A Trump voter returns to finish the job.

A college classmate voted for Donald Trump.

Today he explains why.

I learned that Matt Naitove had voted for President Trump twice. Last Thursday I published his guest post that reported what he didn't like about Democrats. Today he says what he likes about Trump. 

Matt had a long career writing and editing material for Plastics Technology magazine. Matt told me he had Fox News on his home TV 12 hours a day, but that he doesn't watch it constantly. He said that six days a week he performs the chore of reading The New York Times.

I disagree with much of what Matt wrote. I expect many readers to sputter with frustration and objection as they read. But today is his turn.

Naitove

Guest Post by Matt Naitove

The Awful Truth: Six Reasons We Need Trump

After failing my last assignment for a guest post on Peter’s blog, it’s only fair that I complete the job. The question was simple, the answer less so. How did a son of solidly Democratic New York Jewish parents, educated at Harvard and Columbia Journalism School, become a Trump voter?

Last week, I got only so far as to enumerate the failings of the Democrat Party that alienated me. Peter now wants to know what are my positive reasons to vote for Trump.

Some readers will upbraid me for neglecting their litany of objections to Trump and his policies. But, as I said, my assignment is to identify the positives.

So, why is Donald Trump the essential leader for America at this time?

1. He does what so many other Presidents only talked about or hoped for.

• He closed the Southern Border to illegal immigration. Obama turned a lot of people back at the border; Biden (falsely) claimed he lacked authority on his own to dam the flood. Trump started building a modern, durable border wall equipped with electronic sensors in his first term and is completing it now. He has empowered the Border Patrol to do what it was created to do, not serve as concierges for new arrivals. He is pursuing dangerous illegals throughout the nation, not just at the border. His well publicized antipathy to mass immigration alone has staunched the inflow; and he repurposed the CBP One app (now CBP Home) to facilitate “self-deportation.” The results were immediate and (so far) lasting. The benefits to beleaguered cities (like NYC) and the blow to the child-trafficking and human-trafficking profits of the drug cartels are rebukes to the appalling policies of the previous administration.

• He has actively addressed wasteful government spending and rampant fraud. Every president rhetorically targets “waste, fraud & abuse.” Most presidents (Biden excepted) laud the value of minimizing fiscal deficits and the ballooning national debt. Trump created DOGE to attack the problem; its success has been limited, except in drawing public attention to the obscene waste of public tax money on cronyism, beyond-absurd pet projects, and money laundering among a maze of NGOs. Trump has made wide-ranging efforts to shrink, defund or abolish what he considers redundant, unproductive, or counterproductive Federal agencies. Though Trump opponents have enlisted a phalanx of lower-court judges to resist these efforts, Trump’s success, once again, is to educate the public to the waste and outright theft of their tax dollars.

• “Affordability” is not just a slogan or talking point for Trump, but a campaign of action. He has held inflation on a downward curve by curbing wasteful spending, launching an assault on crippling regulations that inhibit business growth and increase costs, and – above all – bringing down energy costs (see below). Prices have declined for some key foodstuffs (eggs!), medicines (rounding up drug companies to cut Medicare costs) and services (home mortgages). He is addressing others by selectively modifying tariffs and import deals. A catastrophic tax increase was forestalled by the One Big Beautiful Bill (with no help from Democrats), and a raft of tax breaks were instituted for all U.S. citizens, especiallythose at lower income levels (not the lie of “tax breaks for billionaires” squawked endlessly by Democrats).

• He is bringing more order to our chaotic healthcare system. Lower drug prices for Medicare is the most immediate effect. Current efforts are underway to design a payment system oriented to patients, not insurance companies, using HSAs to give subsidies directly to individuals, and releasing the shackles of Obamacare (ACA) that impose a limited menu of insurance plans, so that a free market can operate.

• Trump has done more than anyone to cultivate prospects for peace in the Middle East. He is building on the Abraham Accords created in his first term. He has repaired relations with Saudi Arabia, arguably our strongest ally in the region. He did what no other president dared to do in bombing Iran’s nuclear facilities, ending (for now, at least) their headlong rush to atomic weapons. (In his first term, he made good on past presidents’ promises to move our embassy to Jerusalem.)

• Trump (in his first term) forced NATO allies to increase their military spending that was far below mandated levels. That effort has continued with success.

• Trump acted to end (or critically weaken) the downward spiral to tyranny and alliance with America’s enemies (China, Russia, Iran) in Venezuela.

• Trump is pushing for a resolution of another threat to America’s security that many presidents have fretted about but not acted on: Greenland. Look beyond the bluster to recognize the important underlying issue and the first effort in living memory to move off the dime on this. Let’s also remember that Denmark already sold one of its territories, now the U.S. Virgin Islands, to us as recently as 1917.

• Trump’s capture of Maduro and assaults on drug boats offer the first hope in ages that the “war on drugs” may end better than the wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan.

• While numerous past presidents have wished for a substantial banquet space at the White House, Trump is building it – at no public expense.

2. Trump ended the war on fossil fuels and acted on many fronts to reinforce America’s energy security and affordability. Energy is the fundamental cost component of the overall economy. Making it abundant, affordable and secure is the most basic economic policy.

• Increasing opportunities for oil/gas exploration and leasing.

• Removing environmental and other regulatory barriers to energy production. One of Trump’s first acts in his first term was to reverse the Obama halt on the previously approved Keystone XL pipeline (since halted again by Biden).

• Ending the subsidies for EVs and draconian emissions restrictions on gasoline and diesel vehicles that were intended to help force them out of the market.

• Abolishing regulations limiting market choice in appliances (and shower heads) that do little or nothing to improve the environment and mainly frustrate and insult consumers.

• Halting (or trying to halt) offshore wind farms that are being built over the national-security objections of the U.S. Navy (suppressed by the Biden Administration) and in willful violation of wildlife (birds) and marine-life protection laws. Trump is simply insisting on the environmental and national-security vetting of these projects that is required by law.

3. Trump has helped along a growing international trend toward awakening the public from the “Sleep of Reason” imposed on them by the climate-change cult of junk-science charlatans, careerist academics and opportunistic consultants – abetted by a gullible, ignorant and incurious popular press.

• Ensuring that the U.S. government does not contribute funds or prestige to agencies, international bodies, virtue-signaling treaties or publicity events (conferences) that promote phony alarums of climate catastrophe; fraudulent (knowingly or uncaringly unrealistic) demands for reduced standards of living by advanced societies; preposterous claims for “reparations” to poorer nations allegedly harmed by the environmental emissions of richer societies; and concurrent demands that emerging economies invest in costly and unreliable renewable energy instead of more functional and cost-efficient fossil-fuel power generation.

• Appointing an EPA Administrator (Lee Zeldin) with the good sense and guts to withdraw the senseless agency “finding” that carbon dioxide is a pollutant that is hazardous to humans and thus must be regulated by the Agency. So CO2 – plant food, the basis of all life on earth – is a pollutant? Might as well make the same finding about nitrogen (78% of the atmosphere) or H2O. They’re equally essential to life and equally hazardous under certain conditions. And CO2 has been part of the atmosphere since the earth began (a much larger part back then and only 0.04% now). Oxygen is more deserving of being termed a “pollutant” since it’s a relatively new addition to the atmosphere and had a dynamic effect on the earth’s topography, helping wash much of the early continents into the sea.

4. Donald Trump is restoring our military to be the strategic asset we need. Biden gave this lip service while presiding over the degradation of our services’ readiness across the board. (Clinton and Obama were actively hostile to the military.) Besides increasing Defense (or War) budgets, Trump appointed a new kind of Secretary, Pete Hegseth, who has restored the prestige of military service and fostered a radical rethinking of procurement and war-fighting strategy needed to upset the sclerotic systems that threaten our security.

5. Trump is restoring a sense of freedom and fairness that was being eroded over previous administrations.

• The oppressive rule of “DEI” has been challenged. Terms such as whiteness, white privilege, critical race theory, and structural racism are no longer the cudgels they once were to beat dissenters into submission. Words like equity and inclusion have had their fraudulent trappings stripped away.

• Creeping encroachment by governments at all levels – abetted by corporations and academia – to police thought and speech and to disenfranchise promoters of “misinformation” and “disinformation” have been blocked. Threats of debanking and deplatforming – as befell Donald Trump, his family and numerous other conservatives – as well as blocking access to stories such as the Hunter Biden laptop in the NY Post, no longer bite as they did such a short time ago. 

• The nation at large is being forced to confront the motto of Chief Justice John Roberts: “The best way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” The Trump Administration is exposing how this applies to a myriad of programs throughout all levels of government as well as academia and corporate America designed to favor one group over others. The Administration denies the fiction that America has not advanced since 1860 or 1960. It dismisses the idea that present discrimination is the cure for past discrimination. It also objects to any group of Americans being regarded indefinitely as wards of the state.

6. Trump is a force for change, for shaking up the corrupt, sclerotic old ways. The Democrats (except maybe the Socialist wing) and the middle-of-the-road Republicans are happy to preserve the old grift and graft and comfy office perks. Donald Trump offers a ladder up from this foul ditch. Socialists offer a blind step into a darker abyss. I can see only one way to go.

 

[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]

 

Ready or not, it's a new world.

Trump, on Greenland: "It will be done!!!"

Earlier yesterday, Trump wrote the premier of Norway, Jonas Gahr Støre. He felt snubbed:

Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.

Trump no longer pretends to be a fiduciary. He is the principal. He isn't a steward. He thinks like an owner. In either case, he wants his property to prosper, so Trump may not recognize the distinction. An owner can be utterly selfish. Help loyal friends. Punish enemies. Plunder. Graft. Favors. There is no such thing as a bribe. He is the state.

Trump has cleared the air on some areas of feel-good, civics-lesson mythology in America. 

     -- The "rules based order" is a sham and always has been. Trump ended the hypocrisy and self-delusion. Strong countries do what they want. Stephen Miller said it. It shocked people, not because it was wrong but because it was frank. No more pretending there is underlying moral benefit or fairness. 

    -- NATO is a sham and has been for years. The U.S. was never going to go to war and risk American lives to save the Baltic states from Russia, any more than we are now putting soldiers at risk in Ukraine. Trump said the frank truth about NATO's objection to a Greenland takeover: So what? 

"If it affects NATO, then it affects NATO. They need us more than we need them." 

Maybe Western Europe will spend its own money to build a strong unified military, and they will point it east. On the world's chessboard, Greenland is ours and it is about protecting us.

     -- Admit it: The role of the U.S. as global peacekeeper is too expensive to continue. We are abandoning that role and becoming a hemispheric power. Greenland belongs in our sphere. Trump can sell the Greenland acquisition to Americans as a matter of our security. It is a neglected vacant lot. Greenland has 50,000 residents, so Trump could offer $100,000 per resident for $5 billion, less than the cost of an aircraft carrier. They don't have a jungle to escape into to carry out a guerrilla war. We pacify them by occupying them or we can buy them off. We can do this. 

The American public, in its expression of self-government, gave leadership of our nation to Donald Trump. The levers of power that might constrain him are cowed by him, at least for now. The Democratic alternative to Trump is concentrated in prosperous urban centers. Democrats with presidential ambitions, including Rahm Emanuel and Gavin Newsom, say the Democratic brand is a negative.

Democrats are too weak, too accommodating of mass illegal immigration, too willing to allow public lawbreaking, insufficiently respectful of religion, insufficiently patriotic, too accommodating of niche minorities, and too concerned about climate at the expense of practicality. Democrats are unable to create safe, affordable living situations, even in places where they have overwhelming majorities and full operational control of the government. Democrats may not be able to fix their brand -- or want to. The party's most articulate spokespeople are people who come from those Democratic strongholds; they reaffirm those values and policies. 

With that choice, Americans picked Trump. He is venal and crazy, but he is strong and he promised to undo what people didn't like about Democrats.

By choosing Trump, Americans did not mean to make a profound shift in American foreign policy and its place in the world. But Trump comes as a package. We get authoritarianism. We get cronyism. We get rough deportation of immigrants. We get Trump's view of American empire. 

Like it or not, Americans chose this when they chose Trump.

[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]

Easy Sunday: Trump's Nobel medal.

Trump accepted the medal that accompanies the Nobel Peace Prize, a prize awarded to someone else.

Even Greg Gutfeld on Fox had to play it for laughs.  Displaying someone else's diploma! Wearing someone else's Eagle Scout badge! Ha-ha!

I stay in touch with some of my high school, junior high, and elementary school friends. I asked them if they had saved any old awards that they could offer Trump in exchange for not blowing up NATO.

I offered this old debate trophy. DeVere Taylor, my beloved former debate coach at Medford High School, pulled it out of the school's display case when they closed the school building. He brought it to me and I stored it. I would happily offer it to Trump in exchange for ending his trade wars.

My best friend in junior high and high school, Jon Stong, was a much better debater than I was, and I was lucky to have him as a debate partner. He said he did not have a debate trophy of his own -- and he would thoroughly deserve it if I gave it to him. He declined. He has his own tokens, varsity letters from both Hedrick Junior High and Medford High School. Jon was early to mature and get his height. He was probably a full foot taller than I was in the eighth grade. He played basketball, ran track, and played the drums in the school band. He is willing to make a deal with Trump.

Jon ended up marrying the girl I first knew as Patti Clark at Roosevelt Elementary School, a pretty, peppy, and popular girl in third grade, and still. She matured into a woman who became known as Patricia, having outgrown "Patti." She didn't save anything from our Roosevelt Rough Riders days, but she does have this recognition plaque. It has a shiny gold color, giving it good trade value when dealing with Trump. I'll bet she would give it up in exchange for peace in the North Atlantic.  

Stan Horton was a Rough Rider, too. He saved multiple letters from Roosevelt, Hedrick Junior High, and Medford High, awarded for his work as team manager for multiple sports. That role led to sports reporting, calling in box scores that got published in the local newspaper, which was a cool achievement for a high school freshman. That early start led to his long career in journalism. 

Another two high school classmates, Sheryl Gerety and Bruce Winterhalder, married each other. Sheryl kept her Blue Bird and Camp Fire merit badges and displays them on this costume. She would trade them for world peace.

Bruce saved his old scouting merit badges, a pin from a Project Prometheus summer enrichment program, and, on the far right of the second photo, a Red Cross 11-gallon pin, recognizing his blood donations.

My intention in this Easy Sunday post is to be lighthearted. Look at all the stuff we keep! Look at how we hang onto these symbols of merit. We may have moved houses a dozen or more times since childhood, but we cannot quite bear to throw them away. We would willingly join Maria Corina Machado in offering them to Trump to feed his need for recognition, if we got better government in return.

There is a serious point, too. I think Trump looks ridiculous doing anything with the Nobel medal other than returning it to Machado and praising her work. He could have looked generous. He could have shown that he respected the work of other people. He could have looked big, in the character sense. It was an opportunity for grace. 

Couldn't a single aide have gotten through to him and told him what the situation required?  Apparently not.

I look at Bruce's 11-gallon pin with particular admiration and respect. In what world would someone else buy or borrow that pin and stand for photos smiling for the camera while wearing it? We would understand that for what it is: stolen honor. We don't admire or respect that kind of imposter. Quite the opposite.

Even Gutfeld laughs at the absurdity of it.

[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]

American Greenland.

Trump doesn't want use of Greenland.

Trump wants to own it. 

Trump has been talking and posting:

"Countries have to have ownership and you defend ownership, you don't defend leases. And we'll have to defend Greenland,"

“Ownership is very important. Because that’s what I feel is psychologically needed for success.

“NATO becomes far more formidable and effective with Greenland in the hands of the UNITED STATES, Anything less than that is unacceptable.”

I thought we were being trolled. Would Trump really destroy NATO in order to mark Greenland as ours? Doesn't Trump realize that the Mercader projection exaggerates Greenland's size? Does he realize that Greenland's 50,000 people are essentially on welfare, living on the generosity of Danish subsidies? 

Heads up: a movement is gathering to seize Greenland. The Wall Street Journal just nudged the U.S. toward making an American-owned Greenland a reality.

I had accepted as dispositive the feelings of the don't-meddle, isolationist portion of the MAGA base. It combines people like Marjorie Taylor Greene from the populist focus-on-people-here part of MAGA and the educated policy-oriented libertarian part of MAGA, represented well by Reason Magazine. They published this on Thursday.

The article quotes a Quinnipiac poll showing that 86 percent of Americans oppose the U.S. taking Greenland by force. It pairs that with a Reuters/Ipsos poll saying that only a "staggering four percent" of Americans favor it. The tone of the article is that this is the absolute-zero of support, since four percent of Americans in polls will favor even ridiculous, impossible things, i.e. that  "human-sized lizards wearing skin suits control the world."  Ha-ha. It was an invade-Greenland-don't-be-silly article.

They have better antenna into GOP politics than I do. They see what is underway, and don't like it. They were trying to laugh it off. Too late. Serious people are starting to legitimize Trump's ambitions.

The Wall Street Journal ran this article yesterday.

The article does not argue that the USA needs to own Greenland to cover it with military bases. That does not surprise me. Establishment portions of the GOP support NATO. The U.S. is part of the "Western" consensus of developed countries with the same cultural roots. Establishment Republicans don't want NATO to splinter. NATO buys American weapons. Europeans buy American exports. 

A shift is underway, however. The establishment GOP is making the serious argument that Trump does not make. Trump cannot help but communicate that Greenland as a trophy, something new to label, like the Gulf of America, and a matter of Trump vanity. The WSJ makes the case that Greenland is serious business.

Greenland is in the middle of the far-north Atlantic:

Greenland is close to Russian submarine routes:

Missiles, if fired from Russia and aimed at Washington, D.C., go over Greenland:

And this isn't some new-fangled dream of Trump. There is history and precedent. A takeover is almost a fait accompli.

We are seeing a shift in what political scientists call the Overton Window, when an idea sometimes goes from preposterous to normalized to obvious.

Trump moved seizing Greenland from unthinkable to radical and has been saying it often enough -- and with the credibility he has with his base -- that it was starting to be just barely acceptable. The WSJ is attempting to make it sensible. After all, look at those missile routes, and, besides, we already have people and equipment there.

A change is happening in the policy zeitgeist. The GOP is starting to like this idea; maybe Trump is right. The U.S. may need to damage NATO in order to get Greenland, but it will survive because it absolutely needs us, and maybe the trouble is worth it. Europe can defend itself. If Europe wants to defend Ukraine, the Baltic countries, and Poland, it's on them. They can do it if they pony up. The U.S. has a hemisphere to defend, and Greenland is part of the Americas.

[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]

I read the news today, oh boy.

"Everything is beautiful in its own way. . .
Under God's heaven
The world's gonna find the way
There is none so blind
As he who will not see.
          Ray Stevens, "Everything is Beautiful," 1970

Donald Trump is a courageous, far-sighted genius, bringing peace, freedom, and justice to the world, and a stronger, safer, well-respected America. 

He was presented the Nobel Peace Prize! 

I watched a little Fox News while I made coffee this morning. 

Yesterday I published a long post by a college classmate who listed what is wrong with Democrats, as part of a longer project explaining why he supported President Trump. He wrote that he had Fox News on his TV 12 hours a day, although he later explained to college classmates that Fox was "on" the TV, mostly just setting the environment, and that he was in and out of the room over the course of the day. I can see why a person who wanted to be happy might want Fox News on TV. It is a reassuring voice in a troubled world.

It is not true that Fox keeps people angry and outraged -- not after Trump was re-elected. Fox tells its audience that it is a dangerous world -- crime, communists, immigrants, Christians under attack, China, antifa, and Democrats -- but we have a protector: Donald Trump! He is anywhere and everywhere, a mix of Superman, a sword-bearing Jesus, Achilles, and Churchill.

Fox News hosts are upbeat.

  -- Trump's courageous strikes on boats stopped the transportation of drugs from Latin America.  

  -- Trump's brilliant removal of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro is already bringing a democratic, stable, pro-American government in Venezuela. 

  -- Trump set the stage for cheap oil -- our oil by right -- to come from Venezuelan oil fields. 

  -- Trump's threats telling Colombia's president Gustavo Petro that he is next to be deposed generated a conciliatory phone call from him to Trump. 

 -- Trump's tough talk against Iran and our Department of War's bunker-busting bombs, inspired demonstrations that may topple Iran's government.

  -- Trump's having federalized National Guard troops brought prompt safety to Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, and Portland. 

  -- Trump's no-nonsense ICE people are rounding up illegals everywhere.

  --  Trump is frightening anti-American, antifa-loving demonstrators and letting them know they are targets for arrest and worse.

  --  Trump is cleaning up fraud in Democratic cities.

Meanwhile I see liberal tears everywhere. Democrats who consume a media diet outside the Fox News universe are miserable. Some are talking about leaving the country. I read of worry that this is Germany, 1933, or later. Political writers warn people to stop reading their material if they are getting suicidal. Don't tune in, they say; just drop out. 

I have not dropped out, so I awoke today to what I consider inevitable but unwelcome news. Trump has pushed Canada -- reliable, friendly, Canada -- into a closer strategic and trade partnership with China. The U.S. had become an unreliable trading partner, ally, and neighbor.

Trump says he wants Greenland "and there's not a thing Denmark can do about it." Warships from NATO countries are heading to Greenland right now.

China recorded a $1.2 trillion trade surplus, its largest ever. China stepped in when U.S tariffs disrupted our trade relationships with other nations. 

We are losing manufacturing jobs:

Democrats view ICE as dangerous disruptors:

The Nobel Prize is a Rorschach test. Fox celebrated it as Maria Machado's recognition that Trump and Trump alone deserved it, so her giving to him it is a triumph of justice. 

Democrats see a needy and pathetic leader who demands being flattered and pandered to with a participation trophy. What an embarrassment!

So there we have the real divide in the U.S. It is between happy people and worried, frustrated ones. Republican Fox News viewers have a hero amid a sea of trouble. We are in good hands. "Don't worry. Be happy."

Democrats see those hands as malicious and dangerous, and they believe that the world is getting more perilous. "We are on the eve of destruction."

As for me, the Sgt. Pepper album said it:

 "I read the news today, oh boy."  And the news was rather sad.

[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]

"What's a nice boy like you doing voting for Donald Trump?"

I went in search of a Trump voter among my college classmates.

I found one.

I learned that Matt Naitove had voted for President Trump twice. I asked him to write a guest post explaining his reasons. I thought it would be an easy assignment for a journalism school graduate with a 51-year career as a writer, editor, and managing editor, in Matt's case for a trade magazine, Plastics Technology.

I suggested he start by writing what was wrong with Democrats and then switch to why he preferred Trump. Twenty-four hours later I got this. He never got to the Trump part; 1200 words into his post, he was still talking about how bad Democrats are.

He told me he watches Fox News "maybe 12 hrs a day." He said he pages through the entire New York Times six days a week, "a chore I perform like school homework." He said he gets emailed headlines from the New York Times, New York Post and Washington Post, but rarely reads Washington Post stories. He said he has a Fox News app on his phone.

I told Matt I would publish what he wrote verbatim. I decided that readers would benefit from hearing directly from an unfiltered source. Democrats cannot win elections if they dismiss the concerns of Trump voters. Readers don't need to agree with Matt. But they need to hear what issues matter to him and other voters made the political journey away from Democrats to Trump.

Naitove, 1967, a freshman in the Harvard Register, the original Facebook.

Naitove, recent

Guest Post by Matt Naitove

Why I Can’t Vote Democrat Anymore

Writing this post was not my idea. I don’t feel a need to explain myself. But a certain Inquiring Mind asked me to tackle this question: How could a child of two New York Jewish Democrats, raised in New England, educated at Harvard and Columbia Journalism School, stray so far from his roots as to become a Trump voter?

It didn’t happen all at once. In college, I regarded SDS, YPSL (Young People’s Socialist League) and the Young Republicans with the same casual disdain. In the summer of 1970, I collected petition signatures for Eugene McCarthy’s “Amendment to End the War.” My first presidential votes were for McCarthy in 1972 and Jimmy Carter in ’76. Then I voted for Reagan (twice), both Bushes, Bob Dole and Mitt Romney. In 2016 I held my nose and voted for Hillary, but was not the least perturbed when Trump won. I later voted for him twice, without hesitation.

I’m still a registered Democrat – voting in that party’s primaries is the only way to have any say at all in NYC politics. But I vote solidly Republican. Why can’t I identify with Democrats today? Could it be:

•   Open borders that allow in millions to bankrupt our cities (like NYC, where I live) and overcrowd our schools and hospital ERs -- not to mention free entry to hordes of cartel operatives, drug and human traffickers, assorted other criminals, suspected terrorists, spies and other national security threats (sleeper cells?).

•   Sanctuary states and cities (like mine) that welcome in these illegals with free cell phones, food, lodging and work permits not available to “home-grown” paupers and homeless. And most recently, an evident lust to recreating the civic chaos and disruptions of the George Floyd riots by opponents of ICE removal of dangerous criminals. And willful blindness to the fact that deportations of “honest illegals” is simply collateral damage for their non-cooperation with Federal law enforcement.

•   Speaking of homeless, welcoming disgusting encampments of drug addicts, mentally ill and social dropouts that disfigure and endanger cities like LA and SF.

Photo by Matt Naitove, sent as symbolic of the Democratic party, a  ruined Colossus, like these fragments of the giant effigy of Roman Emperor Constantine.

 •   Appalling economic illiteracy that threatens to bankrupt the richest country in the world with profligate spending on “feel-good” programs, blatant pandering and give-aways to favored constituents, donor industries and pet projects with willful blindness to waste and fraud.

•   Equally appalling historical ignorance that adopts “socialism” as a banner for utopian dreams of a just society, when the historical record since the term was invented in the 19th century is of socialist experiments that ranged from abject failure to regimes of unprecedented cruelty, repression, murder and extreme inequality between elites and the masses of subjugated people.

•   An unending stream of mind-numbing lies and hypocrisy from Congressional Democrats who assume everyone forgot what they said in the last year or last election cycle. Cries for “affordability” from those who created the worst inflation in 40 years; criticism of the Maduro capture from those who taunted Trump for inaction on Maduro 4 years ago; denunciations of Trump’s border policy after Bill Clinton, Obama, Hillary Clinton and even Joe Biden all insisted that illegal migration must be stopped; condemnation of Trump’s contesting the election of 2020 when numerous Congressional Democrats have stood up to contest electoral college results when Republicans won: Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Jamie Raskin—member of the Jan. 6 Committee and lead of the first Trump impeachment, Pramila Jayapal, Sheila Jackson Lee, Barbara Boxer, etc. Repeated examples of Democrat mayors and governors who locked down their citizens for Covid and violated their own rules to dine out in fancy restaurants, get hair styling, etc.

•   Outright criminality in pursuit of the Trump-Russia hoax by the FBI and Hilary Clinton campaign abetted by Biden, Obama and others.

•   Suppression of free speech – censorship – under the guise of preventing “misinformation” through government agencies set up for the purpose (like Biden’s abortive misinformation monitor) and badgering of social media by the FBI over the Hunter Biden laptop, and by White House operatives over Covid reporting. Not to mention strong-arming J.P Morgan Chase and Bank of America into “debanking” Trump while out of office under threats by Federal bank regulators.

•   Blatant suppression of conservative groups by the IRS denying tax-free status under “no-scandals” Obama. (Remember Lois Lerner?)

•   Corruption, politicization and discrediting of science and scientific institutions through lying, deception and incompetence regarding Covid, climate change, and gender reassignment.

•   Discrediting of the court system through Dems’ “lawfare” campaign against Trump with shambolic cases like the civil fraud case that valued Mar-a-Lago at $50 million, and the novel (or fanciful) application of little-used laws in the N.Y. criminal trial and aborted Florida documents case. 

•   Discrediting the processes of Congress, like trivializing impeachment through two frivolous Trump cases (which were prefigured by calls for impeachment of Trump before he even assumed office in 2017), and use of obstructionist application of traditional Senatorial “privileges” to simply delay Trump’s cabinet appointments in a manner never seen in Congress before. And don’t forget it was Harry Reid who decided that so-called traditions like the Senate filibuster were really fictions that could be ignored when inconvenient, such as confirming cabinet and most judicial nominations. That was after Reid excoriated this “nuclear option” as dangerous, radical, reckless when a Republican recommended it.

•   Denuding the civic landscape of not only trusted institutions but also of language through Orwellian misuse and overuse of terms that eventually lose any useful or commonly shared meaning: racist, fascist, nazi, “threat to democracy,” socialism, even “science.” (Note: Before Trump, LBJ, Nixon, Reagan & G.W. Bush were also called fascists or Hitler-ish.)

•   Denying the reality of biological sex, insisting on (trans) men invading women’s sports, enabling fake-trans criminals to exploit female prisoners, maiming and disfiguring and permanently damaging the health of children through “gender-affirming” (read sex-denying) surgery and hormonal regimens. None of that supported by real science and mainly serving the greed of hospitals and physicians.

•   Pursuing a largely imaginary – at least greatly exaggerated – climate “crisis” with the effect of denying freedom of choice in the marketplace for cars, appliances, home heating, and more; imposing drastic increases in electric power costs and threats of blackouts and brownouts (a looming near-certainty in NY City and State) through fanatical pursuit of falsely labeled “cheap green energy” and irrational early closing of nuclear and fossil-fuel generation sources; and murderous disregard for violations of wildlife and marine-life protection laws when it comes to wind-power stations, while a fuel pipeline gets stopped by a rare butterfly or salamander.

•   Absurd coddling and financial support for the Islamo-fascist regime in Iran by Obama and Biden, coupled with a general weakness in their approaches to foreign policy, especially Russia and China.

•  Dems in Congress constantly fulminating about actions of the Trump Administration that are “illegal” and “unconstitutional,” in doing so broadcast their ignorance of both the law and constitution. The vacuousness of their pronouncements can be exposed by anyone with the internet research skills of an average sixth grader.

•   Last, but certainly not least, attempting to infuse DEI precepts (I won’t dignify them as “principles”) throughout government, corporate governance, academia and entertainment/culture has been the most divisive influence on our society through slicing and dicing the population into micro-identities and “intersectionalities”; promoting racism through persecuting “whiteness” and “white privilege” and race-base “reparations” for past sins of society. The very term DEI is an Orwellian inversion of meaning: “Diversity” really means uniformity of speech and outlook. “Equity” is the inverse of equality in promoting unequal treatment of different groups in the interest of someone’s definition of “fairness.” And “Inclusion” is all about exclusion of some groups from certain economic or academic opportunities or social benefits.

Even though a few Dems occasionally speak with common sense (John Fetterman and Ro Khanna), when it comes to voting they inevitably fall in line with their party’s lemming-like (or sheep-like) practice of voting as a bloc. There’s no Joe Manchin or Kirsten Sinema (Dem-aligned Independent) today.

 [Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to: https://petersage.substack.com and subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]

The Trump Era

"Why do the birds go on singing?
Why do the stars glow above?
Don't they know it's the end of the world?"
         Skeeter Davis, "The End of the World," 1963

I find plenty to write about every day.

I don't think the end of the world is imminent, but the country is going through dramatic political change. It is an era. Historians will give it a name, like "The Second Great Awakening," or "Jacksonian Democracy," or "the Progressive Era," or "McCarthyism."

When one is in the era, it is hard to make sense of it. Other song lyrics from the same time as Skeeter Davis' capture that, including Bob Dylan's 1962 song:

The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind.
The answer is blowin' in the wind.

The changes happening were out there in the atmosphere, hard to pin down, everywhere and nowhere. The wind. The zeitgeist. This may later be known as "The Trump Era." Or "The Great Unraveling." Or "The Pre-War Era." It will not be called, as was the time that James Monroe was president, the "Era of Good Feelings." Of that I am confident.

I write this blog less because I am trying to explain the zeitgeist blowing in the wind than because I am try to understand it. How do I know what I think until I read what I wrote?

Many readers of this blog also read Heather Cox Richardson' s near-daily blog. It is excellent. She has 2.7 million followers. 

New and less discovered is the three-times-a-week blog by a fellow Medford resident, Bruce Van Zee.

It, too, is excellent. I recommend it. Sometimes he writes from his expertise as a former physician, but more often from the point of view of a person angry and indignant over the corrupt, anti-democratic, cruel policies of Donald Trump. It is available to everyone without a paywall.

I will share a few excerpts.

January 14 post: Fascism
This ideology of Miller and Trump is most assuredly Fascist and represents the most serious threat to the continuation of our 250-year-old Democracy since at least the Civil War. . . . It is a rebuke to 300 years of Enlightenment thinking and human progress.

One would think that Christians would have serious problems with this philosophy because it is so lacking in empathy and compassion, virtues Christ taught. But, apparently, MAGA has managed to purge that kind of “blasphemy” out of Christian Nationalism. 

January 12 post: Graft and naked corruption
It’s pretty clear that early in his second term, Trump systematically dismantled the very parts of government designed to prevent and detect malfeasance and corruption . . . as well as most of the Inspector Generals and Whistle-blower apparatus within the government. And he did so to make it easier for his kleptocracy. But this is getting insufficient attention in large measure due to Trump’s skill at diversion.

You gotta hand it to Trump. With all the corruption and self-dealing, crypto deals, pardons for sale, transactions benefitting cronies or his family’s fortunes, lawlessness, and fraud; he still manages to distract with ICE raids, Venezuela invasions, plans for capturing Greenland, warnings of” invasions” of immigrants, and so forth.

January 10 post: Political violence

While on the subject of gaslighting, sorry – it should be called LYING! The White House published a new website a few days ago dedicated to its version of the events of Jan. 6. I need not tell you that it is an abomination of lies that any sapient human being who witnessed the abundant videos from that infamous day would recognize as such. It is simply unfathomable to me that anyone would believe this garbage.

January 8: Greenland

In the increasingly bizarre and unhinged world of Trump II, we now get this:

“White House reviewing options to take control of Greenland. Military force not excluded.”

Pax Americana--risks being trashed by Trump’s maddingly ill-informed, narrowly self-interested plans. And while he and his team are up to this nonsense, he not only antagonizes most of our traditional allies, but also ignores most of the population he was sworn to serve, the bulk of Americans who are struggling with finding jobs, affording essentials, losing their health insurance, etc. National suicide is an apt description.

 [Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to: https://petersage.substack.com and subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]