"Did you ever have to make up your mind?
You pick up on one and leave the other behind
It's not often easy and not often kind
Did you ever have to make up your mind?"
John Sebastian, The Loving Spoonful, 1965
It happens in life. It happens in politics. You don't really want what you want.
Republicans have that problem with immigration.
Trump understood the frustration felt by Americans on immigration. Too many. Too fast. Too foreign. Too unregulated. Too many people in a permanent gray-area state, semi-legal, here legally awaiting a hearing where they would be sent back. People were angry with Democrats for dithering. Enough voters decided that since Democrats won't handle immigration, Trump would. So Americans elected Trump.[A quick aside to Democrats. I don't acknowledge Trump's strengths because I like and admire him. He is vile, crass, dishonest, authoritarian. But he is president because Democrats screwed up some things, including immigration enforcement, and because Trump better understood American voters anger at cultural elites. Democrats need to understand why Trump won, or our fellow Americans will keep electing him or people like him.]
The One Big Beautiful Bill had lots of moving parts. One part was a giant increase in the budget for ICE -- Immigration Control and Enforcement. The new overall budget is $170 billion, up from about $9 billion -- an extraordinary refocus of resources. The new law includes $45 billion for immigration detention centers and $30 billion to hire more ICE personnel. It will fund at least 116,000 beds, according to the American Immigration Council. These beds are temporary for that time between arrest and deportation, so people will be moving in and out of them. That is a huge capacity for mass deportation.
This isn't pussyfooting around. Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson said, “One of President Trump’s biggest campaign promises was to secure the border and execute the largest mass deportation operation in history." There is a purpose: "The more beds we have, the more bad guys we arrest," border czar Tom Homan said. And everyone here in the U.S. illegally deserves deportation.
Trump's base voters tell pollsters they want people here illegally sent back. Don't be a dithering Hamlet. Take arms against a sea of troubles and clean house. As this blog reported on July 1, 59 percent of Republicans tell the Pew poll they want deportation of people here illegally; 66 percent of "conservatives" feel the same. After all, illegal is illegal. If they were gone, then social service agencies would save money, schools and hospitals would save money, crime rates would go down, and Americans would get off their butts and do jobs currently done by immigrants working under the table. There is an emotional element of invasion, one that Trump and Fox exploit successfully. They insult us by flouting our laws. How dare they? Get out.
The Big Bill did not gear up for "pick and choose" deportation. It geared up for Steven Miller's policy of mass deportation. Pick-and-choose doesn't solve the problem of too many of the wrong people in the wrong spots taking up money and space and jobs. Democrats perceive Miller as a vile racist with a snake-like head, but their disgust with him blinds them to the fact that Republican voters generally agree with his policy.
Here is the rub: Most of those Republicans don't really want what they think they want. They want both mass deportation but also pick-and-choose deportation. The Trump policy of deporting people at apparent random, including highly-visible people with long-standing connections to the community, has an intended and perverse effect. The intended effect is that immigrants see that anyone can be deported. Illegal immigration has slowed and across America, and people here illegally are rethinking their risks. Maybe they should leave so they can leave on their own terms, not in shackles and sent God-knows-where. The perverse effect is that people with mixed-status families, people who own property, people with long-standing jobs, and people best assimilated into America's melting pot are the ones with the most to lose in this current policy of high visibility deportations of "good" people. The dread from the potential of being picked up in the mass deportation effort is unsettling immigrant communities. Stores are empty; workplaces are missing key employees; people are staying away from churches, sporting events, restaurants. We are seeing a kind of strike, and it it is bad for business and communities.
Trump and the GOP created a dilemma for themselves. They defined the problem of immigration as one of mass invasion and substitution of real Americans (i.e. White native-born) for the new people Trump said are mostly bad people, not Mexico's best. Trump said, "They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people." Some. But most aren't, and all of them are mocking our laws by being here. Trump can only do pick-and-choose deportations by denying the original premise of the need for bold action. We are entering an era of contradiction. Trump's voters are already getting uneasy about this.
Trump has one very valuable tool for a politician. He has no sense of obligation to his own past and to people who counted on him. He is willing to change positions without any apparent feeling of guilt or embarrassment for misleading people, and then assert against all evidence that he is being 100-percent consistent. Anyone else would try to explain. He simply pushes ahead with the new position. He will respond to his supporters' contradictory feelings. He will relax enforcement of deportations in red states. It is really what they wanted all along -- a sense that we were making the rules, not the scofflaw immigrants. He will concentrate strict enforcement -- perhaps even punitive and intentionally cruel enforcement -- in blue cities. His supporters will get to keep the immigrants they wanted all along, and his blue-city opponents will cry liberal tears. His supporters will love that. Meanwhile, Democratic mayors and governors will position themselves as supporters of Mexican-flag-waving scofflaws. Better yet for Trump.
Watch. It is already starting to happen.
[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to: https://petersage.substack.com/ Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.]
11 comments:
I'll keep saying this: The US does not have an immigration problem.
This is a ginned up appeal to racists by Republicans, and the billions spent on a show to deport otherwise law abiding people is just that. It won't even make a dent in the number of undocumented migrants and cause unneeded suffering.
It is a textbook example of how fascist propaganda can sway even fair minded people into believing something is a threat.
An army of hooded thugs in black grabbing individuals off the street unannounced and without showing any credentials; then sending them to detention center cages and then to who knows where. “Legal/illegal- that’s just fancy lawyers talk. Just send all them brown skinned people back where they came from.”
Makes me proud to be an AmeriCON.
A different view:
"You can't always get what you want..."
Rolling Stones, 1989
Over on Peter's other publishing site, a person named Erich responded that Hispanics will challenge Trump's actions on immigration. I disagreed, and write this!
Erich: Sorry, I have to disagree. There are many Hispanic legal immigrants, as well as legal immigrants from other countries, who aren't happy that their tax dollars are being spent on illegal immigrants who don't deserve those benefits. Especially when the illegals are benefitting and legal immigrants in need are not being helped in the same way.
One simply needs to ask that why, before Trump was first elected, and elected a 2nd time why immigration laws were not enforced.
No president can make everyone happy.
There are many things I didn't like about past presidents, as well as not liking with the current one. I am happy with enough to say that I like many of the things the current President is doing.
Trump claimed he would be deporting “the worst of the worst” – murderers, rapists, gangbangers and the like. In reality, he’s deporting people doing jobs that Americans don’t want. What’s pathetic is that people who probably imagine themselves to be reasonable are somehow able to rationalize those workers being snatched off the street by masked goons and sent to various hellholes, such as Florida, with no semblance of due process. To dismiss Trump’s cruelty and lawlessness as if he were just another imperfect president is sick and wrong.
“I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides.”
― Elie Wiesel
To all the enablers: how is it we have billions and billions to spend on making War, including war on migrants, but somehow not enough to help those in need? Asking for Jesus.
A few questions for those who see no issues with letting illegal immigrants stay in the US without any restrictions:
1. What is your position on providing a mechanism to legalize their residency in the US? I would support a method to legalize them, with perhaps an interim immigration status to earn permanent residency and citizenship.
2. If #1 is possible and implementable, why hasn't any administration previous to Trumps tried. And yes, I recall the "Dreamers" plan that was never completed.
3. Should we look the other way for businesses and people who hire illegals, contrary to our current laws? Should they be held accountable? Punished? In what way?
I realize that most of the pushback is anti-Trump rhetoric. Fine. What should your favorite Senator, Representative, or future Presidential favorite be doing now to fix the problem?
And yes, I realize that President Trump is considering some form of legalization.
I have no problem with the Trump Administration identifying criminals who've snuck into our country, and returning them to their home country. The US should not be a safe haven for convicted and unconvicted criminals who've entered the US illegally.
Democrats need to understand why Trump won, or our fellow Americans will keep electing him or people like him.
Many of the Democrats I know seem to actively not want to understand this. They are so repelled by Trump that they just can’t see anything else.
"I have no problem with the Trump Administration identifying criminals who've snuck into our country, and returning them to their home country."
This is why it's so difficult to have a rational discussion with MAGA - they cling to some benign illusion of what Trump is actually doing, all the evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.
Practical reality lies between the ideological extremes. Ask MAGA types to name which discrete categories of the undocumented should presumptively remain, period, after informed due process. Ask members of the Left to name the discrete categories of the undocumented who should presumptively be deported, period, after informed due process.
To the extent the devil’s in the details of “due process”, obviously we defer to those in the know. My understanding, FWIW, is that those here illegally are subject to arrest and removal via administrative, not judicial process. Asylum claims, as defined to date, anyway, while requiring judicial review, are nonetheless not substantiated the vast majority of the time.
The Constitution does not allow the government to deprive anybody of their liberty without due process, regardless of their legal status.
I'm going to partially agree with Mike on this point. There's plenty to digest here, and OBS did a more thorough analysis during Trump's term back in 2018.
This is worth a read:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-constitutional-rights-do-undocumented-immigrants-have#:~:text=Under%20the%20expedited%20removal%20process,border%20illegally%2C%E2%80%9D%20Gihon%20said.
The other MikeM in FLA 😉
Post a Comment