Thursday, September 9, 2021

Texans , the Taliban, and Apes.

Who controls female reproduction in Texas?
Males do. Powerful males.


A gorilla would understand that.


The Texas legislature essentially banned abortion beginning even before a woman knows she is pregnant. The Texas governor just assured Texas women that he would protect them from being raped.

The movement to ban abortion is being carried out under false pretenses. It isn't about the fetus. If it were about the fetus, the laws would be assurances for pre-natal health care, day care, and early childhood education.  Banning abortion is about males controlling female reproduction. It is a story as current as the Taliban putting veils on women and as old as primates living in trees. That reality must be ignored or denied because it is so contrary to our professed values of the dignity and autonomy and equal citizenship of women. It is an insult to women, but it is happening--for a reason. 

Hogan Sherrow sheds some light on that reason.
Sherrow

Hogan Sherrow is a Fulbright Scholar and has a Ph.D. in Evolutionary Anthropology from Yale University. He has studied the behavior and ecology of humans and other animals on three different continents, specializing in the evolution of political behavior, tribalism, leadership, and aggression. Hogan now consults for individuals, organizations, and campaigns, here in the Rogue Valley as Owner of You Evolving, LLC, www.you-evolving.com.


Guest Post by Hogan Sherrow


Texans and the Taliban: An Evolutionary Perspective


The Taliban and Texas. On the surface the two don’t seem to have much in common. Texas is staunchly patriotic to the United States (except when they are trying to secede from the Union), overwhelmingly Christian and largely of European, Central American, or Native American descent. The Taliban operates out of Afghanistan, but has no state level allegiance, is strictly Islamic and of Arabic, Afghani, or Pakistani descent.

Despite their deep differences the leaders of the Taliban and the leaders of Texas are eerily similar in one aspect, they continue to do everything they can to control women’s bodies, and their reproductive choices. The Taliban is far more militant and draconian in their efforts than our countrymen in the Lone Star state. They keep women confined to their homes unless escorted by a male relative, prevent them from going to school, and execute women who are accused of adultery. In Texas, things are a bit more subtle, but maintain the same goals. The latest efforts by Texas Republicans and their allies are focused on banning abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected and are a clear attack on the rights of women to control their own bodies and reproduction. Both groups justify their attacks on women based on their religious beliefs.

To some, it might seem that the control of women’s bodies and reproduction is just about power and control, or that it is guided by religion. While both of those are true to some extent, power, control, and religion only scratch the surface of the dynamics at play. The core of this behavior goes much deeper, and it begins with the very way mammals reproduce. Females gestate offspring inside their bodies, and always know that their offspring are their own. This is not the case for males, as they can never be completely sure that any given child is theirs. As a result, male mammals use a whole range of strategies to try to sway the reproductive odds in their favor. From monogamy to promiscuity and sperm competition to harems, efforts by male mammals to influence, or in some cases control female reproductive behavior is common. Primates, the biological Order we belong to, are not immune to efforts to assure or increase paternity. In fact, among our closest living relatives, in apes we see nearly all the strategies used by males to influence or control females played out in a real-time forest setting.
In Kibale National Park, Uganda
 
Gorillas are well known for establishing harems, with one powerful male attracting multiple females as mates. So long as the male successfully leads and protects the group, females will stay bonded to and mate with him. However, if the male fails in his responsibilities, she will leave him and find a new male to join. Among our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees, and bonobos we see drastically different approaches used by males in mating. Chimpanzee males use intimidation and force to impress females and females, in turn favor those males that are the loudest or most violent toward them, and who have the highest rank within the dominance hierarchy. Dominance among male chimpanzees is extremely important because higher ranking males get more mating opportunities. Bonobos are a completely different story, with high-ranking females dominating males, and every community member being a potential or real sexual partner. Male bonobos have no choice but to treat every baby bonobo as their own.

What is playing out half-way around the world and deep in the heart of Texas is, at its basest, rawest form what males have been doing to females for millions of years and what men have been doing to women for millennia. From Chinese foot-binding, to virgin marriages, to public stonings, to outlawing abortions, men have long sought to control the bodies and reproduction of women. While the laws and policies enacted by Mohammad Hasan Akhund’s Taliban and Governor Greg Abbott’s Texas Administration are dangerous and threaten the freedom and safety of women, they are not surprising from an evolutionary perspective. They are exactly what we expect to see when males act out primal behaviors, without checks and balances to keep them in order. What those checks and balances should be will be the topic of another post.

 

 

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hence it’s easier to elect a half black male than it is to elect a white woman.

James Stodder said...

I believe we are slightly closer in evolutionary terms to the chimpanzees then the bonobos. And I also have read that there are very few human societies practicing pollyandry; i.e., females with multiple husbands. (Some Tibetan monastic orders). This leads me to be somewhat pessimistic about the possibilities of completely overcoming these brutish behaviors.

Ed Cooper said...

Fascinating commentary. I look forward to the next article. The point Anonymous makes is salient as it pertains to 2024, imho.
Thanks, Peter, for again helping make sense of these turbulent times.

Michael Trigoboff said...

What this theory leaves out is why so many women are anti-abortion.

Rick Millward said...

I would agree on the anthropological roots of misogyny. But we are long out of the jungle, so these facts serve to illustrate that religion evolved to codify male dominance. When the author speaks of "females...in turn favor those males that are the loudest or most violent toward them" he highlights that violence is the foundational principle of patriarchy.

What, after all, is the reason behind #metoo? Male violence, in particular committed by "dominant males". The Texas laws are exactly that, using religion as a cover as has been done for millennia.

Scientist now longer need to travel to remote jungles to study primate behavior. All you need is a flight to Austin.

Anonymous said...

Liberals go from one day saying they don't want to die themselves from Covid, to the next day planning to kill a baby. Boy....that sounds like fun!

Why is your life so important, while that of a baby doesn't mean squat
to you? Your life is no more important than the unborn. They deserve to live as much as you do. Perhaps we should perform a late-term abortion on you?

People that have abortions are self-centered baby killers with no morals. DISGUSTING!

Diane Newell Meyer said...

Oh dear, another anonymous post proclaiming that a fetus is a "baby". Sigh. Again, one can also look to the animals, as few are self aware (as per the mirror test). Human babies cannot identify the person in the mirror as themself until nearly age two. Puppy, salamander, and other animal fetuses have heart beats. They feel pain, also, and must be treated humanely. But we allow the taking of these lives when necessary. Hearing a heart beat in a 6 week old fetus means nothing about its humanity. The fetus at six weeks is an inch or so big and still has a tail!

I believe that the definition of what is "human" has to do with our sentience and self awareness. Our intelligence makes us unique, and a heart beat does not. But even despite that, we authorize and allow killing of humans. Soldiers go to war, the flat-lined brain is enough to allow the plug to be pulled, we mostly still allow execution for murder.

Therefore there is every reason to allow a woman, whose life and future are at stake, to abort a fetus. It is not a "baby". Its "rights" do not in any way compare with hers. She is a full human being with the right to control her body and what is in it.

Low Dudgeon said...

I wonder if Mr. Sherrow feels obliged to reassess his thesis in view of the recent settled social science, to wit that biology in relation to "male" and "female" is but a social construct hegemonically assigned at birth, whereas the most recent gender self-identification even of a pre-pubescent child is the true empirical bedrock, dispositive for scientific, medical and legal purposes. Or perhaps these trends are in fact our evolution from what for now still prevails among lesser primates (including Afghanis and Texans?).

Mike said...

It's interesting that of all the posts for or against abortion, only one is from a woman.

The Texas law relies upon citizens spying on each other - a tactic used by Hitler in Nazi Germany. Welcome to the future Republicans envision for us.

David Landis said...

As it relates to the Texas law, can an as yet untried rapist, including a family member, sue his victim and/or her helpers, including his own family, should she seek an abortion? Of course, this is apparently moot as rapes have now ended in Texas, according to the Guv.

John F said...

Someone please explain to me why abortion is any man's business. On legal grounds, I don't believe I have standing. The decision to have a child or not should be totally the woman's. That decision about her medical condition is best kept between the woman and her doctor.

Ralph Bowman said...

The man and woman make the fetus. Yet so many men walk away from supporting the woman to the clinic. Dump it on her to make the decision, to take the scorn, to take the yelling and name calling. If the law called for the male to be immediately castrated or have a vasectomy if he could not show the ability to pay for the child’s birth or the raising of the child, woman’s rights to an abortion would be granted immediately.

Anonymous said...

We have paternity tests. Not sure what determining who is the father has to do with this issue. But it is about some men still wanting to dominate and control women and, of course, religion. Some men simply are unable to tolerate the existence of strong, independent women. They have deep seated issues. Maybe from their relationships with their mothers. And men still dominate religion. Ultimately, freedom seeking women will prevail. History is not on the side of these fearful, desperate cavemen. Probably most anti-choice women are still wrapped up in patriarchal religion. They are free to choose not to have an abortion. Free To Choose.