Thursday, October 10, 2024

"I'm coming to America. Land of opportunity."

Net-net, immigration is good for America.


People don't come to America to loaf and collect welfare benefits. They don't get them. 


They come here to work their butts off.


Erich Almasy has been reading the news about the problems of illegal immigration. I wrote here on Tuesday that if Kamala Harris lost the election it would likely be because Biden allowed for too long a surge of undocumented immigrants at the border. It was lawless and disorderly and gave an impression of Democratic incompetence or unwillingness to address real-life problems. There was a problem, and if Democrats won't fix it, maybe Trump will.


Erich Almasy doesn't dispute the fact that a crush entering the country overwhelmed our ability to process them. But amid the claim that immigrants are dangerous, expensive, cat-eating "others," he argues that immigrants -- including undocumented ones -- are a net positive for the U.S. We need them. They don't "cost" us; they enrich us. They are excluded from major federal public benefit programs, including food assistance, non-emergency Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income, and Aid to Families with Dependent Children. They pay into Social Security but don't collect it. And they are more law-abiding than native-born Americans. 


In retirement, Erich and his wife Cynthia Blanton, both college classmates, live in the Mexican city of San Miguel de Allende.




Guest Post by Erich Almasy

Have you ever met an unauthorized immigrant? Probably not knowingly, but almost certainly. They are all around you - serving your food, pumping your gas, driving your Uber, and doing many low-paid jobs that native Americans won’t perform. Most of these people are of Mexican heritage; however, did you know there are about 725,000 Indian unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. — the third largest population of unauthorized immigrants after Mexico and El Salvador?

 

Republicans claim that there are 25 million unauthorized immigrants, but Pew Research, which has collected this information for decades, shows a much smaller number. As of 2021, their statistics show that the nation’s 10.5 million unauthorized immigrants represented about 3 percent of the U.S. population and 22 percent of the foreign-born population. These shares were among the lowest since the 1990s. Between 2007 and 2021, the unauthorized immigrant population decreased by 1.75 million, or 14 percent. The unauthorized immigrant population in the United States grew to 11.0 million in 2022 but remained below the peak of 12.2 million in 2007. The number of unauthorized immigrants from México dropped to 4 million in 2022 from a high of 6.9 million in 2007.

 

In 2023 and into 2024, there was a massive surge in border encounters involving largely non-Mexican unauthorized immigrants. This surge reached its highest monthly total of 249,741 in December 2023. The previous high was 220,063 in March of 2000. By August 2024, the monthly total had dropped to 58,038 encounters, and the surge appears to have ended. The encounters for the twenty-two months of 2023 and 2024 totaled roughly 3.3 million, bringing the U.S. population of unauthorized immigrants to approximately 14.3 million, a 30 percent increase since 2022.

 

Republicans claim a massive cost of unauthorized immigration: increased Medicaid, increased crime, illegal gun imports, increased housing costs, lost jobs, unlawful voting, excessive use of welfare, and education system overload. The National Review blithely asserted they cost $451 billion annually. A Republican report of January 2024 stated that the lifetime fiscal drain per individual is $68,000. The wording of this report includes “likely,” “caveats,” “data limitations,” or “rough approximation” after every “fact.” Many of these assertions, such as housing shortages and gun imports (they go the other way), have been debunked as patently ridiculous. 

 

According to New American Economy, undocumented immigrants contributed about $13 billion to Social Security funds in 2016 and $3 billion to Medicare with no drawdowns. Unauthorized immigrants are not entitled to Medicaid except for emergency treatment. A new Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report shows $27 billion in federal and state spending on Emergency Medicaid for noncitizen immigrants for the seven fiscal years (FY) 2017 through 2023. Twenty-seven billion dollars represents less than 1 percent of overall expenditure in Medicaid over the entire period and, in some years, is less than half of a percent. Spending on Emergency Medicaid was $3.8 billion in FY 2023 and was 0.4 percent of total Medicaid spending that year.

 

Unauthorized immigrants are not entitled to welfare, although their USA-born children are. Unauthorized immigrants stay out of the legal system to avoid deportation. A Texas study found that unauthorized immigrants are arrested at less than half the rate of native-born U.S. citizens for violent and drug crimes and a quarter the rate of native-born citizens for property crimes. They don’t vote in elections. Our election systems distinguish between U.S. citizens and non-citizens, and fraud is nearly non-existent.

 

Professor Francine Lipman of William S. Boyd School of Law at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, states that "unauthorized immigrants contribute more to public coffers in taxes than they cost in social services" and "contribute to the U.S. economy through their investments and consumption of goods and services; filling of millions of essential worker positions resulting in subsidiary job creation, increased productivity and lower costs of goods and services; and unrequited contributions to Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment insurance programs." Even the Republican report admits they contributed $321 billion to the U.S. GDP in 2023.

 

So, was the surge of the past 22 months a problem? Absolutely. Is it over? Apparently. Are unauthorized immigrants a drain on public resources? The facts don’t support it. What exactly is the problem?




[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog to your email go to: https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. Don't pay. The blog is free and always will be.] 



20 comments:

Anonymous said...

I know several quite well. One of them married my daughter and is father to my grandchild. He fits this profile perfectly, as do his circle of friends. He was brought here when he was 14, so not of his own volition, and has been here for decades but was too old for DACA. He pays taxes, and FICA, and will never see a dime of it. He doesn’t send remittances to Mexico so his economic contribution stays here. He’s the model “citizen” except he isn’t.

M2inFLA said...

My dad was born in the USA, and my mom was born in Czechoslovakia, emigrated to Canada, and then married my dad in the early '50s. During the depression, my dad's father sent his children to Czechoslovakia to work the family's farm. When dad's family moved back to the US after WW II, they all worked in the steel mills south of Pittsburg.

After marrying my dad, my mom and dad moved to Western NY, and my mom got a green card and eventually became a US citizen. Me, I was born in the US.

Back in those days, just as now, there were both legal and illegal immigrants.

When the US addressed the immigration issue in the early 20th century, quotas and rules were established for legal immigration.

One of those rules was that people had to apply for admission, and accept those rules.

Of course, there were also illegal immigrants.

Just as there are good and bad American citizens, there are both good and bad legal immigrants, and both good and bad illegal immigrants.

Over the decades, the numbers increased greatly, and there are way more illegal immigrants than ever before. Perhaps a smaller percentage of the US population that 100 years ago, but definitely larger in numbers.

The "bad" illegal immigrants are not good for the country, especially when they consume local, state, and federal resources. Sure they may not qualify for some of that aid they might consume, but none the less, they cost the government money.

In recent years, due to lack of enforcement of current immigration laws, and bending the interpretation of what is and is not permitted, they are a cost to society. There is no process today to control immigration at our northern and southern borders.

That is the reality, and it affects our society and public safety. Federal funds are being consumed as are state funds.

Biggest surprise is all those cities that claimed to be sanctuary cities, and are now learning that it does cost money and resources to take care of those migrants whether legal or illegal.

This has to be brought under control.

Mike said...

Trump and his cult love to hate immigrants. They accuse them of increasing crime, costing the economy and replacing American workers. Numerous reputable studies have shown that’s a crock. Such fears are based on White supremacist propaganda, like the Great Replacement Theory. Obviously, our immigration system needs a lot of work, but not because immigrants pose a threat.

Immigrants in the United States have about a net zero effect on government budgets — they pay about as much in taxes as they consume in benefits. Climate change, on the other hand, does terrible damage, kills many people and costs the U.S. about $150 billion per year, but the GOP platform makes no mention of it. Those who really give a rip about the economy might want to reconsider their priorities.

Low Dudgeon said...

It's almost amusing to see so many nations worldwide, including our next door neighbors north and south, spurning the veritable strings-free cash cow that undocumented economic migrants and provisional asylum seekers represent. Even Germany and the Scandinavian nations are beginning to tighten their borders substantially, and act against the national interest thereby.

Anonymous said...

Germans and Scandinavians must love their dogs and cats more than we do.

Mc said...

Don Old and his cult fear immigrants and women, because they (white males) won't be able to hack the competition.

Hence, they want government rrgulation of uteruses.

Mc said...

Canada doesn't want Americans, and consider the US $hithole country.

Michael Trigoboff said...

One of the main problems with uncontrolled immigration has nothing to do with the economic we’re gonna run to the store OK good enough impact; the problem is cultural. People who are happy with the culture in their area do not necessarily want their area to be flooded with people from an entirely different culture.

It might be different if the current inhabitants were asked and got to have a say in what was going to happen. But often that’s not how it goes. And then, when the local people object, the left has many ways to invalidate those objections, calling the local people “racist, sexist, a basket of deplorables” ™️.

Mike said...

It isn't the locals that are objecting, it's the racist deplorables like Trump, Vance and their white nationalist minions.

John F said...

American employers have been using undocumented immigrants for a very long time. The advantage is obvious: Undocumented immigrants can be easily dismissed or turned over to ICE for deportation.

I worked in a sawmill one summer that hired undocumented immigrants. I remember one day, immigration services arrived on site to arrest these individuals. They fled through the fields, spreading out so that the two agents could only catch two of them. The remainder got away

Secondhand, I’ve heard that meatpacking industries, large forest product companies, and forest managers for private forest companies employ many undocumented immigrants. They are the preferred employees. They work hard and give no trouble.

I recall the Clinton administration implementing a method to detect counterfeit Social Security numbers. This Method allowed government agencies to flag and report to the employer that they hired an undocumented person. When George W. Bush became president, he eliminated that feature from the Social Security number reporting system.

As automation takes over more and more menial tasks, fewer and fewer physical workers are required. The work is still there for some, but their imagination that they’re taking everybody’s jobs is a gross overstatement.

Ed Cooper said...

Mike it's not the Local Progressive or Democratic people complaining, it's the locals who tend to listen to the Drumpfs of the world.

Jennifer V said...

"There is no process today to control immigration at our northern and southern borders." These and other false statements do nothing to solve the problems that exist. The term "open borders" is used so frequently that people actually believe the borders are open. We have multiple systems in place to deal with immigration but they are all overwhelmed. It is so expensive and cumbersome to come here legally it is no wonder people give up. Republicans used to use abortion as an issue to get people to vote for them but now that they can no longer do that, they are using immigration. They have no incentive to solve the problem because they get more votes by complaining about it.

Mike said...

One of the jobs that undocumented aliens have done for as long as I can remember is harvest our crops. I tried working with them one summer, but we were paid by the pound and there was no way I could work fast enough to make the working conditions (heat and stoop labor) worthwhile. However when tRump deports all our farmworkers, I'm sure all the white guys whining about reverse discrimination will be happy to take up the slack and do the jobs that Mexican rapists and murderers have been depriving them of.

Ed Cooper said...

Just a few years back, I frequently took freight from Oregon down South, frequently driving through the strawberry fields and other green vegetables and fruits grown in the Salinas Valley, all the way to Ventura County. And if all the trips I made down or up that route, not once did I see a white person working a short handled hoe, or filling boxes of strawberries. And right here in the Rogue Valley I'd really like to see a tally of white workers putting on roofing on the Starter Mansions which seems to be the vast majority of new housing going up in this area.

Ed Cooper said...

Very well and succinctly put, Jennifer V. You have described the Republican Game Plan perfectly.

M2inFLA said...

Our inattention to controlling border entry has actually encouraged illegal entry, and our government has an incentive to cross illegally: "we will not stop you, and we will take care of you once you get here".

Why won't they stop and stay in Mexico at the southern border?

Yes immigration is a talking points by the Republicans. Democrats too have talking points, but different subjects: like abortion, forgiving student loans, Universal Basic Income, subsidies for new home buyers, the rich should pay their fair share, etc.

Lots of criticism thrown at both sides.

Voters have a lot to chew on.
Unfortunately, neither side has a good candidate with a convincing enough platform to build a huge majority to win the election.

Jennifer said...

"Our inattention to controlling border entry has actually encouraged illegal entry, and our government has an incentive to cross illegally: "we will not stop you, and we will take care of you once you get here"." Another false statement. Over 58,000 people were apprehended in August alone, I would not call that "inattention".

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/10/01/migrant-encounters-at-u-s-mexico-border-have-fallen-sharply-in-2024/

There is a huge difference between Project 2025 and what the Harris-Walz campaign is proposing. The only reason there is not a huge difference in the support of candidates is that people like yourself believe the false statements and trust the wrong people. I support the truth.

Mike said...

“Unfortunately, neither side has a good candidate with a convincing enough platform…”

That is a classic false equivalence. There’s simply no comparison between Harris and Trump. The former is an honorable, experienced public servant who respects the Constitution and rule of law; the latter is a convicted felon who tried to illegally overturn the last election.

M2inFLA said...

Well it is an election year, and it appears to be top of mind...

https://usafacts.org/articles/what-can-the-data-tell-us-about-unauthorized-immigration/

Steve Law said...

The Tuesday afternoon group has heard this before, but my wife Nancy and I have been something of an Underground Railroad, during her early years in the USA. First there was "Rosa" from Spain (not her real name, but the name in her fake passport). Nancy met her in a direct-mail sweatshop. She invited Rosa to stay in our house. Next were a Cambodian brother and sister—they told us—who were saving to join their uncle in the Berkeley area. After that were two Peruvian women who moved into the basement. After the Cambodians left, there was an Indonesian, and so on. Two lived at our house when our first baby came home. Some got married—fraudulently or not, we'll never know. Others found sponsors and/or jobs. Let the record show that they neither robbed, nor raped, nor murdered us.