Friday, August 6, 2021

Election Fair and Accurate

     "I have 100% confidence that the November 2020 Presidential Election in Jackson County was conducted according to law and that the election was fair and accurate."

       Christine Walker, Jackson County Clerk


Donald Trump said that elections that include mail-in voting are a "disaster." He called them "a whole big scam." He tweeted that it would be the "most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history."  He said that if we got rid of mailed ballots there would be a peaceful continuation of power, because he could then respect the voters' choice--because he would win.

Christine Walker


Oregon runs elections exactly the way Trump said was the worst of the worst, with universal mail-in voting, with ballots sent automatically to all registered voters. The elections are administered by Oregon's counties under rules created by the Oregon legislature. Christine Walker is the Jackson County Clerk, an elected position. She was appointed to the position in 2008 and was elected in 2008, 2010, 2014, and 2018, and serves on a variety of professional boards and association relating to election supervision. Chris Walker has partisan political roots as a Republican--her uncle was a Republican County Commissioner--but the office is now non-partisan. She was on the ground managing this election as she did prior ones. She had a front row seat, seeing whether or not there was a wave fake ballots, forged signatures, electronic switching of votes, or other efforts and opportunities to distort the results of the election.

Christine Walker stands by the election.

I have 100% confidence that the November 2020 Presidential Election in Jackson County was conducted according to law and that the election was fair and accurate.  The County Clerk is the voice and will of the people through the election process and I do not take that responsibility lightly.  We conduct elections in a transparent manner, allowing every qualified voter the ability to access/cast a ballot without barriers.  We will continue to have an open dialogue with election officials, stakeholders and the public we serve as to provide greater confidence and dispel disinformation and misinformation pertaining to conducting elections around the country.

Walker addressed some of the areas where election skeptics have claimed fraud could take place. Ballots are returned by mail or into drop boxes. Could hundreds, perhaps thousands of fake ballots have been quietly added to the inflow?  No. In a long interview with me she explained that every ballot that is returned comes in a bar-coded envelope with a signature attestation and every ballot that is mailed to a bar-coded voter and address. The county does not receive or accept anonymous ballots--only ballots that match the records of ballots printed and sent out by the county. There is no opportunity to "stuff" a ballot box. 

Are signatures checked? Yes. "Every single signature is checked," she said. They are checked by people at three different stages of experience. Some signatures are easy to match, based on the signature on file at registration plus the signatures from ballots from previous elections. Questionable ones go to a second team, again one that has access to previous signatures on file. A third team of highly experienced people examine ballots not resolved at the earlier levels. 

About one percent of the 123,000 ballots cast here have questions and problems that require follow-up contact by the Election Department of the Clerk's office. Voters have a chance to remedy questionable signatures and identity, and if the ballots were legally cast before 8:00 p.m. on election day, per Oregon law the vote will be counted if the questions are resolved within two weeks. In the November, 2020 election 1,245 ballots required Clerk office contact with the voter, and 871 people did not successfully remedy the questions. Those votes were not counted. Walker said 334 ballots were mailed or dropped off with no signature on the ballot, and therefore required Clerk office contact. Of those, 204 did not successfully remedy by supplying a valid signature, and were not counted.

The Clerk's office reviewed and sent to the Secretary of State's office for further investigation and potential referral for prosecution 14 ballots, of which four were signed on behalf of people who were known to be deceased. Ten ballots were questioned as potential forgeries.  A common forgery is for a ballot cast in the name of a voter, but signed by a household member. The forgery is identified because when there is a questionable signature the Clerk's office checks the signatures on file both for that person and for other household members, for which there may be multiple signatures on file from voter registration and from ballots on previous elections. The style of signature sometimes better matches the household member than the person who voted. This is a felony.

Are the votes accurately tabulated? The counting machines are checked against a test deck of ballots with a known vote count a week prior to the election, and again ammediately before the actual tally of ballots. Then, of course, there is an actual physical paper ballot available for a hand count audit if necessary. Rarely, but sometimes, the ballot counting machines show a mis-count of a ballot, shorting a ballot. Walker said that voters sometimes leave sticky residue on ballots after having filled them out on a kitchen table and two ballots stick together when run through the machine. The counts are not accepted until there is one-for-one match between ballots known to be entered and the final tally. 

Is every registered voter a legal voter? Walker said that voters must be identified by driver's license, Social Security number, or other acceptable identification documents proving identity and residence at the time of registration, then votes are cast by people at a known address, signed under penalty of perjury. A non-citizen casting a ballot is not doing so secretly or anonymously. It is trackable back to a specific person at every stage, a huge risk to take for a serious felony offense. 

I asked the status of the 14 ballots referred to the Secretary of State. Walker said she did not know the final disposition. The Oregon Secretary of State does those investigations. The Oregon Department of Justice performs the prosecutions. The Secretary of State's office is doing a status report now and says they will inform me in approximately one week.


Tomorrow: The Jackson County Election Department threatened after the November 2020 election:  

"Vote Don't Work. Next time Bullets."

 

4 comments:

Art Baden said...

It’s clear that Walker is a member of a deep state RINO never-Trump conspiracy against real Americans. People are saying that the election was fixed and that illegal aliens and ANTIFA were stuffing ballots in Shady Cove and Prospect. I read it on the internet and a really nice woman in a T-shirt with a big Q on it told me about it yesterday at the gun show, so it must be true. I demand an investigation. Since we can’t trust the leftist legislature in Salem, the pillow guy says he’ll pay for the ballots to be sent to Montana to check them all for bamboo fragments. He’s such a good Christian patriot.

Rick Millward said...

This is good news, and what one would expect.

Somehow some people have gotten the idea that voting in America is some kind of haphazard affair when in fact it is an extremely rigorous and regulated process with multiple checkpoints along the way. Republicans attacking the vote is not new, it goes back to Reconstruction and Jim Crow, but this assault is something new and even more insidious.

I'm glad you brought this information forward, but at the same time I'm sad that you have to.

Bob Warren said...

So once again the lying dirtbag has attested to the fact that
in order to stay in office our entire democracy is a fraud. Trump's
continued allegations of fraud are taken seriously only by those seriously
deluded in their thinking. One major flaw in the principle of free speech is
the lack of accountability for lying dirtbags like Donald Trump. The man's obvious contempt for the truth serves as an example of abuse to the concept of
free speech. I continue to find it odd that in a nation that has endured a
multitude of "leaks" in respect to every subject on Earth that Trump's income tax returns continue to remain a semi-mystery.
Could it possibly be that the people he derides have a higher code of ethics?
Bob Warren

Michael Trigoboff said...

This is the kind of answer you should have gotten in the first place.