Monday, May 24, 2021

Mistake, mistake, mistake.

No wonder governors are in trouble. The COVID rules don't make sense to people anymore. 


Even the people who make the rules cannot obey them.




Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer apologizes.
"Because we were all vaccinated, we didn’t stop to think about it. In retrospect, I should have thought about it. I am human. I made a mistake, and I apologize.”

On May 15 Governor Whitmer updated the COVID rules in response to rising vaccination rates combined with the spread of a new variant in Michigan--a mixed situation. The COVID war is being won, but it isn't over yet, not in Michigan. She announced that nearly all COVID restrictions would end on July 1, but for now there were still rules in place. There were 50% capacity limits at retail establishments, six-foot spacing at sports events, libraries, and waiting rooms. There are specific definitions of "households," of "contact sports," of what constitutes an approved face mask, of what constitutes "indoors," of gathering densities at residential venues. 

All this took place in an order issued by the Governor, 4858 words of dense, complicated material: CLICK.

Whitmer erred when she did something perfectly natural to do. She went to a restaurant with a small group of vaccinated people--a perfectly compliant act--saw two other groups of also-vaccinated people at nearby tables, and then somebody pushed the three separate tables together to form a single makeshift connection of fifteen to better facilitate cross-talk. And somebody noticed.

Mistake!

Each table individually was fine, but when pushed adjacent they became a violation, as described in item 3 of section three.

Gathering limitations for entertainment establishments, recreational establishments, and food service establishments:

3. Consumption of food or beverages is permitted only where patrons are seated, groups of patrons are separated by at least 6 feet, no more than 6 patrons are seated at a table, and groups of patrons do not intermingle.

She violated that rule. Of course, she is catching hell for it. 

Her photographed error is unmistakeable body language communicating privilege and hypocrisy--even though it was, of course, unintentional. She gave voters--both partisan opponents and friends alike--a basis for rejecting both her legal and moral authority. The rule maker didn't obey the rules. Elitist!. Hypocrite! Phony! Tyrant!  "If high and mighty Gretchen Whitmer doesn't follow the rules, why should I???"

The moral authority of the rule-maker is doubly important here because the rules themselves lack the legitimacy that comes from "making sense."  A 35-mile-per-hour speed limit on a curvy road has the legitimacy of apparent danger and the social signaling that other drivers drive about 35 MPH there, a legitimacy present whether or not the state governor is popular. But COVID rules make solid lines in gray areas of uncertainty and ambiguity, so moral authority matters. Entertainment venues trigger rules when 300 people are in attendance, but not to 290. Exercise facilities are limited to 30% capacity, not 35%. Rules were set up for non-tribal casinos, but not tribal ones. At dining areas of "multipurpose facilities" the dining room must be closed between 11:00 p.m. and 4:00 a.m. for some reason. Why not midnight, and why require closure at all? It seems crazily arbitrary. And caught in this tangle was the governor herself: Three tables of five patrons were safe" and legal, but pushing them so they touched created a violation.

It is time for governors to read the room. For better or worse, a critical mass of Americans are done with COVID shutdowns, except in a few places of special concern, i.e. congregant living places for seniors, health care facilities, and dense transportation sites like airplanes and subways--the CDC exceptions. People are accustomed to special rules there, and they "make sense."  Beyond that, Americans trust their own judgement on their risks--same as with decisions on whether or not to ski, eat raw oysters, or smoke cigarettes. Some people will keep wearing masks. Most will not. Suit oneself.

Is this ideal from a public health perspective? No, not ideal. But it is consistent with the American spirit of independence. We are less communitarian a society than some other cultures, e.g. Britain and Western Europe, and less willing to accept authoritarian regimentation than are people in Singapore and China. Governors attempted to hold back the tide for a while, and now Americans will be Americans. People who are vaccinated are probably safe for now; they presume so. People who aren't vaccinated don't want to be. People who are at risk because they cannot be vaccinated are on notice to stay away from other people for a while and maybe forever. That is cruel to them, but it is where Americans are on COVID.

Time for governors to give it up: Declare victory. Say we won the war on COVID, thanks to vaccines and fifteen months of shutdowns. Now do your own thing on COVID. Game over. Olly olly oxen free. 

Or, as we said in my neighborhood near Roosevelt Elementary School in Medford, Oregon, "Olly, olly, in come free." 






5 comments:

Rick Millward said...

"Do as I say, not as I do."

Bureaucratic inconsistency is nothing new, and inevitable in a situation where every state, indeed every community, every household, has their own standards and levels of exposure. Elected officials don't write the rules, but are the public face of all those behind the scenes who do and as such catch the flack. The attention paid to them is out of proportion to their importance in the larger scenario. It's unfair to criticize them for minor infractions, but does come with the job.

However Republican governors who arbitrarily abolish guidelines against the advice of their own public health authorities for political reasons do need to be called out.

Let's at least try to have some perspective.

At the moment I'm happy to be proven wrong in my concerns over relaxing masking and closures. The data indicates the possibility that warmer weather and vaccinations are knocking down infections.

Maybe we are done with COVID, but I'm still not sure COVID is done with us.

Michael. Steely said...

My understanding is that vaccinated people are well protected and pretty much anyone who wants to be vaccinated can be. Those who don't want to be vaccinated remain at risk, but that's their problem. Once all the willing are vaccinated, there would be no further point in not allowing businesses to fully reopen.

Anonymous said...

The problem isn't inconsistency by governmental officials like Newsom and now Governor Whitmer. The problem is the basic human nature of personal inertia towards rules of any kind. An excuse, if you will, towards a rationalization of personal behavior regardless of the rule. The example is most clearly seen in the "stubborn and willful" behavior of a two-year old child. Just try to explain that an adult can do something but the child cannot. We have entered a "gray area" that will be exploited by those individuals bridling at any limitations on their normal activities. Enough is enough we hear towards the mask mandate and social distancing. After a year of worry and now falling infections we're ready to go back to normal. As a vaccinated person I feel protected from the serious effects of Covid-19. I no longer worry that I might infect another human being with Covid, but I wear a mask if asked to while I shop and travel. As I said, I am adult enough to realize we need to stay with the guidelines and protocols just a little longer until the metrics tell us the risk to the nation is manageable. So please get vaccinated if you haven't already.

Anonymous said...

This isn't a big deal to me.
If anything, the restaurant should have said something. Here's why:
All businesses need to be aware of the rules/laws they are required to follow, including laws designed to protect their customers.Is it up to Les Schwab's customers to know what to do with old tire weights? No. We depend om businesses to provide guidance and ensure their premises are safe. This isn't any different.
There are myriad and evolving public health orders that businesses must know and should communicate with their customers. We see that all the time.
So, in this case, the restaurant should have said something. Maybe it did.


Second, to those complaining that the rules keep changing:
This is a good thing.
Science is consistently changing. There was a time when leeches were prescribed for ailments. There was a time when doctors recommend cigarettes. Would you prefer those days, when your health was jeapordized, just because you don't like dealing with change?

If you rely on scientific information free of politics you will do fine.

Ed Cooper said...

Re; restaurant should have said something. Recently entered a local brew pub with about ten other folks for a beer and a bite to eat, and we took two tables outside, but had more than 6 at one table, all vaccinated. In about 30 seconds, a Server politely, but firmly reminded us of the rules, no more than 6 at a table, so we rearranged. No fuss or recriminations, just doing what needed to be done. I simply don't get the mindset of "Nobody can tell US what to do, because 'freedumb'. How infantile this is.