Oregon and Texas have one-party rule.
Parties that hold power a long time get careless.
Oregon Democrats will probably escape the consequences this time.
Opinion journalist Matthew Yglesias said it so well I will simply quote him:
Beyond that, Abbott’s problem is that he’s been in office a long time and he’s the third Republican governor in a row and there’s been a G.O.P. trifecta for a long time and it’s just hard to govern for a really long time without eventually overreaching and pissing people off. The longer any party coalition governs, the more scandals accumulate and the more undisciplined its leaders become. It gets easier for voters to take for granted whatever they like about them and harder for aligned interest groups to take “no” for an answer about their most unsound ideas. You see a version of this in the relatively tight polling for the Oregon governor’s race. I think Tina Kotek will probably pull it off, but if there were a Democrat in the White House, she’d be in real trouble.
Texas has been reliably red for decades. With no real opposition, the party’s allied interest groups and its demands for loyalty have let Texas be carelessly extreme. Take abortion. Texas violated its own culture of Western independence with a law that puts a bounty on anyone who helps a woman get an abortion. Some counties went further, making it illegal to transport someone along county roads on the way out of state to get one. The anti-abortion lobby felt unrestrained so it got a policy it could hold up as a trophy.
One-party rule also closes ranks. The Texas House impeached Attorney General Ken Paxton on corruption charges. The Republican state Senate refused to convict him. His power intact, and with Trump’s backing, he won the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate, ousting John Cornyn. He is a weak candidate with a giant flaw, and he got there because of one-party solidarity.Too much strength becomes a weakness. It covers up mistakes of policy and personnel.
I support Governor Tina Kotek. I have donated to her campaign. I consider a Republican governor too big a risk for Oregon, at least while President Trump is in office and keeps making demands on state and local officeholders.
It was different when Mark Hatfield, Tom McCall, and Vic Atiyeh were governor. They were Republicans, and I considered that no great problem. Having both parties in positions of real power meant both parties had buy-in. Each had to act like a responsible governing party.
A party that sees itself as part of the government does not pretend Oregon roads will maintain themselves. Republican opposition to the Democrats’ transportation package was good politics. Nobody likes a higher gas tax or registration fee, and voters threw the package out in May. But someone, somehow, has to pay to maintain the roads.
I suspect Kotek will win reelection, but by a closer margin than Democrats usually enjoy. The argument for “bringing balance to Oregon” will make sense to some swing voters. Oregon interest groups that back Democrats -- unions, environmental groups, LGBTQ groups, reproductive rights groups -- have not faced hard opposition. Unions pushed through a law that pays unemployment benefits to striking workers, public employees included -- an idea at the far edge of union aspirations.
![]() |
| Democratic billboard. Drazan did a joint appearance with Ron DeSantis |
The race may be close, and incumbency-fatigue gives Drazan a real shot, but the 2026 election is about the man who demands to grab center stage from Kotek: Donald Trump.
[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to: https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.]


4 comments:
Well, I’m sure tired of having Trump as our president.
For some reason, Mahonia Hall seems to be the place where politicians go to disappear in a puff of ineffectiveness. New governors come in, and then … nothing happens.
Does anyone remember Kate Brown, and her amazing accomplishments? Me neither. And what has Kotek accomplished so far?
The same fate may well swallow up Drazan, if she is fortunate (or unfortunate?) enough to win next week, or whenever our silly drawn-out process of counting votes is finally complete.
Electing a Democratic House and a narrowly Democratic Senate in D.C. won’t change much, given the current state of affairs and the tilt toward an authoritarian executive branch. In the 2028 presidential election campaign, the Republican candidate will exploit the mismatch between current expectations and the reality of what Democrats accomplish while controlling Congress. Trump will have a verbal foil and will skewer the Democratic Congress at every opportunity.
Trump has already said he will veto any legislation the Democrats pass if they are in control. So, if both houses are Democrats, it won't mean much with Trump's vetos. However, the Democrats will be able to point to Trump and the Republicans who support him in the 2028 election for president. Then, if both the house and the Senate are the majority Democrats and the president is a Democrat, it will be possible to undo all the damage Trump has done. All the name changes will go back to their original names, all the immigration restrictions will ease, maybe even gas prices will come down because of a sane deal with Iran. Abortion rights will make a comeback. Defund ICE! The best part that if Trump continues to do illegal things, he could be dragged into court and maybe serve some jail time. Orange jumpsuit to match his orange makeup.
The Supreme Court could see some liberal justices appointed. The current ones aren't going to live forever. First, it was the Tea Party, then the Trump Party. It's time for the Democratic Party to take back control.
Post a Comment