Wednesday, October 2, 2024

Gaslighting.

      “Look, Tim, first of all, it’s really rich for Democratic leaders to say that Donald Trump is a unique threat to democracy when he peacefully gave over power on January the 20th, as we have done for 250 years in this country.”
            JD Vance at last night's debate

Wow.

That was the low point for JD Vance in the minds of post-debate pundits. 

I see it as a high point for Vance. Vance was demonstrating his skill as a sycophant, an actor, a con man, and a worthy successor to Trump. What we saw there was the perfect example of "gaslighting." 

Vance told us not to believe our eyes. Don't believe our memories. It takes skill and practice to create an alternative reality that others will believe. Step number one is to stick to the story.  Don't give away the game by looking away or hesitating. Say it with the same matter-of-fact declarative confidence that you would say that one-plus-one-is-two. Practice the line until it feels natural and true: "He peacefully gave over power on January the 20th, as we have done for 250 years in this country."

If you do it right, people believe you. Or sort of believe you. Or doubt what they remember.

I presume the Harris campaign will make an ad out of this, with an insert of a clip of Trump saying he won and urging the crowd to "be strong." There will surely be images of rioters pushing barricades against the police and people breaking windows. The ad might be the thing with makes the vice presidential debate a draw in its net result. Vance had to know the question was coming so he had his answer prepared, and he handled it as well as it can be handled.

But the debate itself was a win for the Trump-Vance team. Democrats should stop fighting what they saw with their own eyes and not gaslight themselves. Vance won. He looked good; Walz less good. Vance looked younger and sharper than Walz, who grimaced and looked down at the notes he was writing. Vance looked like a TV news anchor. Walz looked like a man in the breakfast diner in Iowa or New Hampshire.

The debate won't matter. We are not picking a team. We are picking a symbol, an archetype, and that means choosing between Trump and all he represents (which we know full well) or Harris and what she represents (which we know much less well, except that she isn't Trump.) For a couple of days Democratic punditry will focus on Vance's bit of election gaslighting because it reveals Trump at his most dangerous. Republican punditry and the Trump campaign will celebrate Vance for one day and then put the focus back on Trump. Trump is the center of attention. Vance is an understudy, not the co-star. Trump is the indispensable man, the only one who can save us. The Vance debate "win" shines a poor light onto Trump, who lost his debate. Vance's success undermines the Trump story of indispensability, so we will see little of it.

But mostly, the vice presidential debate won't matter.

If Trump loses this November, Vance won't go away.  He knows he looked good. Better than Trump.



[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your emai go to: https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.] 




Tuesday, October 1, 2024

The desperation period: Tuesday part two

Trump calls Harris "mentally impaired."
“Crooked Joe Biden became mentally impaired, Sad. But lying Kamala Harris, honestly, I believe she was born that way. There’s something wrong with Kamala. And I just don’t know what it is, but there is definitely something missing. And you know what, everybody knows it.”
We have entered a moment of maximum crazy. 

Locally, Curt Ankerberg’s campaign is flailing, making wild accusations in public letters to the Medford City Council. Some Trump-oriented citizens will like Ankerberg's style, but more, I suspect, will consider Ankerberg to be foolish and intemperate. He calls City Council members "bumbling idiots" and worse.

Nationally, Trump sounds rather like Ankerberg. Trump has ramped up from calling Kamala Harris "low-IQ" to saying she has a mental disability. Harris is a college graduate, an attorney, and the debater who is widely acknowledged to have bested Trump by sounding reasonable herself while baiting him into self-defeating rants. Trump looks desperate now in the aftermath of the debate as his language gets cruder. GOP leaders urge him to show some self-discipline, but he cannot help himself.

The crazy is getting higher and higher. 

Trump called his speech "dark." He said we are being invaded by stone-cold killers, dark-skinned foreigners who are nothing like us. He says they will cut your throats when they break into your kitchens. Things are terrible, but he can fix things if he is allowed to take control and be rough, very rough.  

The frantic elevation of this rhetoric reminded me of a moment in the past -- a happier memory.


The end of summer in 1967 did not seem dark to me as I finished up the melon crop before getting onto the airplane to go off to college. A song, "Your Love Keeps Lifting Me Higher and Higher" was recorded in August of 1967, the apogee of the Summer of Love. It was on KYJC and KBOY top-40 radio. The world was full of possibility, and my generation was going to fix what was wrong with everything. There was an up-tempo frantic quality to the song, and more was lifted onto more, and that was lifted onto yet more. But it was okay, because it was love that was getting higher and higher.
Keep my love going, now, higher and higher (lifting me higher and higher, higher)
I said keep on lifting (lifting, lifting, lifting)
Lift me up mama (your love keeps lifting me)
Keep on lifting me (lifting me higher and higher, higher)
Higher and higher



This is the second of two short posts today.



[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your emai go to: https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.] 


Tuesday, part one: Kevin Stine, a Medford City Council member, responds to Ankerberg.

Curt Ankerberg is misinformed.

There is public bidding for the Fire Station 15 project.

Kevin Stine, a Medford City Council member for 10 years, responded to Ankerberg's letter to the council.  

Kevin Stine

Stine ignored mayoral candidate Curt Ankerberg's comments calling the City Council "dumbasses" and "corrupt trash." Ankerberg used those and other words in a letter to the Council I published verbatim yesterday. Stine addressed the two substantive elements of Ankerberg's letter. Could Fire Station 15 be repaired rather than replaced, as Ankerberg asserted? And is the contract to rebuild it a "NO-BID contract to Outlier Construction" as Ankerberg also asserted?

Kevin Stine wrote:

No. There is not adequate rehab for the 50 year old building. The station should have been replaced long ago and it is the right move to get it done. Much has been written about the teeter-totter toilets at the current station. The new fire station will be on the same site, but will be bigger and designed in such a way as to hold a second EMS team, being a great benefit for the citizens of Medford.

There was a public RFP for the awardee to be part of the Construction Manager/General Contractor process. Basically this has the architect work with the construction company to look for ways to keep the project moving forward and keep within budget. There can be times where there is value-engineering to keep costs down.

Any comments that Medford doesn't utilize proper processes when agreeing on contracts is erroneous. Oregon law has very strict requirements for building public facilities, and the City of Medford adheres to all laws and regulations.

Kevin Stine lives in West Medford with his wife and daughter. He served nine years in the U.S. Navy with three deployments aboard submarines. He is a Navy Reservist and a substitute teacher in the Medford schools.

Curt Ankerberg is a Republican, a Trump supporter, and a frequent candidate for local political offices.

Note: The City of Medford website currently has this notice of current bid opportunities with a link to announcement of bids for Fire Station 15: Click here.


That link leads to this PDF file:

Click here



This is the first of two short posts today.


[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your emai go to: https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.] 


 

Monday, September 30, 2024

Curt Ankerberg followup.

Candidate for Medford mayor Curt Ankerberg requests "proper background and context" for his letter to the Medford City Council.

Here is the letter he sent me to provide that context.

Again: Parental Advisory. Rough language.


From Curt Ankerberg, candidate: 

If you want to publish that email [to the city council], then publish a little background with it.

I have written both the school board and the city council dozens of times in the past with nice, rosy, mild language, and they've never responded to my emails. They don't respond to anyone's emails. NEVER. They don't respond to anyone. The school board does not allow public comments during their meetings. The city council gives you two minutes to speak, and the one time that I did speak to the city council many years ago, they ignored me and looked in the air. The current city council does not respond to emails. This is not the first time I've written to them. They've ignore even the nice letters. They don't want to be held accountable to the residents. They ignore the wishes of the voters. They've all been bought and bribed. I am way past being nice with these guys because they ignore what the residents want, and they never listen to anybody. My letter was NOT intended to be nice to them or beg them. I'm way past that. The purpose of the letter was to insult them. I was nice to this city council years ago, but they ignored me and other residents. You have no clue what is going-on in Medford. I don't write these kind of insulting letters to someone on the first go-around. This is what happens when they jerk me and others around year after year. Then I get nasty. I don't respect these people at all. This has been a long time coming. I'm done with their corrupt bullshit. These people don't represent the residents. They've been bought by the Chamber, and two members of the city council are on the Chamber Board and the Builder's Association Board. That's who they represent. There was no public discussion about this fire station. They granted a no-bid contract to a good old boy builder without the public knowing about it. It's a dirty deal. It was rushed-through. This is just like the Rogue X deal that fucked the residents.

You are absolutely an asshole who is always looking for a way to fuck me under. I'm going to stop giving you any information. You have a problem. This is not a Democrat-Republican issue. This is about cleaning-up this fucking town. I'm fighting against the fucking Mafia, and you think that this is a joke. Your head is up your ass. I'm trying to make Medford better, and you're out to fuck me under because I'm a conservative. You're an asshole with a mental problem. My main opponent Mike Zarosinski filed for personal bankruptcy, his wife works for two developers in town who want huge taxpayer money from the city, and he's been bought, and he supports tax increases and road diets. Vote for him, and he's certain to keep the corrupt status quo in Medford.  You're the same clown who gets offended by Trump's Tweets, yet it's OK for Biden and Harris to destroy America. 

You're a fucked-up communist.

 



[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your emai go to: https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.]  


Candidate for mayor of Medford: Curt Ankerberg

 "Dumbasses."  "Bumbling Idiots." "Bribed." "You're corrupt trash."


Parental Warning:

   1. This post contains rough language.

   2. This post is relevant primarily to Southern Oregon readers.

Curt Ankerberg is on the ballot for the nonpartisan position of mayor of Medford.

A prior campaign voters pamphlet

Earlier this year he was a candidate for Jackson County commissioner. In previous years he has been a candidate for Oregon State Senate, for the local school board, and for City Council. He is a Republican and a Trump supporter. He nearly won the Republican primary election for state senator in 2018. 

Those prior candidacies may make Ankerberg's name a familiar one, a significant asset for a candidate in local elections. Voter memories may have dimmed on why his name is familiar. Today's post is a reminder. My purpose is to give voters a feel for the kind of mayor Ankerberg would be if elected. 

I quote verbatim a letter Ankerberg sent to the Medford City Council in reference to an upcoming agenda item, the upgrade of a Medford fire station. 

From: Curt Ankerberg 
Date: Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 1:31 PM
Subject: New Fire Station 15
To:  council@medfordoregon.gov  
City Council,

I am aware that you are going to vote on constructing a new Fire Station 15 on Roberts Road for $9 million, which will increase taxpayers' taxes, and I'm writing to oppose this deal. It stinks.

How many of you have actually toured this fire station? I live 1/4 mile from this station, and I see it all the time. I just toured it a few weeks ago, and I spoke with the firemen.

I was a CPA for 33 years, and I know more about costs than any of you. I can completely refurbish and update this fire station, and make it modern for approximately $2 million. None of you have any business experience, and you don't know what the hell you are doing. You're a bunch of dumbasses. You've all taken campaign contributions from the firemen's union, and you're beholden to them. They want a shiny, new fire station just like the other fire stations in town. It doesn't need to be done. 

Again, I could completely refurbish this fire station, and make it as functional as the other fire stations, for a fraction of the cost. 

You all on the city council and mayor have all proven to be bumbling idiots on the take, and beholden to the Chamber of Commerce and Builders' Association. Unfortunately, you don't give a damn about the residents, and you continue to raise our taxes on stupid projects. They are a reflection of you and your lack of talents. You think that throwing money at a problem will always solve it.

Further, I saw that you want to give a NO-BID contract to Outlier Construction for the construction of this fire station. Did Outlier bribe you to do a no-bid contract? The owner of Adroit Construction, Bob Mayers, is the father of the owner of Outlier, Rob Mayers. It's more than coincidental that Adroit Construction got no-bid contracts for the police station and three fire stations, and now you're giving his son a no-bid-contract for a fire station. Adroit also just got a no-bid contract to build the County's pandemic center. I'd say that all of you have been bribed. You're corrupt trash. You've destroyed Medford and downtown, and you've raised our taxes numerous times for good old boy projects.  

How many more shitty projects are you going to jam down the taxpayers' throats before you leave office in January? You all had better hope that I don't get elected mayor, because I'm going to clean house of all the corruption in Medford, and you'll get thrown-out with the trash. You all stink, and you've been bought.

Curt Ankerberg
Medford, OR



 

[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your emai go to: https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.] 


Sunday, September 29, 2024

Easy Sunday: Sentiment for a baseball park

I remember Fenway Park in Boston.

A baseball stadium is part of the baseball experience.

I was 10 years old in 1960. My father brought my brother and me to a Red Sox game in Boston. We had bleacher tickets, but for some reason Dad brought us in the entrance for box seats. There were empty seats everywhere amid the box seats above the first base dugout. Dad shook hands with an usher, who took us to seats in the third or fourth row. The usher wiped the seats with a cloth and said he might need to move us, but probably not. 

We watched Ted Williams play. What I remember most is Dad's later explanation about the seats. Dad said we didn't deserve to sit in those box seats. He said it wasn't fair to the Red Sox owners, who wouldn't want to give away great seats to people who paid for bleacher seats. But, he said, the seats were in fact paid for, but by people who didn't bother to show up, mostly businesses who bought season tickets to give to clients, but neglected to use them. He said the ushers made little or nothing from their ushering jobs, but that their real income came from tips, the $10 bill Dad gave the usher in the handshake. Dad said everyone, including the Red Sox owners, knew that was how it worked, but that it was done quietly, thus the handshake. It was wrong, Dad said, but a wrong thing that people didn't really care about enough to stop. The seats would have gone to waste, yet it was a kind of theft to sit there. Then again, we did buy tickets, just not those tickets. It was complicated, Dad said.  

I have never heard reference to Fenway Park without thinking about my father's troubled and uneasy explanation about the morality of our sitting in those seats. We sat in box seats three or four times that summer.

Jack Mullen, a friend from my youth, has his own set of memories about a baseball stadium, the Oakland Coliseum. He lived most of his adult life in the Bay Area. He is a fan of the Oakland A's and the Oregon Ducks. In retirement, he lives in Washington, D.C. with his wife, Jennifer Angelo. 


Guest Post by Jack Mullen
For a half century, baseball was the national pastime.

Then, on a cold, gray December day in New York in 1958 the Baltimore Colts upset the New York Giants football team in a nationally televised game that became known as the “Greatest Game Ever Played.” Once the Colts' Allan Ameche scored in overtime, baseball was no longer the national pastime. King Football has ruled the air waves ever since.

Americans have decided baseball is dull and slow. As recent year’s World Series and All-Star Game ratings show, baseball is losing viewers, not just to football, but to professional basketball as well, including the new women’s pro basketball (WNBA) league.

Baseball just lost its last vestige of panache Thursday afternoon. The Oakland A’s played their last baseball game in Oakland. The A’s offered an alternative to baseball’s “button down” corporate style, epitomized by the New York Yankees. Like my Oregon Ducks, the Oakland A’s wore flashy uniforms. Owner Charles O. Finley moved his flailing franchise from Kansas City to Oakland in 1968, and playing in a cool Oakland breeze, won three straight World Series.

Traffic backed up on I-880 as crowds came to see the final game.

The Oakland A’s have always offered what the sport of baseball needs, a team composed of cool dudes. You may have heard of Ricky Henderson stealing 118 bases in a season, or the Bash Brothers (Jose Canseco and Mark McGwire) belting the A’s to a world championship in 1989. How about the movie "Moneyball" in which Brad Pitt played Billy Beane, the GM for the scrappy 2001 A’s team that set an American League record by winning 20 games in a row.

I loved watching an A’s baseball game in that historic stadium. Sometimes good things come to an end.

The A’s owner since 2005 is John Fisher, the inheritor of the Gap fortune. Like so many other owners of professional sports, Fisher wanted a new stadium and decided to pit the city of Oakland against Las Vegas. 
Major League Baseball owners have always wanted to place a team in Las Vegas, and the owners of the San Francisco Giants have always wanted the Bay Area to rid itself of a local competitor.

The City of Oakland was negotiating for a new stadium with John Fisher as he simultaneously negotiated with Las Vegas until, with the backing of baseball commissioner Robert Manfred Jr., Fisher pulled the plug. Baseball owners, including the Giants’ owner Charles B. Johnson, voted unanimously to relocate the Oakland A’s to Las Vegas.

Mind you, the complex financing is incomplete. It involves Clark County bonds, state transferable tax credits, and City of Las Vegas-supplied local infrastructure. The $3.5 billion price tag still awaits the Nevada State Legislature forking over $380 million to Fisher. The new state-of-the-art indoor stadium will not be ready for four years. Meanwhile, Fisher has pulled the A’s out of Oakland. The A’s, no longer called the Oakland A’s, will play the next four seasons in Sacramento, at a 14,000-seat minor league stadium.

To me, as a partial season-ticket holder for the A’s, nothing was better than a hot dog on a warm 72-degree afternoon at the Oakland Coliseum. I didn’t need the carefully curated food choices that new ballparks offer. Artisan beers don't do it for me.

Baseball is a game that should be played on grass. The A’s games in Sacramento’s stadium will be played on artificial turf. Baseball should be played outdoors. Las Vegas plans an indoor stadium with a roof in the style of the Sydney Opera House.

I remember the story of that little boy with a tear in his eye in the midst of the 1919 game-fixing scandal, who said,“Say it ain’t so, Joe” to Shoeless Joe Jackson. I say to John Fisher and all the Major League owners who are fascinated with all the glitz and glamour of Las Vegas, “Say it ain’t so.”





[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your emai go to: https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.]



Saturday, September 28, 2024

Expatriates. Downsizing by leaving the USA

If things completely go off the rails in the USA, you can leave.


In fact, you can leave even if things are OK here.

Erich Almasy and Cynthia Blanton

Today's guest post is from two college classmates who have lived much of their adult lives outside the U.S. They weren't protesting anything. They liked living in Toronto, where Erich Almasy had a job, and they chose to live in retirement in the Mexican city of San Miguel de Allende, a favorite place for U.S. expatriates. Erich and his wife Cynthia Blanton have settled into their new home and feel so comfortable there that they act as cultural ambassadors. They have written a guide to foods of Mexico and Cynthia maintains a blog site where she describes their lives in Mexico: https://cynthiablanton.blogspot.com



Amazon


Guest Post by Erich Almasy


Earlier this month, Cynthia and I celebrated twenty-five years of living outside the United States. We remain American citizens, file taxes, and just submitted our absentee ballots. We simply don’t want to live in the USA. There are four to five million American expatriates like us, with nearly 500,000 living in México. Why did we decide to abandon the place of our birth, upbringing, education, and work experience? It’s not simple.

When we met, long before JD Vance was born, we quickly determined we didn’t want children. For fifty-three years, we have enjoyed a very independent lifestyle. We had our own business so we could live where we wanted and travel extensively. We visited over 70 countries and saw cultures and perspectives different from our native land. In 1999, my company in New York City moved us to Canada; we were ready for a foreign adventure.

Canada is very similar yet very different from the U.S. Language (except for Quebec); entertainment and work experience are almost identical. Social attitudes, personality, and history are very different. When we got dual Canadian citizenship, the immigration judge cautioned the roomful of candidates who resembled a United Nations convention. He warned that, unlike the United States, Canada had never had a revolution, so we had to challenge our new government at every turn. I used to brag to native Canadians that they depended upon a benevolent government since their executive (prime minister) also ran the legislative branch and appointed the judiciary. I smugly asserted the superiority of the American system of checks and balances. It goes to show just how wrong you can be.

Canadians are notorious for being “nice.” They aren’t nicer, but they did build a social welfare state that retains a strong sense of capitalism and self-determination. Canadians overwhelmingly support a social safety net, universal health care, and low-cost education, even with higher taxes. I smiled when I first presented a health card, not a credit card, for my doctor’s visit.

Where to go after retiring? Health care was a major consideration. We tried Medicare and got two shocks. First, Medicare hit us with a penalty for our five years abroad when we had saved the United States government more than $30,000 (NOTE: Two-and-a-half years later, they apologized and refunded the penalty.) Second, we discovered our Medicare Advantage plan was a scam that would still cost us significant out-of-pocket amounts. We now self-fund our medical care and have excellent doctors here.

Location, housing, and social environment were also important. We avoided Trump while in Canada, but the divisiveness and anger we saw on our visits to the United States were disheartening. Nobody smiled! In 2020, we walked out of a Pennsylvania Walmart. Inside, we and the employees were the only people masked against COVID-19. Outside, the driver of a pickup truck yelled, “Fucking Democrats!” And, yes, I did check for an AR-15 in his gun rack. We had no “home” to return to in the U.S., and no place appealed. And then, we visited San Miguel de Allende.

I annoy people when I crow about the place we landed. It’s in the Mexican highlands near the country’s center. The climate is mild, with a year-round average temperature of 70°-80°. Many of the 180,000 people in the municipality live in countryside villages, but most of them are concentrated in the 500-year-old colonial center. We are the wedding capital of México, with couples coming from around México to marry in our 150-year-old parish church modeled after the Gothic cathedral in Köln, Germany. In fact, despite a large number of ex-pats (or “gringos”), we remain primarily a Mexican population, and 90% of the tourists who visit are Mexican.

Our excellent Spanish teacher is Warren Hardy, who also offers online programs. Warren’s initial class discussed the differences between Americans and Mexicans. He said Americans are primarily concerned with succeeding materially for themselves and their families. Many classify themselves as patriots who believe in American exceptionalism and America First! The model citizens are rugged individuals who pull themselves up by their bootstraps. Many Americans seem desperate, living on the edge financially and afraid of losing their health care if they lose their jobs. There is so much anger and fear about racial minorities, immigrants, and political opponents.



Mexicans are focused on family above all. Mexican children are doted upon until the age of twelve. Old people are revered, and the Day of the Dead, our November 2nd remembrance of family members who have passed, is our national holiday. Above all, people are happy with much less. Walking down our cobblestone streets is an adventure in smiles, as everyone says Buenos días, meaning “May you have good days.” We frequently ride the town bus, where the children are clean, immaculately dressed, and beribboned. Being 6’6” tall, I attract much attention, and the children’s smiles and giggles make my day.

When we came here five years ago, we stopped watching the American nightly news, and our stress levels plummeted. Most of all, we began to make friends, some Mexican, mostly ex-pats. Cynthia calls this “summer camp for seniors” because there are endless cultural and volunteer activities. On our first visits to local restaurants, we were struck that people at nearby tables would unilaterally start conversations with us. Everyone carries calling cards so they can exchange numbers and addresses. We had never experienced anything like this, even in “nice” Canada.

We are not deluded about the violence and criminal corruption in México. So far, we have been immune to it; in an equal amount of time in San Francisco in the 70s, we had our house and two cars broken into. Health care is excellent and inexpensive, with some of the best practitioners we have ever seen. Canada and México are, to a large extent,dependent on the U.S. If America sneezes (i.e., has a recession), both countries will get sick. However, I am convinced that Americans, including myself, are not better than people I have met in other countries, many of whom seem much happier. Perhaps our values changed, so we no longer felt included in the United States. Did we abandon America, or did America abandon us?

Erich Almasy and Cynthia Blanton


[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to Https://petersage.substack.com  Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]