associated with support for the civil rights and equality of Blacks. His assassination, and then the murder of Kennedy assassin Lee Harvey Oswald while in Dallas police custody, sealed the deal. Dallas--the idea of Dallas--represented right wing extremism and a place of corruption in service to dark political ends.
In 1973 I traveled through Texas taking three days to cross from Louisiana to New Mexico, the southern route, through Houston. I intentionally sped through. Texas, to me, represented the worst of Deep South racism, backwoods good ol' boy violence against city folk in the tradition of the 1972 movie "Deliverance," and the still-fresh reputation of assassinations. I was an Oregon boy, White and clean cut, but still an outsider with a college education. I removed the old McGovern sticker from my car to get through Texas. I felt out of place until I got to the safety of New Mexico.
Then there was the OPEC oil embargo, which changed the mood. As we waited in gas lines in the mid and late 1970s Texas's reputation repositioned into national lifesaver. It had valuable oil. A prosperous Texas served as foundation for the TV show "Dallas." The show ran from 1978 to 1991--the archetypal show of the greed-is-good Eighties. Texas was swagger, glamour, and tasteless new money, without apology.
Texas was boom and bust country. Busted in 1982 when OPEC turned the oil back on and interest rates climbed. Houston was known for half-finished hollow buildings, I-beam frames in place but nothing inside. Then it recovered, and Texas got a new reputation as that scrappy place that always bounced back. The Dallas Cowboys somehow became "America's team," the NFL's only "national" team and the most valuable franchise because of it.
Now Texas is in crosscurrents. On one hand Texas presents itself as the alternative--indeed antidote--to California. Texas has no income tax. Texas is "business friendly" with an easy regulatory environment. It is open for business and workers. No California woke-ness. Government and NIMBY neighbors don't block new housing in Texas, so Texas had room for you. Dallas-Fort Worth just surpassed Greater Philadelphia to become the country's fourth largest metropolitan area and Texas is gaining congressional seats while California is losing them. Ha! In San Francisco or Silicon Valley or in any suburb within driving distance of the technology jobs there, starter homes cost a million dollars and more. A person making $75,000 or $100,000 a year doing tech or some other 21st century job in Texas--an income to be proud of--could afford a house.
Texas is repositioning from a place of cowboy boots and pickup trucks to a place with urban sensibilities. Austin is the epicenter of coolness, what with the University of Texas, the live music scene, and its growing technology sector. Austin is the new Brooklyn, and Texas as a whole is repositioning as purple, not red. The parts of Texas that are growing are the cities, and people in cities have city values and city politics. They vote Democratic. They are still outvoted by the rural cowboy counties in Bible Belt North Texas and by Old South East Texas, but people moving to the cities are not so different from ones in California, Illinois, and New York.
Amid this change, resistance. Their Attorney General led the lawsuit effort to end Obamacare. The Texas AG wrote the lawsuit to attempt to discard votes to overturn the 2020 election. Texas just sharply reduced mail-in voting, and its legislature limited drop boxes for ballots to one per county, both Loving County with 169 residents and Houston's Harris County with 4.4 million residents. Texas proudly passed a law that effectively bans abortion, a giant statement about the civil rights of women and their ability to control their own reproduction.
I am reminded again of The Great Gatsby and its famous closing lines. "So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."
The future is rushing in on Texas. Its political establishment is encouraging the future, but resisting it as well. Texas sees the green light of a prosperous future on its horizon but it longs for that nostalgic Make America Great Again past that centered power on rural White men. It is too late to stop that future. City people, diverse people, and people with college degrees are moving to Texas, but like Gatsby, the political establishment cannot bear to acknowledge the change that portends.
13 comments:
I removed a post that was nasty in tone and which included warnings about the deserved violence against so-called socialists.
I do not know for sure if this is by Curt Ankerberg. This now-deleted post did not include profanity, nor did it imagine things about my genitalia, so it is possible it is not by Curt. Ankerberg is not a typical Republican, but he does get nearly 50% of the votes of Republicans. I consider his aa reflection on Trump, who he sometimes praises. Who likes Trump?? Curt Ankerberg, famous locally for obscene comments on social media. What do local Republicans think of him? A great many vote for him.
I have said to him that I would be more likely to post his comments if he signed them in his own name. Then readers would know who he is and could decide for themselves in future elections if he deserves their votes.
It is not impossible that Curt Ankerberg has something useful to say. If he,, or someone who writes in his characteristic style, writes non-obscene, non threatening, respectful comments, then fellow-readers can se them.
The anonymous post remaining uttered some unsubstantiated statements. Corruption in Oregon? Please document that! Just stating it don't make it so.
Also there is a implied violence in his last sentences. "Eliminated". Wow!
Nah, anonymous, it will never happen.
Non-Hispanic whites are a dwindling percentage of the Texas population. The 2010 census showed them at 45.3%; the 2020 census showed them at 39.7%. They contributed 187,252 persons, or 4.7%, to the state's overall growth The next lowest were non-Hispanic Blacks, who contributed 557,887 persons, or13.9%. Non-Hispanic Asians and non-Hispanic Others contributed about the same-->600,00 or >16%. But huge growth was in Hispanics--1,980,796, or 49.5%.
Their future prospects are even worse for those who want to maintain white control, because their percentage of the population dwindles as age cohorts get younger.
What these shifts mean electorally is not a given. Many of the Hispanics aren't eligible to vote. Further, the 2020 elections revealed that Hispanic males will vote Republican in surprising numbers. Further, Asians--who tend to be very middle class--will often vote Republican.
That said, the political shift is irreversible. When Deborah and I left Houston in 2009, the city was under Democratic control and its elected officials were wonderfully diverse. All the county (Harris) county-wide elected officials, however, were white. That flipped several election cycles ago.
I think you're correct, Peter, in seeing the draconian laws a Republican (and white) dominated state government is now enacting as a last stand.
The problem with this demographic triumphalism is that both Asians and Hispanics are well along in the process of becoming “white.“ Let’s remember that Italians and the Irish and Jews weren’t considered to be “white“ in the not so distant past.
Ruy Teixeira, one of the foremost proponents of the “demography is destiny“ theory that Democrats would soon dominate, has now reversed course, and is warning Democrats that following this strategy will backfire.
From a Progressive point of view your characterization of Texas as a deep South racist and regressive state is probably still the most accurate.
It falls behind on several metrics but the one that jumps out to me is that it's 43rd in educational achievement which suggests to me that a lot of it's success is from out of state. Also the state's economy is very dependent on oil and gas; not the best place considering climate change.
It is also #1 in executions.
Agreed Asians and especially Latinos will continue to hew rightward, in Texas and elsewhere, the more so if and when immigration policy can be settled one way or the other. The Democratic Party is not a home for traditional family and vocational ethics, nor respect for authority.
Lifelong Republican here. I could not vote for Trump in 2016. He seemed unqualified. Nor in 2020. His few good moves (which were likely not really his anyway) were greatly outweighed by the negative consequences of his malignant narcissism and vulgarian self-promotion.
Mr/Ms Dudgeon,
Recovering liberal here: not really a Republican, but definitely not a Democrat anymore.
There was no way I could vote for Hillary or Biden, but I couldn't vote for Trump either, given his many pathologies. So I voted third-party in both 2016 and 2020.
In 2016 I was sorry that Trump won, but glad that Hillary lost. Illogical, but that's exactly how I felt. In 2020 I was glad that Trump lost but sorry that Biden won. Same thing again.
I am currently watching Dan Crenshaw with interest. He might have the charisma for a successful run at the Presidency in 2024.
“ Corruption in Oregon? Please document that! ”
DHS, Employment Division, OHA, Housing Authority, Youth Authority, PERS.
If not corrupt, incompetent.
Which people are perfectly happy with as long as they’re Democrats.
I consider our local so-called public health department and its leader the same.
The billions of dollars corporations spend to lobby legislatures and as political contributions and political advertisements is the corruption that bothers me.
To Sally:
Listing various departments and calling them corrupt is not documentation. It's just another unsubstantiated (i.e. baseless) allegation.
To Mike
I called them incompetent. The reports are legion and widely available.
To refresh your memory:
"Sally said...
“ Corruption in Oregon? Please document that! ”
DHS, Employment Division, OHA, Housing Authority, Youth Authority, PERS."
Documentation means providing evidence, not just saying there's lots.
Perhaps Oregon's SoS office might do its job and audit the state agencies to see if they are effective. There are 49 other states to compare to.
I sort of agree with Sally since my experience with a few agencies is that there might be room for improvement. There have been several instances where public agencies have wasted a lot of dollars on projects and services that were bungled.
Post a Comment